Outside looking in: non-accession to the WTO

References

• Basra, H (2012) ‘Increased legalization or politicalization? A comparison of accession under the GATT and WTO’, Journal of World Trade, 46:4, 937–959.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bishop, M (2012) ‘The political economy of small states: enduring vulnerability?’, Review of International Political Economy, iFirst1, 19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Börzel, T (2002) ‘Member state responses to Europeanization’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 40:2, 193–214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowman, C (2009) Managing the challenges of WTO participation: case study 33—the Pacific island nations: towards shared representation (Geneva: WTO)
   Google Scholar
• Brazys, S (2010) ‘Dutch disease in the western Pacific: an overview of the FSM economy under the Amended Compact of Free Association’, Pacific Economic Bulletin, 25:3, 24–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Briguglio, L, GCordina, SVella and CVigilance (eds) (2010) Profiling vulnerability and resilience: a manual for small states (London: Commonwealth Secretariat)
   Google Scholar
• Cattaneo, O and CP Braga (2008) ‘Everything you wanted to know about WTO accession (but were afraid to ask)’, World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No 5116, Washington.
   Google Scholar
• Central Bank of Samoa (2008) Annual report for the financial year 2006/2007 (Samoa: Apia)
   Google Scholar
• Collier, P, PGuillaumont, SGuillaumont and JGunning (1997) ‘Redesigning conditionality’, World Development, 25:9, 1399–1407.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, AF (2009) ‘Confronting vulnerability through resilient diplomacy: Antigua and the WTO internet gaming dispute’ in AFCooper and TMShaw (eds) The diplomacies of small states: between vulnerability and resilience (Basingstoke, United Kingdom [UK]: Palgrave Macmillan), 207–218.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, AF and TMShaw (eds) (2009) The diplomacies of small states: between vulnerability and resilience (Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan)
   Google Scholar
• Copelovitch, M and DOhls (2012) ‘Trade, institutions, and the timing of GATT/WTO accession in post-colonial states’, Review of International Organizations, 8, 81–107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, C and M Wilf (2011) ‘Joining the club: accession to the GATT/WTO’, Paper presented atAmerican Political Science Association Annual Meeting, Seattle, 1–4September..
   Google Scholar
• Drabek, Z and MBacchetta (2004) ‘Tracing the effects of WTO accession on policy-making in sovereign states: preliminary lessons from the recent experience in transition countries’, World Economy, 27:7, 1083–1125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dür, A (2008) ‘Bringing economic interests back into the study of EU trade policy-making’, British Journal of Politics & International Relations, 10:1, 27–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards, S (1997) ‘Trade liberalization reforms and the World Bank’, American Economic Review, 87:2, 43–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finger, JM and PSchuler (2000) ‘Implementation of Uruguay Round commitments: the development challenge’, World Economy, 23:4, 511–525.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenaway, D and OMorrissey (2007) ‘Structural adjustment and liberalisation in developing countries: what lessons have we learned?’, Kyklos, 46:2, 241–261.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grynberg, R and RMJoy (2000) ‘The accession of Vanuatu to the WTO—lessons for the multilateral trading system’, Journal of World Trade, 34:6, 159.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Honaker, J and GKing (2010) ‘What to do about missing values in time-series cross section data’, American Journal of Political Science, 54:2, 561–581.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Honaker, J, G King and M Blackwell (2009) ‘Amelia II: a program for missing data’,  < http:gking.harvard.edu/amelia>.
   Google Scholar
• Ianchovichina, E and WMartin (2001) ‘Trade liberalization in China's accession to WTO’, Journal of Economic Integration, 16:4, 421–446.
   Google Scholar
• Ingebritsen, C, INeumann, SGstoehl and JBeyer (2006) Small states in international relations (Seattle: University of Washington Press)
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, S (2012) ‘Small states and compliance bargaining in the WTO: an analysis of the Antigua–US Gambling Services Case’, Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 25:3, 367–385.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobson, HK, WMReisinger and TMathers (1986) ‘National entanglements in international governmental organizations’, American Political Science Review, 80:1, 141–159.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, K (2006) Who's afraid of the WTO? (New York: Oxford University Press)
   Google Scholar
• Jones, K (2009) ‘The political economy of WTO accession: the unfinished business of universal membership’, World Trade Review, 8:2, 279–314.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennett, M, S Evenett and J Cage (2005) Evaluating WTO accessions: legal and economic perspectives (Ottawa: Canadian Independent Development Research Centre [IDRC]).
   Google Scholar
• Keohane, R (1967) ‘The study of political influence in the General Assembly’, International Organization, 21:2, 221–237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, C (1996) ‘Process of accession to the World Trade Organization’, East Asia, 15:3, 4–13.
   Google Scholar
• Langhammer, R and MLücke (1999) ‘WTO accession issues’, World Economy, 22:6, 837–873.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langhammer, R and M Lücke (2001) ‘WTO negotiation and accession issues for vulnerable economies’, UNU WIDER Discussion Paper 2001/36, Kiel.
   Google Scholar
• Lanoszka, A (2001) ‘The World Trade Organization accession process: negotiating participation in a globalizing economy’, Journal of World Trade, 35:4, 575–602.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lauofo, FNP (2012) ‘How to drive and conclude an accession process: perspectives of former chief negotiators’, paper presented at Least Developed Countries (LDCs) Roundtable on WTO Accession, Beijing, 29 May to 1 June.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, D (2009) ‘Bringing an elephant into the room: small African state diplomacy in the WTO’ in AFCooper and TMShaw (eds) The diplomacies of small states: between vulnerability and resilience (Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave MacMillan), 195–206.
   Google Scholar
• Mansfield, ED and JCPevehouse (2006) ‘Democratization and international organizations’, International Organization, 60:1, 137–167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mansfield, ED and JCPevehouse (2008) ‘Democratization and the varieties of international organizations’, Journal of Conflict Resolution, 52:2, 269–294.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michalopolous, C (1998) ‘WTO accession for countries in transition’, World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No 1934, Washington.
   Google Scholar
• Michalopolous, C (1999) ‘Developing countries in the WTO’, World Economy, 22:1, 117–143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panke, D (2012a) ‘Small states in multilateral negotiations. What have we learned?’, Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 25:3, 387–398.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panke, D (2012b) ‘Dwarfs in international negotiations: how small states make their voices heard’, Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 25:3, 313–328.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pelc, K (2011) ‘Why do some countries get better WTO accession terms than others?’, International Organization, 65:3, 639–672.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prowse, S (2002) ‘The role of international and national agencies in trade-related capacity building’, World Economy, 25:9, 1235–1261.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Putnam, R (1988) ‘Diplomacy and domestic politics: the logic of two-level games’, International Organization, 42:3, 427–460.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RNZI (2012) ‘Business sector ready for WTO's accession to WTO’, 6 May,  < http://www.rnzi.com/pages/news.php?op = read&id = 67965>.
   Google Scholar
• Samoa (2010) Foreign Affairs & Trade Bulletin, April–June (Samoa: Apia)
   Google Scholar
• Samoa Chamber of Commerce & Industry (2012) ‘Chamber attends national workshop on Samoa's accession to the WTO’,  < http://www.samoachamber.ws/News/tabid/5088/newsid8323/442/mid/8323/language/en-US/Default.aspx>.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, U (2002) ‘The institutional dimension of WTO accession’, INEF Report 65/2002, InstitutfürEntwicklung und Frieden der Gerhard-Mercator-Universität, Duisburg.
   Google Scholar
• UNCTAD (2003) Challenges and opportunities arising from Samoa's accession to the World Trade Organization: National Conference on WTO Accession and Planning for the Fourth WTO Ministerial Conference (New York).
   Google Scholar
• Wallis, J (2010) ‘“Friendly islands” in an unfriendly system: examining the process of Tonga's WTO accession’, Asia Pacific Viewpoint, 51:3, 262–277.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, PJ (2008) A handbook on accession to the WTO (New York: Cambridge University Press)
   Google Scholar
• Young, O (1989) ‘The politics of international regime formation: managing natural resources and the environment’, International Organization, 43:3, 349–375.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu, M and KF Wong (2008) ‘Democracy and the GATT/WTO accession duration’, SSRN, < http://ssrn.com/abstract = 982032>.
   Google Scholar
• Zarcone, F, C Fink and CP Braga (2005) paper presented at Joint World Bank–GTZ Workshop on WTO Accession Matters, Berlin, 17–19 November, ‘Technical assistance and WTO accession: lessons from experience’
   Google Scholar