Human dignity as an essentially contested concept

References

• Arendt, H (1973) The origins of totalitarianism (San Diego: Harcourt)
   Google Scholar
• Bagaric, M and J Allan (2006) ‘The vacuous concept of dignity’, Journal of Human Rights, 5:1, 257–270.
   Google Scholar
• Beuchot, M (1994) Los fundamentos de los derechos humanos en Bartolomé de Las Casas (Barcelona: Anthropos)
   Google Scholar
• Brennan, WJ (1986) ‘The Constitution of the United States: contemporary ratification’, South Texas Law Review, 27:3, 433.
   Google Scholar
• Carozza, P (2003) ‘From conquest to constitutions: retrieving a Latin American tradition of the idea of human rights’, Human Rights Quarterly, 25:2, 281–313.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carozza, P (2008) ‘Human dignity and judicial interpretation of human rights: a reply’, European Journal of International Law, 19:5, 931–944.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carr, W (1991) ‘Education for citizenship’, British Journal of Educational Studies, 39:4, 373–385.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collier, D et al., (2006) ‘Essentially contested concepts: debates and applications’, Journal of Political Ideologies, 11:3, 211–246.
   Google Scholar
• Connolly, WE (1983) The terms of the political discourse (Oxford: Martin Robertson)
   Google Scholar
• De Koninck, T (2005) ‘Archéologie de la notion de dignité humaine’ in T de Koninck (ed) La dignité humaine: philosophie, droit, politique, économie, médecine (Paris: Presses universitaires France), 15–46.
   Google Scholar
• Dupré, C (2009) ‘Unlocking human dignity: towards a theory for the 21st century’, European Human Rights Law Review, 2, 190–205.
   Google Scholar
• Dworkin, R (1993) Life's dominion: an argument about abortion, euthanasia, and individual freedom (New York: Knopf)
   Google Scholar
• Dworkin, R (2011) Justice for hedgehogs (New York: Belknap Press)
   Google Scholar
• Ehrenberg, KM (2011) ‘Law is not (best considered) an essentially contested concept’, Journal of Law in Context, 7:2, 209–232.
   Google Scholar
• Feldman, D (1999) ‘Human dignity as a legal value: Part 1’, Public Law, 682–702.
   Google Scholar
• Freeden, M (1996) Ideologies and political theory: a conceptual approach (Oxford: Clarendon Press)
   Google Scholar
• Gallie, WB (1956) ‘Essentially contested concepts’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 56, 167–198.
   Google Scholar
• Gallie, WB (1968) Philosophy and the historical understanding (New York: Schocken Books)
   Google Scholar
• Glendon, MA (1999) ‘Foundations of human rights: the unfinished business’, American Journal of Jurisprudence, 44:1, 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Griffin, J (2009) On human rights (Oxford: Oxford University Press)
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, J (2010) ‘The concept of human dignity and the realistic utopia of human rights’, Metaphilosophy, 41:4, 464–480.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Habermas, J (2012) The crisis of the European Union (Cambridge, United Kingdom: Polity Press)
   Google Scholar
• Hauskeller, M (2007) Biotechnology and the integrity of life: taking public fears seriously (London: Ashgate)
   Google Scholar
• Kamali, MH (2002) The dignity of man: an Islamic perspective (Cambridge, United Kingdom: Islamic Texts Society)
   Google Scholar
• Khaitan, T (2011) ‘Dignity as an expressive norm: neither vacuous nor a panacea’, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 32:1, 1–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kidd White, E (2012) ‘There is no such thing as a right to human dignity: a reply to Conor O'Mahony’, International Journal of Constitutional Law, 10:2, 575–584.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Killmister, S (2010) ‘Dignity: not such a useless concept’, Journal of Medical Ethics, 36:3, 160–164.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein, E (2002) ‘Human dignity in German law’ in D Kretzmer and E Klein (eds) The concept of human dignity in human rights discourse (The Hague: Kluwer Law International), 145–159.
   Google Scholar
• Kolnai, A (1976) ‘Dignity’, Philosophy, 51:197, 251–271.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lukes, S (2005) Power: a radical view (New York: Palgrave Macmillan)
   Google Scholar
• Macklin, R (2003) ‘Dignity is a useless concept: it means no more than respect for persons or their autonomy’, British Medical Journal, 327:7429, 1419–1420.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCrudden, C (2008) ‘Human dignity and judicial interpretation of human rights’, European Journal of International Law, 19:4, 655–724.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neal, M (2012) ‘Dignity, law and language-games’, International Journal of the Semiotics of Law, 25:1, 107–122.
   Google Scholar
• Neal, M (2014) ‘Respect for human dignity as “substantive basic norm”’, International Journal of Law in Context, 10:1, 26–46.
   Google Scholar
• O'Mahony, C (2012a) ‘There is no such thing as a right to dignity’, International Journal of Constitutional law, 10:2, 551.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Mahony, C (2012b) ‘There is no such thing as a right to dignity: a rejoinder to Emily Kidd White’, International Journal of Constitutional Law, 10:2, 585.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pele, A (2009) ‘Modelos de la dignidad del ser humano en la edad media’, Derechos y libertades, 21:1, 149–185.
   Google Scholar
• Pele, A (2010) La dignidad humana: sus orígenes en el pensamiento clásico (Madrid: Editorial Dykinson)
   Google Scholar
• Perry, M (2006) Toward a theory of human rights: religion, law, and courts (New York: Cambridge University Press)
   Google Scholar
• Pollmann, A (2011) ‘Embodied self-respect and the fragility of human dignity: a human rights approach’ in P Kaufman, H Kuch, C Neuhäuser and E Webster (eds) Humiliation, degradation, dehumanization: human dignity violated (London: Springer), 243–261.
   Google Scholar
• Rosen, M (2012) Dignity: its history and meaning (Cambridge, USA: Harvard University Press)
   Google Scholar
• Rütsche, B (2010) ‘The role of human dignity in the Swiss legal system: arguing for a dualistic notion of human dignity’, International Journal of Bioethics, 21:4, 83–91.
   Google Scholar
• Schroeder, D (2012) ‘Human dignity and human rights: an appeal to separate the conjoined twins’, Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 15:3, 323–335.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sensen, O (2011) ‘Human dignity in historical perspective: the contemporary and traditional paradigms’, European Journal of Political Theory, 10:1, 71–91.
   Google Scholar
• Simmons, KW (2010) ‘Dworkin's two principles of dignity: an unsatisfactory nonconsequentialist account of interpersonal moral duties’, Boston University Law Review, 90:2, 715–735.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swanton, C (1985) ‘On the “essential contestedness” of political concepts’, Ethics, 95:4, 811–827.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waldron, J (2002) ‘Is the rule of law an essentially contested concept (in Florida)?’, Law and philosophy, 21:2, 137–164.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waldron, J (2007) ‘Dignity and rank’, Archives européennes de sociologie, 48:2, 201–237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waldron, J (2012) Dignity, rank and rights (Oxford: Oxford University Press)
   Google Scholar
• Waldron, J (2013a) ‘Citizenship and dignity’, Working Paper 378, New York University School of Law, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Waldron, J (2013b) ‘Is dignity the foundation of human rights?’, Working Paper 374, New York University School of Law, New York.
   Google Scholar