EU member state participation in military operations: a configurational comparative analysis

References

• Amenta, Edwin, and Poulsen, Jane (1994) ‘Where to begin: a survey of five approaches to selecting independent variables for qualitative comparative analysis’, Sociological Methods & Research, 23:1, 22–53
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumgartner, Michael (2015) ‘Parsimony and causality’, Quality & Quantity, 49:2, 839–856
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumgartner, Michael and Alrik Thiem (2015) ‘Model ambiguities in configurational comparative research’, Sociological Methods & Research, Advance online publication
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, Andrew, Joseph Lepgold and Danny Unger (1994) ‘Burden-sharing in the Persian Gulf War’, International Organization, 48:01, 39–75
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biehl, Heiko, Bastian Giegerich and Alexandra Jonas (2013) Strategic cultures in Europe security and defence policies across the Continent (Potsdam: Springer)
   Google Scholar
• Biscop, Sven (2015) ‘The state of defence in Europe: dependence, deterrence and deployment’, Global Affairs, 1:2, 169–182
   Google Scholar
• Bobrow, Davis and Mark Boyer (1997) ‘Maintaining system stability: contributions to peacekeeping operations’, Journal of Conflict Resolution, 41:6, 723–748
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bove, Vincenzo and Leandro Elia (2011) ‘Supplying peace: participation in and troop contribution to peacekeeping missions’, Journal of Peace Research, 48:6, 699–714
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davidson, Jason (2011) America’s allies and war: Kosovo, Afghanistan, and Iraq (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan) 10.1057/9780230118485
   Google Scholar
• Davidson, Jason (2013) ‘France’, Britain and the intervention in Libya: an integrated analysis’, Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 26:2, 310–329
   Google Scholar
• De Meur, Gisèle and Dirk Berg-Schlosser (1996) ‘Conditions of authoritarianism, fascism, and democracy in interwar Europe systematic matching and contrasting of cases for “Small N” analysis’, Comparative Political Studies, 29:4, 423–468
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Development Core Team (2014) R: a language and environment for statistical computing, version 3.1.2 (Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing)
   Google Scholar
• Dieterich, Sandra, Hartwig Hummel and Stefan Marshall (2010) Parliamentary war powers: a survey of 25 European parliaments (Geneva: Geneva Centre for Democratic Control of Armed Forces)
   Google Scholar
• Dorussen, Han, Emil J Kirchner and James Sperling (2009) ‘Sharing the burden of collective security in the European Union’, International Organization, 63:04, 789–810
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eilstrup-Sangiovanni, Mette (2014) ‘Europe’s defence dilemma’, The International Spectator, 49:2, 83–116
   Google Scholar
• Fordham, Benjamin (1998) ‘The politics of threat perception and the use of force: a political economy model of U.S. Uses of force, 1949–1994’, International Studies Quarterly, 42:3, 567–590
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaibulloev, Khusrav, Justin George, Todd Sandler and Hirofumi Shimizu (2015) ‘Personnel contributions to UN and non-UN peacekeeping missions a public goods approach’, Journal of Peace Research, 52:6, 727–742
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaubatz, Kurt Taylor (1991) ‘Election cycles and war’, Journal of Conflict Resolution, 35:2, 212–244
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giegerich, Bastian and Alexander Nicoll (2012) ‘The struggle for value in European defence’, Survival, 54:1, 53–82
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giegerich, Bastian and William Wallace (2004) ‘Not such a soft power: the external deployment of European forces’, Survival, 46:2, 163–182
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haesebrouck, Tim (2015) ‘Democratic contributions to UN peacekeeping operations. A two-step fuzzy set QCA of Unifil II’, Romanian Journal of Political Science, 15:1, 4–51
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haesebrouck, Tim (2016a) ‘Explaining the member states’ varying military engagements: the potential of a strategic culture perspective’, Journal of Contemporary European Research, 12:3, 774–781
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haesebrouck, Tim (2016b) ‘Democratic participation in the air strikes against Islamic state’, Foreign Policy Analysis, Advance online publication
   Google Scholar
• Haesebrouck, Tim (2016c) ‘NATO burden sharing in Libya a fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis’, Journal of Conflict Resolution, Advance online publication
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haesebrouck Tim and AlrikThiem (Forthcoming) Burden sharing in CSDP military operations defence and peace economics.
   Google Scholar
• Ireland, Michael J and Scott Sigmund Gartner (2001) ‘Time to fight: government type and conflict initiation in parliamentary systems’, The Journal of Conflict Resolution, 45:5, 547–568
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Junk, Julian and Christopher Daase (2013) ‘Germany’ in Heiko Biehl, Bastian Giegerich and Alexandra Jonas (eds) Strategic cultures in Europe security and defence policies across the Continent (Potsdam: Springer), 139–152
   Google Scholar
• Kathman, Jacob D (2011) ‘Civil war diffusion and regional motivations for intervention’, Journal of Conflict Resolution, 55:6, 847–876
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khanna, Jyoti, Todd Sandler and Hirofumi Shimizu (1998) ‘Sharing the financial burden for U.N. and NATO peacekeeping, 1976–1996’, Journal of Conflict Resolution, 42:2, 176–195
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khanna, Jyoti, Todd Sandler and Hirofumi Shimizu (1999) ‘The demand for UN peacekeeping, 1975–1996’, Kyklos, 52:3, 345–368
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kisangani, Emizet F and Jeffrey Pickering (2007) ‘Diverting with benevolent military force: reducing risks and rising above strategic behavior’, International Studies Quarterly, 51:2, 277–299
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lebovic, James H (2004) ‘Uniting for peace? Democracies and United Nations peace operations after the cold war’, Journal of Conflict Resolution, 48:6, 910–936
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levy, Jack S (2008) ‘Case studies: types, designs, and logics of inference’, Conflict Management and Peace Science, 25:1, 1–18
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahoney, James and Gary Goertz (2004) ‘The possibility principle: choosing negative cases in comparative research’, American Political Science Review, 98:04, 653–669
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marx, Axel (2010) ‘Crisp-set qualitative comparative analysis (csQCA) and model specification: benchmarks for future csQCA applications’, International Journal of Multiple Research Approaches, 4:2, 138–158
   Google Scholar
• Marx, Axel and Adrian Dusa (2011) ‘Crisp-set qualitative comparative analysis (csQCA), contradictions and consistency benchmarks for model specification’, Methodological Innovations Online, 6:2, 103–148
   Google Scholar
• Mello, Patrick A (2012) ‘Parliamentary peace or partisan politics? democracies’ participation in the Iraq war’, Journal of International Relations and Development, 15:3, 420–453
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mello, Patrick A (2014) Democratic participation in armed conflict military involvement in Kosovo, Afghanistan and Iraq (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan)10.1057/9781137386519
   Google Scholar
• De Meur, Gisèle (1994) ‘Comparing political systems: establishing similarities and dissimilarities’, European Journal of Political Research, 26: 193–219
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moravcsik, Andrew (2009) ‘Europe: the quiet superpower’, French Politics, 7:3-4, 403–422
   Google Scholar
• Mullenbach, Mark J and Gerard P Matthews (2008) ‘Deciding to intervene: an analysis of international and domestic influences on united states interventions in intrastate disputes’, International Interactions, 34:1, 25–52
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muller-Neuhof, Jost (2015) ‘German military intervention in Syria legal, lawyers rule’, Euractive, 1 December
   Google Scholar
• Olson, Mancur and Richard Zeckhauser (1966) ‘An economic theory of alliances’, Review of Economics and Statistics, 48:3, 266–279
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oma, Ida M (2012) ‘Explaining states’ burden-sharing behaviour within NATO’, Cooperation and Conflict, 47:4, 562–573
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palmer, Glenn, Tamar London and Patrick Regan (2004) ‘What’s stopping you? The sources of political constraints on international conflict behavior in parliamentary democracies’, International Interactions, 30:1, 1–24
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perkins, Richard and Eric Neumayer (2008) ‘Extra-territorial interventions in conflict spaces: explaining the geographies of post-cold war peacekeeping’, Political Geography, 27:8, 895–914
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pohl, Benjamin (2013) ‘Neither bandwagoning nor balancing: explaining Europe’s security policy’, Contemporary Security Policy, 34:2, 353–373
   Google Scholar
• Pohl, Benjamin (2014) EU foreign policy and crisis management operations: power, purpose and domestic politics (London: Routledge)
   Google Scholar
• Pohl, Benjamin and Niels van Willigen (2015) ‘Analytic eclecticism and EU Foreign policy (In) action’, Global Society, 29:2, 175–198
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rathbun, Brian C. (2004) Partisan interventions: European party politics and peace enforcement in the Balkans (Ithaca: Cornell University Press)
   Google Scholar
• Reiter, Dan and Erik R Tillman (2002) ‘Public legislative, and executive constraints on the democratic initiation of conflict’, The Journal of Politics, 64:3, 810–826
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rihoux, Benoît and Ragin, Charles (2009) ‘Comparative research design: case and variable selection’ in Benoît Rihoux and Charles C Ragin (eds) Configurational comparative methods: qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) and related techniques (London: Sage), 19–3210.4135/9781452226569
   Google Scholar
• Ringsmose, Jens (2010) ‘NATO burden-sharing redux: continuity and change after the cold war’, Contemporary Security Policy, 31:2, 319–338
   Google Scholar
• Sandler, Todd and Hirofumi Shimizu (2014) ‘NATO burden sharing 1999–2010: an altered alliance’, Foreign Policy Analysis, 10:1, 43–60
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmitt, Olivier (2012) ‘Strategic users of culture: German decisions for military action’, Contemporary Security Policy, 33:1, 59–81
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, Carsten Q and Claudius Wagemann (2012) Set-theoretic methods for the social sciences: a guide to qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)10.1017/CBO9781139004244
   Google Scholar
• Schuster, Jürgen and Herbert Maier (2006) ‘The rift: explaining Europe’s divergent Iraq policies in the run-up of the American-led war on Iraq’, Foreign Policy Analysis, 2:3, 223–244
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shimizu, Hirofumi and Todd Sandler (2002) ‘Peacekeeping and burden-sharing, 1994–2000’, Journal of Peace Research, 39:6, 651–668
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skaaning, Sven (2011) ‘Assessing the robustness of crisp-set and fuzzy-set QCA results’, Sociological Methods & Research, 40:2, 391–408
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Su, Tsai-Tsu, Mark S Kamlet and David C Mowery (1993) ‘Modeling US budgetary and fiscal policy outcomes: a disaggregated, systemwide perspective’, American Journal of Political Science, 37:1, 213–245
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tago, Atsushi (2009) ‘When are democratic friends unreliable? The unilateral withdrawal of troops from the ‘coalition of the willing’’, Journal of Peace Research, 46:2, 219–234
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tago, Atsushi (2014) ‘Too many problems at home to help you: domestic disincentives for military coalition participation’, International Area Studies Review, 17:3, 262–278
   Google Scholar
• Thiem, Alrik and Adrian Duşa (2013) Qualitative comparative analysis with R: a user’s guide (New York, NY: Springer)10.1007/978-1-4614-4584-5
   Google Scholar