References
- Aline, Robert (2015) ‘European Parliament backs TTIP, rejects ISDS’ EurActiv July 13, <<https://www.euractiv.com/section/global-europe/news/european-parliament-backs-ttip-rejects-isds/>>, accessed 3 July, 2016
- Bauer, Matthias (2016) ‘Manufacturing discontent - the rise to power of anti-TTIP groups’ European Centre for International Political Economy, November 28, <<http://ecipe.org/publications/manufacturing-discontent-the-rise-to-power-of-anti-ttip-groups/>>, accessed 4 March 2017
- Borderlex (2016) ‘Brussels briefing on trade’, <<http://www.borderlex.eu/eutradeinsights/malmstrom-ttip-to-remain-in-a-freezer-for-quite-some-time>>, accessed 1 January 2017
- Brink, Alexander (2009) ‘Hirschman’s rhetoric of reaction: US and German insights in business ethics’, Journal of Business Ethics, 89:1, 109–122
- Ciofu, Sabina Maria and Nicolae Stefanuta (2016) ‘TTIP, the bullied kid of Twitter’, Georgetown Public Policy Review, <<http://gppreview.com/2016/01/14/ttip-twitter-and-how-social-media-is-defining-the-public-argument>>, accessed 1 March 2017
- Dalia Research (2016) ‘eu28 survey data’, <<https://daliaresearch.com/e28>>, accessed 1 September 2017
- De Ville, Ferdi and Gabriel Siles-Brügges (2016) TTIP: the truth about the transatlantic trade and investment partnership (London: Polity)10.14361/9783839434123
- De Wilde, Pieter (2011) ‘No polity for old politics? A framework for analysing the politicization of European integration’, Journal of European Integration, 33:5, 559–575
- Dempsey, Judy (2015) ‘Come on Europe, Go for TTIP!’, Carnegie Europe, 12 October, <<http://carnegieeurope.eu/strategiceurope/61584>>, accessed 14 October, 2015
- Eliasson, Leif Johan and Patricia Garcia-Duran (2018) ‘TTIP negotiations: interest groups, anti-TTIP civil society campaigns and public opinion’, Journal of Transatlantic Studies, 16:2, 101–116
- EU Trade Commission, speeches on TTIP, Multiple (1 December 2012–30 July 2016), <<http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/cfm/doclib_results.cfm?key=de%20gucht%2C%20Malmstr%C3%B6 m&opt=1&dis=50&lan=all&ty=Speeches%20and%20articles&sta=1&en=50&page=1&year1=01/01/2013&year2=30/07/2016§or=all&country=all&langId=EN>≥, accessed 21-25 March 2017
- Eurobarometer 85 (2016) Standard Eurobarometer, <<http://data.europa.eu/euodp/en/data/dataset/S2130_85_2_STD85_ENG>>, accessed 13 November 2016
- European Commission (2017) ‘Report from the commission to the European Parliament, the council, the European economic and social committee and the committee of the regions on the implementation of the trade policy strategy trade for all delivering a progressive trade policy to harness globalisation', <<http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2017/september/tradoc_156037.pdf>>, accessed 14 September 2017
- Finlayson, Alan (2007) ‘From beliefs to arguments: interpretative methodology and rhetorical political analysis’, British Journal of International Relations, 9:4, 545–563
- Finlayson, Alan (2013) ‘Critique and political argumentation’, Political Studies Review, 11:3, 313–320
- Francois, Joseph et al (2013) ‘Reducing Transatlantic Barriers to Trade and Investment—An Economic Assessment. Final Report for the European Commission’, Contract TRADE10/A2/A16, Center for Economic Policy Research, London
- Friends of the Earth Europe (2015) ‘How TTIP undermines food safety and animal welfare’, 3 February, <<http://www.foeeurope.org/how-TTIP-undermines-food-safety-animal-welfare-040215>>, accessed 5 March 2016
- Garcia-Duran, Patricia and Leif Johan Eliasson (2017) ‘The public debate over Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership and its underlying assumptions’, Journal of World Trade, 51:1, 23–42
- Gheyle, Niels (2016) ‘Adding fuel to the flames. How TTIP reinvigorated the politicization of trade’, Conference article. Prepared for the GIFTA workshop series, social and labour impacts of free trade agreements, Brussels, Belgium, 7-8 July
- Gheyle, Niels and Ferdi De Ville (2017) ‘How much is enough? Explaining the continuous transparency conflict in TTIP’, Politics and Governance, 5:3, 16–28
- Grube, Dennis (2016) ‘Sticky words? Towards a theory of rhetorical path dependency’, Australian Journal of Political Science, 51:3, 530–545
- Hamilton, Daniel (ed) (2014) The geopolitics of TTIP; repositioning the Transatlantic relationship for a changing world (Centre for Transatlantic Relations: John Hopkins University)
- Hirschman, Albert (1991) The rhetoric of reaction: perversity, futility, jeopardy (Cambridg, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press)
- Kohlbacher, Florian (2006) ‘The use of qualitative content analysis in case study research’, Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 7:1, Art. 21, <<http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/75/154>>, accessed 16 March 2017
- Lamy, Pascal (2015) ‘The new global trade agenda’ Presentation at Peterson Institute for International Economics (Washington, DC, unedited event transcript), accessed 2 November 2015
- Poletti, Arlo and Dirk De Bièvre (2013) ‘The political science of European trade policy: a literature review with a research outlook’, Comparative European Politics, 12:1, 101–119
- Schimmelfennig, Frank (2001) ‘The community trap: liberal norms, rhetorical action, and the eastern enlargement of the European Union’, International Organization, 55:1, 47–80
- Shorten, Richard (2015) ‘Reactionary rhetoric reconsidered’, Journal of Political Ideologies, 20:2, 179–200
- Siles-Brügge, Gabriel (2018) ‘Transatlantic Investor Protection as a Threat to Democracy: The Potency and Limits of an Emotive Frame’, Canbridge Review of International Affairs, 31:2
- Young, Alasdair (2016) ‘Not your parents’ trade politics: the transatlantic trade and investment partnership negotiations’, Review of International Political Economy, 23:3, 345–378
- Zhang, Yam and Barcbara Wildemuth (2005) ‘Qualitative analysis of content’, Analysis, 1:2, 1–12