Litigation process of social movements as a driver of norm transformation?

References

• Alter, Karen (2014) The new terrain of international law: courts, politics and rights (Princeton: Princeton University Press)
   Google Scholar
• Barclay, Scott, Lynn C. Jones, and Anna-Maria Marshall (2011) ‘Two spinning wheels: studying law and social movements’ in Austin Sarat (ed) Special issue: Social movements/legal possibilities (Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited), 1–16
   Google Scholar
• Björkdahl, Annika (2005) ‘Norm-maker and norm-taker: Exploring the normative influence of the EU in Macedonia’, European Foreign Affairs Review, 10:2, 257–278
   Google Scholar
• Burley, Anne-Marie, and Mattli Walter (1993) ‘Europe before the court: A political theory of legal integration’, International Organization, 47:1, 41–76
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cabla, Sherry, Donald W. Hastings, and Tamara L. Mix (2002) ‘Different voices, different venues: Environmental racism claims by activists, researchers and lawyers’, Research in Human Ecology, 9:1, 26–42
   Google Scholar
• Carpenter, Charli R. (2005) ‘Women, children and other vulnerable groups: Gender strategic frames and the protection of civilians as a transnational issue’, International Studies Quarterly, 49:2, 295–334
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charnysh, Volha, Lloyd Paulette, and Beth A. Simmons (2015) ‘Frames and consensus formation in international relations: The case of trafficking in persons’, European Journal of International Relations, 21:2, 323–351
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Checkel, Jeffrey T. (1998) ‘Review article: The constructivist turn in international relations theory’, World Politics, 50:2, 324–348
   Google Scholar
• Cichowski, Rachel A. (2006) ‘Court, rights, and democratic participation’, Comparative Political Studies, 39:1, 50–75
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cichowski, Rachel A. (2007) The European court and civil society: Litigation, mobilization, and governance (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)
   Google Scholar
• Cichowski, Rachel A. (2013) ‘Mobilization, litigation and democratic governance’, Representation, 49:3, 321–332
   Google Scholar
• Conant, Lisa J. (2006) ‘Individuals, courts, and the development of european social rights’, Comparative Political Studies, 39, 76–100
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cullet, Philippe (2001) ‘Human rights and displacement: The Indian Supreme Court decision on sardar sarovar in international perspective’, International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 50:4, 973–987
   Google Scholar
• De Burca, Grainne (2005) ‘Rethinking law in neofunctionalist theory’, Journal of European Public Policy, 12:2, 310–326
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dorf, Michael C., and Sidney Tarrow (2014) ‘Strange bedfellows: How an anticipatory countermovement brought same sex marriage into the public area’, Law & Social Inquiry, 39:2, 449–473
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dwivedi, Ranjit (2006) Conflict and collective action: The sardar sarovar project in India (London: Routledge)
   Google Scholar
• Entman, Robert M. (1993) ‘Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm’, Journal of Communication, 43:4, 51–58
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Epp, Charles R. (2008) ‘Law as an instrument of social reform’ in Keith E. Whittington, R. Daniel Kelemen, and Gregory A. Caldeira (eds) The Oxford handbook of law and politics (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 595–613
   Google Scholar
• Epstein, Lee and Jack Knight (1998) The choices justices make (Washington, DC: CQ Press)
   Google Scholar
• Finnemore, Martha, and Kathryn Sikkink (1998) ‘International norm dynamics and political change’, International Organisation, 52:4, 887–917
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher, William F. (2010) ‘Diverting water: Revisiting the sardar sarovar project’, International Journal of Water Resources Development, 17:3, 303–314
   Google Scholar
• Flemming, Roy B., John Bohte, and B. Dan Wood (1997) ‘One voice among many: The supreme court's influence on attentiveness to issues in the United States, 1947-92’, American Journal of Political Science, 41:4, 1224–1250
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gill, Stephen (2002) ‘Constitutionalizing inequality and the clash of globalizations’, International Studies Review, 4:2, 47–65
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, Barney G., and Anselm L. Strauss (1999) The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research (Oxon: Transaction Publishers)
   Google Scholar
• Helmke, Gretchen, and Frances Rosenbluth (2009) ‘Regimes and the rule of law: Judicial independence in comparative perspective’, Annual Review of Political Science, 12, 345–366
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirschl, Ran (2004) Towards juristocracy: The origins and consequences of the new constitutionalism (Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press)
   Google Scholar
• Hirschl, Ran (2008) ‘The judicialization of politics’ in Keith E. Whittington, R. Daniel Kelemen, and Gregory A. Caldeira (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Law and Politics (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 119–141
   Google Scholar
• Hirschl, Ran (2014) ‘The origins of the new constitutionalism: Lessons from the “old” constitutionalism’, in Gill Stephen, and A. Claire Cutler (eds) New Constitutionalism and World Order (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 95–108
   Google Scholar
• Horowitz, Donald L. (1977) Courts and the social policy (Washington D.C.: Brookings Institute)
   Google Scholar
• Höpner, Martin, and Armin Schafer (2012) ‘Embeddedness and regional integration: Waiting for Polanyi in a hayekian setting’, International Organization, 66:3, 429–455
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keck, Thomas M. (2009) ‘Beyond backlash: Assessing the impact of judicial decisions on LGBT rights’, Law & Society Review, 43:1, 151–185
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelemen, Daniel R. (2001) ‘The limits of judicial power: Trade-environment disputes in the GATT/EU and the EU’, Comparative Political Studies, 34:6, 622–650
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennedy, David (1980) ‘Theses about International law discourse’, German yearbook of International law, 23 (Berlin: Duncker & Humblot), 353–391
   Google Scholar
• Kersbergen, Kees Van, and Bertjan Verbeek (2007) ‘The politics of international norms: Subsidiarity and the imperfect competence regime of the European Union’, European Journal of International Relations, 13:2, 217–238
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krook, Mona Lena, and Jacqui True (2010) ‘Rethinking the life cycles of international norms: The United Nations and the promotion of gender equality’, European Journal of International Relations, 18:1, 103–127
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lobel, Jules (2004) ‘Courts as forums for protest’, Bepress Legal Series, 213, http://law.bepress.com/expresso/eps/213, Accessed 30 January 2017
   Google Scholar
• Martinsen, Dorte Sindbjerg (2015) ‘Judicial influence on policy outputs? The political constraints of legal integration in the European Union’, Comparative Political Studies, 48:12, 1622–1660
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mate, Manoj (2013) ‘Public interest litigation and the transformation of the supreme court of India’ in Diana Kapiszewsky, Gordon Silverstein, and Robert A. Kagan (eds) Consequential courts: Judicial roles in global perspective (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 262–288
   Google Scholar
• Mather, Lynn (2008) ‘Law and society’ in Keith E. Whittington, R. Daniel Kelemen, and Gregory A. Calderia (eds) The Oxford handbook of law and politics (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 681–697
   Google Scholar
• McCann, Michael (1994) Rights at work: Pay equity reform and the politics of legal mobilization (Chicago IL: Chicago University Press)
   Google Scholar
• McCann, Michael (2008) ‘Litigation and Legal Mobilization’ in Keith E. Whittington, R. Daniel Kelemen, and Gregory A. Caldeira (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Law and Politics (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 522–540
   Google Scholar
• McCann, Michael, William Haltom, and Shauna Fisher (2013) ‘Criminalizing big tobacco: Legal mobilization and the politics of responsibility for health risks in the US’, Law & Social Inquiry, 38:2, 288–321
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCammon, Holly J., and Allison R. McGrant (2015) ‘Litigating change? Social movements and the court system’ Sociology Compass, 9:2, 128–139
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGuire, Kevin T., and James A. Stimson (2004) ‘The least dangerous branch revisited: New evidence on supreme court responsiveness to public preferences’, The Journal of Politics, 66:4, 1018–1035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meer, Shehnaz (1993) ‘Litigating fundamental rights: Rights litigation and Social action litigation in India: A lesson for South Africa’, South African Journal on Human Rights, 9:3, 358–372
   Google Scholar
• Narmada Bachao Andolan v. Union of India and Others. 2005. Judgement of 15 March 2005
   Google Scholar
• Narmada Bachao Andolan v. Union of India and Others. 2000. Judgement of 18 October 2000
   Google Scholar
• Narmada Bachao Andolan v. Union of India. 2017. Order of 8 February 2017
   Google Scholar
• Newell, Peter (2001) ‘Access to environmental justice? Litigation against TNCs in the South’, IDS Bulletin, 32:1, 83–93
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newell, Peter (2012) Globalization and the environment: Capitalism, ecology and power (Polity Press: Cambridge)
   Google Scholar
• Nilsen, Alf Gunvald (2013) ‘Against the current, from below: Resisting dispossession in the narmada valley, India’, Journal of Poverty, 17:4, 460–492
   Google Scholar
• Nolette, Paul (2015) ‘Law enforcement as legal mobilization: Reforming the pharmaceutical industry through government litigation’, Law & Social Inquiry, 40:1, 123–151
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Onuf, Nicolas G. (1989) World of our making: Rules and rule in social theory and international relations (Columbia: University of South Carolina Press)
   Google Scholar
• Picciotto, Sol (2008) ‘Constitutionalizing multilevel governance?’ International Journal of Constitutional Law, 6:3-4, 457–479
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prügl, Elisabeth (2017) ‘Social mechanisms: A methodological tool for feminist IR’ in Harry D. Gould (ed) The art of world making: Nicholas Greenwood Onuf and his critics (Routledge: London and New York), 160–174
   Google Scholar
• Rajagopal, Balakrishnan (2003) International law from below. Development, social movements and third world resistance (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)
   Google Scholar
• Rajagopal, Balakrishnan (2005) ‘Limits of law in counter-hegemonic globalization: The Indian Supreme Court and the narmada valley struggle’ in Boaventura de Sausa Santos, and Cezar A. Rodriguez-Garavito (eds) Law and globalization from below (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 183–217
   Google Scholar
• Randeria, Shalini (2003) ‘Cunning states and unaccountable international institutions: Legal plurality, social movements and rights of local communities to common property resources’, European Journal of Sociology, 44:1, 27–60
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenberg, Gerald N. (1991) The hollow hope: Can courts bring about social transformation? (Chicago: The University of Chicago Press Books)
   Google Scholar
• Sandholtz, Wayne (2008) ‘Dynamics of international norm transformation: Rules against wartime plunder’, European Journal of International Relations, 14:1, 101–131
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandholtz, Wayne, and Kendall W. Stiles (2009) International norms and cycles of transformation (Oxford: Oxford University Press)
   Google Scholar
• Sarat, Austin (1990) ‘‘..The law is all over: Power, resistance and the legal consciousness of the welfare poor’, Yale Journal of Law and the Humanities, 2:2, 343–379
   Google Scholar
• Scheingold, Stuart A. (1974) The politics of rights: Lawyers, public policy and social change (New Haven: Yale University Press)
   Google Scholar
• Shapiro, Martin (1981) Courts: A comparative and political analysis (Chicago: The University of Chicago Press)
   Google Scholar
• Shapiro, Martin (1999) ‘The success of judicial review’, in Sally Kenney, William M. Reisinger, John C. Reitz (eds) Constitutional Dialogues in Comparative Perspective (New York: Palgrave Macmillan), 193–219
   Google Scholar
• Shapiro, Martin, and Alec Stone Sweet (2002) On law, politics and judicialization (Oxford: Oxford University Press)
   Google Scholar
• Simmons, Beth A. (2009) Mobilizing for human rights: International law in domestic politics (New York: Cambridge University Press)
   Google Scholar
• Sinclair, Adriana (2011) ‘Law, caution: Towards a better understanding of law for IR theorists’, Review of International Studies, 37, 1095–1112
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slaughter, Anne-Marie (2003) ‘A global community of courts’, Harvard International Law Journal, 44, 191–219
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Staton, Jeffrey K. and Will H. Moore (2011) ‘Judicial power in domestic and international politics’, International Organization, 65:3, 553–587
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stone Sweet, Alec (2000) Governing with judges: Constitutional politics in Europe (Oxford: Oxford University Press)
   Google Scholar
• Stone Sweet, Alec (2004) The judicial construction of Europe (Oxford: Oxford University Press)
   Google Scholar
• Stone Sweet, Alec (2008) ‘Constitutionalism and judicial power’ in Caramani, Daniele (ed) Comparative Politics (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 162–178
   Google Scholar
• Sunstein, Cass R. (1996) ‘Social norms and social roles’, Columbia Law Review, 96:4, 903–968
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tilly, Charles (2001) ‘Mechanisms in political processes’, Annual Review of Political Science, 4, 21–41
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Visvanathan, Shiv (2000) ‘Supreme court constructs a dam’, Economic and Political Weekly, 35:48, 4176–4180
   Google Scholar
• Wiener, Antje (2014) A theory of contestation (Heidelberg and London: Springer)
   Google Scholar
• Wiener, Antje (2017) ‘A theory of contestation: A precise summary of argument and concepts’, Polity, 49:1, 109–125
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wight, Colin (1999) ‘They shoot dead horses don’t they?: Locating agency in the agent-structure problematique’, European Journal of International Relations, 5:1, 109–142
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Commission on Dams Report (2000) ‘Dams and Development. A New Framework for Decision-Making’, http://www.unep.org/dams/WCD/report/WCD_DAMS%20report.pdf, Accessed 5 January 2017
   Google Scholar
• Zwingel, Susanne (2012) ‘How do norms travel? Theorizing international women’s rights in transnational perspective’, International Studies Quarterly, 56:1, 115–129
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar