References
- Asher, Nicholas and Laure Vieu (2005) ‘Subordinating and coordinating discourse relations’, Lingua, 115:4, 591–610.
- Blanchard, Ben and Takenaka Kiyoshi (2014) ‘China angrily denounces Japan for Russia-Crimea analogy’, Reuter, 28 March 2014. https://uk.news.yahoo.com/china-angrily-denounces-japan-russia-crimea-analogy-090651195.html.
- Epstein, Charlotte (2011) ‘Who speaks? Discourse, the subject and the study of identity in international politics’, European Journal of International Relations, 17:2, 327–350.
- Epstein, Charlotte (2008) The power of words in international relations: Birth of an anti-Whaling discourse (Cambridge: The MIT Press).
- Espinosa, Cristina (2014) ‘The advocacy of the previously inconceivable: A discourse analysis of the Universal Declaration of the Rights of Mother Earth at Rio + 20’, The Journal of Environment & Development, 23:4, 391–416.
- Fairclough, Norman and Ruth Wodak (1997) ‘Critical discourse analysis’, in Tuen van Dijk (ed) Discourse as social interaction: a multidisciplinary introduction, Vol. 2 (London: Sage Publications), 258–284.
- Favarel-Garrigues, Gilles (2003) ‘Competition and confusion in the discourse on organized crime in Russia’, Alternatives: Global, Local, Political, 28:4, 423–457.
- Foucault, Michel (1970) The order of things (London: Tavistock).
- Gries, Peter Hays, Derek Steiger, and Tao Wang (2016) ‘Popular nationalism and China’s Japan policy: The Diaoyu Islands protests, 2012–2013’, Journal of Contemporary China, 25:98, 264–276.
- Habermas, Jürgen (1996) Between facts and norms: Contributions to a discourse theory of law and democracy (Cambridge: MIT Press).
- Hall, Stuart (1992) ‘The west and the rest: Discourse and power’, in Stuart Hall and Bram Gieben (eds) Formations of modernity (Cambridge: Polity), 275–320.
- Hallahan, Kirk, Derina Holtzhausen, Betteke van Ruler, Dejan Verčič, and Krishnamurthy Sriramesh (2007) ‘Defining strategic communication’, International Journal of Strategic Communication, 1:1, 3–35.
- Holzscheiter, Anna (2014) ‘Between communicative interaction and structures of signification: Discourse theory and analysis in international relations’, International Studies Perspectives, 15:2, 142–162.
- Hong, Lei (2014) Foreign Ministry Spokesperson Hong Lei's Regular Press Conference on June 6, 2014. http://www.fmprc.gov.cn/mfa_eng/xwfw_665399/s2510_665401/t1163054.shtml.
- Hong, Lei (2015) Foreign Ministry Spokesperson Hong Lei’s Regular Press Conference on March 18, 2015. http://www.fmprc.gov.cn/mfa_eng/xwfw_665399/s2510_665401/t1246655.shtml.
- Horiuchi, Toru (2014) ‘Public opinion in Japan and the nationalization of the Senkaku Islands’, East Asia, 31:1, 23–47.
- Hua, Chunying (2015) Foreign Ministry Spokesperson Hua Chunying’s Regular Press Conference on April 8, 2015. http://www.fmprc.gov.cn/mfa_eng/wjdt_665385/wsrc_665395/t1253140.shtml.
- Lahusen, Christian, Maria Kousis, Johannes Kiess, and Maria Paschou (2016) ‘Political claims and discourse formations: A comparative account on Germany and Greece in the Eurozone crisis’, Politics & Policy, 44:3, 525–552.
- Lee, David (1992) Competing discourses: Perspective and ideology in language (London: Longman).
- Liu, Xiaoming (2014) ‘Ambassador Liu Xiaoming talks to Jeremy Paxman on BBC Newsnight’, Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the People’s Republic of China, 2014/01/11. http://www.fmprc.gov.cn/mfa_eng/wjb_663304/zwjg_665342/zwbd_665378/t1117856.shtml.
- Milliken, Jennifer (1999) ‘The study of discourse in international relations: A critique of research and methods’, European Journal of International Relations, 5:2, 225–254.
- MOFA (2012b) ‘Three truths about the Senkaku Islands’, October 4, 2012. http://www.mofa.go.jp/region/asia-paci/senkaku/three_truths_1.html.
- MOFA (2012c) ‘Position paper: Japan-China relations surrounding the situation of the Senkaku Islands’, November 9, 2012. http://www.mofa.go.jp/region/asia-paci/senkaku/position_paper_en.html.
- MOFA (2012d) ‘Position paper: Japan-China relations surrounding the situation of the Senkaku Islands – In response to China’s airspace incursion’, December 8, 2012. http://www.mofa.go.jp/region/asia-paci/senkaku/position_paper2_en.html.
- MOFA (2013a) ‘Position paper: Japan-China relations surrounding the situation of the Senkaku Islands – In response to China’s weapons-guiding radar lock-on’, February 7, 2013. http://www.mofa.go.jp/region/asia-paci/senkaku/position_paper3_en.html.
- MOFA (2013b) ‘The Senkaku Islands’. http://www.mofa.go.jp/region/asia-paci/senkaku/pdfs/senkaku_en.pdf.
- MOFA (2013c) ‘The basic view on the sovereignty over the Senkaku Islands’, May 8, 2013. http://www.mofa.go.jp/region/asia-paci/senkaku/basic_view.html.
- MOFA (2016a) Diplomatic Bluebook. http://www.mofa.go.jp/fp/pp/page24e_000157.html.
- MOFA (2016b) ‘Senkaku Islands Q&A’, April 13, 2016. https://www.mofa.go.jp/region/asia-paci/senkaku/qa_1010.html#q5.
- MOFA (2017) ‘Trends in Chinese government and other vessels in the waters surrounding the Senkaku Islands, and Japan’s response’, June 2, 2017. http://www.mofa.go.jp/region/page23e_000021.html.
- MOFA (Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan) (2012a) ‘Statements made by H.E. Mr. Kazuo Kodama, Ambassador Extraordinary and Plenipotentiary, Deputy Permanent Representative of Japan to the UN in exercise of the right of reply’, September 27, 2012. http://www.mofa.go.jp/announce/speech/un2012/un_0928.html.
- Nakano, Ryoko (2016) ‘The Sino-Japanese territorial dispute and threat perception in power transition’, The Pacific Review, 29:2, 165–186.
- Patalano, Alessio (2014) ‘Seapower and Sino-Japanese relations in the East China Sea’, Asian Affairs, 45:1, 34–54.
- Phillips, Nelson and Cynthia Hardy (2002) Discourse analysis: Investigating processes of social construction (Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Ltd).
- Pugliese, Giulio, and Aurelio Insisa (2017) Sino-Japanese power politics: Might, money and minds (United Kingdom: Palgrave Macmillan).
- Reed, Mike (2000) ‘The limits of discourse analysis in organizational analysis’, Organization, 7:3, 524–530.
- Schegloff, Emanuel A. (1999) ‘Schegloff’s texts” as “Billig’s data”: A critical reply’, Discourse & Society, 10, 558–572.
- SCIO (The State Council Information Office of the People’s Republic of China) (2012) White Paper Diaoyu Dao, an Inherent Territory of China. http://english.gov.cn/archive/white_paper/2014/08/23/content_281474983043212.htm.
- Silver, Jennifer J., Noella J. Gray, Lisa M. Campbell, Luke W. Fairbanks, and Rebecca L. Gruby (2015) ‘Blue economy and competing discourses in international oceans governance’, The Journal of Environment & Development, 24:2, 135–160.
- Smith, Paul J. (2009) ‘China-Japan relations and the future geopolitics of East Asia’, Asian Affairs: An American Review, 35:4, 230–256.
- van Dijk, Teun A. (1997) ‘What is political discourse analysis?’, Belgian Journal of Linguistics, 11:1, 11–52.
- van Dijk, Teun A. (2008) Discourse and power (New York: Palgrave Macmillan).
- van Dijk, Teun A. (ed.) (1985) Handbook of discourse analysis, vol. 3: Discourse and dialogue (London: Academic Press).
- Wan, Ming (2014) ‘Coevolution and Sino-Japanese tensions’, Asia-Pacific Review, 21:1, 30–40.
- Wodak, Ruth and Michael Meyer (2009) Methods for critical discourse analysis (London: Sage Publications).
- Xing, Qu (2015) ‘Remarks by Ambassador Qu Xing at “China’s coming war with Asia” book launch debate’, 27 February, 2015. http://www.fmprc.gov.cn/mfa_eng/wjb_663304/zwjg_665342/zwbd_665378/t1241931.shtml.
- Zhai, Yida (2015) ‘Can power make a great state? Asian citizens’ views of China’s power’, Issues & Studies, 51:4, 85–117.
- Zhai, Yida (2016) ‘Identity, contact, and the reduction of mutual distrust: A survey of Chinese and Japanese youth’, The Pacific Review, 30:1, 93–113.
- Zhai, Yida (2018) ‘The gap in viewing China’s rise between Chinese youth and their Asian counterparts’, Journal of Contemporary China, 27:114, 848–866.
- Zhai, Yida (2019a) ‘A peaceful prospect or a threat to global order: How Asian youth view a rising China’, International Studies Review, 21:1, 38–56.
- Zhai, Yida (2019b) ‘Discourse power: Sovereignty claims over the Diaoyu/Senkaku islands’, Territory, Politics, Governance <DOI:10.1080/21622671.2019.1687324>.