Visual narratives of global politics in the digital age: an introduction

References

• Adler-Nissen, R, K Andersen, and L Hansen (2020) ‘Images, emotions, and international politics: The death of Alan Kurdi’, Review of International Studies, 46:1, 75–95
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, W L, and A Segerberg (2012) ‘The logic of connective action’, Information, Communication & Society, 15:5, 739–68
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berents, H, and C Duncombe (2020) ‘Introduction: violence, visuality and world politics’, International Affairs, 96:3, 567–71
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bjola, C, and J Pamment, eds. (2018) Countering online propaganda and extremism: the dark side of digital diplomacy (London: Routledge)
   Google Scholar
• Bjola, C, J Cassidy, and I Manor (2019) ‘Public diplomacy in the digital age’, The Hague Journal of Diplomacy, 14:1–2, 83–101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bjola, C, and K Papadakis (2020) ‘Digital propaganda, counterpublics and the disruption of the public sphere: the Finnish approach to building digital resilience’, Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 33:5, 1–29
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bleiker, R (2001) ‘The aesthetic turn in international political theory’, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 30:3, 509–33
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bleiker, R, ed. (2018) Visual global politics (London: Routledge)
   Google Scholar
• Callahan, W A (2015) ‘The visual turn in IR: documentary filmmaking as a critical method’, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 43:3, 891–910
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Callahan, W A (2020) Sensible politics: Visualizing international relations (Oxford: Oxford University Press)
   Google Scholar
• Carney, N (2016) ‘All lives matter, but so does race: Black Lives Matter and the evolving role of social media’, Humanity & Society, 40:2, 180–99
   Google Scholar
• Carpenter, C, and D W Drezner (2010) ‘International Relations 2.0: the implications of new media for an old profession’, International Studies Perspectives, 11:3, 255–72
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caso, F, and C Hamilton, eds. (2015) Popular culture and world politics: Theories, methods, pedagogies (E-International Relations Publishing)
   Google Scholar
• Chadwick, A (2017) The hybrid media system: Politics and power (Oxford: Oxford University Press)
   Google Scholar
• Conway, M (2020) ‘Routing the extreme right: challenges for social media platforms’, The RUSI Journal, 165:1, 108–13
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper-Cunningham, D (2019) ‘Seeing (in)security, gender and silencing: posters in and about the British women’s suffrage movement’, International Feminist Journal of Politics, 21:3, 383–408
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crilley, R (2020) ‘Where we at? new directions for research on popular culture and world politics’, International Studies Review, 1–17
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crilley, R, and M Gillespie (2019) ‘What to do about social media? politics, populism and journalism’, Journalism, 20:1, 173–6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crilley, R, and P N Chatterje-Doody (2020) ‘Emotions and war on YouTube: affective investments in RT’s visual narratives of the conflict in Syria’, Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 33:5, 1–21
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dickinson, J (2020) ‘Visualising the foreign and the domestic in diaspora diplomacy: images and the online politics of recognition in# givingtoindia’, Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 33:5, 1–26
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dixit, P (2014) ‘Decolonizing visuality in security studies: reflections on the death of Osama bin Laden’, Critical Studies on Security, 2:3, 337–51
   Google Scholar
• Duncombe, C (2017) ‘Twitter and transformative diplomacy: social media and Iran–US relations’, International Affairs, 93:3, 545–62
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eroukhmanoff, C (2019) ‘Responding to terrorism with peace, love and solidarity: ‘Je suis Charlie’,‘Peace’and ‘I Heart MCR’, Journal of International Political Theory, 15:2, 167–87
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freistein, K, and F Gadinger (2020) ‘Populist stories of honest men and proud mothers: A visual narrative analysis’, Review of International Studies, 46:2, 217–36
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friis, S M (2015) ‘Beyond anything we have ever seen: beheading videos and the visibility of violence in the war against ISIS’, International Affairs, 91:4, 725–46
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galai, Y (2019) ‘The victory image: imaging Israeli warfighting from Lebanon to Gaza’, Security Dialogue, 50:4, 295–313
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grayson, K., Davies, M., & Philpott, S. (2009). Pop goes IR? Researching the popular culture—world politics continuum. Politics, 29:3, 155–163
   Google Scholar
• Griffin, P (2019) ‘Symposium: Exploring the (multiple) futures of world politics through popular culture’, Australian Journal of Political Science, 54:4, 508–14
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagström, L, and K Gustafsson (2019) ‘Narrative power: how storytelling shapes East Asian international politics’, Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 32:4, 387–406
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamilton, C. (2016) ‘World Politics 2.0: An Introduction’ in Shepherd, L J, and C Hamilton (eds) Understanding popular culture and world politics in the digital age (Routledge) pp. 3–13
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, L (2011) ‘Theorizing the image for security studies: Visual securitization and the Muhammad cartoon crisis’, European Journal of International Relations, 17:1, 51–74
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harman, S (2019) Seeing politics: film, visual method, and international relations (London: McGill-Queen's University Press)
   Google Scholar
• Heck, A, and G Schlag (2013) ‘Securitizing images: the female body and the war in Afghanistan’, European Journal of International Relations, 19:4, 891–913
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Highfield, T (2017) Social media and everyday politics (London: Wiley)
   Google Scholar
• Hozić, A A (2017) ‘Introduction: the aesthetic turn at 15 (legacies, limits and prospects)’, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 45:2, 201–5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inayatullah, N., and E. Dauphinee, eds. (2016) Narrative global politics: theory, history and the personal in international relations (London: Routledge)
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, S T (2019) ‘A turning IR landscape in a shifting media ecology: the state of IR literature on new media’, International Studies Review, 21:3, 518–34
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, S T, R Crilley, I Manor, C Baker, M Oshikoya, J Joachim, N Robinson, A Schneiker, N S Grove, and C Enloe (2020) ‘Militarization 2.0: communication and the normalization of political violence in the digital age’, International Studies Review, 1–26
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuntsman, A, and R. L Stein (2015) Digital militarism: Israel's occupation in the social media age (Stanford, California: Stanford University Press)
   Google Scholar
• Miskimmon, A, and B O’Loughlin (2020) ‘The visual politics of the 2015 Iran deal: narrative, image and verification’, Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 33:5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miskimmon, A, B O'Loughlin, and L Roselle (2014) Strategic narratives: Communication power and the new world order (London: Routledge)
   Google Scholar
• Moore, C, and L J Shepherd (2010) ‘Aesthetics and international relations: towards a global politics’, Global Society, 24:3, 299–309
   Google Scholar
• Oliveira, J.S.C (2020) Postcolonial maghreb and the limits of IR (London: Palgrave Macmillan)
   Google Scholar
• Redwood, H, and A Wedderburn (2019) ‘A cat-and-Maus game: The politics of truth and reconciliation in post-conflict comics’, Review of International Studies, 45:04, 588–606
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmid, J (2020) ‘(Captain) America in crisis: popular digital culture and the negotiation of Americanness’, Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 33:5, 1–23
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shepherd, L J, and C Hamilton, eds. (2016) Understanding popular culture and world politics in the digital age (London: Routledge)
   Google Scholar
• Shim, D (2013) Visual politics and North korea: seeing is believing (London: Routledge)
   Google Scholar
• Steele, B J, and A Homolar (2019) ‘Ontological insecurities and the politics of contemporary populism’, Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 32:3, 214–21
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tufekci, Z (2017) Twitter and tear gas: the power and fragility of networked protest (London: Yale University Press)
   Google Scholar
• Twiplomacy (2020). ‘Twiplomacy study 2020.’ Twiplomacy. https://twiplomacy.com/blog/twiplomacy-study-2020/, accessed 17 August 2020
   Google Scholar
• Van Noort, C (2020) ‘Strategic narratives, visuality and infrastructure in the digital age: the case of China’s Maritime Silk Road Initiative’, Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 33:5, 1–18
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber, C (2008) ‘Popular visual language as global communication: the remediation of United Airlines Flight 93’, Review of International Studies, 34:S1, 137–53
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wibben, A T R (2010) Feminist security studies: a narrative approach (London: Routledge)
   Google Scholar
• Williams, M C (2003) ‘Words, images, enemies: Securitization and international politics’, International Studies Quarterly, 47:4, 511–31
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winter, C (2020) ‘Framing war: visual propaganda, the Islamic State, and the battle for east Mosul’, Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 33:5, 1–23
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, K A (2019) ‘Telling NATO’s story of Afghanistan: gender and the alliance’s digital diplomacy’, Media, War & Conflict, 12:1, 87–101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zuboff, S (2019) The age of surveillance capitalism: the fight for a human future at the new frontier of power (London: Profile Books)
   Google Scholar