Does grading undermine feedback? The influence of grades on the effectiveness of corrective feedback on L2 writing

References

• van Beuningen, C.G., N.H. de Jong and F. Kuiken. 2011. Evidence on the effectiveness of comprehensive error correction in second language writing. Language Learning 62, no. 1: 1–41. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9922.2011.00674.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bitchener, J. 2012. A reflection on ‘the language learning potential’ of written CF. Journal of Second Language Writing 21, no. 4: 348–363. doi: 10.1016/j.jslw.2012.09.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bitchener, J. and D.R. Ferris. 2012. Written Corrective Feedback in Second Language Acquisition and Writing. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Black, P. and D. Wiliam. 1998. Inside the black box: raising standards through classroom assessment. Phi Delta Kappan 80, no. 2: 139–148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bong, M. 2009. Age-related differences in achievement goal differentiation. Journal of Educational Psychology 101, no. 4: 879–896. doi: 10.1037/a0015945
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bortz, J. and N. Döring. 2010. Forschungsmethoden und Evaluation für Human- und Sozialwissenschaftler. 4th ed. Heidelberg: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, R. 1988. Enhancing and undermining intrinsic motivation: the effects of task-involving and ego-involving evaluation on interest and performance. British Journal of Educational Psychology 58, no. 1: 1–14. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8279.1988.tb00874.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chandler, J. 2003. The efficacy of various kinds of error feedback for improvement in the accuracy and fluency of L2 student writing. System 12, no. 3: 267–296.
   Google Scholar
• Dörnyei, Z. and E. Ushioda. 2011. Teaching and Researching Motivation. 2nd ed. Harlow, UK: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Dweck, C.S. 2000. Self-Theories. Their Role in Motivation, Personality, and Development. Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Elliot, A.J. 1999. Approach and avoidance motivation and achievement goals. Educational Psychologist 34, no. 3: 169–189. doi: 10.1207/s15326985ep3403_3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elliot, A.J. and M. Covington. 2001. Approach and avoidance motivation. Educational Psychology Review 13, no. 2: 73–92. doi: 10.1023/A:1009009018235
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elliot, A.J. and H.A. McGregor. 2001. A 2 × 2 achievement goal framework. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 80, no. 3: 501–519. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.80.3.501
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elliot, A.J., H.A. McGregor and S. Gable. 1999. Achievement goals, study strategies, and exam performance: a mediational analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology 91, no. 3: 549–563. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.91.3.549
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elliot, A.J. and A.C. Moller. 2003. Performance-approach goals: good or bad forms of regulation? International Journal of Educational Research 39, no. 4/5: 339–356. doi: 10.1016/j.ijer.2004.06.003
   Google Scholar
• Elliot, A.J., K. Murayama and R. Pekrun. 2011. A 3 × 2 achievement goal model. Journal of Educational Psychology 103, no. 3: 632–648. doi: 10.1037/a0023952
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elliott, E.S. and C.S. Dweck. 1988. Goals: an approach to motivation and achievement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 54, no. 1: 5–12. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.54.1.5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellis, R. 2006. The Study of Second Language Acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, R. 2009. A typology of written corrective feedback types. ELT Journal 63, no. 2: 97–107. doi: 10.1093/elt/ccn023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fazio, L.L. 2001. The effect of corrections and commentaries on the journal writing accuracy of minority- and majority-language students. Journal of Second Language Writing 10, no. 4: 235–249. doi: 10.1016/S1060-3743(01)00042-X
   Google Scholar
• Ferris, D.R. 2010. Second language writing research and written corrective feedback in SLA. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 32, no. Special Issue 02: 181–201.
   Google Scholar
• Furneaux, C., A. Paran and B. Fairfax. 2007. Teacher stance as reflected in feedback on student writing: an empirical study of secondary school teachers in five countries. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching (IRAL) 45, no. 1: 69–94.
   Google Scholar
• Gass, S.M. and A. Mackey. 2006. Input, interaction and output: an overview. AILA Review 19: 3–17.
   Google Scholar
• Guénette, D. and R. Lyster. 2013. Written corrective feedback and its challenges for pre-service ESL teachers. The Canadian Modern Language Review/La revue canadienne des langues vivantes 69, no. 2: 129–153. doi: 10.3138/cmlr.1346
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hattie, J. and H. Timperley. 2007. The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research 77, no. 1: 81–112. doi: 10.3102/003465430298487
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyland, K. and Hyland, F. 2006. Contexts and issues in feedback on L2 writing: an introduction. In Feedback in Second Language Writing. Contexts and Issues, ed. K. Hyland and F. Hyland, 1–19. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Law, W., A.J. Elliot and K. Murayama. 2012. Perceived competence moderates the relation between performance-approach and performance-avoidance goals. Journal of Educational Psychology 104, no. 3: 806–819. doi: 10.1037/a0027179
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manchón, R. 2011. The language learning potential of writing in foreign language contexts: lessons from research. In Foreign Language Writing Instruction. Principles and Practices, ed. T. Cimasko and M. Reichelt, 44–64. Anderson, SC: Parlor Press.
   Google Scholar
• Moeller, A.J., J.M. Theiler and C. Wu. 2012. Goal setting and student achievement: a longitudinal study. The Modern Language Journal 96, no. 2: 153–169. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-4781.2011.01231.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murayama, K., A.J. Elliot and S. Yamagata. 2011. Separation of performance-approach and performance-avoidance achievement goals: a broader analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology 103, no. 1: 238–256. doi: 10.1037/a0021948
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicholls, J.G. 1984. Achievement motivation: conceptions of ability, subjective experience, task choice, and performance. Psychological Review 91, no. 3: 328–346. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.91.3.328
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pienemann, M. 2011. Language processing capacity. In The Handbook of Second Language Acquisition, ed. C. Doughty and M.H. Long, 679–714. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Pintrich, P.R., A.M. Conley, and T.M. Kempler. 2003. Current issues in achievement goal theory and research. International Journal of Educational Research 39, no. 4/5: 319–337. doi: 10.1016/j.ijer.2004.06.002
   Google Scholar
• Polio, C. 2012. The relevance of second language acquisition theory to the written error correction debate. Journal of Second Language Writing 21, no. 4: 375–389. doi: 10.1016/j.jslw.2012.09.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pulfrey, C., C. Buchs and F. Butera. 2011. Why grades engender performance-avoidance goals: the mediating role of autonomous motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology 103, no. 3: 683–700. doi: 10.1037/a0023911
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts, M.A. 1998. Awareness and the efficacy of error correction. In Attention and Awareness in Foreign Language Learning, ed. R.W. Schmidt, 163–182. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawaii at Manoa.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, R.W. 1990. The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics 11, no. 2: 129–158. doi: 10.1093/applin/11.2.129
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sideridis, G.D. 2005. Goal orientation, academic achievement, and depression: evidence in favor of a revised goal theory framework. Journal of Educational Psychology 97, no. 3: 366–375. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.97.3.366
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Truscott, J. 1996. The case against grammar correction in L2 writing classes. Language Learning 46, no. 2: 327–369. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-1770.1996.tb01238.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Truscott, J. and A.Y.-P. Hsu. 2008. Error correction, revision, and learning. Journal of Second Language Writing 17, no. 4: 292–305. doi: 10.1016/j.jslw.2008.05.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ushioda, E. and Z. Dörnyei. 2012. Motivation. In The Routledge Handbook of Second Language Acquisition, ed. A. Mackey and S.M. Gass, 396–409. London, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar