1,492
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Tailoring mediation to learners’ ZPD: effects of dynamic and non-dynamic corrective feedback on L2 development

References

  • Ableeva, R. 2010. Dynamic assessment of listening comprehension in second language learning. Unpublished doctoral diss., The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA.
  • Aljaafreh, A. and J.P. Lantolf. 1994. Negative feedback as regulation: second language learning in the zone of proximal development. The Modern Language Journal 78: 465–83. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-4781.1994.tb02064.x
  • Ammar, A. 2008. Prompts and recasts: differential effects on second language morphosyntax. Language Teaching Research 12: 183–210. doi: 10.1177/1362168807086287
  • Ammar, A. and N. Spada. 2006. One size fits all? Recasts, prompts, and L2 learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 28: 160. doi: 10.1017/S0272263106060268
  • Antón, M. 2009. Dynamic assessment of advanced second language learners. Foreign Language Annals 42, no. 3: 576–98. doi: 10.1111/j.1944-9720.2009.01030.x
  • Arievitch, I.M. and J.P.P. Haenen. 2005. Connecting sociocultural theory and educational practice: Galperin’s approach. Educational Psychologist 40, no. 3: 155–65. doi: 10.1207/s15326985ep4003_2
  • Davin, K.J. 2013. Integration of dynamic assessment and instructional conversations to promote development and improve assessment in the language classroom. Language Teaching Research 17: 303–22. doi: 10.1177/1362168813482934
  • Davin, K.J. 2016. Classroom dynamic assessment: a critical examination of constructs and practices. The Modern Language Journal 100: 813–29. doi: 10.1111/modl.12352
  • De Guerrero, M. and O.S. Villamil. 2000. Activating the ZPD: mutual scaffolding in L2 peer revision. The Modern Language Journal 84, no. 1: 51–68. doi: 10.1111/0026-7902.00052
  • Ellis, R. 2006. Current issues in the teaching of grammar: an SLA perspective. TESOL Quarterly 40: 83–107. doi: 10.2307/40264512
  • Ellis, R. 2012. Language Teaching Research and Language Pedagogy. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell.
  • Ellis, R., S. Loewen and R. Erlam. 2006. Implicit and explicit corrective feedback and the acquisition of L2 grammar. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 28: 339–68.
  • Erlam, R., R. Ellis and R. Batstone. 2013. Oral corrective feedback on L2 writing: two approaches compared. System 41: 257–68. doi: 10.1016/j.system.2013.03.004
  • Galperin, P.Ya. 1969. Stages in the development of mental acts. In A Handbook of Contemporary Soviet Psychology, ed. M. Cole and I. Maltzman, 249–73. New York: Basic Books.
  • Galperin, P.Ya. 1992. Organization of mental activity and the effectiveness of learning. Journal of Russian and East European Psychology 30, no. 4: 65–82.
  • Goo, J. 2012. Corrective feedback and working memory capacity in interaction-driven L2 learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 34: 445–74. doi: 10.1017/S0272263112000149
  • Iwashita, N. 2003. Negative feedback and positive evidence in task-based interaction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 25: 1–36. doi: 10.1017/S0272263103000019
  • Lantolf, J.P. 2000. Sociocultural Theory and Second Language Learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Lantolf, J.P. and M.E. Poehner. 2004. Dynamic assessment of L2 development: bringing the past into the future. Journal of Applied Linguistics 1: 49–72.
  • Lantolf, J.P. and M.E. Poehner. 2011. Dynamic assessment in the classroom: Vygotskian praxis for second language development. Language Teaching Research 15: 11–33. doi: 10.1177/1362168810383328
  • Lantolf, J.P. and M.E. Poehner. 2014. Sociocultural Theory and the Pedagogical Imperative in L2 Education: Vygotskian Praxis and the Research/Practice Divide. New York: Routledge.
  • Lantolf, J.P. and S.L. Thorne. 2006. Sociocultural Theory and the Genesis of Second Language Development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Long, M.H. 1996. The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In Handbook of Second Language Acquisition, ed. W.C. Ritchie and T.K. Bhatia, 413–68. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
  • Long, M.H. 2007. Problems in SLA. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Lyster, R. 2002. Negotiation in immersion teacher–student interaction. International Journal of Educational Research 37: 237–53. doi: 10.1016/S0883-0355(03)00003-X
  • Lyster, R. and J. Izquierdo. 2009. Prompts versus recasts in dyadic interaction. Language Learning 59: 453–98. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9922.2009.00512.x
  • Lyster, R. and L. Ranta. 1997. Corrective feedback and learner uptake: negotiation of form in communicative classrooms. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 20: 37–66. doi: 10.1017/S0272263197001034
  • Mackey, A. 2006. Feedback, noticing, and second language development: an empirical study of L2 classroom interaction. Applied Linguistics 27: 405–30. doi: 10.1093/applin/ami051
  • Mackey, A. (ed.) 2007. Conversational Interaction in Second Language Acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Mackey, A. and J. Philp. 1998. Conversational interaction and second language development: recasts, responses, and red herrings? The Modern Language Journal 82, no. 3: 338–56. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-4781.1998.tb01211.x
  • McDonough, K. 2005. Identifying the impact of negative feedback and learners’ responses on ESL question development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 27: 79–103. doi: 10.1017/S0272263105050047
  • Nassaji, H. 2009. Effects of recasts and elicitations in dyadic interaction and the role of feedback explicitness. Language Learning 59: 411–52. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9922.2009.00511.x
  • Nassaji, H. and M. Swain. 2000. A Vygotskian perspective on corrective feedback in L2: the effect of random versus negotiated help on the learning of English articles. Language Awareness 9: 34–51. doi: 10.1080/09658410008667135
  • Poehner, M.E. 2008. Dynamic Assessment: A Vygotskian Approach to Understanding and Promoting Second Language Development. Berlin: Springer.
  • Poehner, M.E. 2009. Group dynamic assessment: mediation for the L2 classroom. TESOL Quarterly 43: 471–91. doi: 10.1002/j.1545-7249.2009.tb00245.x
  • Poehner, M.E. and J.P. Lantolf. 2010. Vygotsky’s teaching-assessment dialectic and L2 education: the case for dynamic assessment. Mind, Culture, and Activity 17: 312–30. doi: 10.1080/10749030903338509
  • Poehner, M.E., J. Zhang and X. Lu. 2015. Computerized dynamic assessment C-DA: diagnosing L2 development according to learner responsiveness to mediation. Language Testing 32: 337–57. doi: 10.1177/0265532214560390
  • Rassaei, E. 2014. Scaffolded feedback, recasts, and L2 development: a sociocultural perspective. The Modern Language Journal 98: 417–31. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-4781.2014.12060.x
  • Rassaei, E. 2015. Oral corrective feedback, foreign language anxiety and L2 development. System 49: 98–109. doi: 10.1016/j.system.2015.01.002
  • Ross-Feldman, L. 2007. Interaction in the L2 classroom: does gender influence learning opportunities. In Conversational Interaction in Second Language Acquisition, ed. A. Mackey, 53–77. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Sato, M. and R. Lyster. 2012. Peer interaction and corrective feedback for accuracy and fluency development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 34: 591–626. doi: 10.1017/S0272263112000356
  • Sheen, Y. 2006. Exploring the relationship between characteristics of recasts and learner uptake. Language Teaching Research 10: 361–92. doi: 10.1191/1362168806lr203oa
  • Swain, M. 2000. The output hypothesis and beyond: mediating acquisition through collaborative dialogue. In Sociocultural Theory and Second Language Learning, ed. J.P. Lantolf, 97–114. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Swain, M. and W. Suzuki. 2008. Interaction, output, and communicative language learning. In The Handbook of Educational Linguistics, ed. B. Spolsky and F.M. Hult, 557–68. Oxford: Blackwell.
  • van Compernolle, R.A. and C. Kinginger. 2013. Promoting metapragmatic development through assessment in the zone of proximal development. Language Teaching Research 17: 282–302. doi: 10.1177/1362168813482917
  • van Compernolle, R.A. and L. Williams. 2012. Promoting sociolinguistic competence in the classroom zone of proximal development. Language Teaching Research 16, no. 1: 39–60. doi: 10.1177/1362168811423340
  • Van de Guchte, M., M. Braaksma, G. Rijlaarsdam and P. Bimmel. 2015. Learning new grammatical structures in task-based language learning: the effects of recasts and prompts. The Modern Language Journal 99: 246–62. doi: 10.1111/modl.12211
  • Vygotsky, L.S. 1978. Mind and Society: The Development of Higher Mental Processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Vygotsky, L.S. 1987. The Collected Works of L.S. Vygotsky. Volume 1. New York: Plenum.
  • Vygotsky, L.S. 1998. The problem of age. In The Collected Works of L.S. Vygotsky: Volume 5: Child Psychology, ed. R.W. Rieber, 187–206. New York: Plenum.
  • Wertsch, J.V. 1985. Vygotsky and the Social Formation of Mind. Harvard: Harvard University Press.
  • Wood, D., J.S. Bruner and G. Ross. 1976. The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 17, no. 2: 89–100. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.1976.tb00381.x
  • Yang, Y. and R. Lyster. 2010. Effects of form-focused practice and feedback on Chinese EFL students’ acquisition of regular and irregular past tense forms. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 32: 235–63. doi: 10.1017/S0272263109990519

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.