Keys issues in developing teachers’ competences for CLIL in Andalusia: training, mobility and coordination

References

• Alcaraz-Mármol, G. 2018. Trained and non-trained language teachers on CLIL methodology: teachers’ facts and opinions about the CLIL approach in the primary education context in Spain. LACLIL 11, no. 1: 39–64. doi: 10.5294/laclil.2018.11.1.3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baetens-Beardsmore, H. 2001. Foreword: the past decade and the next millenium. In Profiling European CLIL Classrooms, ed. D. Marsh, A. Maljers and A. Hartiala, 10–1. UNICOM: University of Jyväskylä and European Platform for Dutch Education.
   Google Scholar
• Ball, P. and D. Lindsay. 2010. Teacher training for CLIL in the Basque country: the case of the Ikastolas - an expediency model. In CLIL in Spain: Implementation, Results and Teacher Training, ed. D. Lasagabaster and Y. Ruiz de Zarobe, 162–87. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Banegas, D. 2012. CLIL teacher development: challenges and experiences. Latin American Journal of Content and Language Integrated Learning 5, no. 1: 46–56. Available from: https://www.unifg.it/sites/default/files/allegatiparagrafo/20-01-2014/banegas_clil_teacher_development.pdf. doi: 10.5294/laclil.2012.5.1.4
   Google Scholar
• Banegas, D. 2015. Sharing views of CLIL lesson planning in language teacher education. Latin American Journal of Content and Language Integrated Learning 8, no. 2: 104–30. doi: 10.5294/laclil.2015.8.2.3
   Google Scholar
• Bertaux, P., C.M. Coonan, M.J. Frigols and P. Mehisto. 2010. The CLIL Teacher's Competence Grid. Available from: http://lendtrento.eu/convegno/files/mehisto.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Bruton, A. 2011. Is CLIL so beneficial, or just selective? Re-evaluating some of the research. System 39, no. 4: 523–32. doi: 10.1016/j.system.2011.08.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buckingham, L. 2016. The role of language assistants in a bilingual primary school: theory, practice and recommendations. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation. University of Alcalá de Henares.
   Google Scholar
• Cabezas Cabello, J.M. 2010. A SWOT analysis of the Andalusian Plurilingualism Promotion Plan (APPP). In Proceedings of the 23rd GRETA Convention, ed. M.L. Pérez-Cañado, 83–91. Jaén: Joxman.
   Google Scholar
• Council of Europe. 2006. Plurilingual Education in Europe: 50 Years of International Cooperation. Strasbourg: Language Policy Division. Available from: awww.coe.int/t/dg4/linguistic/Source/PlurilingualEducation_EN.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Coyle, D. 2011. Post-method pedagogies: using a second or other language as a learning tool in CLIL settings. In Content and Foreign Language Integrated Learning, ed. Y. Ruiz de Zarobe, J. Sierra and F. Gallardo del Puerto, 49–74. Frankfurt-am-Main: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Coyle, D., B. Holmes and L. King. 2009. CLIL National Statement and Guidelines. The Languages Company: Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Coyle, D., P. Hood and D. Marsh. 2010. CLIL: Content and Language Integrated Learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dafouz, E. and M. Guerrini, eds. 2009. CLIL Across Educational Levels: Experiences From Primary, Secondary and Tertiary Contexts. Madrid: Santillana.
   Google Scholar
• Dafouz, E. and A. Hibler. 2013. Zip your lips or keep quiet: main teachers’ and language assistants’ classroom discourse in CLIL settings. The Modern Language Journal 97, no. 3: 654–69. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-4781.2013.12026.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delicado, G. and V. Pavón. 2016. Training primary pre-service teachers for CLIL: innovation through collaboration. Pulso 39: 35–57.
   Google Scholar
• Denzin, N.K., ed. 1970. Sociological Methods: A Source Book. Chicago: Aldine.
   Google Scholar
• Ellison, M.E. 2014. CLIL as a catalyst for developing reflective practice in foreign language teacher education. Unpublished PhD. Dissertation. University of Porto.
   Google Scholar
• Eurydice. 2006. Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) at School in Europe. Brussels: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Fernández, R. and A. Halbach. 2011. Analyzing the situation of teachers in the Madrid bilingual project after four years of implementation. In Content and Foreign Language Integrated Learning. Contributions to Multilingualism in European Contexts, ed. Y. Ruiz de Zarobe, J.M. Sierra and F. Gallardo del Puerto, 241–70. Frankfurt-am-Main: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Genesee, F. and K. Lindholm-Leary. 2008. Dual language education in Canada and the USA. In Encyclopedia of Language and Education, (2nd ed., Vol. 5: Bilingual Education) ed. N.H. Hornberger and J. Cummins, 1696–706. New York: Springer US.
   Google Scholar
• de Graaf, R., G.J. Koopman, Y. Anikina and G. Westhoff. 2007. An observation tool for effective L2 pedagogy in content and language Integrated learning (CLIL). The International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 10, no. 5: 603–24. doi: 10.2167/beb462.0
   Google Scholar
• Halbach, A. 2009. The primary school teacher and the challenges of bilingual education. In CLIL Across Educational Levels: Experiences From Primary, Secondary and Tertiary Contexts, ed. E. Dafouz and M. C. Guerrini, 19–26. Madrid: Richmond Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Halbach, A. 2010. From the classroom to university and back: teacher training for CLIL in Spain at the Universidad de Alcalá. In CLIL in Spain: Implementation, Results and Teacher Training, ed. D. Lasagabaster and Y. Ruiz de Zarobe, 243–56. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Hibler, A. 2010. Effective collaboration between native and nonnative speakers in the Spanish CLIL context: the case of language assistants in primary education. Unpublished Masters thesis. Universidad Complutense de Madrid. Available from: http://eprints.ucm.es/12796/1/Hibler_Abbie.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Hillyard, S. 2011. First steps in CLIL: training the teachers. Latin American Journal of Content & Language Integrated Learning 4, no. 2: 1–12. doi: 10.5294/laclil.2011.4.2.1
   Google Scholar
• Horrillo, Z. 2011. Formación del profesorado en el enfoque AICLE: apreciaciones informadas de la didáctica de las materias en las que el otro es experto. Un estudio de caso. In AICLE-CLIL-EMILE: Educación Plurilingüe, ed. C. Escobar, N. Evnitskaya, E. Moore and A. Patiño, 41–56. Barcelona: Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona.
   Google Scholar
• Jakonen, T. 2016. The integration of content and language in students’ task answer production in the bilingual classroom. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism (advance access), 1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Junta de Andalucía. 2005. Plan de Fomento del Plurilingüismo. Una Política Lingüística Para la Sociedad Andaluza. Seville: Consejería de Educación, Junta de Andalucía. Available from: http://cms.ual.es/idc/groups/public/@vic/@vinternacional/documents/documento/jc80302.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Junta de Andalucía. 2013. Guía Informativa Para Centros de Enseñanza Bilingüe, (2nd ed.). Sevilla: Consejería de Educación.
   Google Scholar
• Junta de Andalucía. 2017. Instrucciones Sobre la Organización y Funcionamiento de la Enseñanza Bilingüe Para el Curso 2017–18. Sevilla: Consejería de Educación.
   Google Scholar
• Kiely, R. 2011. CLIL – history and background. In Guidelines for CLIL Implementation in Primary and Pre-Primary Education, ed. S. Ioannou-Georgiou and P. Pavlou, 21–33. Brussels: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Lasagabaster, D. and A. Heras. 2015. The impact of CLIL on affective factors and vocabulary learning. Language Teaching Research 19, no. 1: 70–88. doi: 10.1177/1362168814541736
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lasagabaster, D. and Y. Ruiz de Zarobe, eds. 2010. CLIL in Spain. Implementation, Results and Teacher Training. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Llinares, A. and T. Morton. 2017. Applied Linguistics Perspectives on CLIL. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Lorenzo, F. and L. Rodríguez. 2014. Onset and expansion of L2 cognitive academic language proficiency in bilingual settings: CALP in CLIL. System 47: 64–72. doi: 10.1016/j.system.2014.09.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lorenzo, F., S. Casal and P. Moore. 2009. The effects of content and language Integrated learning in European education: key findings from the Andalusian bilingual sections evaluation project. Applied Linguistics 31, no. 3: 418–42. doi: 10.1093/applin/amp041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ludbrook, G. 2008. Developing a performance test for Italian CLIL teacher certification: examining CLIL teacher language. Studidi Glottodidattica 4: 150–69.
   Google Scholar
• Marsh, D., ed. 2002. CLIL/EMILE The European Dimension: Action, Trends and Foresight Potential. Brussels: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Marsh, D. and D. Wolff, eds. 2007. Diverse Contexts – Converging Goals: CLIL in Europe. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Marsh, D., T. Nikula, S. Takala, U. Rohiola and T. Koivisto. 1999. Language teacher training and bilingual education in Finland. Available from: http://www.celelc.org/projects/Past_Projects/TNP_Languages/TNP1_resources/SP6NatRepFI.pdf?1372922388.
   Google Scholar
• Marsh, D., P. Mehisto, D. Wolff and M. J. Frigols. 2010. The European Framework for CLIL Teacher Education. Graz: European Centre for Modern Languages.
   Google Scholar
• Mehisto, P. 2008. CLIL counterweights: recognizing and decreasing disjuncture in CLIL. International CLIL Research Journal 1, no. 1: 93–119.
   Google Scholar
• Mehisto, P. 2012a. Excellence in Bilingual Education: A Guide for School Principals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mehisto, P. 2012b. Criteria for producing CLIL learning material. Encuentro 21: 15–33.
   Google Scholar
• Mehisto, P., D. Marsh and M. Frigols. 2008. Uncovering CLIL: Content and Language Integrated Learning and Bilingual and Multilingual Education. Oxford: MacMillan-Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Méndez, M.C. and V. Pavón. 2012. Investigating the coexistence of the mother tongue and the foreign language through teacher collaboration in CLIL contexts: perceptions and practice of the teachers involved in the plurligual programme in Andalusia. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 15, no. 5: 573–92. doi: 10.1080/13670050.2012.670195
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, O. 2010. Towards quality-CLIL: successful planning and teaching strategies. Pulso 33: 11–29.
   Google Scholar
• Olivares, M. and C. Pena. 2013. How do we train our CLIL teachers? A Case Study From Alcalá University. Porta Linguarum 19: 87–99.
   Google Scholar
• Pavón, V. 2014a. Enhancing the quality of CLIL: making the best of the collaboration between language teachers and content teachers. Encuentro 23: 115–27.
   Google Scholar
• Pavón, V. and M Ellison. 2013. Examining teachers roles and competences in content and language Integrated learning (CLIL). Linguarum Arena 4: 65–78.
   Google Scholar
• Pavón, V. and M.C. Méndez. 2017. Analysing teachers’ roles regarding cross-curricular coordination in content and language integrated learning (CLIL). Journal of English Studies 15: 233–58.
   Google Scholar
• Pavón, V. and F. Rubio. 2010. Teachers’ concerns about the introduction of CLIL programmes. Porta Linguarum 14: 45–58.
   Google Scholar
• Pavón, V., J. Ávila, A. Gallego and R. Espejo. 2014b. Strategic and organisational considerations in planning CLIL: a study on the coordination between content and language teachers. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 18, no. 4: 409–25. doi: 10.1080/13670050.2014.909774
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pena, C. and M. Porto. 2008. Teacher beliefs in a CLIL education project. Porta Linguarum 10: 151–61.
   Google Scholar
• Pérez-Cañado, M.L. 2016a. From the CLIL craze to the CLIL conundrum: addressing the current CLIL controversy. Bellaterra Journal of Teaching Language and Literature 9, no. 1: 9–31. doi: 10.5565/rev/jtl3.667
   Google Scholar
• Pérez-Cañado, M.L. 2016b. Evaluating CLIL programs: instrument design and validation. Pulso 39: 79–112. Available from: https://ebuah.uah.es/dspace/handle/10017/28338.
   Google Scholar
• Pérez Cañado, M.L. and J. Ráez Padilla. 2015. Introduction and overview. In CLIL in action: Voices from the classroom, ed. D. Marsh, M .L. Pérez Cañado and J. Ráez Padilla, 1–12. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Pérez-Cañado, M.L. 2016c. Teacher training needs for bilingual education: in-service teacher perceptions. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 19, no. 3: 266–95. doi: 10.1080/13670050.2014.980778
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pérez-Cañado, M.L. 2016d. Are teachers ready for CLIL? evidence from a European study. European Journal of Teacher Education 39, no. 2: 202–21. doi: 10.1080/02619768.2016.1138104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruiz de Zarobe, Y. 2013. CLIL implementation: from policy-makers to individual initiatives. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 16, no. 3: 231–43. doi: 10.1080/13670050.2013.777383
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruiz de Zarobe, Y. and R. Jiménez. 2009. Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL): Evidence From Research in Europe. Clevendon: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Salaberri, M.S. 2010. Teacher training programs for CLIL in Andalusia. In CLIL in Spain. Implementation, Results and Teacher Training, ed. D. Lasagabaster and Y. Ruiz de Zarobe, 140–59. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Sánchez Torres, J. 2014. Los papeles que desempeñan el auxiliar de conversación y el profesor-coordinador en centros bilingües Español/Inglés de Sevilla. Un estudio empírico de casos. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation. Universidad de Sevilla.
   Google Scholar
• Scobling, C. 2011. El Auxiliar de Conversación como herramienta de motivación en la enseñanza y aprendizaje de lenguas extranjeras en la educación secundaria y bachillerato en España. Unpublished Master’s Thesis. Universidad Internacional de la Rioja (UNIR).
   Google Scholar
• Tobin, N. and C. Abello-Contesse. 2012. The use of native assistants as language and cultural resources in Andalusia's bilingual schools. In Bilingual and Multilingual Education in the XXI Century, ed. C. abolló-Contesse, P.M. Chandler, M.D. López-Jiménez and R. Chacón, 203–2030. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Tobin, N.A. and C. Abello-Contesse. 2013. The use of native assistants as language and cultural resources in Andalusias bilingual schools. In Bilingual and Multilingual Education in the 21st Century. Building on Experience, ed. C. Abello-Contesse, P. M. Chandler, M. D. López-Jiménez and R. Chacón-Beltrán, 231–55. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Wolff, D. 2002. On the importance of CLIL in the context of the debate on plurilingual education in the European Union. In CLIL/EMILE The European Dimension: Action, Trends and Foresight Potential, ed. D. Marsh, 47–8. Brussels: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Wolff, D. 2012. The European framework for CLIL teacher education. Synergies 8: 105–16.
   Google Scholar