Reassembling Gender: On the Immanent Politics of Gendering Apparatuses of Bodily Production in Science

Works Cited

• Ahmed, Sara (2002), Strange Encounters: Embodied Others in Post-Coloniality, London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ahmed, Sara (2004), The Cultural Politics of Emotion, London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Alaimo, Stacy and Susan Hekman (2008), ‘Introduction: Emerging Models of Materiality in Feminist Theory’, in Stacy Alaimo and Susan Hekman (eds), Material Feminisms, Bloomington: Indiana University Press, pp. 1–19.
   Google Scholar
• Anzaldúa, Gloria (1981), ‘Speaking in Tongues: A Letter to 3rd World Women Writers’, in Cherríe Moraga and Gloria Anzaldúa (eds), This Bridge Called My Back: Writings by Radical Women of Color, New York: Kitchen Table Press, pp. 165–174.
   Google Scholar
• Barad, Karen (1996), ‘Meeting the Universe Halfway: Realism and Social Constructivism without Contradiction’, in Lynn Hankinson Nelson and Jack Nelson (eds), Feminism, Science, and the Philosophy of Science, Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 161–194.
   Google Scholar
• Barad, Karen (2000), ‘Reconceiving Scientific Literacy as Agential Literacy’, in Roddey Reid and Sharon Traweek (eds), Doing Science and Culture, New York: Routledge, pp. 221–258.
   Google Scholar
• Barad, Karen (2007), Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning, Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barad, Karen (2010), ‘Quantum Entanglements and Hauntological Relations of Inheritance: Dis/continuities, Spacetime Enfoldings and Justice-to-Come’, Derrida Today 3:2, pp. 240–68. 10.3366/drt.2010.0206
   Google Scholar
• Butler, Judith and Elizabeth Weed (2011), ‘Introduction’, in Judith Butler and Elizabeth Weed (eds), The Question of Gender: Joan W. Scott's Critical Feminism, Bloomington: Indiana University Press, pp. 1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Cockburn, Cynthia (1981), ‘The Material of Male Power’, Feminist Review 9, pp. 41–58. 10.1057/fr.1981.19
   Google Scholar
• Delamont, Sara and Paul Atkinson (2001), ‘Doctoring Uncertainty: Mastering Craft Knowledge’, Social Studies of Science 31:1, pp. 87–107. 10.1177/030631201031001005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delphy, Christine (1980), ‘A Material Feminism Is Possible’, Feminist Review 4, pp. 79–105. 10.1057/fr.1980.8
   Google Scholar
• Felt, Ulrike and Tereza Stöckelová (2009), ‘Modes of Ordering and Boundaries That Matter in Academic Knowledge Production’, in Ulrike Felt (ed.), Knowing and Living in Academic Research, Prague: Institute of Sociology, pp. 41–124.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, Michel (1991), Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison, London: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Grosz, Elizabeth (2005), Time travels: Feminism, nature, power, Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Haraway, Donna (1988), ‘Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective’, Feminist Studies 14:3, pp. 575–99. 10.2307/3178066
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haraway, Donna (1994), ‘A Game of Cat's Cradle: Science Studies, Feminist Theory, Cultural Studies’, Configurations 2:1, pp. 59–71. 10.1353/con.1994.0009
   Google Scholar
• Haraway, Donna (1997), Modest_Witness@Second_Millenium.FemaleMan^©_Meets_OncoMouse^TM, London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Haraway, Donna (2008), hen species meet. Minneapolis: Minnesota University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hartsock, Nancy (1983), ‘The Feminist Standpoint: Developing the Ground for a Specifically Feminist Historical Materialism’, in Sandra Harding and Merrill B. Hintikka (eds), Discovering Reality: Feminist Perspectives on Epistemology, Metaphysics, Methodology, and Philosophy of Science, Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 283–310.
   Google Scholar
• Hird, Myra (2004), ‘Feminist Matters: New Materialist Considerations of Sexual Difference’, Feminist Theory 5:2, pp. 223–32. 10.1177/1464700104045411
   Google Scholar
• Hirschauer, Stefan and Annemarie Mol (1995), ‘Shifting Sexes, Moving Stories: Feminist/Constructivist Dialogues’, Science, Technology and Human Values 20:3, pp. 368–85. 10.1177/016224399502000306
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmberg, Tora (2011), ‘Mortal Love: Care Practices in Animal Experimentation’, Feminist Theory 12:2, pp. 147–63. 10.1177/1464700111404206
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Irigaray, Luce (1985), Speculum of the Other Woman, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Keller, Evelyn Fox (1983), A Feeling for the Organism: The Life and Work of Barbara McClintock, London: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Keller, Evelyn Fox (1985), Reflections on Gender and Science, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Keller, Evelyn Fox (1987), ‘The Gender/Science System’, Hypatia 2:3, pp. 37–49. 10.1111/j.1527-2001.1987.tb01340.x
   Google Scholar
• Knorr Cetina, Karin (1999), Epistemic Cultures: How the Sciences Make Knowledge, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn, Annette and AnnMarie Wolpe (1978), Feminism and Materialism: Women and Modes of Production, London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, Bruno and Steve Woolgar (1986), Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts, Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Lave, Jean and Etienne Wenger (1991), Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Law, John (1994), Organizing Modernity, Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Law, John and Marianne E. Lien (2013), ‘Slippery: Notes on Empirical Ontology’, Social Studies of Science 43:3, pp. 363–78. 10.1177/0306312712456947
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Law, John and Ingunn Moser (2003), ‘Managing, Subjectivities and Desires’, Lancaster: Centre for Science Studies, Lancaster University, at www.lancaster.ac.uk/sociology/research/publications/papers/law-moser-managing-subjectivities-desires.pdf (accessed 13 January 2008).
   Google Scholar
• Lloyd, Genevieve (1984), The Man of Reason: ‘Male’ and ‘Female’ in Western Philosophy, London: Methuen.
   Google Scholar
• Lorde, Audre (1984), Sister Outsider: Essays and Speeches by Audre Lorde, Freedom, CA: The Crossing Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lorenz-Meyer, Dagmar (2012), ‘Locating Excellence and Enacting Locality’, Science, Technology and Human Values 37:2, pp. 241–63. 10.1177/0162243911409249
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mellström, Ulf (2002), ‘Patriarchal Machines and Masculine Embodiment’, Science, Technology and Human Values 27:4, pp. 460–78. 10.1177/016224302236177
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merchant, Carolyn (1980), The Death of Nature: Women, Ecology and the Scientific Revolution, New York: HarperOne.
   Google Scholar
• Mol, Annemarie (2002), The Body Multiple: Ontology in Medical Practice, Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Morley, Louise (1999), Organising Feminisms: The Micropolitics of the Academy, New York: St. Martin's Press.
   Google Scholar
• Moser, Ingunn (2008), ‘Making Alzheimer's Disease Matter: Enacting, Interfering and Doing Politics of Nature’, Geoforum 39:1, pp. 98–110. 10.1016/j.geoforum.2006.12.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myers, Natasha (2008), ‘Molecular Embodiments and the Body-Work of Modelling in Protein Crystallography’, Social Studies of Science 38:2, pp. 163–99. 10.1177/0306312707082969
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pickering, Andrew (1995), The Mangle of Practice: Time, Agency and Science, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Polanyi, Michael (2009), The Tacit Dimension, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Probyn, Elspeth (2005), Blush: Faces of Shame, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rosser, Sue V. (2012), Breaking into the Lab: Engineering Progress for Women in Science, New York: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shore, Chris (2008), ‘Audit Culture and Illiberal Governance: Universities and the Politics of Accountability’, Anthropological Theory 8:3, pp. 278–98. 10.1177/1463499608093815
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Star, Susan Leigh (1991), ‘Power, Technology and the Phenomenology of Conventions: On Being Allergic to Onions’, in John Law (ed.), A Sociology of Monsters: Essays on Power, Technology and Domination, London: Routledge, pp. 26–56
   Google Scholar
• Stoller, Robert J. (1979), Sexual Excitement: Dynamics of Erotic Life, New York: Pantheon Books.
   Google Scholar
• Strathern, Marilyn (ed.) (2000), Audit Cultures: Anthropological Studies in Accountability, Ethics and the Academy, London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Suchman, Lucy A. (2007), Human–Machine Reconfigurations: Plans and Situated Actions, 2nd edn, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tomkins, Silvan (1963), Affect Imagery Consciousness, Volume II: The Negative Affects, New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Traweek, Sharon (1988), Beam times and life times: The World of High Energy Physicists, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tuin, Iris van der and Rick Dolphijn (2010), ‘The Transversality of New Materialism’, Women: A Cultural Review, 21:2, pp. 153–71.
   Google Scholar
• Urry, C. Megan (2008), ‘Are Photons Gendered? Women in Physics and Astronomy’, in Londa Schiebinger (ed.), Gendered Innovations in Science and Engineering, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, pp. 150–164.
   Google Scholar
• Vitellone, Nicole (2011), ‘The Science of the Syringe’, Feminist Theory 12:2, pp. 201–7. 10.1177/1464700111404282
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar