The Feel of the Feminist Network: Votes for Women after The Suffragette

Works Cited

• Bhabha, Homi (2012), ‘The World and the Home’, in Chiara Briganti and Kathy Mezei (eds), The Domestic Space Reader, Toronto: University of Toronto Press, pp. 358–62.
   Google Scholar
• Brake, Laurel (2011), ‘“Time’s Turbulence”: Mapping Journalism Networks’, Victorian Periodicals Review 44:2, pp. 115–27. doi: 10.1353/vpr.2011.0015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brennan, Teresa (2004), The Transmission of Affect, Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brooker, Peter and Andrew Thacker (2009), ‘General Introduction’, The Oxford Critical and Cultural History of Modernist Magazines: Volume 1, Britain and Ireland 1880–1955, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 1–26.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, Deborah (2009), Household Gods: The British and Their Possessions, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Colmore, Gertrude (1911), Suffragette Sally, Peterborough: Broadview Press (reprint 2008).
   Google Scholar
• Colmore, Gertrude (1913), ‘The White Cross’, Votes for Women, 5 December, p. 143.
   Google Scholar
• Crawford, Elizabeth (1999), The Women’s Suffrage Movement: A Reference Guide, 1866–1928, London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Delap, Lucy and Maria DiCenzo (2008), ‘Transatlantic Print Culture: The Anglo-American Feminist Press and Emerging “Modernities”’, in Ann Ardis and Patrick Collier (eds), Transatlantic Print Culture, 1880–1940: Emerging Media, Emerging Modernisms, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 48–65.
   Google Scholar
• DiCenzo, Maria (2003), ‘Gutter Politics: Women Newsies and the Suffrage Press’, Women’s History Review 12:1, pp. 15–33. doi: 10.1080/09612020300200345
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DiCenzo, Maria (2011), ‘Unity and Dissent: Official Organs of the Suffrage Campaign’, in Maria DiCenzo with Lucy Delap and Leila Ryan, Feminist Print Media: Suffrage, Periodicals and the Public Sphere, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 76–119.
   Google Scholar
• Eustance, Claire, Joan Ryan and Laura Ugolini (2000), A Suffrage Reader: Charting Directions in British Suffrage History, London: Leicester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fernald, Anne E. (2013), ‘Women’s Fiction, New Modernist Studies, and Feminism’, Modern Fiction Studies 59:2, pp. 229–40. doi: 10.1353/mfs.2013.0024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flatley, Jonathan (2008), Affective Mapping: Melancholia and the Politics of Modernism, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• ‘Foreword’ (1912), The Suffragette, 18 October, p. 1.
   Google Scholar
• Green, Barbara (2008), ‘Feminist Things’, in Ann Ardis and Patrick Collier (eds), Transatlantic Print Culture, 1880–1940: Emerging Media, Emerging Modernisms, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 66–79.
   Google Scholar
• Green, Barbara (2016), ‘Suffragette Celebrity at Home from Abroad: Feminist Periodicals and Transatlantic Circulation’, in Leslie Eckel and Clare Elliott (eds), The Edinburgh Companion to Atlantic Literary Studies, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, pp. 235–249.
   Google Scholar
• Green, Barbara (forthcoming), Feminist Periodicals and Daily Life: Women and Modernity in British Culture, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Harrison, Brian (1987), Prudent Revolutionaries: Portraits of British Feminists between the Wars, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hartman, Kabi (2003), ‘“What Made Me a Suffragette”: The New Woman and the New (?) Conversion Narrative’, Women’s History Review 12:1, pp. 35–50. doi: 10.1080/09612020300200346
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holton, Sandra Stanley (1986), Feminism and Democracy: Women’s Suffrage and Reform Politics in Britain, 1900–1918, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Holton, Sandra Stanley (1996), Suffrage Days: Stories from the Women’s Suffrage Movement, New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• ‘Important Statement’ (1912), The Suffragette, 18 October, p. 2.
   Google Scholar
• J. E. M. B. (1912), ‘Government Burglary at Holmwood: An Impression’, Votes for Women, 8 November, p. 90.
   Google Scholar
• Joannou, Maroula and June Purvis (1998), The Women’s Suffrage Movement: New Feminist Perspectives, Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Leys, Ruth (2011), ‘The Turn to Affect: A Critique’, Critical Inquiry 37:3, pp. 434–72. doi: 10.1086/659353
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lysack, Krista (2008), Come Buy, Come Buy: Shopping and the Culture of Consumption in Victorian Women’s Writing, Athens: Ohio University Press.
   Google Scholar
• ‘Militancy Increases’ (1913), The Suffragette, 21 February, pp. 292–3.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, Jane Eldridge (1994), Rebel Women: Feminism, Modernism and the Edwardian Novel, London: Virago.
   Google Scholar
• Morrisson, Mark (2001), The Public Face of Modernism: Little Magazines, Audiences, and Reception 1905–1920, Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, J. Stephen (2014), ‘Introduction: “Visualizing Periodical Networks”’, Journal of Modern Periodical Studies 5:1, pp. iii–xv. doi: 10.5325/jmodeperistud.5.1.0027
   Google Scholar
• Murray, Simone (2000), ‘“Deeds and Words”: The Woman’s Press and the Politics of Print’, Women: A Cultural Review 11:3, pp. 197–222.
   Google Scholar
• Norquay, Glenda and Sowon S. Park (2006), ‘Mediating Women’s Suffrage Literature’, Women’s Studies International Forum 29:3, pp. 301–6. doi: 10.1016/j.wsif.2006.04.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ‘Our Policy’ (1912), Votes for Women, 25 October, p. 56.
   Google Scholar
• Pethick Lawrence, Emmeline (1912a), ‘The Votes for Women Fellowship’, Votes for Women, 8 November, p. 82.
   Google Scholar
• Pethick Lawrence, Emmeline (1912b), ‘The Votes for Women Fellowship’, Votes for Women, 15 November, p. 98.
   Google Scholar
• Pethick Lawrence, Emmeline (1912c), ‘The Rune of Birth and Renewal’, Votes for Women, 20 December, p. 183.
   Google Scholar
• Pethick Lawrence, Emmeline (1913), ‘Militancy for Non-Militants’, Votes for Women, 7 February, p. 273.
   Google Scholar
• Pethick Lawrence, Frederick W. (1911), ‘The Home of the WSPU’, Votes for Women, 1 September, p. 766.
   Google Scholar
• Pethick Lawrence, Frederick W. (1912), ‘To Be Sold Up’, Votes for Women, 1 November, p. 73.
   Google Scholar
• Pethick Lawrence, Frederick W. (1943), Fate Has Been Kind, London: Hutchinson.
   Google Scholar
• ‘Pillar-Box Militancy’ (1912), The Suffragette, 20 December, p. 149.
   Google Scholar
• Purvis, June and Sandra Stanley Holton (2000), Votes for Women, London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Rault, Jasmine (2011), ‘Positive Affect in the Queer Americas’, Topia 25, pp. 239–49.
   Google Scholar
• Rolley, Katrina (1990), ‘Fashion, Femininity and the Fight for the Vote’, Art History 13:1, pp. 47–71. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8365.1990.tb00379.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosen, Andrew (1974), Rise Up Women! The Militant Campaign of the Women’s Social and Political Union 1903–1914, London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Talbot, Mary, Kate Charlesworth and Bryan Talbot (2014), Sally Heathcoate, Suffragette, London: Jonathan Cape.
   Google Scholar
• ‘The Capture of the Monument’ (1913), Votes for Women, 25 April, p. 425.
   Google Scholar
• ‘The General Offices of the WSPU, 4, Clement’s Inn, W.C.’ (1911), Votes for Women, 1 September, p. 767.
   Google Scholar
• ‘The Outlook’ (1912), Votes for Women, 18 October, p. 33.
   Google Scholar
• ‘The Outlook’ (1913a), Votes for Women, 4 July, p. 581.
   Google Scholar
• ‘The Outlook’ (1913b), Votes for Women, 5 December, p. 139.
   Google Scholar
• ‘The Split’ (1912), Punch, 30 October, p. 349.
   Google Scholar
• ‘Votes for Women Fellowship’ (1913), Votes for Women, 30 May, p. 503.
   Google Scholar
• Walker, Lynn (2006), ‘Locating the Global/Rethinking the Local: Suffrage Politics, Architecture, and Space’, Women’s Studies Quarterly 34:1/2, pp. 174–96.
   Google Scholar