George Sand’s Lélia: Dissecting the Crocodile

Works cited

• Anonymous (1845), ‘Modern Criticism – George Sand’, American Whig Review 1:6, pp. 617–39.
   Google Scholar
• Beauvoir, Simone de (1989), The Second Sex, trans. by H.M. Parshley, New York: Vintage Books.
   Google Scholar
• Bergman-Carton, Janis (1995), The Woman of Ideas in French Art, 1830–1848, New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dijkstra, Sandra (1992), Flora Tristan: Feminism in the Age of George Sand, London: Pluto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dougherty, Tom (2013), ‘Sex, Lies, and Consent’, Ethics 123, pp. 717–44. doi: 10.1086/670249
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eastwood, Jonathan (2007), ‘Bourdieu, Flaubert, and the Sociology of Literature’, Sociological Theory 25:2, pp. 149–69. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9558.2007.00302.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emerson, Ralph Waldo (1904), ‘Considerations by the Way’, in The Complete Works of Ralph Waldo Emerson, Vol. 6, Boston: Houghton, Mifflin and Company, pp. 245–78.
   Google Scholar
• Espinosa, Maria (1978), ‘Introduction’, George Sand, Lélia, trans. by Maria Espinosa, Bloomington: Indiana University Press, pp. xi–xxi.
   Google Scholar
• Falk, Patricia (1998), ‘Rape by Fraud and Rape by Coercion’, Brooklyn Law Review 64, pp. 39–180.
   Google Scholar
• Foerster, Maxime A. (2012), ‘French Romanticism and the Reinvention of Love’, PhD thesis, University of Michigan.
   Google Scholar
• Foerster, Maxime (2018), The Politics of Love: Queer Heterosexuality in Nineteenth-Century French Literature, Durham, NH: University of New Hampshire Press.
   Google Scholar
• Freud, Sigmund (1959), ‘Creative Writers and Day-dreaming’ [1908], in The Standard Edition of the Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, trans. by James Strachey, Vol. 9, London: Hogarth Press, pp. 141–53.
   Google Scholar
• Harkness, Nigel (2005), ‘Resisting Realist Petrification in George Sand’s Lélia and Balzac’s Sarrasine’, French Studies 59:2, pp. 159–72. doi: 10.1093/fs/kni136
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Irigaray, Luce (1985), Speculum of the Other Woman, trans. by Gillian C. Gill, Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Larochelle, Therese (1992), ‘Lélia: George Sand’s Iconoclastic Vita Sancta’, George Sand Studies 11:1&2, pp. 14–21.
   Google Scholar
• Leconte, Frantz Antoine (1996), La Tradition de L'ennui Splénétique en France de Christine de Pisan à Baudelaire, New York: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Lukács, Georg (1973), The Theory of the Novel, trans. by Anna Bostock, Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• McPhee, Peter (1993), A Social History of France, 1780–1880, London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Maier, Sarah E. (2004), ‘Trivialized Female Idealism and Valourized Male Realism: The Importance of Being George’, Canadian Review of Comparative Literature /Revue Canadinne de Litterature Comparée CRCL/RCLC 31:3, pp. 267–85.
   Google Scholar
• Mathias, Manon (2010), ‘“Apprendre à voir:” The quest for insight in George Sand’s novels’, PhD thesis, University of Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Mathias, Manon (2016), Vision in the Novels of George Sand, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Merrick, Jeffrey and Ragan, Bryant T. (eds) (1996), Homosexuality in Modern France, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Naginski, Isabelle (1991), George Sand: Writing for her Life, New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Naginski, Isabelle (1992), ‘Lélia and Sand’s Feminine Sublime’, George Sand Studies 11:1&2, pp. 3–13.
   Google Scholar
• Poggioli, Renato (1968), The Theory of the Avant-Garde, trans. by Gerald Fitzgerald, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Richards, Sylvie L.F. (1997), ‘Re-defining Idyllic Love: George Sand’s Indiana as a Righting of Bernardin de Saint-Pierre’s Paul et Virginie,’ in Servanne Woodward (ed.), Altered Writings Followed by Public Space of the Domestic Sphere, London, Ontario: Mestengo Press, pp. 64–83.
   Google Scholar
• Rubenfeld, Jed (2012–2013), ‘The Riddle of Rape-by-Deception and the Myth of Sexual Autonomy’, Yale Law Journal 122:6, pp. 1372–443.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sand, George (1847), Letters of a Traveller, trans. by Eliza A. Ashurst, London: E. Churton.
   Google Scholar
• Sand, George (1978), Lélia, trans. by Maria Espinosa, Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schor, Naomi (1988), ‘Idealism in the Novel: Recanonizing Sand’, Yale French Studies 75, pp. 56–73. doi: 10.2307/2930307
   Google Scholar
• Schor, Naomi (1989), ‘Lélia and the Failures of Allegory’, L'Esprit Créateur 29:3, pp. 76–83. doi: 10.1353/esp.1989.0005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sivert, Eileen Boyd (1981), ‘Lélia and Feminism’, Yale French Studies 62, pp. 45–66. doi: 10.2307/2929893
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, Chloë (2015), ‘Female Sexual Dysfunction, Feminist Sexology, and the Psychiatry of the Normal’, Feminist Studies 41:2, pp. 259–92. doi: 10.15767/feministstudies.41.2.259
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• West, Anthony (1973), Mortal Wounds, New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Wettlaufer, Alexandra K. (2016), ‘George Sand, George Eliot, and the Politics of Difference’, The Romanic Review 107:1–4, pp. 77–102.
   Google Scholar