Red Rag Magazine, Feminist Economics and the Domestic Labour Pains of Liberation

Works Cited

• Alexander, Sally and Sue O'Sullivan (1975a), ‘Sisterhood Under Stress’, Red Rag 8, pp. 18–20.
   Google Scholar
• Andrews, Geoff (2004), Endgames and New Times: The Final Years of British Communism, 1964–1991, London: Lawrence and Wishart.
   Google Scholar
• Barker, Drucilla K. and Susan F. Feiner (2004), Liberating Economics: Feminist Perspectives on Families, Work and Globalization, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bauhardt, Christine and Wendy Harcourt (2018), Feminist Political Ecology and the Economics of Care: In Search of Economic Alternatives, London: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Benton, Sarah (1976b), ‘Dear Red Rag’, Red Rag 11, p. 31.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, Pierre (1979), Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste, trans. Richard Nice, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, Pierre (2017), The Rules of Art: Genesis and Structure of the Literary Field [1996], trans. Susan Emanuel, Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bracke, Maud Anne (2013), ‘Between the Transnational and the Local: Mapping the Trajectories and Contexts of the Wages for Housework Campaign in 1970s Italian Feminism’, Women’s History Review 22:4, pp. 625–642.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bubeck, Diemut Elisabet (1995), Care, Gender and Justice, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, Beatrix (2010–2013), interviewed by Margaretta Jolly, Sisterhood and After: The Women’s Liberation Oral History Project. British Library Sound & Moving Image Catalogue reference C1420/01, transcript p.56/track 3. © The British Library and The University of Sussex.
   Google Scholar
• Clay, Catherine (2016), ‘“The Modern Weekly for the Modern Woman”: Time and Tide, Feminism and Interwar Print Culture’, Women: A Cultural Review 27:4, pp. 397–411.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cowley [later O’Sullivan], Sue (1972b), ‘Eclectic but not Dialectic’, Red Rag 2, pp. 6–7.
   Google Scholar
• Davidson, Ruth (2020), ‘Family Politics: Campaigning for Child Benefits in the 1980s’, Twentieth Century British History 21:1, pp. 101–124.
   Google Scholar
• Delap, Lucy (2016), ‘Feminist Bookshops, Reading Cultures and the Women’s Liberation Movement in Britain, c. 1974–2000’, History Workshop Journal 81:1, pp. 171–196.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delmar, Rosalind (2020), ‘Introduction’, available at the Amiel Melburn Trust Internet Archive at http://banmarchive.org.uk/collections/redrag/index_frame.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Diani, Mario and Donatella della Porta (2006), Social Movements: An Introduction, Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• DiCenzo, Maria with Alexis Motuz (2016), ‘Politicizing the Home: Welfare Feminism and the Feminist Press in Interwar Britain’, Women: A Cultural Review 27:4, pp. 378–396.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DiCenzo, Maria with Lucy Delap and Leila Ryan (2011), Feminist Media History: Suffrage, Periodicals and the Public Sphere, Basingstoke: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Feigenbaum, Anna (2013), ‘Written in the Mud: (Proto) Zine-making and Autonomous Media at the Greenham Common Peace Camp’, Feminist Media Studies 13:1, pp. 1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Fell, Alison and Angela Weir (1973a), ‘The State the Family is in’, Red Rag 4, pp. 13–15.
   Google Scholar
• Ferber, Marianne A. and Julie A. Nelson (1993), Beyond Economic Man: Feminist Theory and Economics, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fleming, Suzie (1973b), ‘We Want Some Money of Our Own’, Red Rag 4, pp. 16–17.
   Google Scholar
• Folbre, Nancy and Julie A. Nelson (2000), ‘For Love or Money—Or Both?’, The Journal of Economic Perspectives 14:4, pp. 123–140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forster, Laurel (2016), ‘Spreading the Word: Feminist Print Cultures and the Women’s Liberation Movement’, Women’s History Review 25:5, pp. 812–831.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fraser, Nancy (2013), Fortunes of Feminism: From State-Managed Capitalism to Neoliberal Crisis, London, New York: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, Caroline (1973c), ‘When is a Wage Not a Wage’, Red Rag 5, pp. 16–18.
   Google Scholar
• Gardiner, Becky (8 June 2012), ‘A Life in Writing: Selma James’, available on the Guardian Comment is Free website at https://www.theguardian.com/books/2012/jun/08/life-in-writing-selma-james (viewed August 2020).
   Google Scholar
• Green, Barbara (2016), ‘The Feel of a Feminist Network: Votes for Women After the Suffragette’, Women: A Cultural Review 27:4, pp. 259–377.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henderson, Roberta (1991), interviewed by Margot Farnham, Observing the 1980s Oral History Project. British Library Sound and Moving Image Catalogue Reference C456/110, part 6 of 9. © The British Library.
   Google Scholar
• Himmelweit, Susan (ed.) (2000), Inside the Household: From Labour to Care, Basingstoke: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Hughes, Celia (2015), Young Lives on the Left: Sixties Activism and the Liberation of the Self, Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, Ben (2019), ‘Free Markets and Feminism: The Neo-Liberal Defence of the Male Breadwinner Model in Britain, c. 1980–1997’, Women’s History Review 28:2, pp. 297–316.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James, Selma (1973), ‘Women, the Unions and Work or … What Is not To Be Done’ available on Caring Labor: An Archive at https://caringlabor.wordpress.com/2010/08/14/selma-james-women-the-unions-and-work-or-what-is-not-to-be-done/ (viewed August 2020).
   Google Scholar
• Jolly, Margaretta (2019), Sisterhood and After: An Oral History of the UK’s Women’s Liberation Movement, 1968-Present, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jordan, Tessa (2010), ‘Branching Out: Second-Wave Feminist Periodicals and the Archive of Canadian Women’s Writing’, ESC: English Studies in Canada 36:1, pp. 63–90.
   Google Scholar
• Knight, Laura (1972b), ‘Ruby Loftus Screwing a Breech Ring’, Red Rag 2, p. 7.
   Google Scholar
• Malos, Ellen (ed.) (1980), The Politics of Housework, London: Allison & Busby Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Messac, Luke (2018), ‘Outside the Economy: Women’s Work and Feminist Economics in the Construction and Critique of National Income Accounting’, Journal of Imperial and Commonwealth History 46:3, pp. 552–578.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mullen, Carol (1972b), ‘What is Definitely Not to Be Done’, Red Rag 2, pp. 14–18.
   Google Scholar
• Murray, Simone (2004), ‘The Cuala Press: Women, Publishing, and the Conflicted Genealogies of “Feminist Publishing”’, Women’s Studies International Forum 27:5-6, pp. 489–506.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ‘Office Girls Eating Lunch Near Crown Zellerback Building’ (1972b), Red Rag 2, p. 8.
   Google Scholar
• O’Sullivan, Sue (1976b), ‘Dear Sisters’, Red Rag 11, p. 28.
   Google Scholar
• O’Sullivan, Sue (1976b), ‘Dear Red Rag’, Red Rag 11, pp. 29–30.
   Google Scholar
• Powell, Manushag N. (2011), ‘Afterword: We Other Periodicalists, or, why Periodical Studies?’, Tulsa Studies in Women’s Literature 30:2, pp. 441–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Red Rag Collective (1972a), ‘Editorial’, Red Rag 1, p. 2.
   Google Scholar
• Red Rag Collective (1972b), ‘Editorial’, Red Rag 2, p. 2.
   Google Scholar
• Red Rag Collective (1973b), ‘At Work’, Red Rag 4, p. 2.
   Google Scholar
• Red Rag Collective (1974a), ‘Editorial’, Red Rag 6, p. 2.
   Google Scholar
• Red Rag Collective (1974b), ‘Editorial’, Red Rag 7, p. 2.
   Google Scholar
• Red Rag Collective (1975a), ‘Editorial, Red Rag 8, p. 2.
   Google Scholar
• Red Rag Collective (1977a), ‘Editorial’, Red Rag 12, pp. 2–4.
   Google Scholar
• Rowbotham, Sheila (1972b), ‘The Carrot, the Stick and the Movement’, Red Rag 2, pp. 4–5.
   Google Scholar
• Rowbotham, Sheila (2019), Promise of a Dream: Remembering the Sixties, London and New York: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Saunders, Caroline and Paul Dalziel (2017), ‘Twenty-Five Years of Counting for Nothing: Waring’s Critique of National Accounts’, Feminist Economics 23:2, pp. 200–218.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Setch, Eve (2002), ‘The Face of Metropolitan Feminism: The London Women’s Liberation Workshop 1969–1979’, Twentieth-Century British History 13:2, pp. 171–190.
   Google Scholar
• Sjöö, Monica (1972b), ‘Women, Claimants Unions and the Cohabitation Ruling’, Red Rag 2, pp. 20–1.
   Google Scholar
• Southwick, Casssandra (1972b), ‘A Summary of Selma James’ Pamphlet “Women, the Unions and Work”’, Red Rag 2, p. 3.
   Google Scholar
• Stevenson, George (2019), The Women’s Liberation Movement and the Politics of Class in Britain, London and New York: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Stoller, Sarah (2018), ‘Forging a Politics of Care: Theorizing Household Work in the British Women’s Liberation Movement', History Workshop Journal 85:2, pp. 95–119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toupin, Louise (2018), Wages for Housework: A History of an International Feminist Movement, 1972–77, Vancouver: Pluto and University of British Columbia Press.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, Jenny (2011), ‘As Many Pairs of Shoes as She Likes’, London Review of Books 33, 15 December, p. 24.
   Google Scholar
• Victor, Michelene née Wandor (1972), ‘Fuzzy Feminism’, Red Rag 2, pp. 12–13.
   Google Scholar
• Victor, Ivan (1974), ‘Woman’s Lib Make Man Do the Housework’, Red Rag 7, p. 27.
   Google Scholar
• Vogel, Lise (2000), ‘Domestic Labor Revisited’, Science and Society 64:2, pp. 151–170.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wandor, Michelene (1990), Once A Feminist: Stories of Generations, London: Virago.
   Google Scholar
• Waring, Marilyn (1999), Counting for Nothing: What Men Value and What Women are Worth [1988], 2nd ed. North Sydney: Allen & Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• Waters, Melanie (2016), ‘“Yours in Struggle”: Bad Feelings and Revolutionary Politics in Spare Rib’, Women: A Cultural Review 27:4, pp. 446–465.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weeks, Kathi (2011), The Problem with Work: Feminism, Marxism, Antiwork and Postwork Imaginaries, Durham and London: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar