Fempreneurs and Digital Feminist Publishing

Works Cited

• Andrejevic, Mark, John Banks, John Edward Campbell, Nick Couldry, Adam Fish, Alison Hearn and Laurie Oulette (2014), ‘Participations: Dialogues on the Participatory Promise of Contemporary Culture and Politics’, International Journal of Communication 8, pp. 1089–106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Åström, Joachim and Martin Karlsson (2016), ‘The Feminine Style, the Male Influence, and the Paradox of Gendered Political Blogspace’, Information, Communication and Society 19:11, pp. 1636–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balka, Ellen (1993), ‘Women’s Access to Online Discussions About feminism’, Electronic Journal of Communications / La revue electronique de communication 3, p. 1, at http://www.cios.org/www/ejc/v3n193.htm (accessed 4 April 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Banet-Weiser, Sarah (2018), Empowered: Popular Feminism and Popular Misogyny, Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Banet-Weiser, Sarah and Kate M. Miltner (2015), ‘#MasculinitySoFragile: Culture, Structure, and Networked Misogyny’, Feminist Media Studies 16:1, pp. 171–4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banet-Weiser, Sarah and Laura Portwood-Stacer (2017), ‘The Traffic in Feminism: An Introduction to the Commentary and Criticism on Popular feminism’, Feminist Media Studies 7:5, pp. 884–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baxter, Holly and Rhiannon Lucy Cosslett (2014), The Vagenda: A Zero Tolerance Guide to the Media, London: Square Peg.
   Google Scholar
• ‘(B)logging off: Feministing forever’ (2019), Feministing, at http://feministing.com/2019/12/08/blogging-off-feministing-forever/ (accessed 26 February 2020).
   Google Scholar
• Chasmar, Jessica (2016), ‘Guardian Columnist Quits Twitter over “Rape and Death Threat” Against 5-Year-old Daughter’, The Washington Times, 27 July, at https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/jul/27/jessica-valenti-guardian-columnist-quits-twitter-o/ (accessed 28 February 2020).
   Google Scholar
• Citron, Danielle (2014), Hate Crimes in Cyberspace, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Conill, Raul Ferrer (2016), ‘Camouflaging Church as State’, Journalism Studies 17:7, pp. 904–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deacon, David, Michael Pickering, Peter Golding and Graham Murdock (1999), Researching Communications: A Practical Guide to Methods in Media and Cultural Analysis, London: Arnold.
   Google Scholar
• DeVault, Marjorie L. and Glenda Gross (2012), ‘Feminist Qualitative Interviewing: Experience, Talk, and Knowledge’, in Sharlene Hesse-Biber (ed.), Handbook of Feminist Research: Theory and Praxis, 2nd edn, London: Sage, pp. 206–35.
   Google Scholar
• Dever, Maryanne (2017), ‘Archives and New Modes of Feminist Research’, Australian Feminist Studies 32:91–92, pp. 1–4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DiCenzo, Maria, Lucy Delap and Leila Ryan (2011), Feminist Media History: Suffrage, Periodicals and the Public Sphere, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Dikwal-Bot, Diretnan (2018), ‘A Qualitative Study of Gender Representation, Inequality and Resistance on Nigerian Female Blogs’, PhD thesis, University of Leicester.
   Google Scholar
• Duffy, Brooke Erin (2016), ‘The Romance of Work: Gender and Aspirational Labour in the Digital Culture industries’, International Journal of Cultural Studies 19:4, pp. 441–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eichhorn, Kate (2010), ‘D.I.Y. Collectors, Archiving Scholars, and Activist Librarians: Legitimizing Feminist Knowledge and Cultural Production Since 1990’, Women’s Studies 39:6, pp. 622–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisenstein, Hester (2005), ‘A Dangerous Liaison?: Feminism and Corporate Globalization’, Science & Society 69:3, pp. 487–518.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eveleigh, Alexandra (2014), ‘Crowding out the Archivist? Locating Crowdsourcing Within the Broader Landscape of Participatory archives’, in Mia Ridge (ed.), Crowdsourcing Our Cultural Heritage, Farnham: Ashgate Publishing, pp. 211–12.
   Google Scholar
• Faludi, Susan (1992), Backlash: The Undeclared War Against Women, London: Chatto and Windus.
   Google Scholar
• Falzon, Mark-Anthony (2009), Multi-Sited Ethnography: Theory, Praxis and Locality in Contemporary Research, Surrey: Ashgate Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• FAQ (2020), ‘Frequently Asked Questions’, Feministing, at http://feministing.com/frequently-asked-questions/ (accessed 2 March 2020).
   Google Scholar
• ‘Farewell to the Establishment’ (2019), The Establishment, at https://theestablishment.co/farewell-from-the-establishment/index.html (accessed 25 February 2020).
   Google Scholar
• Farrell, Amy Erdman (1998), Yours in Sisterhood: Ms Magazine and the Promise of Popular Feminism, Chapel Hill and London: The University of North Carolina Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fotopoulou, Aristea (2016), Feminist Activism and Digital Networks: Between Empowerment and Vulnerability, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Fraser, Nancy (2009), ‘Feminism, Capitalism, and the Cunning of History’, New Left Review 56, March/April at https://newleftreview.org/issues/ii56/articles/nancy-fraser-feminism-capitalism-and-the-cunning-of-history.
   Google Scholar
• Friedman, Elisabeth J (2017), Interpreting the Internet: Feminist and Queer Counterpublics in Latin America, Oakland: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fuchs, Christian and Sebastian Sevignani (2013), ‘What Is Digital Labour? What Is Digital Work? What’s Their Difference? And Why Do These Questions Matter for Understanding Social Media?’, Journal for a Global Sustainable Information Society 11, p. 2, at https://www.triple-c.at/index.php/tripleC/article/view/461 (accessed 14 July 2016).
   Google Scholar
• Geiger, Brigitte and Margit Hauser (2012), ‘Archiving Feminist Grassroots Media’, in Elke Zobl and Ricarda Drueke (eds), Feminist Media: Participatory Spaces, Networks and Cultural Citizenship, Bielefeld: Transcript Verlag, pp. 73–86.
   Google Scholar
• Gill, Rosalind (2016), ‘Post-Postfeminism?: New Feminist Visibilities in Postfeminist times’, Feminist Media Studies 16:4, pp. 610–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gill, Rosalind (2017), ‘The Affective, Cultural and Psychic Life of Postfeminism: A Postfeminist Sensibility 10 Years on’, European Journal of Cultural Studies 20:6, pp. 606–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldberg, Emma (2019), ‘A Farewell to Feministing and the Heyday of Feminist Blogging', New York Times, 8 December.
   Google Scholar
• Goldberg, Michelle (2015), ‘Feminist Writers are so Besieged by Online Abuse that Some Have Begun to Retire’, The Washington Post, 20 February, at https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/online-feminists-increasingly-ask-are-the-psychic-costs-too-much-to-bear/2015/02/19/3dc4ca6c-b7dd-11e4-a200-c008a01a6692_story.html (accessed 27 February 2020).
   Google Scholar
• Goldman, Robert, Deborah Heath and Sharon L. Smith (2009), ‘Commodity Feminism’, Critical Studies in Mass Communication 8:3, pp. 333–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goring, Elisabeth S (2002), ‘Suffragette Jewellery in Britain’, The Journal of Decorative Arts Society 1850—the Present 26, pp. 84–99.
   Google Scholar
• Hammad, Hannah and Anthea Taylor (2015), ‘Introduction: Feminism and Contemporary Celebrity culture’, Celebrity Studies 6:1, pp. 124–7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han, Xiao (2018), ‘Searching for an Online Space for Feminism? The Chinese Feminist Group Gender Watch Women’s Voice and Its Changing Approaches to Online Misogyny’, Feminist Media Studies 18:4, pp. 734–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harp, Dustin and Mark Tremayne (2006), ‘The Gendered Blogosphere: Examining Inequality Using Network and Feminist Theory’, Journal of Mass Communication Quarterly 83:2, pp. 247–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harvey, Alison (2019), Feminist Media Studies, Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jane, Emma J (2017), Misogyny Online: A Short (and Brutish) History, London, Thousand Oaks and New Delhi: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• King, Leslie and Julianne Busa (2017), ‘When Corporate Actors Take Over the Game: The Corporatization of Organic, Recycling and Breast Cancer Activism’, Social Movement Studies 16:5, pp. 549–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kozinets, Robert V. (2019), Netnography: The Essential Guide to Qualitative Social Media Research, London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Kuehn, Kathleen and Thomas F. Corrigan (2013), ‘Hope Labor: The Role of Employment Prospects in Online Social Production’, The Political Economy of Communication 1, p. 1, at https://www.polecom.org/index.php/polecom/article/view/9 (accessed 4 May 2016).
   Google Scholar
• Loza, Susana (2014), ‘Hashtag Feminism, #SolidarityIsForWhiteWomen, and the Other #FemFuture’, Ada: A Journal of Gender, New Media and Technology 5, at http://adanewmedia.org/2014/07/issue5-loza/.
   Google Scholar
• Lumsden, Karen and Heather Morgan (2017), ‘Media Framing of Trolling and Online Abuse: Silencing Strategies, Symbolic Violence, and Victim blaming’, Feminist Media Studies 17:6, pp. 926–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lurker, Trish (2019), ‘Women into Print: Feminist Presses in Australia’, in Michelle Arrow and Angela Woollacott (eds), Everyday Revolutions: Remaking Gender, Sexuality -and Culture in 1970s Australia, Canberra: ANU Press, pp. 121–38.
   Google Scholar
• MacLure, Maggie (2013), ‘The Wonder of Data’, Cultural Studies ↔ Critical Methodologies 13:4, pp. 228–32.
   Google Scholar
• Mahtani, Shibabi and Regine Cabato (2019), ‘Why Crafty Internet Trolls in the Philippines may be Coming to a Website Near You’, The Washington Post, at https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/asia_pacific/why-crafty-internet-trolls-in-the-philippines-may-be-coming-to-a-website-near-you/2019/07/25/c5d42ee2-5c53-11e9-98d4-844088d135f2_story.html (accessed 28 February 2020).
   Google Scholar
• Mendes, Kaitlynn (2011), ‘The Lady is a Closet Feminist!: Discourses of Backlash and Postfeminism in British and American Newspapers’, International Journal of Cultural Studies 14:6, pp. 1–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mendes, Kaitlynn (2015), SlutWalk: Feminism, Activism & Media, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Mendes, Kaitlynn, Katia Belisário and Jessica Ringrose (2019a), ‘Digitized Narratives of Rape: Disclosing Sexual Violence Through Pain Memes’, in Ulrika Andersson, Monika Edgren, Lena Karlsson and Gabriella Nilsson (eds), Rape Narratives in Motion, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 171–97.
   Google Scholar
• Mendes, Kaitlynn, Jessica Ringrose and Jessalynn Keller (2019b), Digital Feminist Activism: Girls and Women Fight Back Against Rape Culture, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Menon, Ritu (2001), ‘Dismantling the Master’s House … : The Predicament of Feminist Publishing and Writing Today’, Australian Feminist Studies 16:35, pp. 175–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mercer, John (2009), ‘Shopping for Suffrage: the Campaign Shops of the Women’s Social and Political Union’, Women’s History Review 18:2, pp. 293–309.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moseley, Rachel and Helen Wheatley (2008), ‘Is Archiving a Feminist Issue? Historical Research and the Past, Present, and Future of Television Studies’, Cinema Journal 47:3, pp. 152–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moss, Rachel (2014), ‘The Feminist Times To Close After Just 12 Months - Here's Why', Huffington Post, 14 July, at https://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/2014/07/14/feminist-times-spare-rib-magazine-close_n_5584591.html
   Google Scholar
• Munro, Elasaid (2013), ‘Feminism: A Fourth Wave?’ The Political Studies Association, at http://www.psa.ac.uk/insight-plus/feminism-fourth-wave (accessed 4 December 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Murray, Simone (2004), Mixed Media: Feminist Presses and Publishing Politics, London: Pluto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Novoselova, Veronika and Jennifer Jenson (2019), ‘Authorship and Professional Digital Presence in Feminist blogs’, Feminist Media Studies 19:2, pp. 257–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Núñez Puente, Sonia, Sergio D’Antonio Maceiras and Diana Fernández Romero (2019), ‘Twitter Activism and Ethical Witnessing: Possibilities and Challenges of Feminist Politics Against Gender-Based Violence’, Social Science Computer Review, at https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439319864898 (accessed 1 March 2020).
   Google Scholar
• Penny, Laurie (2013), Cybersexism: Sex, Gender and Power on the Internet, London: Bloomsbury Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Piepmeier, Alison (2009), Girl Zines: Making Media, Doing Feminism, New York and London: NYU Press.
   Google Scholar
• Poland, Bailey (2016), Cybersexism in the 21st Century, Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
   Google Scholar
• Postill, John and Sarah Pink (2012), ‘Social Media Ethnography: The Digital Researcher in a Messy Web’, Media International Australia 145, pp. 123–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powell, Anastasia and Nicola Henry (2017), Sexual Violence in a Digital Age, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Raven, Charlotte (2014), ‘Feminist Times: My Feminist Times’ Journey’, The Feminist Times, at http://archive.feministtimes.com/my-feminist-times-journey/ (Accessed 23 November 2017).
   Google Scholar
• Rivers, Nicola (2017), Postfeminism(s) and the Arrival of the Fourth Wave: Turning Tides, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Rubin, Herbert J. and Irene S. Rubin (2005), Qualitative Interviewing: The Art of Hearing Data, 2nd edn, London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Shaw, Frances (2012), ‘“Hottest 100 Women”: Cross-Platform Discursive Activism in Feminist Blogging Networks’, Australia Feminist Studies 27:74, pp. 373–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaw, Adrienne (2014), ‘The Internet is Full of Jerks Because the World is Full of Jerks: What Feminist Theory Teaches Us About the Internet’, Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies 11:3, pp. 273–7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Submissions (n.d.), The Vagenda, at http://vagendamagazine.com/submissions/ (accessed 27 February 2017).
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, Anthea (2016), Celebrity and the Feminist Blockbuster, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Thelandersson, Fredrika (2014), ‘A Less Toxic Feminism: Can the Internet Solve the Age Old Question of How to Put Intersectional Theory Into Practice?’, Feminist Media Studies 14:3, pp. 527–30.
   Google Scholar
• Withers, Deborah M (2015), Feminism, Digital Culture and the Politics of Transmission: Theory, Practice and Cultural Heritage, London: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Write for Us (2001–2018), The F-Word, at https://thefword.org.uk/write-for-us/ (accessed 27 November 2017).
   Google Scholar
• Young, Elizabeth (1989), ‘The Business of Feminism: Issues in London Feminist Publishing’, Frontiers: A Journal of Women Studies 10:3, pp. 1–5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, Stacey (1997), Discourse, Politics and the Feminist Movement, London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Zeisler, Andi (2016), We Were Feminists Once: From Riot Grrrl to Covergirl, The Buying and Selling of a Political Movement, New York: Public Affairs.
   Google Scholar
• Zobl, Elske and Ricarda Drueke (2012), Feminist Media: Participatory Spaces, Networks and Cultural Citizenship, Germany: Transcript.
   Google Scholar