Objectionable ObjectivityFootnote¹

1. I believe credit must go to Sir Frederick Dainton for first suggesting in 1971 that it is possible for scientists to be ‘objective to an objectionable degree’.

: A Review Article

References

• Alexander , R. 1984 . “ ‘Innovation and continuity in the initial education curriculum’ ” . In Change in Teacher Education: Context and Provision since Robbins , Edited by: Alexander , R. , Craft , M. and Lynch , J. London : Holt Reinhart and Winston .
   Google Scholar
• Alexander , R. 1992 . Policy and Practice in Primary Education , London : Routledge .
   Google Scholar
• Alexander , R. , Rose , J. and Woodhead , C. 1992 . Curriculum Organisation and Classroom Practice in Primary Schools: A Discussion Paper , London : Department of Education and Science .
   Google Scholar
• Adelman , C. and Alexander , R. 1987 . “ ‘The integrity of evaluation’ ” . In Evaluating Education , Edited by: Murphy , R. and Torrance , H. London : PCP .
   Google Scholar
• David , T. , Curtis , A. and Siraj‐Blatchford , I. 1992 . Effective Teaching in The Early Years: Fostering Children's Learning in Nurseries and in Infant Classes , Stoke‐on‐Trent : Trentham Books .
   Google Scholar
• Giddens , A. 1991 . Modernity and Self‐Identify: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age , Polity Press .
   Google Scholar
• Hargreaves , A. ‘Changing Teachers, Changing Times’ . Paper presented at WCEAC . Canada.
   Google Scholar
• National Curriculum Council . 1993 . The National Curriculum at Key Stages 1 and 2 , York : NCC .
   Google Scholar
• Office for Standards in Education . 1993 . Curriculum Organisation and Classroom Practice: A follow‐up report , London : DFE Publications .
   Google Scholar
• Palmer , J. and Stevenson , R. 1992 . Review of Policy and Practice in Primary Education . British Journal of Educational Studies , XXXX ( 4 ) November 1992 By Robin Alxander.
   Google Scholar