Rethinking the disclosure debates: a situational analysis of the multiple meanings of human biomonitoring data

References

• Albertini, R., M. Bird, N. Doerrer, L. Needham, S. Robison, L. Sheldon, and H. Zenick. 2006. “The Use of Biomonitoring Data in Exposure and Human Health Risk Assessments.” Environmental Health Perspectives 114(11): 1755–1762.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altman, R. G., R. Morello-Frosch, J. G. Brody, R. A. Rudel, P. Brown, and M. Averick. 2008. “Pollution Comes Home and Gets Personal: Women’s Experience of Household Chemical Exposure.” Health and Social Behavior 49: 417–435.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bredenoord, A. L., N. C. Onland-Moret, and J. J. M. Van Delden. 2011. “Feedback of Individual Genetic Results to Research Participants: In Favor of a Qualified Disclosure Policy.” Human Mutation 32(8): 861–867.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brody, J. G., R. Morello-Frosch, P. Brown, R. A. Rudel, R. G. Altman, M. Frye, C. Osimo, C. Perez, and L. Seryak. 2007. “‘Is It Safe’: New Ethics for Reporting Personal Exposures to Environmental Chemicals.” American Journal of Public Health 97(9): 1547–1554.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, P. 2007. Toxic Exposures: Contested Illness and the Environmental Health Movement. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, P., R. Morello-Frosch, J. G. Brody, R. G. Altman, R. A. Rudel, L. Senier, C. Perez, and R. Simpson. 2010. “Insitutional Review Board Challenges Related to Community-based Participatory Research on Human Exposure to Environmental Toxins: A Case Study.” Environmental Health 9(39).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buck, A. J., J. E. Vena, B. M. McGuinness, M. A. Cooney, and G. Louis. 2010. “Communicating Serum Chemical Concentrations to Study Participants: Follow Up Survey.” Environmental Health 9(20).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caux, C., D. J. Roy, L. Guilbert, and C. Viau. 2007. “Anticipating the Ethical Aspects of the Use of Biomarkers in the Workplace. A Tool for Stakeholders.” Social Science and Medicine 65(2): 344–354.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke, A. 2005. Situational Analysis: Grounded Theory After the Postmodern Turn. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, A. E. 2003. “Situational Analyses: Grounded Theory Mapping After the Postmodern Turn.” Symbolic Interaction 26(4): 553–576.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke, A. E. 2009. “From Grounded Theory to Situational Analysis: What’s New? Why? How?” In Developing Grounded Theory: The Second Generation, edited by J. M. Morse, P. N. Stern, J. Corbin, B. Bowers, A. Clarke and K. Charmaz, 194–221. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.
   Google Scholar
• Deck, W., and T. Kosatsky. 1999. “Communicating Their Individual Results to Participants in an Environmental Exposure Study: Insights from Clinical Ethics.” Environmental Research 80(2): S223–S229.
   Google Scholar
• Espeland, W. N., and M. L. Stevens. 2008. “A Sociology of Quantification.” European Journal of Sociology/Archives Européennes de Sociologie 49(3): 401–436.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foster, W. G., and J. Agzarian. 2007. “Reporting Results of Biomonitoring Studies.” Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry 387(1): 137–140.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foster, M. W., J. J. Mulvihill, and R. R. Sharp. 2009. “Evaluating the Utility of Personal Genomic Information.” Genetics in Medicine 11(8): 570–574.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallagher, J. E., E. A. C. Hubal, and S. W. Edwards. 2010. “Biomarkers for Environmental Exposure.” In Biomarkers: In Medicine, Drug Discovery, and Environmental Health, edited by V. S. Vaidya and J. V. Bonventre, 517–547. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Grosse, S. D., and M. J. Khoury. 2006. “What is the clinical utility of genetic testing?” Genetics in Medicine 8(7): 448–450.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haines, D. A., T. E. Arbuckle, E. Lye, M. Legrand, M. Fisher, R. Langlois, and W. Fraser. 2011. “Reporting Results of Human Biomonitoring of Environmental Chemicals to Study Participants: A Comparison of Approaches Followed in Two Canadian Studies.” Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 65: 191–198.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison, M. 2007. “Applying Bioethical Principles to Human Biomonitoring.” Environmental Health 7 (Supplement 1 S8).
   Google Scholar
• Hedgecoe, A. 2008. “From Resistance to Usefulness: Sociology and the Clinical Use of Genetic Tests.” BioSocieties 3(2): 183–194.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LaKind, J. S., L. L. Aylward, C. Brunk, S. DiZio, M. Dourson, D. A. Goldstein, M. E. Kilpatrick, et al. 2008. “Guidelines for the Communication of Biomonitoring Equivalents: Report from the Biomonitoring Equivalents Expert Workshop.” Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology 51(3): S16–S26.
   Google Scholar
• Morello-Frosch, R., J. G. Brody, P. Brown, R. G. Altman, R. A. Rudel, and C. Perez. 2009. “Toxic Ignorance and Right-to-Know in Biomonitoring Results Communication: A Survey of Scientists and Study Participatns.” Environmental Health 8(6).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morello-Frosch, R., P. Brown, J. G. Brody, R. G. Altman, R. A. Rudel, A. Zota, and C. Perez. 2011. “Experts, Ethics, and Environmental Justice: Communicating and Contesting Results from Personal Exposure Science.” In Technoscience and Environmental Justice: Expert Cultures in a Grassroots Movement, edited by G. Ottinger and B. R. Cohen, 93–118. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council. 2006. Human Biomonitoring for Environmental Chemicals. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Needham, L. L. 2008. “Introduction to Biomonitoring.” Journal of Chemical Health and Safety 15(6): 5–7.
   Google Scholar
• Ravitsky, V., and B. S. Wilfond. 2006. “Disclosing Individual Genetic Results to Research Participants.” The American Journal of Bioethics 6(6): 8–17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sexton, K., L. Needham, and J. Pirkle. 2004. “Human Biomonitoring of Environmental Chemicals.” American Scientist 92: 38–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smart, A. 2006. “A Multi-dimensional Model of Clinical Utility.” International Journal for Quality in Health Care 18(5): 377–382.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strauss, A. L. 1987. Qualitative Analysis for Social Scientists. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Strauss, A. L., and J. Corbin. 1998. Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, B. L., D. B. Barr, J. M. Wright, B. Buckley, and M. S. Magsumbol. 2008. “Interpretation of Biomonitoring Data in Clinical Medicine and the Exposure Sciences.” Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology 233: 76–80.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, S. E., E. R. Baker, A. C. Leonard, M. H. Eckman, and B. P. Lanphear. 2010. “Understanding Preferences for Disclosing of Individual Biomarker Results among Participants in a Longitudinal Birth Cohort.” Journal of Medical Ethics 36: 736–740.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, N., M. D. McClean, P. Brown, A. Aschengrau, and T. F. Webster. 2009. “Participant Experiences in a Breastmilk Biomonitoring Study: A Qualitative Assessment.” Environmental Health 8(4).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar