886
Views
18
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Papers

The injecting ‘event’: harm reduction beyond the human

Pages 337-349 | Received 30 Mar 2016, Accepted 07 Feb 2017, Published online: 07 Mar 2017

References

  • Ahmed, S. (2004). The cultural politics of emotion. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
  • Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.10.1215/9780822388128
  • Barad, K. (2012). On touching: The inhuman that therefore I am. Differences: A Journal of Feminist Cultural Studies, 23, 206–223. doi:10.1215/10407391-1892943
  • Bergschmidt, V. B. (2004). Pleasure, power and dangerous substances: Applying Foucault to the study of ‘heroin dependence’ in Germany. Anthropology and Medicine, 11, 59–73. doi:10.1080/1364847042000204915
  • Bøhling, F. (2014). Crowded contexts: On the affective dynamics of alcohol and other drug use in nightlife spaces. Contemporary Drug Problems, 41, 361–392. doi:10.1177/009145091404100305
  • Bourgois, P. (2000). Disciplining addictions: The bio-politics of methadone and heroin in the United States. Culture, Medicine & Psychiatry, 24, 165–195. doi:10.1023/A:1005574918294
  • Braidotti, R. (2013). The posthuman. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  • Crawford, A. (2010). If ‘the body keeps the score’: Mapping the dissociated body in trauma narrative, intervention, and theory. University of Toronto Quarterly, 79, 702–719. doi:10.1353/utq.2010.0231
  • Deleuze, G. (1990). The logic of sense. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
  • Deleuze, G. (1993). The fold: Leibniz and the Baroque. London: Bloomsbury.
  • Deleuze, G. (2004). Difference and repetition. London: Bloomsbury.
  • Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (2004). A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia. London: Continuum.
  • Demant, J. (2009). When alcohol acts: An Actor-network approach to teenagers, alcohol and parties. Body & Society, 15, 25–46. doi:10.1177/1357034x08100145
  • Dennis, F. (2016a). Encountering “Triggers”: Drug-body-world entanglements of injecting drug use. Contemporary Drug Problems, 43, 126–141. doi:10.1177/0091450916636379
  • Dennis, F. (2016b). Drugs: Bodies becoming “normal”. M/C Journal. Retrieved from http://journal.media-culture.org.au/index.php/mcjournal/article/view/1073
  • Dilkes-Frayne, E. (2014). Tracing the “Event” of drug use: “Context” and the coproduction of a night out on MDMA. Contemporary Drug Problems, 41, 445–479. doi:10.1177/009145091404100308
  • Duff, C. (2007). Towards a theory of drug use contexts: Space, embodiment and practice. Addiction Research & Theory, 15, 503–519. doi:10.1080/16066350601165448
  • Duff, C. (2012). Accounting for context: Exploring the role of objects and spaces in the consumption of alcohol and other drugs. Social & Cultural Geography, 13, 145–159. doi:10.1080/14649365.2012.655765
  • Duff, C. (2013). The social life of drugs. International Journal of Drug Policy, 24, 167–172. doi:10.1016/j.drugpo.2012.12.009
  • Duff, C. (2014). Assemblages of health: Deleuze’s empiricism and the ethology of life. New York, NY: Springer.10.1007/978-94-017-8893-9
  • Duff, C. (2016). Assemblages, territories, contexts. International Journal of Drug Policy, 33, 15–20. doi:10.1016/j.drugpo.2015.10.003
  • Dwyer, R., Fraser, S., & Treloar, C. (2011). Doing things together? Analysis of health education materials to inform hepatitis C prevention among couples. Addiction Research and Theory, 19, 352–361. doi:10.3109/16066359.2011.562619
  • Erickson, P., Riley, D., Cheung, Y., & O’Hare, P. (1997). Harm reduction: A new direction for drug policies and programs. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.10.3138/9781442657533
  • Ezard, N. (2001). Public health, human rights and the harm reduction paradigm: From risk reduction to vulnerability reduction. International Journal of Drug Policy, 12, 207–219. doi:10.1016/S0955-3959(01)00093-7
  • Farrugia, A. (2015). ‘You can’t just give your best mate a massive hug every day’: young men, play and MDMA. Contemporary Drug Problems, 42, 240–256. doi:10.1177/0091450915601520
  • Fraser, M. (2011). Facts, ethics and event. In C. Bruun Jensen & K. Rödje (Eds.), Deleuzian intersections: Science, technology, anthropology (pp. 55–83). Oxford, New York: Berghahn Books.
  • Fraser, S. (2004). ‘It’s your life!’: Injecting drug users, individual responsibility and hepatitis C prevention. Health: An Interdisciplinary Journal for the Social Study of Health, Illness and Medicine, 8, 199–221. doi:10.1177/1363459304041070
  • Fraser, S. (2006). The chronotope of the queue: Methadone maintenance treatment and the production of time, space and subjects. International Journal of Drug Policy, 17, 192–202. doi:10.1016/j.drugpo.2006.02.010
  • Fraser, S. (2013). The missing mass of morality: A new fitpack design for hepatitis C prevention in sexual partnerships. International Journal of Drug Policy, 24, 212–219. doi:10.1016/j.drugpo.2013.03.009
  • Fraser, S., Rance, J., & Treloar, C. (2016). Hepatitis C prevention and convenience: Why do people who inject drugs in sexual partnerships ‘run out’ of sterile equipment? Critical Public Health, 26, 294–306. doi:10.1080/09581596.2015.1036839
  • Fraser, S., & Seear, K. (2011). Making disease, making citizens: The politics of hepatitis C. Farnham: Ashgate.
  • Fraser, S., Treloar, C., Bryant, J., & Rhodes, T. (2014). Hepatitis C prevention education needs to be grounded in social relationships. Drugs: Education, Prevention and Policy, 21, 88–92. doi:10.3109/09687637.2013.776517
  • Fraser, S., & Valentine, K. (2006). ‘Making blood flow’: Materializing blood in body modification and blood-borne virus prevention. Body & Society, 12, 97–119. doi:10.1177/1357034x06061191
  • Fraser, S., & Valentine, K. (2008). Substance and substitution: Methadone subjects in liberal societies. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9780230582569
  • Gomart, E., & Hennion, A. (1999). A sociology of attachment: Music amateurs, drug users. In J. Law & J. Hassard (Eds.), Actor network theory and after (pp. 220–248). Oxford: Blackwell/Sociological Review.
  • Haraway, D. J. (2008). When species meet. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
  • Harris, M., & Rhodes, T. (2013). Methadone diversion as a protective strategy: The harm reduction potential of ‘generous constraints’. International Journal of Drug Policy, 24, e43–e50. doi:10.1016/j.drugpo.2012.10.003
  • Hathaway, A. D. (2001). Shortcomings of harm reduction: Toward a morally invested drug reform strategy. International Journal of Drug Policy, 12, 125–137. doi:10.1016/S0955-3959(01)00085-8
  • Heather, N., Wodak, A., Nadelmann, E., & O’Hare, P. (Eds.). (1993). Psychoactive drugs and harm reduction: From faith to science. London: Whurr.
  • Hunt, N. (2004). Public health or human rights: What comes first? International Journal of Drug Policy, 15, 231–237. doi:10.1016/j.drugpo.2004.02.001
  • Jürgens, R. J., Csete, J. J., Amon, S., Baral, C., & Beyrer, C. (2010). People who use drugs, HIV, and human rights. The Lancet, 376, 475–485. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60830-6
  • Keane, H. (2003). Critiques of harm reduction, morality and the promise of human rights. International Journal of Drug Policy, 14, 227–232. doi:10.1016/S0955-3959(02)00151-2
  • Kerr, T., Wood, E., Betteridge, G., Lines, R., & Jürgens, R. (2004). Harm reduction in prisons: A ‘rights based analysis’. Critical Public Health, 14, 1–16. doi:10.1080/09581590400027478
  • Latour, B. (2004). Why has critique run out of steam? From matters of fact to matters of concern. Critical Inquiry, 30, 225–248. doi:10.1086/421123
  • Lury, C., & Wakeford, N. (2012). Inventive methods: The happening of the social. London: Routledge.
  • Malinowska-Sempruch, K., & Gallagher, S. (Eds.). (2004). War on drugs, HIV/AIDS and human rights. New York, NY: The International Debate Education Association.
  • Malins, P. (2004). Machinic assemblages: Deleuze, Guattari and an ethico-aesthetics of drug use. Janus Head, 7, 84–104. Retrieved from http://www.janushead.org/7-1/malins.pdf
  • Martin, A., Myers, N., & Viseu, A. (2015). The politics of care in technoscience. Social Studies of Science, 45, 625–641. doi:10.1177/0306312715602073
  • McLean, K. (2011). The biopolitics of needle exchange in the United States. Critical Public Health, 21, 71–79. doi:10.1080/09581591003653124
  • Michael, M. (2015). Ignorance and the epistemic choreography of method. In M. Gross & L. McGoey (Eds.), Routledge International Handbook of Ignorance Studies (pp. 84–92). London: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.
  • Michael, M., & Rosengarten, M. (2012). Medicine: Experimentation, politics, emergent bodies. Body & Society, 18, 1–17. doi:10.1177/1357034X12451860
  • Miller, P. G. (2001). A critical review of the harm minimization ideology in Australia. Critical Public Health, 11, 167–178. doi:10.1080/09581590110039865
  • Mol, A. (2010). Actor-network theory: Sensitive terms and enduring tensions. Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, 50, 253–269. Retrieved from http://dare.uva.nl/document/2/90295
  • Moore, D., & Fraser, S. (2006). Putting at risk what we know: Reflecting on the drug-using subject in harm reduction and its political implications. Social Science & Medicine, 62, 3035–3047. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.11.067
  • Mugford, S. (1993). Harm reduction: Does it lead where its proponents imagine? In N. Heather, A. Wodak, E. Nadelmann, & P. O’Hare (Eds.), Psychoactive drugs and harm reduction: From faith to science (pp. 21–34). London: Whurr.
  • O’Hare, P., Newcombe, R., Matthews, A., Buning, E., & Drucker, E. (Eds.). (1991). The reduction of drug-related harm. London: Routledge.
  • O’Malley, P., & Valverde, M. (2004). Pleasure, freedom and drugs: The uses of ‘pleasure’ in liberal governance of drug and alcohol consumption. Sociology, 38, 25–42. doi:10.1177/0038038504039359
  • Poulsen, M. (2015). Embodied subjectivities: Bodily subjectivity and changing boundaries in post-human alcohol practices. Contemporary Drug Problems, 42, 3–19. doi:10.1177/0091450915569499
  • Puig de la Bellacasa, M. (2011). Matters of care in technoscience: Assembling neglected things. Social Studies of Science, 41, 85–106. doi:10.1177/0306312710380301
  • Race, K. (2014). Complex events: Drug effects and emergent causality. Contemporary Drug Problems, 41, 301–334. doi:10.1177/009145091404100303
  • Race, K. (2015). ‘Party and Play’: Online hook-up devices and the emergence of PNP practices among gay men. Sexualities, 18, 253–275. doi:10.1177/1363460714550913
  • Release. (2016). Drug policy in the UK and its intersection with international human rights. Submission to the office of the high commissioner for human rights from Release. Retrieved from http://www.release.org.uk/sites/default/files/pdf/publications/Release%20submision%20on%20drug%20policy%20in%20the%20UK%20-%20OHCHR%20final.pdf
  • Rhodes, T. (2002). The ‘risk environment’: A framework for understanding and reducing drug-related harm. International Journal of Drug Policy, 13, 85–94. doi:10.1016/S0955-3959(02)00007-5
  • Rhodes, T. (2009). Risk environments and drug harms: A social science for harm reduction approach. International Journal of Drug Policy, 20, 193–201. doi:10.1016/j.drugpo.2008.10.003
  • Rhodes, T., Singer, M., Bourgois, P., Friedman, S. R., & Strathdee, S. A. (2005). The social structural production of HIV risk among injecting drug users. Social Science & Medicine, 61, 1026–1044. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.12.024
  • Rumbold, G., Kellehear, A., & Hamilton, M. (Eds.). (1998). Drug use in Australia: A harm minimisation approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Seear, K., & Moore, D. (2014). Complexity: Researching alcohol and other drugs in a multiple world. Contemporary Drug Problems, 41, 295–300. doi:10.1177/009145091404100302
  • Stagoll, C. (2010). Event. In A. Parr (Ed.), The Deleuze dictionary (revised ed., pp. 89–91). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
  • Stengers, I., & Ralet, O. (1997). Drugs: Ethical choice or moral consensus. In I. Stengers (Ed.), Power and invention: Situating science (pp. 215–232). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
  • Stevens, A. (2011). Drug policy, harm and human rights: A rationalist approach. International Journal of Drug Policy, 22, 233–238. doi:10.1016/j.drugpo.2011.02.003
  • Tarr, J., & Thomas, H. (2011). Mapping embodiment: Methodologies for representing pain and injury. Qualitative Research, 11, 141–157. doi:10.1177/1468794110394067
  • UNAIDS. (2015). Do no harm: Health, human rights and people who use drugs. Retrieved from http://www.unaids.org/sites/default/files/media_asset/donoharm_en.pdf
  • Vargas, E. V. (2010). Tarde on drugs, or measure against suicide. In M. Candea (Ed.), The social after Gabriel Tarde: Debates and assessments (pp. 208–230). London: Routledge.
  • Wintour, P. (2015, July 29). Obese people and drug users who refuse treatment could have benefits cut. The Guardian. Retrieved from http://www.theguardian.com/society/2015/jul/29/benefits-drugs-alcohol-obesity-refusing-treatment-review

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.