Technologies of the self in public health: insights from public deliberations on cognitive and behavioural enhancement

References

• Bell, S., Partridge, B., Lucke, J., & Hall, W. (2013). Australian University students’ attitudes towards the acceptability and regulation of pharmaceuticals to improve academic performance. Neuroethics, 6, 197–205.10.1007/s12152-012-9153-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blaxter, M. (1997). Whose fault is it? People’s own conceptions of the reasons for health inequalities. Social Science & Medicine, 44, 747–756.10.1016/S0277-9536(96)00192-X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boenink, M., Swierstra, T., & Stemerding, D. (2010). Anticipating the interaction between technology and morality: A scenario study of experimenting with humans in bionanotechnology. Studies in Ethics, Law, and Technology, 4, 1941–6008.
   Google Scholar
• Calnan, M., Montaner, D., & Horne, R. (2005). How acceptable are innovative health-care technologies? A survey of public beliefs and attitudes in England and Wales. Social Science & Medicine, 60, 1937–1948.10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.08.058
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeSantis, A., Noar, S. M., & Webb, E. M. (2010). Speeding through the frat house: A qualitative exploration of nonmedical ADHD stimulant use in fraternities. Journal of Drug Education, 40, 157–171.10.2190/DE.40.2.d
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dijkstra, A. M., & Schuijff, M. (2016). Public opinions about human enhancement can enhance the expert-only debate: A review study. Public Understanding of Science, 25, 588–602.10.1177/0963662514566748
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans-Brown, M., McVeigh, J., Perkins, C., & Bellis, M. A. (2012). Human enhancement drugs: The emerging challenges to public health. Liverpool: North West Public Health Observatory.
   Google Scholar
• Forlini, C., & Racine, E. (2012). Stakeholder perspectives and reactions to “academic” cognitive enhancement: Unsuspected meaning of ambivalence and analogies. Public Understanding of Science, 21, 606–625.10.1177/0963662510385062
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, J. (2014). What kind of research does public health need? Critical Public Health, 24, 249–252.10.1080/09581596.2014.917813
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hotze, T. D., Shah, K., Anderson, E. E., & Wynia, M. K. (2011). “Doctor, would you prescribe a pill to help me … ?” A national survey of physicians on using medicine for human enhancement. The American Journal of Bioethics, 11, 3–13.10.1080/15265161.2011.534957
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehoux, P., Gauthier, P., Williams-Jones, B., Miller, F. A., Fishman, J. J., Hivon, H., & Vachon, P. (2014). Examining the ethical and social issues of health technology design through the public appraisal of prospective scenarios: A study protocol describing a multimedia-based deliberative method. Implementation Science, 9, 81. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-9-81
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehoux, P., Jimenez-Pernett, J., Miller, F. A., & Williams-Jones, B. (2016). Assessment of a multimedia-based prospective method to support public deliberations on health technology design: Participant survey findings and qualitative insights. BMC Health Services Research, 16, 616. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1870-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lucke, J., & Partridge, B. (2013). Towards a smart population: A public health framework for cognitive enhancement. Neuroethics, 6, 419–427.10.1007/s12152-012-9167-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lupton, D. (2013). Quantifying the body: Monitoring and measuring health in the age of mHealth technologies. Critical Public Health, 23, 393–403.10.1080/09581596.2013.794931
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall, C., & Rossman, G. B. (2011). Designing qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Millington, B. (2016). ‘Quantify the invisible’: Notes toward a future of posture. Critical Public Health, 26, 405–417.10.1080/09581596.2015.1085960
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Outram, S. M., & Racine, E. (2011). Developing public health approaches to cognitive enhancement: An analysis of current reports. Public Health Ethics, 4, 93–105.10.1093/phe/phr006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Partridge, B. J., Bell, S. K., Lucke, J. C., Yeates, S., & Hall, W. D. (2011). Smart drugs “as common as coffee”: Media hype about neuroenhancement. Plos One, 6, e28416.10.1371/journal.pone.0028416
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Racine, E., Waldman, S., Rosenberg, J., & Illes, J. (2010). Contemporary neuroscience in the media. Social Science & Medicine, 71, 725–733.10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.05.017
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rock, M. J., Degeling, C., & Blue, G. (2014). Toward stronger theory in critical public health: Insights from debates surrounding posthumanism. Critical Public Health, 24, 337–348.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schelle, K. J., Faulmüller, N., Caviola, L., & Hewstone, M. (2014). Attitudes toward pharmacological cognitive enhancement: A review. Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, 8, 1–14.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stemerding, D., Swierstra, T., & Boenink, M. (2010). Exploring the interaction between technology and morality in the field of genetic susceptibility testing: A scenario study. Futures, 42, 1133–1145.10.1016/j.futures.2009.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Street, J., Duszynski, K., Krawczyk, S., & Braunack-Mayer, A. (2014). The use of citizens’ juries in health policy decision-making: A systematic review. Social Science & Medicine, 109, 1–9.10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.03.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swierstra, T., & Rip, A. (2007). Nano-ethics as NEST-ethics: Patterns of moral argumentation about new and emerging science and technology. NanoEthics, 1, 3–20.10.1007/s11569-007-0005-8
   Google Scholar
• Thoer, C., & Robitaille, M. (2011). Utiliser des médicaments stimulants pour améliorer sa performance: usages et discours de jeunes adultes québécois [Using stimulant drugs to improve one’s performance: uses and discourses of young adults in Quebec]. Drogues, santé et société, 10, 143–183.10.7202/1013481ar
   Google Scholar