‘It would have control over me instead of me having control’: intrauterine devices and the meaning of reproductive freedom

References

• Aiken, A. R. A., Borrero, S., Callegari, L. S., & Dehlendorf, C. (2016). Rethinking the pregnancy planning paradigm: Unintended conceptions or unrepresentative concepts? Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 48, 147–151. doi:10.1363/48e10316
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (2009). ACOG committee opinion no. 450: Increasing use of contraceptive implants and intrauterine devices to reduce unintended pregnancy. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 114, 1434–1438.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (2012). ACOG committee opinion no. 539: Adolescents and long-acting reversible contraception: Implants and intrauterine devices. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 120, 983–988.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Amico, J. R., Bennett, A. H., Karasz, A., & Gold, M. (2016). ‘She just told me to leave it’: Women’s experiences discussing early elective IUD removal. Contraception, 94, 357–361. doi:10.1016/j.contraception.2016.04.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnett, M. J., Thorpe, R. J., Gaskin, D. J., Bowie, J. V., & LaVeist, T. A. (2016). Race, medical mistrust, and segregation in primary care as usual source of care: Findings from the exploring health disparities in integrated communities study. Journal of Urban Health, 93, 456–467. doi:10.1007/s11524-016-0054-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asker, C., Stokes-Lampard, H., Wilson, S., & Beavan, J. (2006). What is it about intrauterine devices that women find unacceptable? Factors that make women non-users: A qualitative study. Journal of Family Planning and Reproductive Health Care, 32, 89–94.10.1783/147118906776276170
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borrero, S., Nikolajski, C., Steinberg, J. R., Freedman, L., Akers, A. Y., Ibrahim, S., & Schwarz, E. B. (2015). ‘It just happens’: A qualitative study exploring low-income women’s perspectives on pregnancy intention and planning. Contraception, 91, 150–156. doi:10.1016/j.contraception.2014.09.014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (1999). Ten great public health achievements–United States, 1900–1999. MMWR. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 48, 241.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Colen, S. (1995). ‘Like a mother to them’: Stratified reproduction and West Indian childcare workers and employers in New York. In F. D. Ginsburg & R. Rapp (Eds.), Conceiving the new world order: The global politics of reproduction (pp. 78–102). Berkeley and Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dehlendorf, C., Ruskin, R., Grumbach, K., Vittinghoff, E., Bibbins-Domingo, K., Schillinger, D., & Steinauer, J. (2010). Recommendations for intrauterine contraception: A randomized trial of the effects of patients’ race/ethnicity and socioeconomic status. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 203, 319.e1–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dehlendorf, C., Fox, E., Sobel, L., Borrero, S., Akers, A. Y., Ibrahim, S., & Schwarz, E. B. (2016). Patient-centered contraceptive counseling: Evidence to inform practice. Current Obstetrics and Gynecology Reports, 5, 55–63. doi: 10.1007/s13669-016-0139-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Downey, M. M., Arteaga, S., Villaseñor, E. V., & Gomez, A. M. (in press). More than a destination: Contraceptive decision-making as a journey. Women’s Health Issues. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2017.03.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finer, L. B., & Zolna, M. R. (2016). Declines in unintended pregnancy in the United States, 2008–2011. New England Journal of Medicine, 374, 843–852. doi:10.1056/NEJMsa1506575
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frost, J. J., & Lindberg, L. D. (2013). Reasons for using contraception: Perspectives of US women seeking care at specialized family planning clinics. Contraception, 87, 465–472. doi:10.1016/j.contraception.2012.08.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geronimus, A. T. (2003). Damned if you do: Culture, identity, privilege, and teenage childbearing in the United States. Social Science & Medicine, 57, 881–893.10.1016/S0277-9536(02)00456-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gomez, A. M., & Clark, J. B. (2014). The relationship between contraceptive features preferred by young women and interest in IUDs: An exploratory analysis. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 46, 157–163. doi:10.1363/46e2014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gomez, A. M., Fuentes, L., & Allina, A. (2014). Women or LARC first? Reproductive autonomy and the promotion of long-acting reversible contraceptive methods. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 46, 171–175. doi:10.1363/46e1614
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gomez, A. M., Hartofelis, E. C., Finlayson, S., & Clark, J. B. (2015). Do knowledge and attitudes regarding intrauterine devices predict interest in their use? Women’s Health Issues, 25, 359–365. doi:10.1016/j.whi.2015.03.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gubrium, A. C., Mann, E. S., Borrero, S., Dehlendorf, C., Fields, J., Geronimus, A. T., … Gómez, A. M. (2016). Realizing reproductive health equity needs more than long-acting reversible contraception (LARC). American Journal of Public Health, 18–19. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2015.302900
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, K. S., Ela, E., Zochowski, M. K., Caldwell, A., Moniz, M., McAndrew, L., … Ernst, S. (2016). ‘I don’t know enough to feel comfortable using them’: Women’s knowledge of and perceived barriers to long-acting reversible contraceptives on a college campus. Contraception, 93, 556–564. doi:10.1016/j.contraception.2016.02.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammer, K. 2015. An act to create a contraceptive incentive for Medicaid beneficiaries; and for other purposes. HB1868. State of Arkansas and 90th General Assembly.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, L. H., & Wolfe, T. (2014). Stratified reproduction, family planning care and the double edge of history. Current Opinion in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 26, 539–544. doi:10.1097/gco.0000000000000121
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Health Resources and Services Administration. n.d. Women’s preventive services: Required health plan coverage guidelines. Retrieved July 6, 2016, from http://www.hrsa.gov/womensguidelines/
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, A. V., Karasek, D., Dehlendorf, C., & Foster, D. G. (2016). Racial and ethnic differences in women’s preferences for features of contraceptive methods. Contraception, 93, 406–411. doi:10.1016/j.contraception.2015.12.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, C. G. 2013. Female inmates sterilized in California prisons without approval. The Center for Investigative Reporting. Retrieved February 12, 2014, from http://cironline.org/reports/female-inmates-sterilized-california-prisons-without-approval-4917
   Google Scholar
• Johnson-Hanks, J. A., Bachrach, C. A., Morgan, S. P., & Kohler, H.-P. (2011). Understanding family change and variation: Toward a theory of conjunctural action. New York, NY: Springer Science & Business Media.10.1007/978-94-007-1945-3
   Google Scholar
• Kavanaugh, M. L., Jerman, J., & Finer, L. B. (2015). Changes in use of long-acting reversible contraceptive methods among U.S. women, 2009–2012. Obstetrics & Gynecology, 126, 917–927. doi:10.1097/aog.0000000000001094
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lessard, L. N., Karasek, D., Ma, S., Darney, P., Deardorff, J., Lahiff, M., … Foster, D. G. (2012). Contraceptive features preferred by women at high risk of unintended pregnancy. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 44, 194–200. doi:10.1363/4419412
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Littlejohn, K. E. (2013). ‘It’s those pills that are ruining me’: Gender and the social meanings of hormonal contraceptive side effects. Gender & Society, 27, 843–863. doi:10.1177/0891243213504033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• López, I. O. (2008). Matters of choice: Puerto Rican women’s struggle for reproductive freedom. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Luker, K. (1978). Taking chances: Abortion and the decision not to contracept. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Luker, K. (1999). A reminder that human behavior frequently refuses to conform to models created by researchers. Family Planning Perspectives, 31, 248–249.10.2307/2991574
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mann, E. S. (2013). Regulating Latina youth sexualities through community health centers: Discourses and practices of sexual citizenship. Gender & Society, 27, 681–703. doi:10.1177/0891243213493961
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, E. (1990). The woman in the body: A cultural analysis of reproduction. Boston, MA: Beacon Press Books.
   Google Scholar
• May, E. T. (2010). America and the pill: A history of promise, peril, and liberation. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Modern wonders: The age of the thing. 1993. The Economist, 329, 87–91.
   Google Scholar
• Mosher, W. D., & Jones, J. (2010). Use of contraception in the United States: 1982–2008. Vital and Health Statistics, 23(29), 1–44.
   Google Scholar
• Ott, M. A., Sucato, G. S., & Committee on Adolescence (2014). Contraception for adolescents. Pediatrics, 134, e1244–e56. doi:10.1542/peds.2014-2299
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rice, C. 2017. The Trump effect? IUD visits rise after election. Athena Health. Retrieved April 14, 2017, from https://insight.athenahealth.com/trump-effect-iud-visits-rise-after-election
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, L., & Kaplan, D. (2016). Locating LARC within the context of sexual and reproductive justice. American Journal of Public Health, 106, e13–e14. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2016.303206
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sawhill, I. V. (2014). Generation unbound: Drifting into sex and parenthood without marriage. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sisson, G. (2012). Finding a way to offer something more: Reframing teen pregnancy prevention. Sexuality Research and Social Policy, 9, 57–69. doi:10.1007/s13178-011-0050-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sister Song Women of Color Reproductive Justice Collective, and National Women’s Health Network. (2016). Long-acting reversible contraception statement of principles. Retrieved April 14, 2017, from https://www.nwhn.org/advocacy-issue-long-acting-reversible-contraceptives-larcs/
   Google Scholar
• Sonfield, A. (2017). What is at stake with the federal contraceptive coverage guarantee? Guttmacher Policy Review, 20, 8–11.
   Google Scholar
• Stern, A. M. (2005). Sterilized in the name of public health: Race, immigration, and reproductive control in modern California. American Journal of Public Health, 95, 1128–1138. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2004.041608
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevens, L. M. (2015). Planning parenthood: Health care providers’ perspectives on pregnancy intention, readiness, and family planning. Social Science & Medicine, 139, 44–52. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.06.027
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takeshita, C. (2012). The global biopolitics of the IUD: How science constructs contraceptive users and women’s bodies. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thorburn, S., & Bogart, L. M. (2005). African American women and family planning services: Perceptions of discrimination. Women & Health, 42, 23–39.10.1300/J013v42n01_02
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tone, A. (2001). Devices and desires: A history of contraceptives in America. New York, NY: Hill and Wang.
   Google Scholar
• White, K., Hopkins, K., Potter, J. E., & Grossman, D. (2013). Knowledge and attitudes about long-acting reversible contraception among Latina women who desire sterilization. Women’s Health Issues, 23, e257–e263. doi:10.1016/j.whi.2013.05.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar