Prioritisation of targets for weed biological control I: a review of existing prioritisation schemes and development of a system for South Africa

References

• Barton, J., Fowler, S. V., Gianotti, A. F., Winks, C. J., De Beurs, M., Arnold, G. C., & Forrester, G. (2007). Successful biological control of mist flower (Ageratina riparia) in New Zealand: Agent establishment, impact and benefits to the native flora. Biological Control, 40(3), 370–385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2006.09.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bebawi, F., Campbell, S., & Stanley, T. (2002). Priority lists for weed research in the wet-and dry-tropics of north Queensland. Plant Protection Quarterly, 17(2), 67–73.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, B. M., & Van Sittert, L. (2019). Historicising perceptions and the national management framework for invasive alien plants in South Africa. Journal of Environmental Management, 229, 174–181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.07.029
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blackburn, T. M., Essl, F., Evans, T., Hulme, P. E., Jeschke, J. M., Kühn, I., Kumschick, S., Markova, Z., Mrugała, A., & Nentwig, W. (2014). A unified classification of alien species based on the magnitude of their environmental impacts. PLoS Biology, 12(5), e1001850. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001850
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Briese, D. (2003). The centrifugal phylogenetic method used to select plants for host-specificity testing of weed biological control agents: Can and should it be modernised?. In H. Spafford Jacob & D. T. Briese (Eds.), Improving the selection, testing and evaluation of weed biological control agents (pp. 23–33). CRC Technol. Ser. No. 7.
   Google Scholar
• Canavan, K., Paterson, I. D., Ivey, P., Sutton, G. F., & Hill, M. P. (Forthcoming). Prioritisation of targets for weed biological control III: A tool to identify the next targets for biological control in South Africa and set priorities for resource allocation. Biocontrol Science and Technology.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charudattan, R. (2005). Ecological, practical, and political inputs into selection of weed targets: What makes a good biological control target? Biological Control, 35(3), 183–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2005.07.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cuda, J., & Sutton, D. (2000). Is the aquatic weed hygrophila, Hygrophila polysperma (Polemoniales: Acanthaceae), a suitable target for classical biological control. In N. R. Spencer (Ed.), Proceedings of the X international symposium on Biological Control of Weeds, July 4–14, 1999 (pp. 4–14), Montana State University, Montana, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Cuthbert, R. N., Dick, J. T., Callaghan, A., & Dickey, J. W. (2018). Biological control agent selection under environmental change using functional responses, abundances and fecundities; the Relative Control Potential (RCP) metric. Biological Control, 121, 50–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2018.02.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delfosse, E. S. (2005). Risk and ethics in biological control. Biological Control, 35(3), 319–329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2005.09.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Downey, P. O., & Paterson, I. D. (2016). Encompassing the relative non-target risks from agents and their alien plant targets in biological control assessments. BioControl, 61(6), 615–630. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10526-016-9744-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Downey, P. O., & Richardson, D. M. (2016). Alien plant invasions and native plant extinctions: A six-threshold framework. AoB Plants, 8, plw047. https://doi.org/10.1093/aobpla/plw047
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Downey, P. O., Scanlon, T. J., & Hosking, J. R. (2010a). Prioritizing weed species based on their threat and ability to impact on biodiversity: A case study from New South Wales. Plant Protection Quarterly, 25(3), 111.
   Google Scholar
• Downey, P. O., Williams, M. C., Whiffen, L. K., Auld, B. A., Hamilton, M. A., Burley, A. L., & Turner, P. J. (2010b). Managing alien plants for biodiversity outcomes—the need for triage. Invasive Plant Science and Management, 3(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1614/IPSM-09-042.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ehler, L., & Miller, J. (1978). Biological control in temporary agroecosystems. Entomophaga, 23(3), 207–212. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02373094
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, A., Smith, L., & Woods, D. (2011). Climatic analysis to determine where to collect and release Puccinia jaceae var. solstitialis for biological control of yellow starthistle. Biocontrol Science and Technology, 21(3), 333–351. https://doi.org/10.1080/09583157.2010.546522
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Froude, V. (2002). Biological control options for invasive weeds of New Zealand protected areas. Department of Conservation Wellington.
   Google Scholar
• Goeden, R. (1983). Critique and revision of Harris’ scoring system for selection of insect agents in biological control of weeds. Protection Ecology, 5(4), 287–301.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gregory, R., Failing, L., Harstone, M., Long, G., McDaniels, T., & Ohlson, D. (2012). Structured decision making: A practical guide to environmental management choices. John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, R., & Ehler, L. (1979). Rate of establishment of natural enemies in classical biological control. Bulletin of the ESA, 25(4), 280–283.
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, R., & Bloem, K. (2006). USDA-APHIS_PPQ Biological targets for pest canvassing and evaluation 2005-2006, Final Report. www.aphis.usda.gov/plant_health/plant_pest_info/biocontrol/download/pest-canvassing.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Harms, N. E., & Nachtrieb, J. G. (2019). Suitability of introduced Nymphoides spp.(Nymphoides cristata, N. peltata) as targets for biological control in the United States. ERDC/TN APCRP-BC-42, Aquatic Plant Control Research Program, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, P. (1973). The selection of effective agents for the biological control of weeds. The Canadian Entomologist, 105(12), 1495–1503. https://doi.org/10.4039/Ent1051495-12
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hennecke, B., Arrowsmith, L., & ten Have, J. (2013). Prioritising targets for biological control of weeds-a decision support tool for policy makers. Australian Bureau of Agricultural and Resource Economics and Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Hierro, J. L., Maron, J. L., & Callaway, R. M. (2005). A biogeographical approach to plant invasions: The importance of studying exotics in their introduced and native range. Journal of Ecology, 93(1), 5–15. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0022-0477.2004.00953.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill, G., & Greathead, D. (2000). 11. Economic evaluation in classical biological control. The Economics of Biological Invasions. Edward Elgar Publishing Inc. 208–226.
   Google Scholar
• Hoelmer, K., & Kirk, A. (2005). Selecting arthropod biological control agents against arthropod pests: Can the science be improved to decrease the risk of releasing ineffective agents? Biological Control, 34(3), 255–264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2005.05.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwong, R. M. (2014). Is delta arrowhead (Sagittaria platyphylla) a suitable target for biological control in Australia?: Proceedings of the 19th Australasian Weeds Conference, Science, Community and Food Security: The Weed Challenge (pp. 1–4), Hobart, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Lefoe, G., & Ainsworth, N. (2012). Prioritising Victorian government investment into weed biocontrol: Proceedings of the 18th Australasian Weeds Conference (pp. 359–360), Weeds Society of Victoria, Melbourne, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Mack, R., & Lonsdale, W. (2002). Eradicating invasive plants: Hard-won lessons for islands. In C. R. Veitch & M. N. Clout (Eds.), Turning the Tide: The Eradication of Invasive Species (pp. 164–172). IUCN.
   Google Scholar
• Manrique, V., Diaz, R., Cuda, J. P., & Overholt, W. A. (2011). Suitability of a new plant invader as a target for biological control in Florida. Invasive Plant Science and Management, 4(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1614/IPSM-D-10-00040.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marohasy, J. (1998). The design and interpretation of host-specificity tests for weed biological control with particular reference to insect behaviour. Biocontrol News and Information, 19, 13–20.
   Google Scholar
• McClay, A. (1989). Selection of suitable target weeds for classical biological control in Alberta. Selection of Suitable Target Weeds for Classical Biological Control in Alberta., AECV89-R1.
   Google Scholar
• McFadyen, R. E. C. (1998). Biological control of weeds. Annual Review of Entomology, 43(1), 369–393. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ento.43.1.369
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Moran, V., & Hoffmann, J. (2015). The fourteen international symposia on biological control of weeds, 1969–2014: Delegates, demographics and inferences from the debate on non-target effects. Biological Control, 87, 23–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2015.04.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moran, V. C., Zachariades, C., & Hoffmann, J. H. (2021). Implementing a system in South Africa for categorizing the outcomes of weed biological control. Biological Control, 153, 104431. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2020.104431
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morin, L., Heard, T., Scott, J., Sheppard, A., Dhileepan, K., Osunkoya, O., & van Klinken, R. (2013). Prioritisation of weed species relevant to Australian livestock industries for biological control. Project Report, Meat & Livestock Australia Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Morin, L., McConnachie, A., & Turner, P. (2016). Prioritisation of weed biocontrol targets for NSW. A Report for the NSW Environmental Trust, CSIRO.
   Google Scholar
• Morrison, T., McAlpine, C., Rhodes, J., Peterson, A., & Schmidt, P. (2010). Back to the future? Planning for environmental outcomes and the new caring for our country program. Australian Geographer, 41(4), 521–538. https://doi.org/10.1080/00049182.2010.519763
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neser, S. (1992). Targeting and selection of weeds and candidate organisms for biocontrol projects. 21st Symposium on Biological Control of Weeds in South Africa, Thomas Baines Nature Reserve, South Africa.
   Google Scholar
• Palmer, W., & Miller, E. (1996, January 19–26). A method for prioritizing biological control projects with reference to those of Queensland. In V. C. Moran & J. H. Hoffmann (Eds.), Proceedings of the IX International Symposium on biological control of weeds (pp. 313–317), University of Cape Town, Stellenbosch, South Africa.
   Google Scholar
• Paterson, I. D., Hill, M. P., Canavan, K., & Downey, P. O. (Forthcoming). Prioritisation of targets for weed biological control II: The South African Biological Control Target Selection system. Biological Control Science and Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Paterson, I. D., Vitorino, M., de Cristo, S., Martin, G. D., & Hill, M. P. (2014). Prioritisation of potential agents for the biological control of the invasive alien weed, Pereskia aculeata (Cactaceae), in South Africa. Biocontrol Science and Technology, 24(4), 407–425. https://doi.org/10.1080/09583157.2013.864382
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paynter, Q. (2010). Prioritisation of targets for biological control of weeds in the Pacific region (LC0910/190). Landcare Research.
   Google Scholar
• Paynter, Q., & Dodd, S. (2012). Weed biocontrol scoping study in the Cook Islands. Landcare Research Contract Report LC1140. Landcare Research New Zealand Ltd, Auckland New Zealand, pp. 80.
   Google Scholar
• Paynter, Q., Hill, R., Bellgard, S., & Dawson, M. (2009). Improving targeting of weed biological control projects in Australia. Final Report to Land and Water Australia, Canberra, Australia, pp. 115.
   Google Scholar
• Paynter, Q., Overton, J. M., Hill, R. L., Bellgard, S. E., & Dawson, M. I. (2012). Plant traits predict the success of weed biocontrol. Journal of Applied Ecology, 49(5), 1140–1148. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2012.02178.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paynter, Q., Paterson, I., & Kwong, R. (2020). Predicting non-target impacts. Current Opinion in Insect Science, 38, 79–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cois.2020.02.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pemberton, R. W. (2002). Selection of appropriate future target weeds for biological control. In R. Van Driesch, S. Lyon, B. Blossey, M. Hoddle, & R. Reardon (Eds.), Biological control of invasive plants in the eastern United States (pp. 375–386). USDA Forest Service.
   Google Scholar
• Perrings, C., Dehnen-Schmutz, K., Touza, J., & Williamson, M. (2005). How to manage biological invasions under globalization. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 20(5), 212–215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2005.02.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peschken, D. P., & McClay, A. S. (1995, February 2–7). Picking the target: A revision of McClay’s scoring system to determine the suitability of a weed for classical biological control. In E. S. Delfosse & R. R. Scott (Eds.), Proceedings of the Eighth international symposium on Biological Control of Weeds (pp. 137–143), Lincoln University, Canterbury, New Zealand.
   Google Scholar
• Pyšek, P., Lambdon, P. W., Arianoutsou, M., Kühn, I., Pino, J., & Winter, M. (2009). Alien vascular plants of Europe. In Handbook of alien species in Europe (pp. 43–61). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Raghu, S., & Morin, L. (2017). Prioritizing weed targets for biological control in the Western USA. CSIRO.
   Google Scholar
• Schwarzländer, M., Hinz, H. L., Winston, R., & Day, M. (2018). Biological control of weeds: An analysis of introductions, rates of establishment and estimates of success, worldwide. BioControl, 63(3), 319–331. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10526-018-9890-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheppard, A., Heard, T., & Briese, D. (2003). What is needed to improve the selection, testing and evaluation of weed biological control agents. In S. Jacob, & H. Briese, D.T. (Eds.), Improving the selection, testing and evaluation of weed biological control agents. Proceedings of the biological control of weeds Symposium and workshop, September 13, 2002 (pp. 87–98). Technical Series 7.
   Google Scholar
• Sheppard, A., Shaw, R., & Sforza, R. (2006). Top 20 environmental weeds for classical biological control in Europe: A review of opportunities, regulations and other barriers to adoption. Weed Research, 46(2), 93–117. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3180.2006.00497.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skinner, K., Smith, L., & Rice, P. (2000). Using noxious weed lists to prioritize targets for developing weed management strategies. Weed Science, 48(5), 640–644. https://doi.org/10.1614/0043-1745(2000)048[0640:UNWLTP]2.0.CO;2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Syrett, P. (2002). Biological control of weeds on conservation land: Priorities for the Department of Conservation (Internal series no. 82). Department of Conservation.
   Google Scholar
• Thorp, J., & Lynch, R. (2000). The determination of weeds of national significance. National Weeds Strategy Executive committee. National Weeds Strategy Executive Committee.
   Google Scholar
• Todd, J., Barratt, B., & Withers, T. (2017). 3.5 can predictive models help to identify the most appropriate Non-target species for host-specificity testing? In P. G. Mason, D. R. Gillespie, & C. Vincent (Eds.), Proceedings of the 5th International Symposium on biological control of arthropods (pp. 55–57), CABI, Wallingford, UK.
   Google Scholar
• van Klinken, R. D., Morin, L., Sheppard, A., & Raghu, S. (2016). Experts know more than just facts: Eliciting functional understanding to help prioritise weed biological control targets. Biological Invasions, 18(10), 2853–2870. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-016-1175-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Wilgen, B., Van der Heyden, F., Zimmermann, H., Magadlela, D., & Willems, T. (2000). Big returns from small organisms: Developing a strategy for the biological control of invasive alien plants in South Africa. South African Journal of Science, 96(3), 148–152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wapshere, A. (1974). A strategy for evaluating the safety of organisms for biological weed control. Annals of Applied Biology, 77(2), 201–211. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7348.1974.tb06886.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zachariades, C., Paterson, I. D., Strathie, L. W., Hill, M. P., & Van Wilgen, B. W. (2017). Assessing the status of biological control as a management tool for suppression of invasive alien plants in South Africa. Bothalia-African Biodiversity & Conservation, 47(2), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.4102/abc.v47i2.2142
   Google Scholar