309
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles

Evaluation of plant protection efficacy in field conditions and side effects of Lysobacter capsici AZ78, a biocontrol agent of Plasmopara viticola

, , , , , , , , , , , , , & show all
Pages 930-951 | Received 29 Nov 2021, Accepted 06 Apr 2022, Published online: 25 Apr 2022

References

  • Amichot, M., Joly, P., Martin-Laurent, F., Siaussat, D., & Lavoir, A.-V. (2018). Biocontrol, new questions for ecotoxicology? Environmental Science and Pollution Research International, 25(34), 33895–33900. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-3356-5
  • Barrett, K. L., Grandy, N., Harrison, E. G., Hassan, S., & Oomen, P. (1994). Guidance document on regulatory testing procedures for pesticides with non-target arthropods. ESCORT workshop (European Standard Characteristics of Non-Target Arthropod Regulatory Testing). In Wageningen, the Netherlands: a Joint BART, EPPO/CoE and IOBC Workshop Organised in Conjunction with SETAC-Europe and Funded by the EC.
  • Bernard, M., Horne, P., & Hoffmann, A. (2004). - Ecological pest management: the effect of viticultural fungicides on beneficial predatory mites. The Australian & New Zealand Grapegrower & Winemaker, 32nd Annual Technical Issue, 485a: 7-12.
  • Blümel S., Bakker, F.M., Baier, B., Brown, K., Candolfi, M. P., Goßmann, A., Grimm, C., Jäkel, B., Nienstedt, K., Schirra, K. J., Ufer, A., & Waltersdorfer, A. (2000). Laboratory residual contact test with the predatory mite Typhlodromus pyri Scheuten (Acari: Phytoseiidae) for regulatory tesing of plant protection products. In M. P. Candolfi, S. Blümel, R. Forster, F. M. Bakker, C. Grimm, S. A. Hassan, U. Heimbach, M. A. Mead-Briggs, B. Reber, R. Schmuck, & H. Vogt (Eds). Guidelines to evaluate side-effects of plant protection products to non-target arthropods (pp. 121–143). IOBC/WPRS.
  • Brescia, F., Marchetti-Deschmann, M., Musetti, R., Perazzolli, M., Pertot, I., & Puopolo, G. (2020). The rhizosphere signature on the cell motility, biofilm formation and secondary metabolite production of a plant-associated Lysobacter strain. Microbiological Research, 234, 126424. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micres.2020.126424
  • Candolfi, M. (2002). Guidance document on regulatory testing and risk assessment procedures for plant protection products with non-target arthropods. (Ed.), ESCORT2 Workshop, 2002.
  • Candolfi, M., Bigler, F., Campbell, P., Heimbach, U., Schmuck, R., Angeli, G., Bakker, F., Brown, K., Carli, G., Dinter, A., Forti, D., Forster, R., Gathmann, A., Hassan, S., Mead-Briggs, M., Melandri, M., Neuwmann, P., Pasqualini, E., Powell, W., … Vogt, H. (2000). Principles for regulatory testing and interpretation of semi-field and field studies with non-target arthropods. Anzeiger fur Schadlingskunde/Journal of Pest Science, 73(6), 141–147. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02956449
  • Cimmino, A., Bejarano, A., Masi, M., Puopolo, G., & Evidente, A. (2021). Isolation of 2,5-diketopiperazines from Lysobacter capsici AZ78 with activity against Rhodococcus fascians. Product Research, 35 (23), 2021, 4969–4977. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/14786419.2020.1756803
  • Dinesh, D. S., Kumari, S., Kumar, V., & Das, P. (2014). The potentiality of botanicals and their products as an alternative to chemical insecticides to sandflies (Diptera: Psychodidae): A review. Journal of Vector Borne Diseases, 51(1), 1.
  • Duso, C., Pozzebon, A., Kreiter, S., Tixier, M. S., & Candolfi, M. (2012). Management of phytophagous mites in European vineyards. In Arthropod management in vineyards (pp. 191–217). Springer.
  • EFSA Panel on Plant Protection Products and their Residues (PPR). (2013). Guidance on tiered risk assessment for plant protection products for aquatic organisms in edge-of-field surface waters. EFSA Journal, 11(7), 3290, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2013.3290
  • Escribano-Viana, R., Portu, J., Garijo, P., Gutiérrez, A. R., Santamaría, P., López-Alfaro, I., López, R., & González-Arenzana, L. (2018). Evaluating a preventive biological control agent applied on grapevines against Botrytis cinerea and its influence on winemaking. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 98(12), 4517–4526. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.8977
  • European Food Safety Authority. (2013). Conclusion on the peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of confirmatory data submitted for the active substance Copper (I), copper (II) variants namely copper hydroxide, copper oxychloride, tribasic copper sulfate, copper (I) oxide, Bordeaux mixture. EFSA Journal, 11(6), 3235.
  • Hautier, L., Jansen, J.-P., Mabon, N., Schiffers, B., Deleu, R., & Moreira, C. (2006). Building selectivity list of plant protection products on beneficial arthropods in open field: A concrete example with potato crop. IOBC-WPRS Bulletin, 29(10), 21–32.
  • International Organisation of Vine and Wine. (n.d.). Technical standards and documents. https://www.oiv.int/en/technicalstandards-and-documents
  • Köhl, J., Booij, K., Kolnaar, R., & Ravensberg, W. J. (2019). Ecological arguments to reconsider data requirements regarding the environmental fate of microbial biocontrol agents in the registration procedure in the European Union. BioControl, 64(5), 469–487. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10526-019-09964-y
  • Köhl, J., Postma, J., Nicot, P., Ruocco, M., & Blum, B. (2011). Stepwise screening of microorganisms for commercial use in biological control of plant-pathogenic fungi and bacteria. Biological Control, 57(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2010.12.004
  • Köhler, H. R., & Triebskorn, R. (2013). Wildlife ecotoxicology of pesticides: Can we track effects to the population level and beyond? Science, 341(6147), 759–765. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1237591
  • Lorenz, D. H., Eichhorn, K. W., Bleiholder, H., Klose, R., Meier, U., & Weber, E. (1995). Growth stages of the grapevine: Phenological growth stages of the grapevine (Vitis vinifera L. ssp. vinifera) – codes and descriptions according to the extended BBCH Scale. Australian Journal of Grape and Wine Research, 1(2), 100–103. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-0238.1995.tb00085.x
  • Mead-Briggs, M. A., Brown, K., Candolfi, M. P., Coulson, M. J. M., Miles, M., Moll, M., … McIndoe, E. (2000). A laboratory test for evaluating the effects of plant protection products on the parasitic wasp, Aphidius rhopalosiphi (DeStephani-Perez) (Hymenoptera: Braconidae). In M. P. Candolfi, S. Blümel, R. Forster, F. M. Bakker, C. Grimm, S. A. Hassan, U. Heimbach, M. A. Mead-Briggs, B. Reber, R. Schmuck, & H. Vogt (Eds). Guidelines to evaluate side-effects of plant protection products to non-target arthropods (pp. 13–25). IOBC/WPRS.
  • Nicolini, G., Román, T., Carlin, S., Malacarne, M., Nardin, T., Bertoldi, D., & Larcher, R. (2018). Characterisation of singlevariety still ciders produced with dessert apples in the Italian Alps. Journal of the Institute of Brewing, 124(4), 457–466.
  • Nissen, P., Nielsen, D., & Arneborg, N. (2003). Viable Saccharomyces cerevisiae cells at high concentrations cause early growth arrest of non-Saccharomyces yeasts in mixed cultures by a cell–cell contact-mediated mechanism. Saccharomyces cerevisiae, 20(4), 331–341.
  • OECD. (2004a). OECD Test. Guidelines for the Testing of Chemicals, Test No 202: Daphnia sp. acute immobilisation test. 2, 6.
  • OECD. (2004b). OECD Test. Guidelines for the Testing of Chemicals, Test No 222: Earthworm reproduction test. 647.
  • OECD. (2004c). OECD Test. Guidelines for the Testing of Chemicals, Test No. 220: Enchytraeid Reproduction Test.
  • OEPP/EPPO. (2003). Environmental risk assessment scheme for plant protection products, PP 3/9.
  • Pino-Otín, M. R., Ballestero, D., Navarro, E., González-Coloma, A., Val, J., & Mainar, A. M. (2019). Ecotoxicity of a novel biopesticide from Artemisia absinthium on non-target aquatic organisms. Artemisia Absinthium, 216, 131–146.
  • Puopolo, G., Cimmino, A., Palmieri, M., Giovannini, O., Evidente, A., & Pertot, I. (2014a). Lysobacter capsici AZ78 produces cyclo (l-Pro-l-Tyr), a 2, 5-diketopiperazine with toxic activity against sporangia of Phytophthora infestans and Plasmopara viticola. Journal of Applied Microbiology, 117(4), 1168–1180. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/jam.12611
  • Puopolo, G., Giovannini, O., & Pertot, I. (2014b). Lysobacter capsici AZ78 can be combined with copper to effectively control Plasmopara viticola on grapevine. Microbiological Research, 169(7-8), 633–642. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micres.2013.09.013
  • Puopolo, G., & Pertot, I. (2014). A new bacterial Lysobacter capsici strain and uses thereof. Patent: WO2014173906.
  • Puopolo, G., Tomada, S., & Pertot, I. (2018). The impact of the omics era on the knowledge and use of Lysobacter species to control phytopathogenic micro-organisms. Journal of Applied Microbiology, 124(1), 15–27. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/jam.13607
  • Puopolo, G., Tomada, S., Sonego, P., Moretto, M., Engelen, K., Perazzolli, M., & Pertot, I. (2016). The Lysobacter capsici AZ78 genome has a gene pool enabling it to interact successfully with phytopathogenic microorganisms and environmental factors. Frontiers in Microbiology, 7, 96. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2016.00096
  • Román, T., Tonidandel, T., Larcher, R., Celotti, E., & Nicolini, G. (2018). Importance of polyfunctional thiols on semi-industrial Gewürztraminer wines and the correlation to technological treatments. European Food Research and Technology, 244(3), 379–386. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s00217-017-2963-6
  • SANCO/10329/2002 rev 2 final (2002): Guidance document on Terrestrial Ecotoxicology Under Council Diective 91/414/EEC.
  • Segarra, G., Puopolo, G., Giovannini, O., & Pertot, I. (2015). Stepwise flow diagram for the development of formulations of non spore-forming bacteria against foliar pathogens: The case of Lysobacter capsici AZ78. Journal of Biotechnology, 216, 56–64. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiotec.2015.10.004
  • Segarra, G., Puopolo, G., Porcel-Rodríguez, E., Giovannini, O., & Pertot, I. (2016). Monitoring Lysobacter capsici AZ78 using strain specific qPCR reveals the importance of the formulation for its survival in vineyards. FEMS Microbiology Letters, 363(3), fnv243. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/femsle/fnv243
  • Tomada, S., Sonego, P., Moretto, M., Engelen, K., Pertot, I., Perazzolli, M., & Puopolo, G. (2017). Dual RNA-Seq of Lysobacter capsici AZ78–Phytophthora infestans interaction shows the implementation of attack strategies by the bacterium and unsuccessful oomycete defense responses. Environmental Microbiology, 19(10), 4113–4125. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/1462-2920.13861
  • Velázquez, R., Zamora, E., Álvarez, M. L., Hernández, L. M., & Ramírez, M. (2015). Effects of new Torulaspora delbrueckii killer yeasts on the must fermentation kinetics and aroma compounds of white table wine. Torulaspora delbrueckii, 6, 1222.
  • Vlassi, A., Nesler, A., Parich, A., Puopolo, G., & Schuhmacher, R. (2020a). Volatile-mediated inhibitory activity of rhizobacteria as a result of multiple factors interaction: The case of Lysobacter capsici AZ78. Microorganisms, 8(11)), https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms8111761
  • Vlassi, A., Nesler, A., Perazzolli, M., Lazazzara, V., Büschl, C., Parich, A., Puopolo, G., & Schuhmacher, R. (2020b). Volatile organic compounds from Lysobacter capsici AZ78 as potential candidates for biological control of soilborne plant pathogens. Frontiers in Microbiology, 11, 1748. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2020.01748

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.