After compliance in India and beyond: a theory of implementation dilemmas and comparative institutional analysis

References

• Abbot, Kenneth, Philip Genschel, Duncan Snidal, and Bernard Zangl. 2015. International Organizations as Orchestrators. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Acharya, Amitav, and Alastair I. Johnston, eds. 2007. Crafting Cooperation: Regional International Institutions in Comparative Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Aggarwal, Vinod, ed. 1998. Institutional Designs for a Complex World: Bargaining, Linkages and Nesting. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Alexandroff, A. S., and A. F. Cooper, eds. 2010. Rising States, Rising Institutions: Challenges for Global Governance. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bodansky, Daniel. 2001. The Art and Craft of International Environmental Law. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chaudhry, Praveen K., Vijay L. Kelkar, and Vikash Yadav. 2004. “The Evolution of ‘Homegrown Conditionality’ in India: IMF Relations.” Journal of Development Studies 40 (6): 59–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Checkel, Jeffrey T. 2005. “International Institutions and Socialization in Europe: Introduction and Framework.” International Organization 59 (Fall 2005): 801–826.
   Google Scholar
• Chitalkar, Poorvi, and David M. Malone. 2015. “India and Global Governance.” In The Oxford Handbook of Indian Foreign Policy, edited by David M. Malone, S. Raja Mohan, and Srinath Raghavan, 581–595. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Christmann, Petra, and Glen Taylor. 2006. “Firm Self-regulation Through International Certifiable Standards: Determinants of Symbolic versus Substantive Implementation.” Journal of International Business Studies 37 (6): 863–878.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coplovitch, Mark. 2010. “Master or Servant? Common Agency and the Political Economy of IMF Lending.” International Studies Quarterly 54 (1): 49–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cowles, Maria, James Caporaso, and Thomas Risse, eds. 2001. Transforming Europe: Europeanization and Domestic Change. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cronin-Furman, Kate. 2020. “Human Rights Half Measures: Avoiding Accountability in Postwar Sri Lanka.” World Politics 72 (1): 121–163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dai, Xinyuan. 2002. “Information Systems in Treaty Regimes.” World Politics 54: 504–536.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dai, Xinyuan. 2005. “Why Comply? The Domestic Constituency Mechanism.” International Organization 59 (2): 363–398.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dai, Xinyuan. 2006. “The Conditional Nature of Democratic Compliance.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 50 (5): 690–713.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dai, Xinyuan. 2013. “The Compliance Gap and the Efficacy of International Human Rights Institutions.” In The Persistent Power of Human Rights: From Commitment to Compliance, edited by Thomas Risse, Stephen Ropp, and Kathryn Sikkink, 85–102. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Deere, Carolyn. 2011. The Implementation Game: The TRIPS Agreement and the Global Politics of Intellectual Property Reform in Developing Countries. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Duffield, John S. 2003. “The Limits of “Rational Design,”.” International Organization 57 (Spring): 411–430.
   Google Scholar
• Dunoff, J. L., and Mark Pollack. 2013. “Reviewing Two Decades of IL/IR Scholarship.” In Interdisciplinary Perspectives on International Law and International Relations: The State of the Art, edited by Jeffrey Dunoff, and Mark A. Pollack, 626–662. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• George, Alexander L. 1979. “Case Studies and Theory Development: The Method of Structured, Focused Comparison.” In Diplomacy: New Approaches in History, Theory and Policy, edited by Paul G. Lauren, 43–68. New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• George, Alexander, and Andrew Bennett. 2005. Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gerring, John. 2012. Case Study Research: Principles and Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gilbert, Christopher, and David Vines, eds. 2000. The World Bank: Structure and Policies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goldstein, Judith. 1998. “International Institutions and Domestic Politics: GATT, WTO, and the Liberalization of Trade.” In The WTO as an International Organization, edited by Anne O. Kruger, 133–160. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gueven, Ali Burak. 2017. “Defending Supremacy: How the IMF and the World Bank Navigate the Challenge of Rising Powers.” International Affairs 93 (5): 1149–1166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta, Surupa. 2022. “India’s Engagement with the International Monetary Fund (IMF): Growing into an Ownership Role.” Contemporary South Asia 30 (2).
   Google Scholar
• Hafner-Burton, Emilie M., Jana Von Stein, and Erik Gartzke. 2008. “International Organizations Count.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 52 (2): 175–188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haftel, Yoram Z., and Alexander Thompson. 2006. “The Independence of International Organizations: Concepts and Applications.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 50 (2): 253–275.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halliday, Terrance, and Gregory Shaffer. 2015. “Translational Legal Orders.” In Translational Legal Orders, edited by Terrance Halliday, and Greg Shaffer, 3–74. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hillebrecht, Courtney. 2014. Domestic Politics and International Human Rights Tribunals: The Problem of Compliance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hopewell, Kristen. 2016. Breaking the WTO: How Emerging Powers Disrupted the Neoliberal Project. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hopkins, Daniel, and Beth Simmons. 2005. “The Constraining Power of International Treaties: Theory and Methods.” American Political Science Review 99 (4): 623–631.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahler, Miles. 2013. “Rising Powers and Global Governance: Negotiating Change in a Resilient Status Quo.” International Affairs 89 (3): 711–729.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaya, Ayse. 2015. Power and Global Economic Institutions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kelman, Herbert. 1958. “Compliance, Identification, and Internationalization: Three Processes of Attitude Change.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 2 (1): 51–60.
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy, Scott, ed. 2018. Global Governance and China: The Dragon’s Learning Curve. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kent, Ann. 2007. Beyond Compliance: China, International Organizations and Global Security. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Keohane, Robert O. 1984. After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Keohane, Robert. 1989. International Institutions and State Power. Boulder CO: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Keohane, Robert. 1998. “International Institutions: Can Interdependence Work?” Foreign Policy Spring: 82–96.
   Google Scholar
• Kirton, John, and Michael Trebilock. 2016. Hard Choices, Soft Law: Voluntary Standards in Global Trade, Environment and Social Governance. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Koremenos, Barbara. 2013. “The Content of International Law.” The Journal of Conflict Resolution 57 (4): 653–681.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koremenos, Barbara. 2016. The Continent of International Law: Explaining Agreement Design. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Koremenos, Barbara, and Timm Betz. 2013. “The Design of Dispute Settlement Procedures in International Agreements.” In Interdisciplinary Perspectives on International Law and International Relations, edited by Jeffrey Dunoff, and Mark A. Pollack, 371–393. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Koremenos, Barbara, Charles Lipson, and Duncan Snidal, eds. 2001. “The Rational Design of International Institutions.” International Organization 55 (4): 761–799.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lidarev, Ivan, and Harsh Pant. 2022. “India and Maritime Governance in the Indian Ocean.” Contemporary South Asia 30 (2).
   Google Scholar
• Lipscy, Philip. 2017. Renegotiating the World Order: Institutional Change in International Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Luce, Edward, and Ray Marcelo. 2003. “India Urged to Reduce High Debt Burden.” The Financial Times, July 21.
   Google Scholar
• Mahbubani, Kishore. 2009. The New Asian Hemisphere: the Irresistible Shift of Global Power to the East. New York: Public Affairs.
   Google Scholar
• Mansfield, Edward D., and Jon C. Pevehouse. 2008. “Democratization and the Varieties of International Organizations.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 52 (2): 269–294.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, Lisa. 1992. Coercive Cooperation: Explaining Multilateral Economic Sanctions. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, Lisa. 2013. “Against Compliance.” In Interdisciplinary Perspectives on International Law and International Relations, edited by Jeffrey Dunoff, and Mark A. Pollack, 591–610. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mosley, Layna. 2010. “Regulating Globally, Implementing Locally: The Financial Codes and Standards Effort.” Review of International Political Economy 17 (4): 724–761.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mukherjee, Rohan, and David M. Malone. 2013. “India and the UN Security Council; An Ambiguous Tale.” Economic and Political Weekly 48 (29): 110–117.
   Google Scholar
• Mukherji, Rahul. 2013. “Ideas, Interests, and the Tipping Point: Economic Change in India.” Review of International Political Economy 20 (2): 363–389.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Narlikar, Amrita. 2010. “New Powers in the Club: The Challenges of Global Trade Governance.” International Affairs 86 (3): 717–728.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olsen, Tricia, and Aseema Sinha. 2013. “Linkage Politics and the Persistence of National Policy Autonomy in Emerging Powers: Patents, Profits, and Patients in the Context of TRIPS Compliance.” Business and Politics 15 (3): 323–356.
   Google Scholar
• Paul, T. V., ed. 2016. Accommodating Rising Powers: Past, Present, and Future. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Paul, T. V., Deborah Larson, and William Wohlforth, eds. 2014. Status in World Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pearson, Margaret. 1999. “China’s Integration into the International Trade and Investment Regime.” In China Joins the World: Progress and Prospects, edited by Elizabeth Economy, and Michel Oksenberg, 161–205. New York: Council on Foreign Relations.
   Google Scholar
• Pierson, Paul. 1994. Dismantling the Welfare State?: Reagan, Thatcher and the Politics of Retrenchment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pope, Shawn, and Alwyn Lim. 2017. “International Organizations as Mobilization Structures: World CSR Associations and Their Disparate Impacts on Member’s CSR Practices, 2000–20016.” Social Forces 95 (4): 1725–1756.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rabbi, Fazal. 2012. “War Against Terrorism and its Repercussions for Pakistan.” Pakistan Journal of History and Culture 33 (2): 71–90.
   Google Scholar
• Raustiala, Kal. 2000. “Compliance and Effectiveness in International Regulatory Cooperation.” Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law 32: 387–440.
   Google Scholar
• Raustiala, Kal, and Anne-Marie Slaughter. 2002. “International Law, International Relations and Compliance.” In Handbook of International Relations, edited by Walter Carlnaes, Thomas Risse, and Beth Simmons, 538–558. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Reynolds, Bruce, and Susan K. Sell. 2018. “China’s Role in Global Governance: A Comparison of Foreign Exchange and Intellectual Property.” In Global Governance and China: The Dragon’s Learning Curve, edited by Scott Kennedy, 132–157. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Risse, Thomas, Stephen Ropp, and Kathryn Sikkink. eds. 2013. The Persistent Power of Human Rights: From Commitment to Compliance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, Cynthia, Leslie Armijo, and Saori Katada. 2017. The BRICs and Collective Financial Statecraft. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Saffee, Agmad. 2015. “Pakistan’s Counter-terrorism Policy” Issue Brief, Institute of Strategic Studies, October 7, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Sasikumar, Karthika. 2010. “State Agency in the Time of the Global War on Terror: India and the Counter-terrorism Regime.” Review of International Studies 36: 615–638.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaffer, Gregory. 2021. Emerging Powers and the World Trading System: The Past and Future of International Economic Law. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shaffer, Gregory, James Nedumpara, and Aseema Sinha. 2015. “State Transformation and the Role of Lawyers: The WTO, India, and Transnational Legal Ordering.” Law and Society Review 49 (3): 595–629.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaffer, Gregory, Michelle Sanchez, and Barbara Rosenberg. 2008. “The Trials of Winning at the WTO: What Lies Behind Brazil’s Success.” Cornell International law Journal 41: 383–502.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simmons, Beth. 2002. “Capacity, Commitment, and Compliance: International Law and the Settlement of Territorial Disputes.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 46 (6): 829–856.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinha, Aseema. 2007. “Global Linkages and Domestic Politics: Trade Reform and Institution Building in India in Comparative Perspective.” Comparative Political Studies 40 (10): 1183–1210.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinha, Aseema. 2016. Globalizing India: How Global Rules and Markets Are Shaping India’s Rise to Power. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sinha, Aseema. 2019. “A Theory of Reform Consolidation in India: From Crisis-induced Reforms to Strategic Internationalization.” India Review 18 (1): 54–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sola, Lourdes, and Laurence Whitehead. 2020. “Democratic Statecraft: Perspectives from an “Unsettled” Global South.” The Tocqueville Review 41 (2): 159–182.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Speth, James, and Peter Haas. 2006. Global Environmental Governance. Washington, DC: Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sripati, Vijayashri. 2000. “India’s National Human Rights Commission: A Shacked Commission?” Boston University International Law Journal 18 (1): 1–46.
   Google Scholar
• Stone, Randall. 2002. Lending Credibility: The IMF and the Post- Communist Transition. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stone, Randall. 2011. Controlling Institutions: International Organizations and the Global Economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Subotic, Jelena. 2009. “The Paradox of International Justice Compliance.” The International Journal of Transitional Justice 3: 362–383.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Von Stein, Jana. 2013. “The Engines of Compliance.” In Interdisciplinary Perspectives on International Law and International Relations, edited by Jeffrey Dunoff, and Mark A. Pollack, 477–501. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Walter, Andrew. 2008. Governing Finance: East Asia’s Adoption of International Standards. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, Junmin. 2009. “Global-market Building as State Building: China’s Entry into the WTO and Market Reforms of China’s Tobacco Industry.” Theory and Society 38 (2): 165–194.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weller, Patrick, and Xu Yi-Chong, eds. 2015. The Politics of International Organizations: Views from Insiders. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Woods, Ngaire. 2006. The Globalizers: The IMF, the World Bank and Their Borrowers. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yi-chong, Xu, and Patrick Weller. 2018. The Working World of International Organizations: Authority, Capacity and Legitimacy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar