Postmodernist perceptions of teacher professionalism: a critique

References

• Abbott, I., Rathbone, M., & Whitehead, P. (2013). Education policy. London: Sage Publications Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Alexander, R. (2010). Children, their world, their education – final report and recommendations of the Cambridge primary review. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, P. S. (2005). Postmodernism and religion. In S. Sim (Ed.), The Routledge companion to postmodernism (2nd ed., pp. 45–50). Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Apple, M.W. (2004) Ideology and Curriculum (3rd ed.). London: RoutledgeFalmer.
   Google Scholar
• ATL. (2012). Teacher professionalism. Retrieved March 25, 2013, from http://www.atl.org.uk/policy-and-campaigns/policy-library/teacher-professionalism.asp
   Google Scholar
• Ball, S. (2007), Education Plc: Understanding private sector participation in public sector education. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Barber, M. (2005). Informed professionalism: Realising the potential. Presentation to a conference of the Association of Teachers and Lecturers, London.
   Google Scholar
• Barrow, R. (1999). The need for philosophical analysis in a postmodern era. Interchange, 30(4), 415–432.
   Google Scholar
• Basini, A. (1996). The National Curriculum: Foundation subjects. In J. Docking (Ed.), National school policy; major issues in education policy for schools in England and Wales, 1979 onwards (pp. 1–14). London: David Fulton Publishers Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Bassett, D., Lyon, G., Tanner, W., & Watkin, B. (2012). Unleashing the potential of academies. London: Reform and The Schools Network.
   Google Scholar
• Bassey, M., (2013). Letters: Gove will bury pupils in facts and rules. Retrieved April 2, 2013, from http://www.independent.co.uk/voices/letters/lettersgove-will-bury-pupils-in-facts-and-rules-8540741.html
   Google Scholar
• Bousted, M. (2007). Foreword. In Johnson, M. (Ed.), Subject to Change: New Thinking on the Curriculum. London: ATL.
   Google Scholar
• Children, Schools and Families Committee (CSFC). (2009). National curriculum fourth report of session 2008–09, Volume I Report, together with formal minutes. London: The Stationery Office Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Clabaugh, G. K., & Rozycki, E. G. (1999). Understanding schools: The foundations of education. USA: Harpercollins College Div.
   Google Scholar
• Conway, D. (2010). Liberal education and the national curriculum. London: Civitas.
   Google Scholar
• Department for Children, Schools and Families (DCSF). (2007). The children's plan building brighter futures. Norwich: TSO.
   Google Scholar
• DES. (1987). The National Curriculum 5–16, a consultation document, London: DES.
   Google Scholar
• Department for Education (DfE). (2010). The importance of teaching: The schools white paper. London: DfE.
   Google Scholar
• DfE. (2011). The Framework for the National Curriculum; A report by the expert panel for the national curriculum review. London: DfE.
   Google Scholar
• DfE. (2012a). Conversion overview 5: What the academy offers. Retrieved March 28, 2013, from http://www.education.gov.uk/schools/leadership/typesofschools/academies/primary/faqs/a00205436/primaryconversionprocess5#faq6
   Google Scholar
• DfE. (2012b). What is an academy? Retrieved April 01, 2013, from http://www.education.gov.uk/schools/leadership/typesofschools/academies/b00205692/whatisanacademy
   Google Scholar
• DfE. (2013a). School direct; information for schools. Retrieved January 29, 2013, from http://www.education.gov.uk/schools/careers/traininganddevelopment/initial/b00205704/school-direct/schools
   Google Scholar
• DfE. (2013b). Consultation principles. Retrieved April 02, 2013, from https://www.education.gov.uk/consultations/index.cfm?menu=4
   Google Scholar
• DfE. (2013c). National curriculum documents for primary English, mathematics and science. Retrieved April 02, 2013, from https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/national-curriculum-in-england-primary-curriculum
   Google Scholar
• Doll, W. E. (1993). A post-modern perspective on curriculum. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Efland, A., Freedman, K., & Stuhr, P. (1996). Postmodern arts education: An approach to curriculum. Reston, VA: The National Art Education Association.
   Google Scholar
• Elliot, J. (1998). The curriculum experiment, meeting the challenge of social change. Buckingham: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, T. (2012). The myth of school autonomy: Centralisation as the determinant of English educational politics. FORUM, 54(2), 231–245.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1980). Power/knowledge. Brighton: Harvester.
   Google Scholar
• Giddens, A. (1990). The consequences of modernity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Golby, M. (Ed.). (1987). Perspectives on the national curriculum. Exeter: School of Education, University of Exeter.
   Google Scholar
• Gove, M. (2013a). Speech to the social market foundation; check against delivery. Retrieved April 02, 2013, from http://www.smf.co.uk/media/news/michael-gove-speaks-smf/
   Google Scholar
• Gove, M. (2013b). I refuse to surrender to the Marxist teachers hell-bent on destroying our schools: Education Secretary berates ‘the new enemies of promise’ for opposing his plans. Retrieved April 02, 2013, from http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-2298146/I-refuse-surrender-Marxist-teachers-hell-bent-destroying-schools-Education-Secretary-berates-new-enemies-promise-opposing-plans.html
   Google Scholar
• Graham, D. (1993). A lesson for us all; the making of the national curriculum. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hammersley-Fletcher, L., & Strain, M. (2011). Power, agency and middle leadership in English primary schools. British Educational Research Journal, 37(5), 871–884.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hargreaves, A. (1994). Changing teachers, changing times; teachers’ work and culture in the postmodern age. London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Hargreaves, A. (2000). Four ages of professionalism and professional learning. Teachers and Teaching: History and Practice, 6(2), 151–182.
   Google Scholar
• Hargreaves, A. (2003). Teaching in the knowledge society. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hartley, D. (1997). Re-schooling society. London: Falmer Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, D. (1989). The condition of postmodernity; an enquiry into the origins of cultural change. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Helsby, G., & McCulloch, G. (Eds.). (1997). Teachers and the national curriculum. London: Cassell.
   Google Scholar
• Howells, H. (2003). Teaching professionalism and curriculum power: A cautionary tale. English in Australia, 135, 27–39.
   Google Scholar
• Jencks, C. (1992). The post-modern reader. New York, NY: St Martin's Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, K. (2009). An English vernacular: Teacher trade unionism and educational politics 1970–2007. In S. Gerwirtz, P. Mahony, I. Hextall, & A. Cribb (Eds.), Changing teacher professionalism; internatinoal trends, challenges and ways forward (pp. 54–64). Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Keates, C. (2012). What do you think of Michael Gove's national curriculum? Retrieved March 27, 2013, from http://www.guardian.co.uk/teacher-network/teacher-blog/2012/jun/13/national-curriculum-gove
   Google Scholar
• Kvale, S. (1995). The social construction of validity. Qualitative Inquiry, 1(1), 19–40.
   Google Scholar
• Larson, M. S. (1977). The rise of professionalism. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lawton, D. (1996). Beyond the national curriculum; teacher professionalism and empowerment. London: Hodder and Stoughton Educational.
   Google Scholar
• Leat, D., Livingston, K., & Priestley, M. (2013). Curriculum deregulation in England and Scotland – different directions of travel? In W. Kuiper & J. Berkvens (Eds.), Balancing curriculum regulation and freedom across Europe (pp. 229–248). Netherlands: CIDREE Yearbook.
   Google Scholar
• Lyotard, J. F. (1984). The postmodern condition: A report on knowledge. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lyotard, J. F. (1992). What is postmodernism? In C. Jencks (Ed.), The post-modern reader. New York, NY: St Martin's Press.
   Google Scholar
• MacDonald, D. (2003). Curriculum change and the post-modern world: Is the school curriculum-reform movement an anachronism? Journal of Curriculum Studies, 35(2), 139–149.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh, C. J. (2009). Key concepts for understanding curriculum. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• McCulloch, G., Helsby, G., & Knight, P. (2000). The politics of professionalism; teachers and the curriculum. London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• McLaren, P., & Farahmandpur, R. (2000). Reconsidering Marx in post-Marxist times: A requiem for postmodernism? Educational Researcher, 29(3), 25–33.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, R., & Young, M. (2001). Knowledge and the curriculum in the sociology of education: Towards a reconceptualisation. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 22(4), 445–461.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Union of Teachers. (2013). New curriculum: Have your say. Retrieved March 28, 2013, from http://www.teachers.org.uk/campaigns/curriculum
   Google Scholar
• Oates, T., James, M., Pollard, A., & Wiliam, D. (2011). The framework for the national curriculum; a report by the expert panel for the national curriculum review. London: Department for Education.
   Google Scholar
• Peck, D. (2012). What do you think of Michael Gove's national curriculum? Retrieved March 27, 2013, from http://www.guardian.co.uk/teacher-network/teacher-blog/2012/jun/13/national-curriculum-gove
   Google Scholar
• Powell, J. (1998). Postmodernism for beginners. Conneticut: Writers and Readers Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Pring, R., Hayward, G., Hodgson, A., Johnson, J., Keep, E., Oancea, A., … Wilde, S. (2009). Education for all: The future of education and training for 14–19 year olds. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ransome, S. (1995). Theorizing education policy. Journal of Education Policy, 10(4), 427–428.
   Google Scholar
• Ross, A. (2000). Curriculum construction and critique. London: Falmer Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sachs, J. (2003). The activist teaching profession. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sim, S. (2005). The Routledge companion to postmodernism (2nd ed.). Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Slattery, P. (1995). Curriculum development in the postmodern era. London: Garland Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Stenhouse, L. (1975) An Introduction to Curriculum Research and Development. London: Heinemann Educational Books Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, C. (1989). Sources of the self. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, S., Fazal, R., Lingard, B., & Henry, M. (1997). Educational policy and the politics of change. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• The Historical Association. (2013). Consulted? Yes. Listened to? No. Retrieved March 25, 2013, from http://www.history.org.uk/resources/primary_news_1762.html
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, L. (2012). Rethinking the importance of teaching: Curriculum and collaboration in an era of localism. Retrieved March 25, 2013, from http://www.thersa.org/__data/assets/pdf_file/0008/570716/RSA-Re-thinking-the-importance-of-teaching.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Timmins, N. (1996). The five giants: A biography of the welfare state. London: Fontana Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tomlinson, S. (2005). Education in a post-welfare society. Berkshire: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tooley, J. (1996). Education without the state. London: Institute of Economic Affairs.
   Google Scholar
• Trowler, P. (2003). Education Policy, London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Watson, N. (2005). Postmodernism and lifestyles. In S. Sim (Ed.), The Routledge companion to postmodernism (2nd ed., pp. 35–44.). Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Whitty, G., Power, S., & Halpin, D. (1998). Devolution and choice in education, the school, the state and the market. Buckingham: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Williamson, B. (2012). Centrifugal schooling: Third sector policy networks and the reassembling of curriculum policy in England. Journal of Education Policy, 27(6), 775–794.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, M. (2012, November). A curriculum of the dead, for the living, or perhaps no curriculum at all? (Conference discussion) Standing Committee for the Education and Training of Teachers' Annual Conference.
   Google Scholar