The Wheel of Writing: a model of the writing domain for the teaching and assessing of writing as a key competency

References

• Bakhtin, M. (1986). Speech genres and other late essays. ( V. McGee, Trans.). Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barton, D. (1994). Literacy: The ecology of written language. Routledge: London.
   Google Scholar
• Barton, D., & Hamilton, M. (1998). Local literacies: Reading and writing in one community. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bazerman, C. (1988). Shaping written knowledge: The genre and activity of the experimental article in science. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bazerman, C. (2000). Letters and the social grounding of differentiated genres. In D. Barton & N. Hall (Eds.), Letter writing as a social practice (pp. 15–30). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Bazerman, C. (2009). Genre and cognitive development: beyond writing to learn. In C. Bazerman, A. Bonini, & D. Figueiredo (Eds.), Genre in a changing world (pp. 279–294). Fort Collins, CO: Parlor Press LCC.
   Google Scholar
• Beck, S., & Jeffrey, J. V. (2007). Genres of high-stakes writing assessments and the construct of writing competence. Assessing Writing, 12, 60–79.
   Google Scholar
• Behinzadeh, N., & Engelhard, G, Jr. (2011). Historical view of the influences of measurement and writing theories on the practice of writing assessment in the United States. Assessing Writing, 16, 189–211.
   Google Scholar
• Berge, K. L. (1988). Skolestilen som genre [The school essay as genre]. Oslo: Cappelen.
   Google Scholar
• Berge, K. L. (1995). Communication. In R. Asher (Ed.). Encyclopedia of language and linguistics (pp. 95–102). London: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Berge, K. L. (2002a). Hidden norms in assessment of students' exam essays in Norwegian upper secondary schools. Written Communication, 19, 458–492.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berge, K. L. (2002b). From utterance to text, again: Theoretical reflections on the notion of ‘text’ based on empirical studies of writing in different contexts. In P. Coppock & P. Violi (Eds.), The semiotics of writing: Transdisciplinary perspectives on the technology of writing (pp. 157–182). Turnhout: Brepols.
   Google Scholar
• Berge, K. L. (2006). Perspektiv på skriftkultur [Perspectives on literacy]. In S. Matre (Ed.), Utfordringar for skriveopplæring og skriveforsking i dag [Challenges in the teaching of writing and writing research today]. Trondheim: Tapir.
   Google Scholar
• Berge, K. L. (2007). The rhetoric of science in practice: Experiences from Nordic research on subject-oriented texts and text cultures. In K. Fløttum (Ed.), Language and discipline perspectives on academic discourse (pp. 40–63). Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Berge, K. L. (2008). Teksten [The text]. In K. Asdal, K. L. Berge, K. Gammelgaard, H. Jordheim, T. Rem, T. Riiser-Gundersen, & J. Tønnesson (Eds.), Tekst og historie [Text and history] (pp. 36–68). Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
   Google Scholar
• Berge, K. L. (2009). Writing as a text-cultural competence: Challenges and solutions in defining writing as a basic competence in the new Norwegian curriculum. In J. Kalliokoski, T. Nikko, S. Pyhäniemi, & S. Shore (Eds.), The diversity of speech and writing (pp. 15–42). Helsinki: AfinLa.
   Google Scholar
• Berge, K. L. (2011). Rhetoric and the study of texts, text norms and text cultures. In J. E. Kjeldsen & J. Grue (Eds.), Scandinavian studies in rhetoric. Rhetorica Scandinavica 1997-2010 (pp. 88–105). Odökra: Retorikförlaget.
   Google Scholar
• Berge, K. L. (2014). The evolution of a public opinion text culture in Denmark-Norway 1770–1799. In K. Gammelgaard & E. Holmøyvik (Eds.), Textualizing democracy: The Norwegian constitution 1814–2014 (pp. 167–182) New York, NY: Berghahn.
   Google Scholar
• Bernstein, B. (1996). Pedagogy, symbolic control, and identity. London: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Billett, S. (1998). Appropriation and ontogeny: Identifying compatibility between cognitive and sociocultural contributions to adult learning and development. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 17, 21–34.
   Google Scholar
• Evensen, L. S. (2001). Grounding in interaction. In P. Coppock & P. Violi (Eds.), The semiotics of writing: Transdisciplinary perspectives on the technology of writing (pp. 137–155). Turnhout: Brepols.
   Google Scholar
• Evensen, L. S. (2002). Convention from below: Negotiating interaction and culture in argumentative writing. Written Communication, 19, 382–413.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evensen, L. S. (2010). En gyldig vurdering av elevers skrivekompetanse [A valid assessment of pupils' writing competency]? In J. Smidt, I. Folkvord, & A. J. Aasen (Eds.), Rammer for skriving: Om skriveutvikling i skole og yrkesliv [Frames of writing. On writing development in school and work] (pp.13–31). Trondheim: Tapir.
   Google Scholar
• Evensen, L. S. (2013). Applied linguistics: Towards a new integration? London: Equinox.
   Google Scholar
• Evensen, L. S., Berge, K. L., Fasting, R. B., Thygesen, R., & Vagle, W. (2005). Context of situation or context of culture? The case of learning to write. In S. Granath, J. Milander, & E. Wennö (Eds.), The power of words. Studies in honour of Moria Linnarud (pp. 63–71). Karlstad: Universitetstryckeriet.
   Google Scholar
• Goody, J. & Watt, I. (1963). The consequences of literacy. In Comparative Studies in Social History, 5, 304–345.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goody, J. (1986). The logic of writing and the organization of society. Cambridge: Cambridge UP.
   Google Scholar
• Goody, J. (1987). The Interface between the written and the oral. Cambridge: Cambridge UP.
   Google Scholar
• Gorman, T. P., Purves, A. C., & Degenhart, R. E. (Eds.) (1988). The IEA study of written composition I. The international writing tasks and scorings scales. International studies in educational achievement (Vol. 5). Oxford: Pergamon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hung, D. W. L. (1999). Activity, apprenticeship, and epistemological appropriation: implications from the writings. Educational Psychologist, 34, 193–205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ivanic, R. (2004). Discourses of writing and learning to write. Language and Education, 18, 220–245.
   Google Scholar
• Karlsson, A. M. (2006). En arbetsdag i skriftsamhället. [A day at work in the literacy society]. Stockholm: Norstedts akademiska.
   Google Scholar
• Kress, G. (1994). Before writing: Rethinking the paths to literacy. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ledin, P., & Mackin, D. (2015). How lists, bullet points and tables recontextualise social practice. A multimodal study of management language in Swedish universities. Critical Discourse Studies, 12, 463–481.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luckmann, T. (1992). On the communicative adjustment of perspectives, dialogue and communicative genres. In A. H. Wold (Ed.), The dialogue alternative. Towards a theory of language and mind (pp. 219–234). Oslo: Scandinavian UP.
   Google Scholar
• Luhmann, N. (1986). Love as passion. The codification of intimacy. London: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Malinowski, B. (1923). The problem of meaning in primitive languages. In C. K. Ogden & I. A. Richards (Eds.), The meaning of meaning (pp. 296–336). London: Routledge and Keegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Mertz, E., & Parmentier, R. J. (1985). Semiotic mediation: Sociocultural and psychological perspectives. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, C. R. (1984). Genre as social action. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 70, 151–167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nystrand, M. (1986). The structure of written communication: Studies in reciprocity between writers and readers. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nystrand, M., Greene, S., & Wiemelt, J. (1993). Where did composition studies come from? Toward an intellectual history of writing research. Written Communication, 10, 267–333.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olsson, D. (1994). The World on Paper: The Conceptual and Cognitive Implications of Writing and Reading. Cambridge: Cambridge UP.
   Google Scholar
• Olson, D., & Cole, M. (Eds.). (2006). Technology, literacy, and the evolution of society. Implications on the work of Jack Goody. London: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Ongstad, S. (1997). Sjanger, posisjonering og oppgaveideologier [Genre, positioning, and ideologies of assignments] (PhD thesis). NTNU, Trondheim.
   Google Scholar
• Prior, P. (2006). A sociocultural theory of writing. In C. A. MacArthur, S. Graham, and J. Fitzgerald (Eds.), Handbook of writing research (pp. 54–66). New York, NY: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Prior, P., & Hengst, J. (2010). Exploring semiotic remediation as discourse practice. London: Palgrave MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Purves, A. (Ed.) (1992). The IEA study of written composition II: Education and performance in fourteen countries. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scribner, S., & Cole, M. (1981). The psychology of literacy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard UP.
   Google Scholar
• Street, B. (1984). Literacy in theory and practice. Cambridge: Cambridge UP.
   Google Scholar
• Swales, J. (1990). Genre analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge UP.
   Google Scholar
• Vähäpassi, A. (1988). The domain of school writing and development of the writing tasks. In T. P. Gorman, A. C. Purves, & R. E. Degenhart (Eds.), The IEA study of written composition I. The international writing tasks and scorings scales (pp. 15–40). Oxford: Pergamon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wertsch, J. V. (Ed.). (1985). Culture, communication and cognition: vygotskian perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge UP.
   Google Scholar
• Wertsch, J. (1991). Voices of the mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard UP.
   Google Scholar
• Wertsch, J. (1997). Narrative tools of history and identity. Culture and Psychology, 3, 5–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar