Effectiveness of the multidimensional curriculum model in developing higher-order thinking skills in elementary and secondary students

References

• Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. ( Eds.). (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives. New York, NY: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Bell, S. (2010). Project based learning for the 12st century: Skills for the future. The Clearinghouse, 83, 39–43.
   Google Scholar
• Chipman, S. F., Segal, J. W., & Glaser, R. (2013). Thinking and Learning Skills: Volume 2: Research and Open Questions (2nd Ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Christensen, C. M., Horn, M. B., & Staker, H. (2013). Is K-12 blended learning disruptive? An introduction of the theory of hybrids. Clayton Christensen Institute. Retrieved February 18, 2016, from www.christenseninstitute.org
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. (2013). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• de Bono, E. (1970). Lateral thinking: Creativity step by step. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
   Google Scholar
• de Bono, E. (2006). Lateral thinking: The power of provocation manual. de Bono Thinking Systems.
   Google Scholar
• Dwyer, C. P., Hogan, M. J., & Stewart, I. (2014). An integrated critical thinking framework for the 21st century. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 12, 43–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferrari, A., & Wyse, D. (2015). Creativity in education: An overview of the implications of creativity in curricula. In D. Wyse, L. Hayward, & J. Pandya ( Eds.), The SAGE handbook of curriculum, pedagogy and assessment. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Future Problem Solving Program (2001). Future problem solving program coach's handbook. Lexington, KY: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Grant, M. M. (2002). Getting a grip on project-based learning: Theory, cases and recommendations. Meridian: A Middle School Computer Technologies Journal, 5(Winter). Retrieved February 19, 2016, from http://www.ncsu.edu/meridian/win2002/514/project-based.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Halpern, D. F. (2014). Critical thinking across the curriculum: A brief edition of thought & knowledge. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hativa, N. (2003). Teaching processes in the classroom. Tel Aviv: Academic Publishing for Teachers Professional Development. (Hebrew)
   Google Scholar
• Higgins, S. (2014). Critical thinking for 21st-century education: A cyber-tooth curriculum? Prospects, 44(4), 559–574.
   Google Scholar
• Higgins, S., Hall, E., Baumfield, V., & Moseley, D. (2005). A meta-analysis of the impact of the implementation of thinking skills approaches on pupils. Project Report. London: EPPI-Centre, Social Science Research Unit, Institute of Education, University of London.
   Google Scholar
• Hyerle, D., & Alper, L. (2011). Student successes with thinking maps. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Isaksen, S. G., & Treffinger, D. J. (2004). Celebrating 50 years of reflective practice: Versions of creative problem solving. Journal of Creative Behavior, 38, 75–101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kauffman, D. I. (1976). Teaching the future. Palm Springs, CA: ETC.
   Google Scholar
• Leat, D., & Higgins, S. (2002). The role of powerful pedagogical strategies in curriculum development. Curriculum Journal, 13(1), 71–85.
   Google Scholar
• Maker, C. J., Zimmerman, R., Paz Gomez-Arizaga, M., Pease, R., & Burke, E. M. (2015). Developing real-life problem solving: Integrating the DISCOVER problem matrix, problem based learning, and thinking actively in a social context. In H. E. Vidergor & C. R. Harris ( Eds.), Applied practice for educators of gifted and able learners. Rotterdam: Sense.
   Google Scholar
• Marzano, R. J., Brandt, R. S., Hughes, C. S., Jones, B. F., Presseisen, B. Z., Rankin, S. C., & Suhor, C. (1988). Dimensions of thinking: A framework for curriculum and instruction. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
   Google Scholar
• Moseley, D. (2005). Frameworks for thinking: A handbook for teaching and learning. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Partnership for 21st Century Skills (2008). Retrieved February, 1, 2016 from www.21stcenturyskills.org
   Google Scholar
• Passig, D. (1995). To teach and learn the future: Futuristic educational and training systems. Tel Aviv: Bar-Ilan University.
   Google Scholar
• Passig, D. (2001). To study and to teach the future. Journal of Jewish Education, 66(3), 41–50. ( Hebrew)
   Google Scholar
• Passig, D. (2004). Future time span as cognitive skill in future studies. Futures Research Quarterly, 19(4), 27–47.
   Google Scholar
• Passig, D. (2013). Forcognito – The future mind. Tel Aviv: Mishkal – Yediot Ahronot Books and Hemed Books. (Hebrew)
   Google Scholar
• Perkins, D., Tishman, S., Ritchhart, R., Donis, K., & Andrade, A. (2000). Intelligence in the wild: A dispositional view of intellectual traits. Educational Psychology Review, 12(3), 269–293.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ritchhart, R., & Perkins, D. (2008). Teaching Students to Think: Making Thinking Visible. Educational Leadership, 65(5), 57–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salant, P., & Dillman, D. A. (1994). How to conduct your own survey. New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Savery, J. R. (2006). Overview of problem-based learning: Definitions and distinctions. The Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 1(1), 9–20.
   Google Scholar
• Savery, J. R. (2015). Overview of problem-based learning: Definitions and distinctions. In A. Walker, H. Leary, C. E. Hemlo-Silver & P. A. Ertmer (Eds.), Essential readings in problem-based learning: Exploring and extending the legacy of Howard S. Barrows (pp. 5–15). West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Segal, J. W., Chipman, S. F., & Glaser, R. (2014). Thinking and learning skills: Volume 1: Relating instruction to research. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Tomlinson, C., & Jarvis, J. (2009). Differentiation: Making curriculum work for all students through responsive planning and instruction. In J. Renzulli, J. Gubbins, K. McMillan, R. Eckert, & C. Little ( Eds.), Systems and models for developing programs for the gifted and talented (pp. 599–625). Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tomlinson, C. A., Kaplan, S. N., Renzulli, J. S., Purcell, J., Leppien, J., & Burns, D. (2002). The parallel curriculum: A design to develop high potential and challenge high-ability learners. Washington, DC: Corwin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Trilling, B., & Fadel, C. (2009). 21^st century skills: Learning for life in our times (3rd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Josse-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Van Tassel-Baska, J., & Stambaugh, T. (2006). Comprehensive curriculum for gifted learners. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• VanTassel-Baska, J., & Little C. ( Eds.), (2011). Content based curriculum for high ability learners. Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vickery, A. (2013). Frameworks for thinking: Developing active learning in the primary classroom. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Vidergor, H. E. (2010). The Multidimensional Curriculum Model. Gifted and Talented International, 25(2), 153–165.
   Google Scholar
• Vidergor, H. E. (2015). The multidimensional curriculum model. In H. E. Vidergor & C. R. Harris ( Eds.), Applied practice for educators of gifted and able learners. Rotterdam: Sense.
   Google Scholar
• Wallace, B. (2001). Teaching thinking skills across the primary curriculum. London: David Fulton (A NACE-Fulton Pub) ISBN 1 85346 766 9.
   Google Scholar
• Wallace, B. (2015). Using the TASC thinking and problem-solving framework to create a curriculum of opportunity across the full spectrum of human abilities: TASC – thinking actively in a social context. In H. E. Vidergor & C. R. Harris ( Eds.), Applied practice for educators of gifted and able learners (pp. 113–130). Rotterdam: Sense.
   Google Scholar
• Wegerif, R., Li, L., & Kaufman, J. C. ( Eds.). (2015). The Routledge international handbook of research on teaching thinking. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Yoad, Z. (2010). Thinking in the learning process during the knowledge era. Tel Aviv: Maalot. (Hebrew)
   Google Scholar
• Zohar, A. (1996). To learn, think, and learn to think. Ministry of Education, Pedagogical Management, Curriculum Division. Jerusalem: Branco Weiss. (Hebrew)
   Google Scholar
• Zohar, A., & Dori, Y. (2003). Higher order thinking skills and low-achieving students: Are they mutually exclusive? The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12(2), 145–181.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zohar, A., & Nemet, F. (2002). Fostering students' knowledge and argumentation skills through dilemmas in human genetics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39, 35–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar