Social Class, Gender and Ethnic Differences in Subjects Taken at Age 14.

References

• Anders, J., Henderson, M., Moulton, V., & Sullivan, A. (in press). The role of schools in explaining individuals’ subject choices at age 14. Oxford Review of Education.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AQA. (2015). Subject list. Retrieved from http://www.aqa.org.uk/subjects ( 18 August 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Bell, S. J. (2001). Patterns of subject update and examination entry 1984-1997. Educational Studies, 27(2), 201–219.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boudon, R. (1974). Education, opportunity, and social inequality. New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Breen, R., & Goldthorpe, J. (1997). Explaining educational differentials: Towards a formal rational action theory. Rationality and Society, 9(3), 275–305
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caldas, S. J., & Bankston, C. (2012). Effect of school population socioeconomic status on individual academic achievement. The Journal of Educational Research, 90(5), 269–277.
   Google Scholar
• Chevalier, A. (2011). Subject choice and earnings of UK graduates. Economics of Education Review, 30, 1187–1201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coe, R., Searle, J., Barmby, P., Jones, K., & Higgins, S. (2008). Relative difficulty of examination in different subjects. Durham: CEM Centre, Durham University. Retrieved from http://www.cem.org/attachments/score2008report.pdf ( 21 August 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Davies, P., Telhaj, S., Hutton, D., Adnett, N., & Coe, R. (2008). Socioeconomic background, gender and subject choice in secondary schooling. Educational Research, 50(3), 235–248.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Department for Education, National Centre for Social Research (DfE). (2012). First longitudinal study of young people in England: Waves (12th Ed. 1-7, pp. 2004–2010). [ data collection]. London: Data Service. SN: 5545, http://dx/doi.org/10.5255/UKDA-SN-5545-3
   Google Scholar
• Department for Education, National Centre for Social Research (DfE). (2013). First longitudinal study of young people in England: Waves (2nd ed. 1–7, pp. 2004–2010). Secure Access. [ data collection]. London: Data Service. Retrieved from http://dx/doi.org/10.5255/UKDA-SN-7104-2
   Google Scholar
• Dolton, P. J., & Vignoles, A. (2002). The return on post-compulsory school mathematics study. Economica, 69(273), 113–142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Francis, B. (2000). The gender subject: Students’ subject preferences and discussions of gender and subject ability. Oxford Review of Education, 26(1), 35–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galindo-Rueda, F., Marcenaro-Gutierrez, O., & Vignoles, A. (2004). The widening socio-economic gap in UK higher education. National Institute Economic Review, 190, 75–88.
   Google Scholar
• Gorard, S., & See, B. H. (2009). The impact of socio-economic status on participation and attainment in science. Birmingham: Birmingham University. Retrieved from http://eprints.bham.ac.uk/299/1/Gorard_2009_Studies_in_Science_Education.pdf ( 19 August 2015 ).
   Google Scholar
• Heath, A., & Brinbaum, Y. (2007). Explaining ethnic inequalities in educational attainment. Ethnicities, 7(3), 291–305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heath, A. F., Rothon, C., & Kilpi, E. (2008). The second generation in Western Europe: Education unemployment, and occupational attainment. Annual Review of Sociology, 34, 211–235.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodgson, A., & Spours, K. (2008). 14-19 Education and training: Curriculum, qualifications and organisation. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, Michelle, Erikson, Robert, Goldthorpe, John H., & Yaish, Meir (2007). Primary and secondary effects in class differentials in educational attainment. Acta Sociologica, 50(3), 211–229
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jin, W., Muriel, A., & Sibieta, L. (2011). Subject and course choices at ages 14 and 16 amongst young people in England: Insights from behavioural economics. London: Institute for Fiscal Studies, Department for Education. Research Report DFE-RR160.
   Google Scholar
• Jonsson, J. O. (1999). Explaining sex differences in educational choice: An empirical assessment of a rational choice model. European Sociological Review, 15(4), 391–404.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lessard-Phillips, L. (2009). Degrees of success: The education of the second generation in Canada and Britain. Oxford: University of Oxford, DPhil Sociology.
   Google Scholar
• Marks, Gary N. (2015). Are school-SES effects statistical artefacts? Evidence from longitudinal population data. Oxford Review of Education, 41(1), 122–144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moulton, V., Sullivan, A., Henderson, M., & Anders, J. (in press). Does what you study at age 14-16 matter for educational transitions post-16? Oxford Review of Education.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noden, P., Shiner, M., & Modood, T. (2014). University offer rates for candidates from different ethnic categories. Oxford Review of Education, 40(3), 349–369.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OCR. (2015). Subject list. Retrieved from http://www.ocr.org.uk/qualifications/by-subject/ ( 18 August 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Ofqual. (2015). Inter-subject comparability of exam standards in GCSE and a level: ISC Working Paper No. 3. Coventry: The Office of Qualifications and Examinations Regulation, December 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Perry, L., & McConney, A. (2010). School socio-economic composition and student outcomes in Australia: Implications for educational policy. Australian Journal of Education, 54(1), 72–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plewis, I. (2009). Ethnic differences in educational attainments and progress revisited. CCSR working paper 2009-01. Manchester: Cathie Marsh Centre for Census and Survey Research.
   Google Scholar
• Rothon, C. (2005). Black and minority Ethnic educational attainment and engagement with school in Britain (DPhil Sociology). Oxford: University of Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Rouhani, S. (2014). Intersectionality-informed quantitative research: A primer. Vancouver: SFU: The Institute for Intersectionality Research & Policy.
   Google Scholar
• Russell Group. (2013/14). Informed choices: A Russell group guide to making decisions about post-16 education. London: Russell Group. Retrieved from http://www.russellgroup.org/InformedChoices-latest.pdf ( 8 April 2015 ).
   Google Scholar
• Sullivan, A. (2009). Academic self‐concept, gender and single‐sex schooling. British Educational Research Journal, 35(2), 259–288.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sullivan, A., Zimdars, A., & Health, A. (2010). The social structure of the 14-16 curriculum in England: International studies. Sociology of Education, 20(1), 5–21.
   Google Scholar
• Sullivan, A., & Unwin, L. (2011). Towards compulsory education in England. In S. Lamb, E. Markussen, R. Teese, N. Sandberg, & J. Polesel (Eds.), School dropout and completion (pp. 117–135). Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• The Royal Society. (2008). Exploring the relationship between socioeconomic status and participation and attainment in science education. London: The Royal Society. Retrieved from https://royalsociety.org/∼/media/Royal_Society_Content/policy/publications/2008/4294969756.pdf ( 19 August 2015 ).
   Google Scholar
• Tripney, J., Newman, M., Bangpan, M., Niza, C., MacKintosh, M., & Sinclair, J. (2010). Subject choice in STEM: Factors influencing young people (aged 14-19) in education. A systematic review of the UK literature. London. Retrieved from http://www.wellcome.ac.uk/About-us/Publications/Reports/Education/WTX063080.htm( 19 August 2015 ).
   Google Scholar
• Vidal Rodeiro, C. L. (2007). Uptake of GCSE subjects 2000–2006. Statistics report series no. 4. Cambridge Assessment. Cambridge: Assessment Research and Development Cambridge Assessment. Retrieved from http://www.cambridgeassessment.org.uk/images/111061-uptake-of-gcse-subjects-2000-2006.pdf ( 12 October 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Waters, M. C., Heath, A., Tran, V. C., & Boliver, V. (2013). Second generation attainment and inequality: Primary and secondary effects on educational outcomes in Britain and the US. In R. Alba & J. Holdaway (Eds.), The children of immigrants at school: A comparative look at integration in the United States and Western Europe (pp. 120–159). New York, NY: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wolf, A. (2011). Review of vocational education – the wolf report. London: Department for Education. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/180504/DFE-00031-2011.pdf ( 18 August 2015 ).
   Google Scholar