Standards-based reform to senior-secondary curriculum and metacognition in the literacy domain

References

• ACARA (2009). Curriculum design. Retrieved 4 March 2011 from http://www.acara.edu.au/verve/_resources/Curriculum_Design_Paper_pdf
   Google Scholar
• ACARA (2015, October 16). Australian curriculum version 7.5. Sydney: Author. Retrieved fromhttp://www.australiancurriculum.edu.au-Home-TheAustralianCurriculumv7.5
   Google Scholar
• ACARA (n.d.-a, March 4). Information sheet: A world-class curriculum for the 21st century. Retrieved from http://www.acara.edu.au/verve/_resources/Information_Sheet_A_world-class_curriculum_for_the_21st_century.pdf
   Google Scholar
• ACARA (n.d.-b, March 4). Information sheet: Diversity of learners. Retrieved from http://www.australiancurriculum.edu.au/static_20110301143956/docs/Information%20Sheet%20Diversity%20of%20 learners.pdf
   Google Scholar
• ACARA (n.d.-c, March 4). Information sheet: Structure of the Australian curriculum. Retrieved from http://www.acara.edu.au/verve?_resources/Information_Sheet_Structure_of_the_Foundation_to_Year_10_Australian_Curriculum.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Allen, K. D., & Hancock, T. E. (2008). Reading comprehension improvement with individualized cognitive profiles and metacognition. Literacy Research and Instruction, 47, 124–139. doi:10.1080/19388070801938320
   Google Scholar
• Baas, D., Castelijns, J., Vermeulen, M., Martens, R., & Segers, M. (2015). The relation between Assessment for Learning and elementary students’ cognitive and metacognitive strategy use. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 33–46. doi:10.1111/bjep.12058
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker, L., & Beall, L. C. (2009). Metacognitive processes and reading comprehension. In S. Israel & G. Duffy (Eds.), Handbook of research on reading comprehension (pp. 373–388). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ball, S. J. (2007). Education policy and social class: The selected works of Stephen J. Ball. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ball, S. J., Maguire, M., & Braun, A. (2012). How schools do policy: Policy enactments in secondary schools. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Black, P. (2001). Dreams, strategies and systems: Portraits of assessment past, present and future. Assessment in Education, 8(1), 65–85. doi:10.1080/09695940120033261
   Google Scholar
• Black, P., Harrison, C., Lee, C., Marshall, B., & Wiliam, D. (2003). Assessment for learning: Putting it into practice. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Inside the black box: Raising standards through classroom assessment. Phi Delta Kappan, 80(2), 81 +. doi:10.1177/0011128711398030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2004). The formative purpose: Assessment must first promote learning. In M. Wilson (Ed.), Towards coherence between classroom assessment and accountability (pp. 20–50). Chicago, IL: The National Society for the Study of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2006a). Developing a theory of formative assessment. In J. Gardner (Ed.), Assessment and learning (pp. 81–100). London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2006b). Assessment for learning in the classroom. In J. Gardner (Ed.), Assessment and learning (pp. 9–25). London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2009). Developing the theory of formative assessment. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 21, 5–31. doi:10.1007/s11092-008-9068-5x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2011). Research methods in education. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Crafter, G., Crook, P., & Reid, A. (2006). Success for all: Ministerial review of senior secondary education in SA. Adelaide: State of SA.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. (2008). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Crotty, M. (1998). The foundations of social research. St Leonards: Allen & Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, P., & Hughes, J. (2009). The fractured arms of government and the premature end of lifelong learning. Journal of Education Policy, 24(5), 595–610. doi:10.1080/02680930903125145
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desautel, D. (2009). Becoming a thinking thinker: Metacognition, self-reflection, and classroom practice. Teachers College Record, 3(8), 1997–2020.
   Google Scholar
• Dudley, P., & Swaffield, S. (2008). Understanding and using assessment data. In S. Swaffield (Ed.), Unlocking assessment: Understanding for reflection and application (pp. 105–120). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Earl, L., Watson, N., Levin, B., Leithwood, K., Fullan, M., & Torrence, N. (2003, July 8). Watching and learning 3: Final report of the Ontario Institute for Studies in Education (OISE)/University of Toronto (U of T) evaluation of the implementation of the National Literacy and Numeracy Strategies. Toronto: OISE/University of Toronto. Retrieved from http://www.standards.dfes.gov.uk/literacy/publications
   Google Scholar
• Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognitive and cognitive monitoring: A new era of cognitive development inquiry. American Psychologist, 34, 906–911.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harlen, W., Gipps, C., Broadfoot, P., & Nuttall, D. (1992). Assessment and the improvement of education. The Curriculum Journal, 3(3), 215–230. doi:10.1080/0958517920030302
   Google Scholar
• Hattie, J. A. C. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hopmann, S. T. (2008). No child, no school, no state left behind: Schooling in the age of accountability. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 40(4), 417–456. doi:10.1080/00220270801989818
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelchtermans, G. (2007). Macropolitics caught up in micropolitics: The case of the policy on quality control in Flanders (Belgium). Journal of Education Policy, 22(4), 471–491. doi:10.1080/02680930701390669
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhn, D. (2000). Metacognitive development. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 9, 178–181.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leithwood, K., Jantzi, D., Earl, L., Watson, N., Levin, B., & Fullan, M. (2004). Strategic leadership for large-scale reform: The case of England's National Literacy and Numeracy Strategy. School Leadership and Management, 24(1), 57–79. doi:10.1080/1363243042000172822
   Google Scholar
• Levin, B. (2008). How to change 5000 schools: A practical and positive approach for teaching change at every level. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
   Google Scholar
• Levin, B. (2010). The challenge of large-scale literacy improvement. School Effectiveness and School Improvement: An International Journal of Research, Policy and Practice, 21(4), 359–376. doi:10.1080/09243453.2010.486589
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonald, T., Thornley, C., Ciriza, F., Behumi, K., & Staley, R. (2011). Achieving success: The role of metacognition in secondary literacy learning. Set: Research Information for Teachers, (2), 47–54.
   Google Scholar
• Paris, S., Cross, D. R., & Lipson, M. Y. (1984). Informed strategies for learning: A program to improve children's reading awareness and comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 1239–1252. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.76.6.1239
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips, N., & Hardy, C. (2002). Discourse analysis: Investigating processes of social construction. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Pullin, D. C., & Haertel, E. H. (2008). Assessment through the lens of ‘opportunity to learn’. In P. A. Moss, D. C. Pullin, J. P. Gee, E. H. Haertel, & L. J. Young (Eds.), Assessment, equity, and opportunity to learn (pp. 17–41). Leiden: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Resnick, L. (1994). Performance puzzles: Issues in measuring capabilities and certifying accomplishments: Project 2.3 complex performance assessments. Los Angeles: National Centre for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing.
   Google Scholar
• SACE Board of SA (2015, March 7). The Personal Learning Plan. Adelaide: Author. Retrieved from https://www.sace.sa.edu.au/web/personal-learning-plan/stage-1/planning-to-teach/subject-outline
   Google Scholar
• Schubert, W. H. (2010). Intended curriculum. In C. Kridal (Ed.), Encyclopedia of curriculum studies (pp. 489–490). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Sperling, R., Howard, B., Staley, R., & DuBois, N. (2004). Metacognition and self-regulated learning constructs. Educational Research and Education, 10(2), 117–139. doi:10.1076/edre.10.2.117.27905
   Google Scholar
• Whetton, C. (2009). A brief history of a testing time: National curriculum assessment in England 1989–2008. Educational Research, 51(2), 137–159. doi:10.1080/00131880902891222
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yates, L., Collins, C., & O'Connor, K. (2011). Australian curriculum making decisions. In L. Yates, C. Collins, & K. O'Connor (Eds.), Australia's curriculum dilemmas – state cultures and the big issues (pp. 3–22). Melbourne: Melbourne University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. (2014). Case study research: Design and methods (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar