Exploring the role of ‘brokers’ in developing a localised curriculum

References

• Akkerman, S., & Bakker, B. (2011). Boundary crossing and boundary objects. Review of Educational Researcher, 81, 132–169.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akkerman, S., & van Eijck, M. (2013). Re-theorising the student dialogically across and between boundaries of multiple communities. British Educational Research Journal, 39(1), 60–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson-Butcher, D., Lawson, H. A.,Bean, J., Flaspohler, P., Boone, B., & Kwiatkowski, A. (2008). Community collaboration to improve schools: Introducing a new model from Ohio. Children & Schools, 30, 161–172.
   Google Scholar
• Angel, V., Eckford, L., & Lowery, L. (2017). Developing a community orientation through a focus on local heritage a nd environment. In D. Leat (Ed.), Enquiry and project based learning: Students, school and society (pp.144–159). Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Au, W. (2007). High-stakes testing and curricular control: A qualitative metasynthesis. Educational Researcher, 36(5), 258–267.
   Google Scholar
• Ball, S. (2003). The teacher's soul and the terrors of performativity. Journal of Education Policy, 18(2), 215–228.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berliner, D. (2011). Rational responses to high stakes testing: The case of curriculum narrowing and the harm that follows. Cambridge Journal of Education, 41(3), 287–302.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biesta, G., & Tedder, M. (2007). Agency and learning in the life course: Towards an ecological perspective. Studies in the Education of Adults, 39, 132–149.
   Google Scholar
• Burt, R., Jannotta, J., & Mahoney, J. (1998). Personality correlates of structural holes. Social Networks, 20(1), 63–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canen, A. (1999). The challenges of conducting an ethnographic case study of a United Kingdom teacher education institution. Journal of Teacher Education, 50(1), 50–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Celio, C., Durlak, J., & Dymnicki, A. (2011). A meta-analysis of the impact of service-learning on students. Journal of Experiential Education, 34(2), 164–181.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, D., & Mehta, J. (2017). Why reform sometimes succeeds: Understanding the conditions that produce reforms that last. American Educational Research Journal, 54(4), 644–690.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. (1966). Democracy and education: An introduction to the philosophy of education. New York, NY: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dibben, M., Eley Morris, S., & Lean, M. (2000). Situational trust and cooperative partnerships between physicians and their patients: A theoretical explanation transferable from business practice. QJM: An International Journal of Medicine, 93(1), 55–61.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engestrom, Y., Engestrom, R., & Karkkainen, M. (1995). Polycontextuality and boundary crossing in expert cognition: Learning and problem solving in complex work activities. Learning and Instruction, 5, 319–336.
   Google Scholar
• Epstein, J. L., & Sheldon, S. B. (2002). Present and accounted for: Improving student attendance through family and community involvement. Journal of Educational Research, 95(5), 308–318.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fenwick, T. (2007). Organisational learning in the “knots”: Discursive capacities emerging in a school-university collaboration. Journal of Educational Administration, 45(2), 138–153.
   Google Scholar
• Gonzalez, N., Moll, L.C., & Amanti, C. (Eds.). (2005). Funds of knowledge: Theorizing practices in households, communities, and classrooms. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Goodson, I. (2008). Investigating the teacher's life and work. Rotterdam: Sense Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Gould, R., & Fernandez, R. (1989). Structures of mediation: A formal approach to brokerage in transaction Networks. Sociological Methodology, 19, 89–126.
   Google Scholar
• Heffernan, T. (2004). Trust formation in cross-cultural business to business relationships. Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal, 7(2), 114–125.
   Google Scholar
• Landa, M. S. H. (2008). Crossing the divide: A phenomenological study of early childhood literacy teachers who choose to work with children in high-poverty schools (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). College Park: University of Maryland.
   Google Scholar
• Lawson, M., & Lawson, H. (2013). New conceptual frameworks for student engagement research, policy, and practice. Review of Educational Research, 83(3), 432–479.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leat, D. (Ed.). (2017). Enquiry and project based learning: Students, schools and society. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Leat, D., & Thomas, U. (2016a). Community curriculum making through enquiry and project based learning: A guide for schools and partners. Newcastle University: Research Centre for Learning and Teaching. Retrieved from http://www.ncl.ac.uk/media/wwwnclacuk/cflat/files/Community%20Curriculum%20Making%20guide.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Leat, D., & Thomas, U. (2016b). Productive pedagogies: Narrowing the gap between schools and communities. Forum, 58(3), 371–383.
   Google Scholar
• Lewicki, R., & Bunker, B. (1995). Trust in relationships: A model of trust development and decline. In B. Bunker & J. Rubin (Eds.), Conflict, co-operation and justice (pp. 133–173). San-Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• McGrane, J., Halliday, J., & Moore, S. (2017). The Broomley Bee project. In D. Leat (Ed.), Enquiry and project ba sed learning: Students, school and society (pp. 171–192). Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, R., & Kirby, C. (2016). The UK STEM education landscape. A report for the Lloyd's Register Foundation from the Royal Academy of Engineering Education and Skills Committee. Retrieved from www.raeng.org.uk/stemlandscape.
   Google Scholar
• Nasir, N., & Hand, V. (2008). From the court to the classroom: Opportunities for engagement, learning, and identity in basketball and classroom mathematics. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 17, 143–179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patton, A, & Robin, J. (2012). Work that matters – The teacher's guide to project based learning. London: Paul Hamlyn Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Phelan, P., Davidson, A. L., & Cao, H. T. (1991). Students’ multiple worlds: Negotiating the boundaries of family, peer, and school cultures. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 22, 224–250.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Priestley, M., Biesta, G., & Robinson, S. (2013). Teachers as agents of change: Teacher agency and emerging models of curriculum. In M. Priestley & G. Biesta (Ed.), Reinventing the curriculum: New trends in curriculum policy and practice (pp. 187–206). London: Bloomsbury Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Priestley, M., Edwards, R., & Priestley, A. (2012). Teacher agency in curriculum making: Agents for change and spaces for manoeuvre. Curriculum Inquiry, 42(2), 191–213.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reeves, J., & Forde, C. (2004). The social dynamics of changing practice. Cambridge Journal of Education, 34, 85–102.
   Google Scholar
• Rousseau, D., Sitkin, S., Burt, R., & Camerer, C. (1998). Not so different after all: A cross discipline view of trust. Academy of Management Review, 23(3), 393–404.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanders, M. G. (2003). Community involvement in schools: From concept to practice. Education and Urban Society, 35(2), 161–181.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sannino, A. (2008). Sustaining a non-dominant activity in school: Only a Utopia? Journal of Educational Change, 9(4), 329–338.
   Google Scholar
• Sfard, A. (1998). On two metaphors for learning and the dangers of choosing just one. Educational Researcher, 27(2), 4–13.
   Google Scholar
• Sharp, C., Pye, D., Blackmore, J., Brown, E., Eames, A., Easton, C., … Benton, T. (2006). National evaluation of creative partnerships. Retrieved from https://www.nfer.ac.uk/publications/CPS01/CPS01.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Sinnema, C., & Aitken, G. (2013). Emerging international trends in curriculum. In M. Priestley & G. Biesta (Eds.), Reinventing the curriculum – New trends in curriculum policy and practice (pp. 141–163). London: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Sodha, S., & Guglielmi, S. (2009). A stitch in time: Tackling educational disengagement. Interim Report. London: Demos.
   Google Scholar
• Standing, G. (2011). The precariat: The new dangerous class. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Stovel, K., & Shaw, L. (2012). Brokerage. Annual Review of Sociology, 38, 139–158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suchman, L. (1994). Working relations of technology production and use. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 2(1), 21–39.
   Google Scholar
• Tyack, D., & Tobin, W. (1994). The “grammar” of schooling: Why has it been so hard to change? American Educational Research Journal, 31(3), 453–479.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ungar, M. (2012). The social ecology of resilience: A handbook of theory and practice. New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, R., & Pickett, K. (2010). The spirit level: Why equality is better for everyone? London: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Willis, J. W. (2007). Foundations of qualitative research: Interpretive and critical approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Willms, J. D., Friesen, S., & Milton, P. (2009). What did you do in school today? Transforming classrooms through social, academic, and intellectual engagement (First National Report). Toronto: Canadian Education Association.
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R. (2014). Case Study Research Design and Methods (5th Edition). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar