‘Complete freedom to choose within limits’ – teachers’ views of curricular autonomy, agency and control in Estonia, Finland and Germany

References

• Apple, M. W. (2001). Educating the ‘right’ way. Markets, standards, god, and inequality. New York, NY: Routledge Falmer.
   Google Scholar
• Au, W. (2011). Teaching under the new Taylorism: High-stakes testing and the standardization of the 21st century curriculum. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 43, 25–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ball, S. (2006). Good school/bad school. Paradox and fabrication. In S. Ball (Ed.), Education policy and social class. The selected works of Stephen J. Ball (pp. 96–114). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Berger, S., Canning, R., Dolan, M., Kurek, S., Pilz, M., & Rachwal, T. (2012). Curriculum-making in pre-vocational education in the lower secondary school: A regional comparative analysis within Europe.. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 44, 679–701.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biesta, G., Priestley, M., & Robinson, S. (2015). The role of beliefs in teacher agency. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 21(6), 624–640.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biesta, G. J. J. (2010). Good education in an age of measurement: Ethics, politics, democracy. Boulder, CO: Paradigm.
   Google Scholar
• Biesta, G. J. J., & Tedder, M. (2007). Agency and learning in the lifecourse: Towards an ecological perspective. Studies in the Education of Adults, 39, 132–149.
   Google Scholar
• Carter, I. (2012). Positive and negative liberty. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of philosophy. First published Thu Feb 27, 2003; substantive revision Mon Mar 5, 2012. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. Retrieved from http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2012/entries/liberty-positivenegative/
   Google Scholar
• Dale, R. (2003). Globalization: A new world for comparative education? In J. Schriewer (Ed.), Discourse formation in comparative education (pp. 87–110). Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Erss, M. (2015). The politics of teacher autonomy in Estonia, Germany, and Finland (Dissertations in social sciences). Tallinn: Tallinn University, School of Educational Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Erss, M., Kalmus, V., & Autio, T. H. (2016). ‘Walking a fine line.’ Teachers’ perception of curricular autonomy in Estonia, Finland, and Germany. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 48(5), 589–609.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erss, M., Mikser, R., Löfström, E., Ugaste, A., Rõuk, V., & Jaani, J. (2014). Teachers’ views of curriculum policy: The case of Estonia. British Journal of Educational Studies, 62(4), 393–411.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Estonian National Curriculum for Gymnasiums. (2014). Gümnaasiumi riiklik õppekava. ( Riigi Teataja I, 29.08.2014). Retrieved from https://www.riigiteataja.ee/akt/129082014021
   Google Scholar
• Eurydice. (2008). Levels of autonomy and responsibilities of teachers in Europe. Brussels. Eurydice European Unit ( The information network on education in Europe).
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1995). Discipline and punish. The birth of the prison. (A. Sheridan, Trans.). New York, NY: Vintage books.
   Google Scholar
• Friedman, I.A.. (1999). Teacher-perceived work autonomy: The concept and its measurement.. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 59(1): 58–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goodson, I. F. (2003). Professional knowledge, professional lives. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hameyer, U. (2010). Transforming the school curriculum in Germany. In E. H-F. Law & N. Nieveen (Eds.), Schools as curriculum agencies. Asian and European perspectives on school-based curriculum development (pp. 217–238). Rotterdam: Sense.
   Google Scholar
• Hargreaves, A., & Shirley, D. (2009). The fourth way. The inspiring future for educational change. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
   Google Scholar
• Heikonen, L., Pietarinen, J., Pyhältö, K., Toom, A., & Soini, T. (2017). Early career teachers’ sense of agency in the classroom: Associations with turnover intentions and perceived inadequacy in teacher-student interaction. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 45(3), 250–266.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herdegen, P. (2009). Schulische Prüfungen. Entstehung-Entwicklung-Funktion. Prüfungen am bayerischen Gymnasium vom 18. bis zum 20. Jahrhundert [School exams. Origin, development and function. Exams at Bavarian gymnasia from the 18th to the 20th century]. Bad Heilbrunn: Verlag Julius Klinkhart.
   Google Scholar
• Hopmann, S. (2003). On the evaluation of curriculum reforms. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 35(4), 459–478.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoyle, E. (1975). Professionality, professionalism and control in teaching. In V. Houghton, R. McHugh, & C. Morgan (Eds.), Management in education: The management of organisations and individuals (pp. 314–320). London: Ward Lock Educational in association with Open Universit y Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hoyle, E. (2008). Changing conceptions of teaching as a profession: Personal reflections. In D. Johnson & R. Maclean (Eds.), Teaching: Professionalization, development and leadership (pp. 285–304). Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• ISB – Institut für Schulentwicklung und Bildungsforschung in München. (n.d.). Vergleichsarbeiten [Comparative tests]. Retrieved from https://www.isb.bayern.de/foerderschulen/leistungserhebungen/vergleichsarbeiten/
   Google Scholar
• Lawson, T. (2004). Teacher autonomy: Power or control? Education 3-13, 32(3), 3–18.
   Google Scholar
• Mayring, P. (2000). Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse. Qualitative Sozialforschung, 1(2 Art. 20), 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Education and Research in Estonia. (2014). Üldhariduse välishindamise ülesanded, põhimõtted ja arendamise alused aastani 2020 [The tasks, principles and development guidelines of external evaluation in general education until 2020]. Retrieved from https://www.hm.ee/sites/default/files/uldhariduse_valishindamise_ulesanded.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Nieveen, N. (2011, September 14). Teachers’ professional development in curriculum design in the Netherlands. Paper presented at the European Conference for Educational Research, Berlin.
   Google Scholar
• Nieveen, N., & Kuiper, W. (2012). Balancing curriculum freedom and regulation in Netherlands, European Educational Research Journal, 11(3), 357–368.
   Google Scholar
• Nieveen, N., van den Akker, J., & Resink, F. (2010). Framing and supporting school-based curriculum development in the Netherlands. In E. H. Law & N. Nieveen. (Eds.), Schools as curriculum agencies. Asian and European perspectives on school-based curriculum development (pp. 273–286). Rotterdam: Sense.
   Google Scholar
• Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2005). Teachers matter. Attracting, developing and retaining effective teachers. Paris: OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Pearson, L. C., & Hall, B. W. (1993). Initial construct validation of the teaching autonomy scale. Journal of Educational Research, 86(3), 172–177.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pfander, A. (1967). Phenomenology of willing and motivation. (H. Spiegelberg Trans.). Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press (Original work published 1908).
   Google Scholar
• Priestley, M., Biesta, G., & Robinson, S. (2015). Teacher agency. An ecological approach. London: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Pyhältö, K., Pietarinen, J., & Soini, T. (2012). Do comprehensive school teachers perceive themselves as active professional agents in school reforms ? Journal of Educational Change, 13(1), 95–116.
   Google Scholar
• Ropo, E., & Välijärvi, E. (2010). School-based curriculum development in Finland. In H. Law & N. Nieveen (Eds.), Asian and European perspectives on school-based curriculum development (pp. 197–216). Rotterdam: Sense.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2006). Self-regulation and the problem of human autonomy: Does psychology need choice, self-determination, and will ? Journal of Personality, 74, 1557–1586.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sahlberg, P. (2011). ( Finnish lessons). What can the world learn from educational change in Finland ? New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schratz, M., & Westfall-Greiter, T. (2010). School-based curriculum development in Austria. In H. Law & N. Nieveen (Eds.), Asian and European perspectives on school-based curriculum development (pp. 167–178). Rotterdam: Sense.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, R., & Erdoğan, S. (2008). Teacher–learner autonomy. Programme goals and student–teacher constructs. In T. Lamb & H. Reinders (Eds.), Learner and teacher autonomy. Concepts, realities and responses ( Aila applied linguistics series I) (pp. 83–101). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Soini, T., Pietarinen, J., & Pyhältö, K. (2016). What if teachers learn in the classroom ? Teacher Development, 20(3), 380–397.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vansteenkiste, M., & Ryan, R. M. (2013). On psychological growth and vulnerability: Basic psychological need satisfaction and need frustration as a unifying principle. Journal of Psychotherapy Integration, 23, 263–280.
   Google Scholar
• Vähäsantanen, K., Hökkä, P., Eteläpelto, A., Rasku-Puttonen, H., & Littleton, K. (2008). Teachers' professional identity negotiations in two different work organisations. Vocations and Learning: Studies in Vocational and Professional Education, 1(2), 131–148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wermke, W., & Forsberg, E. (2016). The changing nature of autonomy: Transformations of the late Swedish teaching profession. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 61(2), 155–168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wermke, W., & Höstfält, G. (2014). Conceptualizing teacher autonomy in time and space: A model for comparing various forms of governing the teaching profession. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 46(1), 58–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar