Seeing double: design and enactments of a lesson on perspective-taking

References

• Ball, S. J. (2015). What is policy? 21 years later: Reflections on the possibilities of policy research. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 36(3), 306–313.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barad, K. (2003). Posthumanist performativity: Toward an understanding of how matter comes to matter. Signs, 28(3), 801–831.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burdett, L. (1997, 2000). Shakespeare can be fun: A midsummer night's dream for kids. Toronto: Firefly Books Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Canadians for 21st Century Learning and Innovation. (2012). Shifting minds: A 21st century vision of public education in Canada (p. 3). Retrieved fromhttp://www.c21canada.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/Shifting-Minds-Revised.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Calkins, L., Hartman, A., & White, Z. (2005). One to one: The art of conferring with young writers. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Chopik, W. J., O'Brien, E., & Konrath, S. H. (2017). Differences in empathic concern and perspective taking across 63 countries. Journal of Cross-cultural Psychology, 48(1), 23–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clandinin, D. J. (2016). Engaging in narrative inquiry. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Clandinin, D. J., & Connelly, F. M. (1992). Teacher as curriculum maker. In P. Jackson ( Ed.), Handbook of research on curriculum (pp. 363–401). New York, NY: Macmillan
   Google Scholar
• Clandinin, D. J., & Connelly, F. M. (2000). Narrative inquiry: Experience and story in qualitative research. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Clandinin, D. J., & Murphy, M. S. (2009). Relational ontological commitments in narrative research. Educational Researcher, 38(8), 598–601.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connelly, M., & Clandinin, D. J. (1990). Stories of experience and narrative inquiry. Educational Researcher, 19(5), 2–14.
   Google Scholar
• Cope, B., & Kalantzis, M. (2015). The things you do to know: An introduction the pedagogy ofmultiliteracies. In B. Cope & M. Kalantzis ( Eds.), A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Learning by design (pp. 1–36). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Dahlberg, G., & Moss, P. (2010). Foreword. In L. M. Olsson ( Ed.), Movement and experimentation in early childhood education (pp. xiii–xxviii). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Decuypere, M., & Simons, M. (2016). Relational thinking in education: Topology, sociomaterial studies, and figures. Pedagogy, Culture and Society, 24(3), 371–386.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deng, Z. (2010). Curriculum planning and systems change. International Encyclopedia of Education, 1, 384–389.
   Google Scholar
• Fenwick, T., & Edwards, R. (2013). Performative ontologies: Sociomaterial approaches to researching adult education and lifelong learning. European Journal for Research on the Education and Learning of Adults, 4(1), 49–63.
   Google Scholar
• Fenwick, T., Edwards, R., & Sawchuk, P. (2011). Emerging approaches to educational research: Tracing the sociomaterial. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hargreaves, A., Earl, L., & Schmidt, M. (2002). Perspectives on alternative assessment reform. American Educational Research Journal, 39(1), 69–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hibbert, K. (2015). The secret of “Will” in new times: The affordances of a cloud curriculum. In M. Hamilton, R. Heydon, K. Hibbert, & R. Stooke ( Eds.), Negotiating spaces for literacy learning: Multimodality and governmentality (pp. 149–165). London: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Hibbert, K., & Iannacci, L. (2005). From dissemination to discernment: The commodification of literacy instruction and the fostering of ‘good teacher consumerism.’ The Reading Teacher, 58(8), 716–727.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hibbert, K., Ott, M., & Iannacci, L. (2015). Co-constructed by design: Knowledge processes in a fluid ‘cloud curriculum. ’ In B. Cope & M. Kalantzis ( Eds.), A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Learning by design (pp. 127–141). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Hodges, S. D., & Klein, K. J. K. (2001). Regulating the costs of empathy: The price of being human. Journal of Socioeconomics, 30, 437–452.
   Google Scholar
• Iannacci, L. (2007). Critical narrative research: Conceptualizing and furthering the validity of an emerging methodology. Vitae Scholasticae, 24, 55–76.
   Google Scholar
• Ickes, W., Gesn, P. R., & Graham, T. (2000). Gender differences in empathic accuracy: Differential ability or differential motivation? Personal Relationships, 7, 95–109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ingold, T. (2013). Making: Anthropology, archaeology, art and architecture. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kalantzis, M., & Cope, B. (2010). The teacher as designer: Pedagogy in the new media age. e-Learning and Digital Media 7, 200–222.
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, A. V. (2009). The curriculum: Theory and practice (6th ed.). London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Law, J. (1999). After ANT: Complexity, naming and topology. The Sociological Review, 47(S1), 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• McKenzie, M., & Bieler, A. (2016). Critical education and sociomaterial practice: Narration, place and the social. New York, NY: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Mol, A., & Law, J. (1994). Regions, networks and fluids: Anaemia and social topology. Social Studies of Science, 24(4), 641–671.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mulcahy, D. (2012). Thinking teacher professional learning performatively: A socio-material account. Journal of Education and Work, 25(1), 121–139.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (n.d.). The case for 21^st century learning. Retrieved fromhttp://www.oecd.org/general/thecasefor21st-centurylearning.htm
   Google Scholar
• Ontario Literacy and Numeracy Secretariat. (2007). Learning blocks for literacy and numeracy. Retrieved fromhttp://curriculum.org/secretariat/files/May30LearningBlocks.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ontario Ministry of Education. (2016). Ontario schools, kindergarten to grade 12: Policy and program requirements. Retrieved from http://www.edu.gov.on.ca/eng/document/policy/os/index.html
   Google Scholar
• Ott, M. (2016). Assessment narratives: The affordances of video inquiry for formative assessment of multiliteracies (Master's thesis (Paper 3651)). Retrieved fromhttp://ir.lib.uwo.ca
   Google Scholar
• Pinar, W. ( Ed.). (1975). Curriculum theorizing: The reconceptualists. Berkeley, CA: McCutchan Publishing Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• QWILL Media and Education Inc. (2014). Why QWILL. Retrieved fromhttp://viewer.zmags.com/publication/037099ad#/037099ad/1
   Google Scholar
• Reckwitz, A. (2002). Toward a theory of social practices: A development in culturalist theorizing. European Journal of Social Theory, 5(2), 243–263.
   Google Scholar
• Rinaldi, C. (2012). The pedagogy of listening: The listening perspective from Reggio Emilia. In C. Edwards, L. Gandini, & G. Forman ( Eds.), The hundred languages of children: The Reggio Emilia experience in transformation (pp. 233–246). Oxford: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Rowe, D. W. (2012). The affordances of multimodal interaction analysis for studying the beginnings of literacy. Retrieved from https://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&pid=sites&srcid=ZGVmYXVsdGRvbWFpbnxkZWJvcmFod2VsbHNyb3dlfGd4OjNkYmYxNWVmZDNjZWI4NWQ
   Google Scholar
• Ruby, P., & Decety, J. (2001). Effect of subjective perspective taking during simulation of action: A PET investigation of agency. Nature Neuroscience, 4,(5), 546–550.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sivesind, K., & Westbury, I. (2016). State-based curriculum-making, part I. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 48(6), 744–756.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sørensen, E. (2009). The materiality of learning: Technology and knowledge in educational practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Toohey, K., Dagenais, D., Fodor, A., Hof, L., Nunez, O., Singh, A., & Schulze, L. (2015). ‘That sounds so cooool’: Entanglements of children, digital tools, and literacy practices. TESOL Quarterly, 49(3), 461–485.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar