9,075
Views
23
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Teachers’ curriculum agency in teaching a standards-based curriculum

ORCID Icon
Pages 479-498 | Received 30 Jun 2017, Accepted 06 Jun 2018, Published online: 26 Jul 2018

References

  • Adolfsson, C.-H. (2018). Upgraded curriculum? An analysis of knowledge boundaries in teaching under the Swedish subject-based curriculum. The Curriculum Journal, 1–17. doi:10.1080/09585176.2018.1442231
  • Adolfsson, C.-H., & Alvunger, D. (2017). The selection of content and knowledge conceptions in the teaching of curriculum standards in compulsory schooling. In N. Wahlström & D. Sundberg (Eds.), Transnational curriculum standards and classroom practices: The new meaning of teaching (pp. 98–115). New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Alvunger, D. (2015). Towards new forms of educational leadership? The local implementation of förstelärare in Swedish schools. Nordic Journal of Studies in Educational Policy, 1(3), 55–66.
  • Alvunger, D., & Wahlström, N. (2017). Research-based teacher education? Exploring the meaning potentials of Swedish teacher education. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 24(4), 332–349. doi:10.1080/13540602.2017.1403315
  • Anderson-Levitt, K.M. (2008). Globalization and curriculum. In: M.F. Connelly (Ed.), The Sage handbook of curriculum and instruction (pp. 349–368). London: Sage Publications.
  • Bergh, A., & Wahlstro¨m, N. (2017). Conflicting goals of educational action: A study of teacher agency from a transactional realism perspective. The Curriculum Journal, 29(1), 134–149. doi:10.1080/09585176.2017.1400449
  • Bernstein, B. (2000). Pedagogy, symbolic control and identity: Theory, research, critique. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
  • Bryman, A. (2012). Social research methods (4th ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Creswell, J.W. (2010). Mapping the developing landscape of mixed methods research. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Sage handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research (pp. 45–68). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  • Creswell, J.W., & Plano Clark, V. (2007). Designing and conducting mixed methods. London: Sage Publications.
  • Datnow, A. (2012). Teacher agency in educational reform: Lessons from social networks research. American Journal of Education, 119(1), 193–201.
  • Datnow, A., Hubbard, L., & Mehan, H. (1998). Educational reform implementation: A co-constructed process (research report 5). Santa Cruz, CA: Center for Research on Education, Diversity and Excellence.
  • Doyle, W. (1992). Curriculum and pedagogy. In P.W. Jackson (Ed.), Handbook of research on curriculum (pp. 486–516). New York, NY: Macmillan.
  • Edwards, A. (2005). Relational agency: Learning to be a resourceful practitioner. International Journal of Educational Research, 43(3), 168–182.
  • Emirbayer, M., & Mische, A. (1998). What is agency? American Journal of Sociology, 103, 962–1023.
  • Forsberg, E., & Lundahl, C. (2012). Re/produktionen av kunskap i det svenska utbildningssystemet [Re/production of knowledge in the Swedish education system]. In T. Englund, E. Forsberg, & D. Sundberg (Eds.), Vad räknas som kunskap? Läroplansteoretiska utsikter och inblickar i lärarutbildning och skola [What counts as knowledge? Curriculum theory perspectives on teacher education and school] (pp. 200–224). Stockholm: Liber.
  • Haavelsrud, M. (2010). Classification strength and power relations. In A. Morais, I. Neves, B. Davies, & H. Daniels (Eds.), Towards a sociology of pedagogy: The contribution of Basil Bernstein to research (pp. 319–337). New York, NY: Peter Lang.
  • Martin, J.R., & Maton, K. (2017). Systemic functional linguistics and legitimation code theory on education: Rethinking field and knowledge structure. ONOMAZEIN Numero especial SFL y TCL sobre educación y conocimiento, 1, 12–45. Retrieved from http://onomazein.letras.uc.cl/03_Numeros/Nespecial-SFL/N-SFLe.html
  • Maton, K. (2009). Cumulative and segmented learning: Exploring the role of curriculum structures in knowledge-building. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 30(1), 43–57. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/40375403
  • Maton, K., & Doran, Y.J. (2017). Semantic density: A translation device for revealing complexity of knowledge practices in discourse, part 1 – Wording. ONOMAZEIN Numero especial SFL y TCL sobre educación y conocimiento, 1, 46–76. Retrieved from http://onomazein.letras.uc.cl/03_Numeros/Nespecial-SFL/N-SFLe.html
  • National Agency for Education (NAE). (2011a). Läroplan för grundskola, förskola och fritidshemmet [Curriculum for the compulsory school, preschool class and the leisure-time centre] Lgr11. Stockholm: The National Agency for Education.
  • National Agency for Education (NAE). (2011b). Allmänna råd för planering och genomförande av undervisningen [General guidelines for planning and performing teaching]. Stockholm: Fritzes.
  • National Agency for Education (NAE). (2015). Kommentarsmaterial till kursplanen isvenska [Commentary material for the syllabus in Swedish]. Stockholm: Fritzes.
  • Neves, I., & Morais, A. (2010). Texts and contexts in educational systems: Studies of recontextualisation spaces. In A. Morais, I. Neves, B. Davies, & H. Daniels (Eds.), Towards a sociology of pedagogy: The contribution of Basil Bernstein to research (pp. 223–249). New York, NY: Peter Lang.
  • Priestley, M. (2010). Schools, teachers and curriculum change: A balancing act? Journal of Educational Change, 12(1), 1–23.
  • Priestley, M., Biesta, G., & Robinson, S. (2017). Teacher agency: An ecological approach. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
  • Priestley, M., Edwards, R., Priestley, A., & Miller, K. (2012). Teacher agency in curriculum making: Agents of change and spaces for manoeuvre. Curriculum Inquiry, 42(2), 191–214.
  • Pyhältö, K., Pietarinen, J., & Soini, T. (2014). Comprehensive school teachers’ professional agency in large-scale educational change. Journal of Educational Change, 15(3), 303–325.
  • Priestley, M., & Sinnema, C. (2014). Down-graded curriculum? An analysis of knowledge in new curricula in Scotland and New Zealand. Curriculum Journal, 25(1), 50–75.
  • Robertson, S., & Dale, R. (2015). Towards a ‘critical cultural political economy’ account of the globalising of education. Globalisation, Societies and Education, 13(1), 149–170.
  • Salminen, J., & Annevirta, T. (2016). Curriculum and teachers’ pedagogical thinking when planning for teaching. European Journal of Curriculum Studies, 3(1), 387–406.
  • Singh, P. (2002). Pedagogising knowledge: Bernstein’s theory of the pedagogic device. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 23(4), 571–582.
  • Strandler, O. (2017). Constraints and meaning-making: Dealing with the multifacetedness of social studies in audited teaching practices. Journal of Social Science Education, 16(1), 56–67.
  • Sundberg, D. (2017). Mapping and tracing transnational curricula in classrooms – The mixed-methods approach. In N. Wahlström & D. Sundberg (Eds.), Transnational curriculum standards and classroom practices: The new meaning of teaching (pp. 48–65). New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Sundberg, D., & Wahlström, N. (2012). Standards-based curricula in a denationalized conception of education: The case of Sweden. European Educational Research Journal, 11(3), 342–356.
  • Swedish Research Council (SRC). (2017). Good research practice. Stockholm: Swedish Research Council.
  • Vongalis-Macrow, A. (2007). I, teacher: Re‐territorialization of teachers’ multi‐faceted agency in globalized education. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 28(4), 425–439.
  • Wahlström, N. (2017). The travelling reform agenda: The Swedish case through the lens of OECD. In N. Wahlström, & D. Sundberg (Eds.), Transnational curriculum standards and classroom practices: The new meaning of teaching (pp. 15–30). New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Wahlström, N., & Sundberg, D. (2015). A theory-based evaluation of the curriculum Lgr11 (working paper no. 2015:11). Uppsala: IFAU – Institute for Evaluation of Labour Market and Education Policy.
  • Wahlström, N., & Sundberg, D. (2017). Transnational curriculum standards and classroom practices: The new meaning of teaching. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Waldow, F. (2012). Standardisation and legitimacy: Two central concepts in research on educational borrowing and lending. In G. Steiner-Khamsi & F. Waldow (Eds.), World year book of education 2012: Policy borrowing and lending (pp. 411–427). New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Young, M. (2008). From constructivism to realism in the sociology of the curriculum. Review of Research in Education, 32(1), 1–28.