Realising the school science curriculum

References

• Abbott, A. (2001). The chaos of disciplines. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Aikenhead, G. (2003). STS education: A rose by any other name. In R. Cross (Ed.). A vision for science education: Responding to the work of Peter J. Fensham (pp. 59–75). London: RoutledgeFalmer.
   Google Scholar
• Albe, V. (2008). Students’ positions and considerations of scientific evidence about a controversial socioscientific issue. Science & Education, 8–9, 805–827.
   Google Scholar
• Atkins, P. (1995). Science as truth. History of the Human Sciences, 8, 97–102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck, U. (1992). The risk society: Towards a new modernity. London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Bencze, L. (Ed.) (2017). Science and technology education promoting wellbeing for individuals, societies and environments: STEPWISE. Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Bencze, L., & Carter, L. (2011). Globalizing students acting for the common good. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48, 648–669.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, J., & Hogarth, S. (2009). Would you want to talk to a scientist at a party? High school students’ attitudes to school science and to science. International Journal of Science Education, 31, 1975–1998.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernstein, R. J. (1998). The new constellation: The ethical-political horizons of modernity/postmodernity. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bhaskar, R. (2008). A realist theory of science. Abingdon, OX: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bhaskar, R. (2011). Reclaiming reality: A critical introduction to contemporary philosophy. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bodmer, W. F. (1985). The public understanding of science: Report of an ad hoc group endorsed by the council of the Royal Society. London: The Royal Society.
   Google Scholar
• Bouillon, L. M., & Gomez, L. M. (2001). Connecting school and community with science learning: Real world problems and school-community partnerships as contextual scaffolds. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 878–898.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calabrese Barton, A., & O’Neill, T. (2008). Counter-storytelling in science: Authoring a place in the worlds of science and community. In Levinson, R., Nicholson, H. & Parry, S. (Eds.). Creative encounters: New conversations in science, education and the arts (pp. 138–158). London: The Wellcome Trust.
   Google Scholar
• Chalmers, N. (1999). What is this thing called science? (3rd ed.). Buckingham: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Christensen, C. (2009). Risk and school science education. Studies in Science Education, 45, 205–223.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collier, A. (1994). Critical realism: An introduction to Roy Bhaskar’s philosophy. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, H. M., & Pinch, T. (1998). The Golem: What you should know about science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dawson, C. (2000). Selling snake oil: Must science educators continue to promise what they can’ deliver? Melbourne Studies in Education, 4, 121–132.
   Google Scholar
• Day, S. P., & Bryce, T. G. K. (2011). Does the discussion of socio‐scientific issues require a paradigm shift in science teachers' thinking? International Journal of Science Education, 33, 1675–1702.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donnelly, J. F. (2004). Humanizing science education. Science Education, 88, 762–784.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drake, F. (2006). Mobile phone masts: Protesting the scientific evidence. Public Understanding of Science, 15, 387–410.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fensham, P. (2002). Time to change drivers for scientific literacy. Canadian Journal of Science, Technology and Mathematics Education, 2, 9–24.
   Google Scholar
• Galloway, S. (2012). Reconsidering emancipatory education: Staging a conversation between Paulo Freire and Jacques Rancière. Educational Theory, 62, 163–184.
   Google Scholar
• Gough, A. (2015). STEM policy and science education: Scientistic curriculum and sociopolitical silences. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 10, 445–458.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gross, P. R., Levitt, N. & Lewis, M. W. (Eds.) (1996). The flight from science and reason. New York: New York Academy of Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Haack, S. (1996). Science as social? – yes and no. In L. H. Nelson and D. Nelson (Eds.) Feminism, science and the philosophy of science (pp. 79–93). Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, E. (1999). Science education and social responsibility. School Science Review, 81, 14–16.
   Google Scholar
• Hand, M., & Levinson, R. (2012) Discussing controversial issues in the classroom. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 44, 614–629.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirst, P., & Peters, R. (1970). The logic of education. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• House of Lords. (2000). Science and technology: Third report. London: House of Lords.
   Google Scholar
• Hudson, W. D. (Ed.) (1969). The is-ought question. London: MacMillan Education.
   Google Scholar
• Johnstone A. H., (1982), Macro- and microchemistry. School Science Review, 64, 377–379.
   Google Scholar
• Kosso, P. (2008). The discovery of Neptune: Using history and philosophy to illustrate the nature of science. School Science Review, 89 (330), 53–58.
   Google Scholar
• Kragh, H. (2002). Paul Dirac: Seeking beauty. Physics World, 15, 27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lalji, N. (2007). The resource curse revised: Conflict and coltan in the Congo. Harvard International Review, 29, 34–37.
   Google Scholar
• Layton, D., Jenkins,E., Macgill, S., & Davey, A. (1993). Inarticulate science. Driffield: Studies in Education Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, S., & Roth, W-M. (2003). Science and the "Good Citizen": Community-Based scientific literacy. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 28, 403–424.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levinson R (2000). Thinking through science. Primary Science Review, 61, 20–22.
   Google Scholar
• Levinson, R., & Turner, S. (2001). Valuable lessons. London: The Wellcome Trust.
   Google Scholar
• Levinson, R. (in press). I know what I want to teach but how can know what they are going to learn? In L. Bryan & K. Tobin (Eds.), Critical issues and bold visions fo science education: he road ahead. Leiden: Brill.
   Google Scholar
• Lowenhaupt Tsing, A. (2015). The mushroom at the end of the world: On the possibility of life in capitalist ruins. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lyons, T. (2006). Different countries, same science classes: Students’ experiences of school science in their own words. International Journal of Science Education, 28, 591–613.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Millar, R. (2006). Twenty first century science: Insights from the design and implementation of a scientific literacy approach in school science. International Journal of Science Education, 28, 1499–1521.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Millar, R., & Osborne, J. (1998). Beyond 2000. Science Education for the future. London: King’s College.
   Google Scholar
• Morris, A. (2016). Why icebergs float: Exploring science in everyday life. London: UCL Press.
   Google Scholar
• Murray, I., & Reiss, M. (2005) The student review of the science curriculum. School Science Review, 87, 83–93.
   Google Scholar
• Nielsen, J. A. (2012). Co-opting Science: A preliminary study of how students invoke science in value laden discussions. International Journal of Science Education, 34, 275–299.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osborne, J., & Collins, S. (2001). Pupils' views of the role and value of the science curriculum: A focus-group study. International Journal of Science Education, 23, 441–467.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pedretti, E., & Nazir, J. (2011). Currents in STSE education: Mapping a complex field, 40 years on. Science Education, 95, 601–626.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pouliot, C. (2015). Quand les citoyen.ne.s.soulevent la poussiere. Montreal, QC: Carte Blanche.
   Google Scholar
• Putnam, H. (2002). The collapse of the fact-value dichotomy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ravetz, J. R. (1999). What is post-normal science? Futures, 31, 647–653.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts, D. A. (2011). Competing visions of scientific literacy. In C. Linder, L. Östman, D. A. Roberts, P-O. Wickman, G. Ericksen, & A. MacKinnon (Eds.), Exploring the landscape of scientific literacy (Chapter 2). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ryder, J. (2001). Identifying science understanding for functional scientific literacy. Studies in Science Education, 36, 1–44.
   Google Scholar
• Simonneaux, J., & Legardez, A. (2010). The epistemological and didactical challenges involved in teaching socially acute questions. The example of globalization. Journal of Social Science Education, 9, 24–35.
   Google Scholar
• Solomon, J. S. (1988). Science technology and society courses: Tools for thinking about social issues. International Journal of Science Education, 10, 379–387.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solomon, J. S. (2013). Science of the people. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Solomon, J., & Aikenhead, G. (1994). STS Education: International Perspectives on Reform. New York: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sjöström, J. (2017). Vision III: framing stem education with moral-philosophical-existential-political alternatives. Paper presented at ESERA conference, Dublin, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, J. L., & Hunt A. (2014) History and philosophy of science and the teaching of science in England. In M. Matthews M. (Ed) International Handbook of Research in History, Philosophy and Science Teaching (pp. 2045–2081). Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, J. (2000). Using current controversies in the classroom: Opportunities and concerns. Melbourne Studies in Education, 41, 133–144.
   Google Scholar
• University of York Science Education Group (2007). Perspectives on science: The history, philosophy and ethics of science. Oxford: Heinemann Educational.
   Google Scholar
• Wolpert, L. (1994). The unnatural nature of science. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zembylas, M. (2006). Science education as emancipatory: The case of Roy Bhaskar’s philosophy of meta-reality. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 38, 665–676.
   Google Scholar