Curriculum coherence as perceived by district-level stakeholders in large-scale national curriculum reform in Finland

References

• Allen, C. D., & Penuel, W. R. (2015). Studying teachers’ sensemaking to investigate teachers’ responses to professional development focused on new standards. Journal of Teacher Education, 66, 136–149. doi:10.1177/0022487114560646
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, L. W. (2002). Curricular alignment: A re-examination. Theory into Practice, 41(4), 255–260. doi:10.1207/s15430421tip4104_9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beane, J. A. (Ed.). (1995). Toward a coherent curriculum. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
   Google Scholar
• Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables (1st ed.). New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Byrne, B. M. (2012). Structural equation modeling with Mplus. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Canrinus, E. T., Bergem, O. K., Klette, K., & Hammerness, K. (2017). Coherent teacher education programmes: Taking a student perspective. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 49, 313–333. doi:10.1080/00220272.2015.1124145
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, F. F., Sousa, K. H., & West, S. G. (2005). Teacher's corner: Testing measurement invariance of second-order factor models. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 12, 471–492. doi:10.1207/s15328007sem1203_7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheung, A. C. K., & Wong, P. M. (2011). Effects of school heads' and teachers' agreement with the curriculum reform on curriculum development progress and student learning in Hong Kong. International Journal of Educational Management, 25, 453–473. doi:10.1108/09513541111146369
   Google Scholar
• Coburn, C. E. (2003). Rethinking scale: Moving beyond numbers to deep and lasting change. Educational Researcher, 32, 3–12. doi:10.3102/0013189X032006003
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, S. A. (1987). Instructional alignment: Searching for a magic bullet. Educational Researcher, 16, 16–20. doi:10.3102/0013189X016008016
   Google Scholar
• Creese, B., Gonzalez, A., & Isaacs, T. (2016). Comparing international curriculum systems: The international instructional systems study. The Curriculum Journal, 27, 5–23. doi:10.1080/09585176.2015.1128346
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darling-Hammond, L., & McLaughlin, M. W. (1995). Policies that support professional development in an era of reform. Phi Delta Kappan, 76, 597–604.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Datnow, A., & Stringfield, S. (2000). Working together for reliable school reform. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk, 5(1), 183–204.
   Google Scholar
• Desimone, L. (2013). Teacher and administrator responses to standards-based reform. Teachers College Record, 115, 1–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donnell, L. A., & Gettinger, M. (2015). Elementary school teachers' acceptability of school reform: Contribution of belief congruence, self-efficacy, and professional development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 51, 47–57. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2015.06.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernandez, T., Ritchie, G., & Barker, M. (2008). A sociocultural analysis of mandated curriculum change: The implementation of a new senior physics curriculum in New Zealand schools. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 40, 187–213. doi:10.1080/00220270701313978
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finnish National Board of Education. (2014). National core curriculum for basic education 2014. Finnish National Board of Education. Helsinki: Publications 2016, 5.
   Google Scholar
• Firestone, W. A., Mangin, M. M., Martinez, M. C., & Polovsky, T. (2005). Leading coherent professional development: A comparison of three districts. Educational Administration Quarterly, 41, 413–448. doi:10.1177/0013161X04269605
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fortus, D., Sutherland Adams, L.M., Krajcik, J., & Reiser, B. (2015). Assessing the role of curriculum coherence in student learning about energy. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 52, 1408–1425. doi:10.1002/tea.21261
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuhrman, S. H. (1993). The politics of coherence. In S.H. Fuhrman (Ed.), Designing coherent educational policy (pp. 1–34). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Fullan, M. (2007). The new meaning of educational change (4th ed.). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fullan, M., & Quinn, J. (2016). Coherence: The right drivers in action for schools, districts, and systems. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
   Google Scholar
• Geraedts, C., Boersma, K.T., & Eijkelhof, H.M.C. (2006). Towards coherent science and technology education. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 38, 307–325. doi:10.1080/00220270500391589
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo, L. (2012). The impact of new national curricular reform on teachers. Canadian and International Education, 41, 87–105.
   Google Scholar
• Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2014). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Harlow, UK: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Hallinger, P., & Heck, R.H. (2002). What do you call people with visions? The role of vision, mission, and goals in school leadership and improvement. In K. Leithwood & P. Hallinger (Eds.), Handbook of research in educational leadership and administration (2nd ed., pp. 9–40). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Hammerness, K. (2006). From coherence in theory to coherence in practice. Teachers College Record, 108, 1241–1265. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00692.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hatzakis, T., Lycett, M., & Serrano, A. (2007). A programme management approach for ensuring curriculum coherence in IS (higher) education. European Journal of Information Systems, 16, 643–657. doi:10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000707
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Honig, M.I., & Hatch, T.C. (2004). Crafting coherence: How schools strategically manage multiple, external demands. Educational Researcher, 33, 16–30.
   Google Scholar
• Hopkins, D. (2001). School improvement for real. London, UK: Routledge Falmer.
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, A. V. (2009). The curriculum: Theory and practice (6th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Kumpulainen, K., & Lankinen, T. (2016). Striving for educational equity and excellence: Evaluation and assessment in Finnish basic education. In H. Niemi, A. Toom, & A. Kallioniemi (Eds.), Miracle of education: The principles and practices of teaching and learning in Finnish schools (2nd revised ed., pp. 71–82). Rotterdam: SensePublishers.
   Google Scholar
• Li, Q., & Ni, Y. (2011). Impact of curriculum reform: Evidence of change in classroom practice in mainland China. International Journal of Educational Research, 50, 71–86. doi:10.1016/j.ijer.2011.06.003
   Google Scholar
• Luttenberg, J., Carpay, T., & Veugelers, W. (2013). Educational reform as a dynamic system of problems and solutions: Towards an analytic instrument. Journal of Educational Change, 14, 335–352. doi:10.1007/s10833-012-9196-z
   Google Scholar
• Mølstad, C. E. (2015). State-based curriculum-making: Approaches to local curriculum work in Norway and Finland. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 47, 441–461. doi:10.1080/00220272.2015.1039067
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris, P., Lo, M., & Adamson, B. (2000). Improving schools in Hong Kong—Lessons from the past. In B. Adamson, K. Chan, & T. Kwan (Eds.), Changing the curriculum: The impact of reform on primary schooling in Hong Kong (pp. 245–262). Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998–2015). Mplus users guide (7th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthen & Muthen.
   Google Scholar
• Newmann, F. M., Smith, B., Allensworth, E., & Bryk, A. S. (2001). Instructional program coherence: What it is and why should it guide school improvement policy. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 23, 297–321. doi:10.3102/01623737023004297
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ng, S.W. (2009). Why did principals and teachers respond differently to curriculum reform? Teacher Development, 13, 187–203. doi:10.1080/13664530903335558
   Google Scholar
• Niemi, H. (2016). The societal factors contributing to education and schooling. In H. Niemi, A. Toom, & A. Kallioniemi (Eds.), Miracle of education: The principles and practices of teaching and learning in Finnish schools (2nd revised ed., pp. 23–40). Rotterdam: SensePublishers.
   Google Scholar
• Penuel, W. R., Fishman, B. J., Gallagher, L. P., Korbak, C., & Lopez-Prado, B. (2009). Is alignment enough? Investigating the effects of state policies and professional development on science curriculum implementation. Science Education, 93, 656–677. doi:10.1002/sce.20321
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pietarinen, J., Pyhältö, K., & Soini, T. (2017). Large-scale curriculum reform in Finland – exploring the interrelation between implementation strategy, the function of the reform, and curriculum coherence. The Curriculum Journal, 28(1), 22–40. doi:10.1080/09585176.2016.1179205
   Google Scholar
• Pyhältö, K., Pietarinen, J., & Soini, T. (2014). Comprehensive school teachers’ professional agency in large-scale educational change. Journal of Educational Change, 15(3), 303–325. doi:10.1007/s10833-013-9215-8
   Google Scholar
• Pyhältö, K., Pietarinen, J., & Soini, T. (2018). Dynamic and shared sense-making in large-scale curriculum reform in school districts. The Curriculum Journal, 29(2), 181–200. doi:10.1080/09585176.2018.1447306
   Google Scholar
• Rosenmund, M. (2000). OP-ED Approaches to international comparative research on curricula and curriculum-making processes. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 32, 599–606. doi:10.1080/00220270050116905
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sahlberg, P. (2015). Finnish lessons 2.0: What can the world learn from educational change in Finland? (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Salminen, J., & Annevirta, T. (2016). Curriculum and teachers’ pedagogical thinking when planning for teaching. European Journal of Curriculum Studies, 3(1), 387–406.
   Google Scholar
• Schafer, J. L., & Graham, J. W. (2002). Missing data: Our view of the state of the art. Psychological Methods, 7, 147–177.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, W. H., & Houang, R. T. (2012). Curricular coherence and the common core state standards for mathematics. Educational Researcher, 41, 294–308. doi:10.3102/0013189X12464517
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, W. H., Wang, H. C., & McKnight, C. C. (2005). Curriculum coherence: An examination of US mathematics and science content standards from an international perspective. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 37, 525–559. doi:10.1080/0022027042000294682
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shwartz, Y., Weizman, A., Fortus, D., Krajcik, J., & Reiser, B. (2008). The IQWST experience: Using coherence as a design principle for a middle school science curriculum. The Elementary School Journal, 109, 199–219. doi:10.1086/590526
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sleegers, P. J. C., Thoonen, E. E. J., Oort, F. J., & Peetsma, T. T. D. (2014). Changing classroom practices: The role of school-wide capacity for sustainable improvement. Journal of Educational Administration, 52, 617–652.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, M., & O’Day, J. A. (1991). Systemic school reform. In S.H. Fuhrman & B. Malen (Eds.), The politics of curriculum and testing (pp. 233–268). Bristol, PA: Falmer.
   Google Scholar
• Spillane, J. P. (1996). School districts matter: Local educational authorities and state instructional policy. Educational Policy, 10(1), 63–87. doi:10.1177/0895904896010001004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spillane, J. P., Reiser, B. J., & Reimer, T. (2002). Policy implementation and cognition: Reframing and refocusing implementation research. Review of Educational Research, 72, 387–431. doi:10.3102/00346543072003387
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spillane, J. P., & Thompson, C. L. (1997). Reconstructing conceptions of local capacity: The local education agency's capacity for ambitious instructional reform. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 19, 185–203. doi:10.3102/01623737019002185
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Squires, D. A. (2009). Curriculum alignment: Research-based strategies for increasing student achievement. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
   Google Scholar
• Statistics Finland. (2013). Municipalities and regional divisions based on municipalities. Helsinki: Statistics Finland.
   Google Scholar
• Tian, M., & Risku, M. (2019). A distributed leadership perspective on the Finnish curriculum reform 2014. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 51, 229–244. doi:10.1080/00220272.2018.1499806
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Timperley, H., & Parr, J. (2005). Theory competition and the process of change. Journal of Educational Change, 6, 227–251. doi:10.1007/s10833-005-5065-3
   Google Scholar
• Vitikka, E., Krokfors, L., & Rikabi, L. (2016). The Finnish national core curriculum. In H. Niemi, A. Toom, & A. Kallioniemi (Eds.), Miracle of education: The principles and practices of teaching and learning in Finnish schools (2nd revised ed., pp. 83–90). Rotterdam: SensePublishers.
   Google Scholar
• Yuen, T. W. W., Cheung, A. C. K., & Wong, P. M. (2012). A study of the impact of the first phase of the curriculum reform on student learning in Hong Kong. International Journal of Educational Management, 26, 710–728. doi:10.1108/09513541211263782
   Google Scholar