Curriculum coherence and teachers’ decision-making in Scottish high school history syllabi

References

• Barton, K. (2002). Oh, that’s a tricky piece!’: Children, mediated action and the tools of historical time. The Elementary School Journal, 103(2), 161–185. doi:10.1086/499721
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barton, K. (2015). The denial of desire: How to make history education meaningless. In A. Chapman & A. Wilschut (Eds.), Joined-up history (pp. 265–282). Charlotte: Information Age.
   Google Scholar
• Barton, K., & Levstik, L. (2004). Teaching history for the common good. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Berlin, I. (1961). Two concepts of liberty (1st ed.). Oxford: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Blow, F., Shemilt, R., Rogers, D., & Smith, C. (2015). Only connect: How children form connections within and between historical narratives. In A. Chapman & A. Wilschut, Joined up history (pp. 279–315). Charlotte: Information Age Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Brant, J., Chapman, A., & Isaacs, T. (2016). International Instructional Systems: Social studies. The Curriculum Journal, 27(1), 62–79. doi:10.1080/09585176.2015.1134340
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carroll, J. (2016). Exploring historical frameworks as a curriculum goal: A case study examining students’ notions of historical significance when using millennia-wide timescales. The Curriculum Journal, 27(4), 454–478. doi:10.1080/09585176.2016.1191362
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chapman, A., & Wilschut, A. (2015). Joined-up history: New directions in history education research (1st ed.). Charlotte: Information Age Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Christian, D. (2004). Maps of time: An introduction to big history. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Counsell, C. (2017). The fertility of substantive knowledge: In search of its hidden generative power. In Debates in History Teaching, by I Davies, 80-99. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Crawford, K. (1995). A history of the right: The battle for control of national curriculum history 1989–1994. British Journal of Educational Studies, 43(4), 433–456. doi:10.1080/00071005.1995.9974049
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dale, R. (1989). The state and education policy. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Donaldson, G. (2012). Teaching Scotland’s future: Report of a review of Teacher Education in Scotland. Edinburgh: Scottish Government.
   Google Scholar
• Duquette, C. (2015). Relating historical consciousness to historical thinking through assessment. In K. Ercikan & P. Seixas (Eds.), New directions in historical thinking (pp. 51–63). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Education Scotland. (2012b). Curriculum for excellence briefing 4: Interdisciplinary learning. Edinburgh: Education Scotland.
   Google Scholar
• Ferro, M. (1984). The use and abuse of history. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Fordham, M. (2016). Knowledge and language: Being hisorical with substantive concepts. In C. Counsell, K. Burn, & A. Chapman (Eds.), Masterclass in history education (pp. 43–58). London: Bloomsbury Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Foster, S., & Crawford, K. (2006). What shall we tell the Children? International perspectives on school history textbooks. Greenwich: Information Age.
   Google Scholar
• Foster, S., Lee, P., & Ashby, R. (2008). Usable historical pasts: A study of students’ frameworks of the past: Full Research Report ESRC End of Award Report, RES-000-22-1676. Swindon: .ESRC.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, R., & Ormond, B. (2018). Historical Knowledge in a knowledge economy - what types of knowledge matter? Educational Review, 71(5), 564–580.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, R., & Burn, K. (2016). English History teachers’ views on what substantive content young people should be taught. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 48(4), 518–546. doi:10.1080/00220272.2015.1122091
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, R., & Reynolds, R. (2018). Exploring teachers’ curriculum decision making: Insights from history education. Oxford Review of Education, 44(2), 139–155. doi:10.1080/03054985.2017.1352498
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirsch, E. (1987). Cultural literacy: What every American needs to know. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
   Google Scholar
• Kropman, M., van Boxtel, C., & van Drie, J. (2015). Small country, great ambitions: Prospective teachers’ narratives and knowledge about Dutch history. In A. Chapman & A. Wilschut, Joined-up history (pp. 57–84). Charlotte: Information Age Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, P. (2011). Historical education and historical literacy. In I. Davies (Ed.), Debates in history teaching (pp. 63–72). Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, P. (2004). Walking backwards into tomorrow: Historical consciousness and understanding history. History Education Research Journal, 4(1), 40–114. doi:10.18546/HERJ.04.1.03
   Google Scholar
• Lee, P., & Howson, J. (2009). Two out of five did not know that Henry VIII had six wives': History Education, Historical literacy and historical consciousness. In L. Symcox & A. Wilschut (Eds.), National history standards: The problem of the canon and the future of teaching history (pp. 211–264). Charlotte: Information Age.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, P., & Ashby, R. (2000). Progression in Historical understanding among students ages 7-14. In P. Stearns, P. Seixas, & S. Wineberg (Eds.), Knowing, teaching, and learning history: National and international perspectives (pp. 199–222). New York: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Levesque, S., & Clark, P. (2018). Historical thinking: Definitions and educational applications. In S. Metzger & L. Harris (Eds.), The Wiley International handbook of history teaching and learning (pp. 119–147). New York: John Wiley and Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Nash, G., Crabtree, C., & Dunn, R. (1997). History on trial: Culture wars and the teaching of the past. New York: Knopf.
   Google Scholar
• Nora, P. (1989). Between memory and history: Les Lieux de memoire. Representations, 26(1), 7–24. doi:10.2307/2928520
   Google Scholar
• Nuttall, D. (2013). Possible futures: Using frameworks of knowledge to help Year 9 connect past, present and future. Teaching History, 151, 33–44.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2005). The Defintion and Selection Key Competencies: Executive summary. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/pisa/35070367.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Ormond, B. (2017). Curriculum decisions - The challenges of teacher autonomy over knowledge selection for history. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 49(5), 599–619. doi:10.1080/00220272.2016.1149225
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Philippou, S., Kontovourki, S., & Theodorou, E. (2014). Can autonomy be imposed? Examining teacher (re)positioning during the ongoing curriculum change in Cyprus. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 46(5), 611–633. doi:10.1080/00220272.2013.856033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips, R. (1998). History teaching, nationhood and the state. London: Cassell.
   Google Scholar
• Priestley, M., & Biesta, G. (2013). Reinventing the curriculum: New trends in curriculum policy and practice. London: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Priestley, M., Biesta, G., & Robinson, S. (2015). Teacher agency: An ecological approach. London: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Quicke, J. (1988). The ‘new right’ and education. British Journal of Educational Studies, 36(1), 5–20. doi:10.1080/00071005.1988.9973770
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers, R. (2016). Frameworks for big history: Teaching history at its lower resolutions. In C. Counsell, K. Burn, & A. Chapman (Eds.), Masterclass in history education: Transforming teaching and learning (pp. 59–76). London: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Schools' History Project. (1976). A new look at history. Edinburgh: Homes MacDougall.
   Google Scholar
• Scottish Executive. (2004). A curriculum for excellence – The curriculum review group. Edinburgh: Scottish Executive.
   Google Scholar
• Seixas, P. (2017). Historical consciousness and historical thinking. In M. Carretero, S. Berger, & M. Grever (Eds.), Palgrave handbook of research in historical culture and education (pp. 59–72). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Shemilt, D. (2009). National history standards: The problem of the canon and the future of teaching history. Drinking an Ocean and Pissing a Cupful: How adolescents make sense of history (pp. 141–210). Charlotte: Information Age. [CrossRef]
   Google Scholar
• Shemilt, D., & Howson, J. (2011). Frameworks of knowledge: Dilemmas and debates. In I. Davies (Ed.), Debates in history teaching (pp. 73–83). Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Slater, J. (1989). The politics of history teaching: A humanity dehumanised (1st ed.). London: Institute of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, J. (2017). Discursive dancing: Traditionalism and social realism in the 2013 English curriculum wars. British Journal of Educational Studies, 65(3), 307–329.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, J. (2018). Scotland's Curriculum for Excellence and history teachers' epistemologies: A case of curricular epistemic socialisation? Scottish Educational Review, 50(1), 18–35.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, J. (2019). Community and contestation: A Gramscian case study of teacher resistance. Journal of Curriculum Studies. doi:10.1080/00220272.2019.1587003
   Google Scholar
• Smith, J., & Jackson, D. (2017). A Cuckoo in the Nest? Powerful knowledge in the English history education discourse. European Journal of Curriculum Studies, 4(2), 633–643.
   Google Scholar
• SQA. (2018). Assessment statistics. Retrieved from https://www.sqa.org.uk/sqa/63001.8312.html: SQA.
   Google Scholar
• Stenhouse, L. (1968). The humanities curriculum project. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 1(1), 26–33. doi:10.1080/0022027680010103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, T., & Guyver, R. (2011). History wars and the classroom: Global perspectives. Charlotte: Information Age.
   Google Scholar
• van Drie, J., & van Boxtel, C. (2003). Developing conceptual understanding through talk and mapping. Teaching History, 110, 27–32.
   Google Scholar
• van Drie, J., & van Boxtel, C. (2008). Historical reasoning: Towards a framework for analyzing students’ reasoning about the past. Educational Psychology Review, 20(2), 87–110. doi:10.1007/s10648-007-9056-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitty, G. (2010). Revisiting school knowledge: Some sociological perspectives on new school curricula. European Journal of Education, 45(1), 28–44. doi:10.1111/j.1465-3435.2009.01422.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilschut, A. (2009). Canonical Standards or orientational frames of reference. In L. Symcox & A. Wilschut (Eds.), National history standards: The problem of the canon and the future of teaching history (pp. 117–140). Charlotte: Information Age.
   Google Scholar
• Wilschut, A. (2015). Testing frames of references knowledge in national examinations: Report on an experiment in the Netherlands. In A. Chapman & A. Wilschut (Eds.), Joined-up history (pp. 85–114). Charlotte: Information Age Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Wood, S., & Payne, F. (1999). The Scottish school history curriculum and issues of national identity. Curriculum Journal, 10(1), 107–121. doi:10.1080/0958517990100108
   Google Scholar
• Woolley, M. (2018). Experiencing the history National Curriculum 1991–2011: Voices of veteran teachers. History of Education, 48(2), 212–232. doi:10.1080/0046760X.2018.1544668
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, M., & Muller, J. (2010). Three educational scenarios for the future: Lessons from the sociology of knowledge. European Journal of Education, 45(1), 11–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar