How technology makes us human: cultural historical roots for design and technology education

References

• Abrams, F. (2012, October 25). Cultural literacy: Michael Gove's school of hard facts [online article]. Retrieved from http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/education-20041597
   Google Scholar
• ACARA. (2014). The Australian curriculum: Technologies. Retrieved from https://www.australiancurriculum.edu.au/f-10-curriculum/technologies/
   Google Scholar
• Allsop, T., & Woolnough, B. (1990). The relationship of technology to science in English schools. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 22(2), 127–136. doi: 10.1080/0022027900220202
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersen, L. W. and Krathwohl, D. R. (Eds). (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives. New York: Addison Wesley Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Arthur, W. B. (2009). The nature of technology: What it is and how it evolves. London: Penguin Book Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Atkinson, S. (1990). Design and technology in the United Kingdom. Journal of Technology Education, 2(1), 1–12. Retrieved from https://scholar.lib.vt.edu/ejournals/JTE/v2n1/pdf/atkinson.pdf doi: 10.21061/jte.v2i1.a.2
   Google Scholar
• BACC for the Future. (2018). https://www.baccforthefuture.com/
   Google Scholar
• Bakhurst, D. (2007). Vygotsky’s demons. In H. Daniels, M. Cole, & J. V. Wertsch (Eds.), The Cambridge companion to Vygotsky. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Becher, T. (1994). The significance of disciplinary differences. Studies in Higher Education, 19(2), 151–161. doi: 10.1080/03075079412331382007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell, D., Morrison-Love, D., Wooff, D., & McLain, M. (2017). Analysing design and technology as an educational construct: An investigation into its curriculum position and pedagogical identity. The Curriculum Journal, 28(4), 539–558. doi: 10.1080/09585176.2017.1286995
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernstein, B. (1971). On the classification and framing of educational knowledge. In M. F. D. Young (Ed.), Knowledge and control: New directions for the sociology of education. London: Collier MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Bernstein, B. (1975). Class, codes and control: Towards a theory of educational transmission (Vol. III). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bernstein, B. (1990). The structuring of pedagogic discourse: Class codes and control (Vol. IV). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bernstein, B. (2000). Pedagogy, symbolic control and identity: Theory, research, critique (revised ed.), New York: Rowman and Little.
   Google Scholar
• Biesta, G. (2014). Pragmatising the curriculum: Bringing knowledge back into the curriculum conversation, but via pragmatism. The Curriculum Journal, 25(1), 29–49. doi: 10.1080/09585176.2013.874954
   Google Scholar
• Biesta, G., & Burbules, N. (2003). Pragmatism and educational research. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Biglan, A. (1973a). Relationships between subject matter characteristics and the structure and output of university departments. Journal of Applied Psychology, 57(3), 204–213. doi: 10.1037/h0034699
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biglan, A. (1973b). The characteristics of subject matter in different academic areas. Journal of Applied Psychology, 57(3), 195–203. doi: 10.1037/h0034701
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bloom, B. S. (Ed.) (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals: Handbook 1, cognitive domain. New York: Longman Higher Education.
   Google Scholar
• Black, P., & Harrison, G. (1985). In place of confusion: Technology and science in the school curriculum. London: Nuffield-Chelsea Curriculum Trust.
   Google Scholar
• Bronowski, J. (2011). The ascent of man. London: BBC Books.
   Google Scholar
• Bruner, J. S. (2009). Culture, Mind, and education. In K. Illeris (Ed.), Contemporary theories of learning: Learning theorists. In their own words. Oxon, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, J. (2011). Why do language use and tool use both count as manifestations of intelligence? In T. McCormack, C. Hoerl, & S. Butterfill, (Eds.), Tool use and causal cognition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chand, I., & Runco, M. A. (1993). Problem finding skills as components of the creative process. Personality and Individual Differences, 14(1), 155–162. doi: 10.1016/0191-8869(93)90185-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Claxton, G., Lucas, B., & Webster, R. (2010). Bodies of knowledge: How the learning sciences could transform practical and vocational education. London: Edge Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Cole, M. (2007). Cultural psychology. In Y. Engeström, R. Miettinen, & R.-L. Punamäki (Eds.), Perspectives on activity theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cole, M. (1996). Cultural psychology: A once and future discipline. London: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cole, M., & Gajdamaschko, N. (2007). Vygotsky and culture. In H. Daniels, M. Cole & J. V. Wertsch (Eds.), The Cambridge companion to Vygotsky. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cross, N. (2011). Design thinking. Oxford, UK: Berg
   Google Scholar
• Cross, N. (2006). Designerly ways of knowing. Germany: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Cross, N. (2001). Designerly ways of knowing: Design discipline versus design science. Design Issues, 17(3), 49–55. doi: 10.1162/074793601750357196
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1988). Motivation and creativity: Towards a synthesis of structural and energetic approaches to cognition. New Ideas in Psychology, 6(2), 159–176. doi: 10.1016/0732-118X(88)90001-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daniels, H., Cole, M. & Wertsch, J. V. (Eds.). (2007). The Cambridge companion to Vygotsky. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dave, R. (1967). Psychomotor domain. Berlin: International Conference of Educational Testing.
   Google Scholar
• DES/WO. (1988). National curriculum design and technology working group: Interim report. London: Department for Education and Science and the Welsh Office.
   Google Scholar
• DfE. (2019). Guidance: English Baccalaureate (EBacc) [online]. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/english-baccalaureate-ebacc/english-baccalaureate-ebacc
   Google Scholar
• DfE. (2016). Educational excellence everywhere [electronic document]. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/educational-excellence-everywhere
   Google Scholar
• DfE. (2015). Design and technology GCSE subject content [electronic document]. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/gcse-design-and-technology
   Google Scholar
• DfE. (2013). National curriculum in England: Framework document [electronic document]. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/national-curriculum
   Google Scholar
• DfE. (2011). The framework for the national curriculum: A report by the Expert Panel for the National Curriculum review. London: Department for Education.
   Google Scholar
• DfE. (1995). Design and technology in the national curriculum. London: Department for Education.
   Google Scholar
• D&TA. (2018). Designed and made in Britain? [online article]. Retrieved from https://www.data.org.uk/campaign/
   Google Scholar
• de Vries, M. J. (2005). Teaching about technology: An introduction to the philosophy of technology for non-philosophers. Netherlands: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. (1916). Democracy and education: An introduction to the philosophy of education. New York: The Macmillan Company.
   Google Scholar
• Dreyfus, H. L., & Dreyfus, S. (1986). Mind over machine: The power of human intuition and expertise in the era of the computer. New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eggleston, J. (1996). Teaching design and technology (2nd ed.). Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Engeström, Y. (2009). Expansive learning: Towards an activity-theoretical reconceptualisation. In K. Illeris (Ed.), Contemporary theories of learning: Learning theorists. In their own words. Oxon, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Engeström, Y. (1999). Activity theory and individual and social transformation. In Y. Engeström, R. Miettinen, & R. L. Punamaki (Eds.), Perspectives on activity theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Feenberg, A. (1999). Questioning technology. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ferré, F. (1988). Philosophy of technology. Englewood Cliffs, USA: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Florman, S. (1987). The civilized engineer. New York: St Martin's Press.
   Google Scholar
• Froebel, F. (1908). The education of man. Translated by W. N. Hailmann. New York: D. Appleton and Company.
   Google Scholar
• Gibb, N. (2017). The importance of knowledge-based education [speech]. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/nick-gibb-the-importance-of-knowledge-based-education
   Google Scholar
• Greenfield, P. M. (1991). Language, tools and brain: The ontogeny and phylogeny of hierarchically organized sequential behavior. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 14(4), 531–551. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X00071235
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gumbo, M. T. (2017). Alternative Knowledge Systems. In P. J. Williams & K. Stables (Eds.), Critique in Design and Technology Education. Singapore: Springer Nature.
   Google Scholar
• Hardy, A. (2017). How did the expert panel conclude that D&T should be moved to a basic curriculum? In E. Norman & K. Baynes (Eds.), Design Epistemology and Curriculum Planning. Loughborough, UK: Loughborough Design Press Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Harrison, A. (2013). More work-based 'studio schools' announced [online article]. Retrieved from http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/education-22091861
   Google Scholar
• Harrison, M. (2011). Supporting the T and the E in STEM: 2004–2010. Design and Technology Education: An International Journal, 16(1), 17–25.
   Google Scholar
• Harrow, A. J. (1972). A taxonomy of the psychomotor domain. New York: David McKay Co.
   Google Scholar
• Hickman, L. A. (2001). Philosophical tools for technological culture: Putting pragmatism to work. Bloomington, USA: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jeffreys, B. (2017, June 27). What now for grammar schools? [online article]. Retrieved from http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/education-40384549
   Google Scholar
• Johnson-Frey, S. H. (2004). The neural bases of complex tool use in humans. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8(2), 71–81. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2003.12.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kimbell, R. (2018). Constructs of quality and the power of holism. In Proceedings of PATT36 research and practice in technology education: Perspectives on human capacity and development (pp. 181–186). Athlone Institute of Technology, Co. Westmeath, Ireland, 18–21 June 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Kimbell, R., Stables, K., & Green, R. (1996). Understanding practice in design and technology. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McGarr, O., & Lynch, R. (2015). Monopolising the STEM agenda in second-level schools: Exploring power relations and subject subcultures. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 27(1), 51–62. doi: 10.1007/s10798-015-9333-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCormick, R. (1997). Conceptual and procedural knowledge. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 7(1-2), 141–159. doi: 10.1023/A:1008819912213
   Google Scholar
• McGimpsey, I. (2011). RSA design & society. A review of literature on design education in the national curriculum [electronic document]. Retrieved from https://www.thersa.org/globalassets/pdfs/blogs/rsa_dt-lit_review_final.pdf
   Google Scholar
• McGinn, R. (1978). What is technology? Research in Philosophy and Technology, 1, 179–197.
   Google Scholar
• McLain, M., Bell, D., Wooff, D., & Morrison-Love, D. (2018). Cultural and historical roots for design and technology education: Why technology makes us human. In Proceedings of PATT36 Research and Practice in Technology Education: Perspectives on Human Capacity and Development (pp. 223–230). Athlone Institute of Technology, Co. Westmeath, Ireland, 18–21 June 2018,.
   Google Scholar
• McLain, M. (2012). The importance of technological activity and designing and making activity, a historical perspective. In Proceedings of PATT26 Technology Education in the 21st Century. Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden. Stockholm, Sweden: Linköping Universitet.
   Google Scholar
• Marranzo, R. J., & Kendell, J. S. (2007). The new taxonomy of educational objectives (2nd ed.). London: Sage Publications Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, J. (2011). RSA design & society. What’s wrong with DT? [electronic document]. Retrieved from https://www.thersa.org/globalassets/pdfs/blogs/rsa_whats-wrong-with-dt.pdf
   Google Scholar
• MoE. (2017). Technology in the New Zealand curriculum. Retrieved from http://nzcurriculum.tki.org.nz/The-New-Zealand-Curriculum/Technology
   Google Scholar
• Mitcham, C. (1994). Thinking through technology: A path between engineering and philosophy. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Morrison-Love, D. (2017). Towards a transformative epistemology of technology education. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 51(1), 23–37. doi: 10.1111/1467-9752.12226
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mumford, L. (1934). Technics and civilisation. New York: Harcourt Brace.
   Google Scholar
• NCC. (1990). Technology in the national curriculum. London: Department for Education and Science and the Welsh Office.
   Google Scholar
• Nicholl, B., & McLellan, R. (2007). Oh yeah, yeah you get a lot of love hearts. The Year 9s are notorious for love hearts. Everything is love hearts.’ Fixation in pupils’ design and technology work (11–16 years). Design and Technology Education: An International Journal, 12(1), 34–44.
   Google Scholar
• Nickerson, R. S. (2005). Technology and cognition amplification. In R. J. Sternberg & D. D. Preiss (Eds.), Intelligence and technology: The impact of tools on the nature and development of human abilities. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associated Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Neumann, R., Parry, S., & Becher, T. (2002). Teaching and learning in their disciplinary contexts: a conceptual analysis. Studies in Higher Education, 27(4), 405–417. doi: 10.1080/0307507022000011525
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Sullivan, G. (2013). Design and technology education: Vocational or academic? A case of yin and yang. In G. Owen-Jackson (Ed.), Debates in design and technology education. Oxon, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Paechter, C. (1995). Subcultural retreat: Negotiating the design and technology curriculum. British Educational Research Journal, 21(1), 75–87.
   Google Scholar
• Paton, G. (2013, April 24). New D&T curriculum axed over 'dumbing down' fears [online article]. Retrieved from https://www.telegraph.co.uk/education/educationnews/10016110/New-DandT-curriculum-axed-over-dumbing-down-fears.html
   Google Scholar
• Pavlova, M. (2005). Knowledge and values in technology education. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 15(2), 127–147. doi: 10.1007/s10798-005-8280-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Penfold, J. (1987). From handicraft to craft design and technology. Studies in Design Education Craft and Technology, 20(1), 34–48.
   Google Scholar
• Rasinen, A. (2003). An analysis of the technology education curriculum of six countries. Journal of Technology Education, 15(1), 31–47. Retrieved from https://scholar.lib.vt.edu/ejournals/JTE/v15n1/pdf/rasinen.pdf doi: 10.21061/jte.v15i1.a.3
   Google Scholar
• Reiss, M., & White, J. (2013). An aims-based curriculum: The significance of human flourishing for schools. IOE Press: London
   Google Scholar
• Roe Smith, M. (1994). Technological determinism is American culture. In M. Roe Smith & L. Marx (Eds.), Does technology drive history? The dilemma of technological determinism. Cambridge, USA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Russell, D. R. (1993). Vygotsky, Dewey, and externalism: Beyond the student/discipline dichotomy. Journal of Advanced Composition, 13(1), 173–197
   Google Scholar
• Ryle, G. (1949). 1990). The concept of mind. London: Penguin Books Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Scharff, R. C., & Dusek, V. (2003). Philosophy of technology: The technological condition (an anthology). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Simpson, E. J. (1972). The classification of educational objectives in the psychomotor domain. Washington: Gryphon House.
   Google Scholar
• Sternberg, R. J. (2005). The theory of successful intelligence. Interamerican Journal of Psychology, 39(2), 189–202.
   Google Scholar
• Tallis, R. (2003). The hand: A philosophical inquiry into the human being. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tappan, M. B. (1997). Language, culture, and moral development: A Vygotskian perspective. Developmental Review, 17(1), 78–100. doi: 10.1006/drev.1996.0422
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: Development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, USA: Harvard University Press
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S., & Luria, A. R. (1930/1993). Studies on the history of behavior: Ape, primitive, and child. Hillsdale, USA: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Wartofsky, M. W. (1979). Models: Representation and the scientific understanding. Dordrecht, Holland: D. Reidel. Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Welham, H. (2015, September 22). University technical colleges: Five years on, the jury's still out [online article]. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/education/2015/sep/22/university-technical-colleges-five-years-on-the-jurys-still-out
   Google Scholar
• White, J. (2018). The weakness of ‘powerful knowledge’. London Review of Education, 16(2), 325–335. doi: 10.18546/LRE.16.2.11
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, P. J., & Wellbourne-Wood, S. (2006). Design for experience: A new rationale. Design and Technology Education: An International Journal, 11(2), 9–19.
   Google Scholar
• Wolpert, L. (2003). Causal belief and the origins of technology. Philosophical Transfers of the Royal Society London, 361(1809), 1709–1719. doi: 10.1098/rsta.2003.1231
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, M. (2008). Bringing knowledge back in: From social constructivism to social realism in the sociology of education. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar