Global versus facet predictors of intention to quit: differences in a sample of male and female Singaporean managers and non-managers

References

• Arnold, H., Feldman, D. and Purbhoo, M. (1985) ‘The Role of Social Desirability Response Bias in Turnover Research’, Academy of Management Journal, 28: 955–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avolio, B., Yammarino, F. and Bass, B. (1991) identifying Common Method Variance with Data Collected from a Single Source: An Unresolved Sticky Issue’, Journal of Management, 17: 571–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Betz, M. and O’Connell, L. (1989) ‘Work Orientations of Males and Females: Exploring the Gender Socialization Approach’, Sociological Inquiry, 59: 318–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brayfield, A. and Crockett, W. (1955) ‘Employee Attitudes and Employee Performance’, Psychological Bulletin, 52: 396–424.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brayfield, A. and Rothe, H. (1951) ‘An Index of Job Satisfaction’, Journal of Applied Psychology, 35:307–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brett, J. and Stroh, L. (1994) ‘Turnover of Female Managers’. In Burke, R. and McKeen, C. (eds) Women in Management: Current Research Issues. London: Paul Chapman.
   Google Scholar
• Buchanan, B. (1974) ‘Building Organizational Commitment: The Socialization of Managers in Work Organizations’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 19: 533–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Catalyst (1991) As cited in Brett, J. and Stroh, L. (1994) ‘Turnover of Female Managers’. In Burke, R. and McKeen, C. (eds) Women in Management: Current Research Issues. London: Paul Chapman.
   Google Scholar
• Chow, I. (1995) ‘Career Aspirations, Attitudes and Experiences of Female Managers on Hong Kong’, Women in Management Review, 10: 28–32.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, A. (1992) ‘Antecedents of Organizational Commitment across Occupational Groups: A Meta-Analysis’, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 13: 539–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cotton, J. and Tuttle, J. (1986) ‘Employee Turnover: A Meta-Analysis and Review with Implications for Research’, Academy of Management Review, 11: 55–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deaux, K. (1984) ‘From Individual Differences to Social Categories’, American Psychologist, 39: 105–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dodd-McCue, D. and Wright, G. (1996) ‘Men, Women and Attitudinal Commitment: The Effects of Workplace Experiences and Socialization’, Human Relations, 49: 1065–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisenberger, R., Huntington, R., Hutchison, S. and Sowa, D. (1986) ‘Perceived Organizational Support’, Journal of Applied Psychology, 71: 500–7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fagenson, E. (1986) ‘Women’s Work Orientations: Something Old, Something New’, Group and Organizational Studies, 11: 75–100.
   Google Scholar
• Feldman, J. and Lynch, J. (1988) ‘Self-Generated Validity and Other Effects of Measurement on Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behavior’, Journal of Applied Psychology, 73: 421–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerhart, B. (1990) ‘Voluntary Turnover and Alternative Job Opportunities’, Journal of Applied Psychology, 75: 467–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glick, W., Jenkins, G. and Gupta, N. (1986) ‘Method versus Substance: How Strong Are Underlying Relationships between Job Characteristics and Attitudinal Outcomes?’, Academy of Management Journal, 29: 441–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gomez-Mejia, L. (1983) ‘Sex Differences during Occupational Socialization’, Academy of Management Journal, 26: 492–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graddick, M. and Farr, M. (1983) ‘Professionals in Scientific Disciplines: Sex-Related Differences in Working Life Commitments’, Journal of Applied Psychology, 68: 641–5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gutek, B., Nakamura, C. and Nieva, V. (1981) ‘The Interdependence of Work and Family Roles’, Journal of Occupational Behavior, 2: 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Gutek, B., Searle, S. and Klepa, L. (1991) ‘Rational versus Gender Role Explanations for Work-Family Conflict’, Journal of Applied Psychology, 76: 560–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hackman, R. and Oldham, G. (1976) ‘Motivation through the Design of Work: Test of a Theory’, Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 16: 250–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herzberg, F., Mausner, B., Peterson, R. and Capwell, R. (1957) Job Attitudes: Review of Research and Opinions. Pittsburgh, PA: Pittsburgh Psychological Services.
   Google Scholar
• Hodson, R. (1989) ‘Gender Differences in Job Satisfaction’, The Sociological Quarterly, 30: 385–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hollenbeck, J., Ilgen, D., Ostroff, C. and Vancover, J. (1987) ‘Sex Differences in Occupational Choice, Pay and Work: A Supply-Side Approach to Understanding the Male-Female Wage Gap’, Personnel Psychology, 40: 715–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hom, P. and Griffeth, R. (1995) Employee Turnover. Cincinnati, OH: South-Western College Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Hulin, C., Roznowski, M. and Hachiya, D. (1985) ‘Alternative Opportunity and Withdrawal Decisions: Empirical and Theoretical Discrepancies and an Integration’, Psychological Bulletin, 97: 233–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ivancevich, J. and Matteson, M. (1980) Stress and Work: A Managerial Perspective. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman.
   Google Scholar
• Kanter, R. (1977) Men and Women of the Corporation. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Koh, H.C. and Goh, C.T. (1995) ‘An Analysis of the Factors Affecting the Turnover Intention of Non-Managerial Clerical Staff: A Singapore Study’, International Journal of Human Resource Management, 6: 103–25.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, T. and Mitchell, T. (1994) ‘An Alternative Approach: The Unfolding Model of Voluntary Employee Turnover’, Academy of Management Review, 19: 51–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lobel, S. (1991) ‘Allocation of Investment in Work and Family Roles: Alternative Theories and Implications for Research’, Academy of Management Review, 16: 507–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lunneborg, P. (1990) Women Changing Work. New York: Bergin & Garvey.
   Google Scholar
• Mannheim, B. (1993) ‘Gender and the Effects of Demographics, Status, and Work Values on Work Centrality’, Work and Occupations, 20: 3–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsden, P., Kalleberg, A. and Cook, C. (1993) ‘Gender Differences in Organizational Commitment’, Work and Occupations, 20: 368–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mason, S. (1995) ‘Gender Differences in Job Satisfaction’, Journal of Social Psychology, 135: 143–51.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathieu, J. and Zajac, D. (1990) ‘A Review and Meta-Analysis of the Antecedents, Correlates and Consequences of Organizational Commitment’, Psychological Bulletin, 108: 171–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michaels, C. and Spector, P. (1982) ‘Causes of Employee Turnover: A Test of the Mobley, Griffeth, Hand and Meglino Model’, Journal of Applied Psychology, 67: 53–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, J. and Wheeler, K. (1992) ‘Unravelling the Mysteries of Gender Differences in Intentions to Leave the Organization’, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 13: 465–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mintzberg, H. (1973) The Nature of Managerial Work. New York: Harper & Row.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, T. (1985) ‘An Evaluation of the Validity of Correlational Research Conducted in Organizations’, Academy of Management Review, 10: 192–205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mobley, W. (1982) Employee Turnover: Causes, Consequences and Control. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Mobley, W., Griffeth, R., Hand, H. and Meglino, B. (1979) ‘A Review and Conceptual Analysis of the Employee Turnover Process’, Psychological Bulletin, 86: 493–522.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrison, A. and Von Glinow, M. (1990) ‘Women and Minorities in Management’, American Psychologist, 45: 200–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrison, A., White, R. and Van Velsor, E. (1987) Breaking the Glass Ceiling. Greensboro, NC: Center for Creative Leadership.
   Google Scholar
• Mowday, R., Porter, L. and Steers, R. (1982) Employee—Organization Linkages: The Psychology of Commitment, Absenteeism and Turnover. New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Muchinsky, P. and Morrow, P. (1980) ‘A Multidiscipinary Model of Voluntary Employee Turnover’, Journal of Vocational Behavior, 17: 263–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porter, L. and Steers, R. (1973) ‘Organizational Work and Personal Factors in Employee Turnover and Absenteeism’, Psychological Bulletin, 80: 151–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Price, J. (1977) The Study of Turnover. Ames, IA: Iowa State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Price, J. (1995) ‘A Role for Demographic Variables in the Study of Absenteeism and Turnover’, International Journal of Career Management, 7: 26–32.
   Google Scholar
• Price, J. and Mueller, C. (1981) ‘A Causal Model of Turnover for Nurses’, Academy of Management Journal, 24: 543–65.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Price, J. and Mueller, C. (1986) Absenteeism and Turnover of Hospital Employees. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
   Google Scholar
• Riger, S. and Galligan, P. (1980) ‘Women in Management: An Exploration of Competing Paradigms’, American Psychologist, 35: 902–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosin, H. and Korabik, K. (1995) ‘Organizational Experiences and Propensity to Leave: A Multivariate Investigation of Men and Women Managers’, Journal of Vocational Behavior, 46: 1–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rusbult, C. and Farrell, D. (1983) ‘A Longtitudinal Test of the Investment Model: The Impact of Job Satisfaction, Job Commitment and Turnover of Variations in Rewards, Costs, Alternatives and Investments’, Journal of Applied Psychology, 68: 429–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shore, L. and Martin, H. (1989) ‘Job Satisfaction and Organizational Commitment in Relation to Work Performance and Turnover Intentions’, Human Relations, 42: 625–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sicherman, N. (1996) ‘Gender Differences in Departures from a Large Firm’, Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 49: 484–505.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spector, P. (1987) ‘Method Variance as an Artifact in Self-Reported Affect and Perceptions at Work: Myth or Significant Problem?’, Journal of Applied Psychology, 72: 438–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steel, R. and Ovalle, N. (1984) ‘A Review and Meta-Analysis of Research on the Relationship between Behavioral Intentions and Employee Turnover’, Journal of Applied Psychology, 69: 673–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steers, R. and Mowday, R. (1981) ‘Employee Turnover and Post Decision Accommodation Processes’. In Cummings, L. and Staw, B. (eds) Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol. 3. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stroh, L., Brett, J. and O’Reilly, A. (1992) ‘All the Right Stuff: A Comparison of Female and Male Managers Career Progression’, Journal of Applied Psychology, 77: 251–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stroh, L., Brett, J. and O’Reilly, A. (1996) ‘Family Structure, Glass Ceiling and Traditional Explanations for the Differential Rate of Turnover between Female and Male Managers’, Journal of Vocational Behavior, 49: 99–118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan, D. and Akhtar, S. (1995) ‘A Comparison of Job-Facet Satisfaction and Commitment Determinants of Turnover Intention’, International Journal of Employment Studies, 3: 35–51.
   Google Scholar
• Weisberg, J. and Kirschenbaum, A. (1993) ‘Gender and Turnover: A Reexamination of the Impact of Sex on Intent and Actual Job Changes’, Human Relations, 46: 987–1006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, L., Cote, J. and Buckley, M. (1989) ‘Lack of Method Variance in Self-Reported Affect and Perceptions at Work: Reality or Artifact?’, Journal of Applied Psychology, 74: 462–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winer, B. (1971) Statistical Principles in Experimental Design. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar