HR in collaborative innovation with customers: role, alignment and challenges

References

• Adler, P. S., & Kwon, S. (2002). Social capital: Prospects for a new concept. Academy of Management Review, 27, 17–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amabile, T. M (1988). A model of creativity and innovation in organizations. In B. M. Staw & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 10, pp. 123–167). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barrick, M. R., & Mount, M. K. (1991). The big five personality dimensions and job performance: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 44, 1–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrick, M. R., Stewart, G. L., Neubert, M. J., & Mount, M. K. (1998). Relating member ability and personality to work-team processes and team effectiveness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 377–391.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barron, F., & Harrington, D. M. (1981). Creativity, intelligence, and personality. Annual Review of Psychology, 32, 439–476.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker, B. E., & Huselid, M. A. (2006). Strategic human resource management: Where do we go from here? Journal of Management, 32, 898–925.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bedwell, W. L., Wildman, J. L., DiazGranados, D., Salazar, M., Kramer, W. S., & Salas, E. (2012). Collaboration at work: An integrative multilevel conceptualization. Human Resource Management Review, 22, 128–145.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bettencourt, L. A., Ostrom, A. L., Brown, S. W., & Roundtree, R. I. (2002). Client co-production in knowledge-intensive business services. California Management Review, 44, 100–128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Billington, J., Baron-Cohen, S., & Wheelwright, S. (2007). Cognitive style predicts entry into physical sciences and humanities: Questionnaire and performance tests of empathy and systemizing. Learning and Individual Differences, 17, 260–268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biron, M., Farndale, E., & Paauwe, J. (2011). Performance management effectiveness: Lessons from world-leading firms. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 22, 1294–1311.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boeing Corporation. (2008). Boeing honors 11 suppliers with top performance. Retrieved from http://www.boeing.com/news/releases/2008/q2/080417b_nr_supplier.html (accessed 20 April 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Bogers, M., Afuah, A., & Bastian, B. (2010). Users as innovators: A review, critique, and future research directions. Journal of Management, 36, 857–875.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowen, D. E., & Ostroff, C. (2004). Understanding HRM–firm performance linkages: The role of the strength of the HRM system. Academy of Management Review, 29, 203–221.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Herstatt, C. (2008). The freedom-fighters: How incumbent corporations are attempting to control user-innovation. International Journal of Innovation Management, 12, 543–572.
   Google Scholar
• Brockhoff, K. (2003). Customers' perspectives of involvement in new product development. International Journal of Technology Management, 26, 464–481.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burt, R. S. (2005). Brokerage and closure: An introduction to social capital. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Buur, J., & Matthews, B. (2008). Participatory innovation. International Journal of Innovation Management, 12, 255–273.
   Google Scholar
• Camelo-Ordaz, C., Garcia-Cruz, J., Sousa-Ginel, E., & Valle-Cabrera, R. (2011). The influence of human resource management on knowledge sharing and innovation in Spain: The mediating role of affective commitment. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 22, 1442–1463.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, A. J., & Cooper, R. G. (1999). Do customer partnerships improve new product success rates? Industrial Marketing Management, 28, 507–519.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cano, C. P., & Cano, P. Q. (2006). Human resources management and its impact on innovation performance in companies. International Journal of Technology Management, 35, 11–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Capretz, L. F. (2007). Personality types in software engineering. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 58, 207–214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cavusgil, S. T., Calantone, R. J., & Zhao, Y. (2003). Tacit knowledge transfer and firm innovation capacity. Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing, 18, 6–21.
   Google Scholar
• Cech, E. A. (2014). Culture of disengagement in engineering education? Science, Technology, & Human Values, 39, 42–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ceylan, C. (2013). Commitment-based HR practices, different types of innovation activities and firm innovation performance. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 24, 208–226.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chesbrough, H., & Crowther, A. K. (2006). Beyond high tech: Early adopters of open innovation in other industries. R&D Management, 36, 229–236.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi, B., O'Connor, G. C., & Ravichandran, T. (2013). The effect of human capital management practices on breakthrough innovation (BI) in large firms. Paper presented at the 2013 Academy of Management Annual Meeting, Orlando, FL.
   Google Scholar
• Churchill, J. (2009). Interviewing methods for lead user project teams. Video retrieved from http://web.mit.edu/evhippel/www/teaching.htm (accessed 18 May 2012).
   Google Scholar
• Churchill, J., von Hippel, E., & Sonnack, M. (2009). Lead User Project Handbook: A practical guide for Lead User Research Teams. Cambridge: Lead User Concepts. Retrieved from http://web.mit.edu/evhippel (accessed 18 May 2012).
   Google Scholar
• Colbert, B. A. (2004). The complex resource-based view: Implications for theory and practice in strategic human resource management. Academy of Management Review, 29, 341–358.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook, J. S., & Cook, L. (2004). Promoting organizational knowledge sharing. In B. Montano (Ed.), Innovations of knowledge management (pp. 300–321). Hershey, PA: Hershey Idea Group.
   Google Scholar
• Cooke, F. L., & Saini, D. (2010). How does the HR strategy support an innovation oriented business strategy? An investigation of institutional context and organizational practices in Indian firms. Human Resource Management, 49, 377–400.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Culp, G., & Smith, A. (2001). Understanding psychological type to improve project team performance. Journal of Management in Engineering, 17, 24–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dauda, J. (2009). Managing technology innovation: The human resource management perspective. Frankfort: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• De Long, D. W., & Fahey, L. (2000). Diagnosing cultural barriers to knowledge management. Academy of Management Executive, 14, 113–127.
   Google Scholar
• Delery, J. E., & Doty, D. H. (1996). Modes of theorizing in strategic human resource management: Tests of universalistic, contingency, and configurational performance predictions. Academy of Management Journal, 39, 802–835.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Saa-Perez, P., & Diaz-Diaz, N. L. (2010). Human resource management and innovation in the Canary Islands: An ultra-peripheral region of the European Union. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 21, 1649–1666.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desouza, K. C., Awazu, Y., Jha, S., Dombrowski, C., Papagari, S., Baloh, P., & Kim, J. Y. (2008). Customer-driven innovation. Research Technology Management, 51, 35–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dewett, T. (2007). Linking intrinsic motivation, risk taking, and employee creativity in an R&D Environment. R&D Management, 37, 197–208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisenberg, I. (2011). Lead-user research for breakthrough innovation. Research Technology Management, 54, 50–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Agency theory: An assessment and review. Academy of Management Review, 14, 57–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enkel, E., Kausch, C., & Gassmann, O. (2005). Managing the risk of customer integration. European Management Journal, 23, 203–213.
   Google Scholar
• Etgar, M. (2008). A descriptive model of the consumer co-production process. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 36, 97–108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feist, G. J. (1998). A meta-analysis of personality in scientific and artistic creativity. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2, 290–309.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fletcher, J. K. (2007). Leadership, power, and positive relationships. In J. E. Dutton & B. R. Ragins (Eds.), Exploring positive relationships at work: Building a theoretical and research foundation (pp. 347–371). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Florida, R., Cushing, R., & Gates, G. (2007). When social capital stifles innovation. Harvard Business Review, 80, 20.
   Google Scholar
• Ford, R. C., Edvardsson, B., Dickson, D., & Enquist, B. (2012). Managing the innovation co-creation challenge: Lessons from service exemplars Disney and IKEA. Organizational Dynamics, 41, 281–290.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foss, N. J., Laursen, K., & Pedersen, T. (2011). Linking customer interaction and innovation: The mediating role of new organizational practices. Organization Science, 22, 980–999.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Füller, J. (2008). Brand community members as a source of innovation. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 25, 608–619.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Füller, J. (2010). Refining virtual co-creation from a consumer perspective. California Management Review, 52, 98–122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Füller, J., Matzler, K., Hutter, K., & Hautz, J. (2012). Consumers' creative talent: Which characteristics qualify consumers for open innovation projects? An exploration of asymmetrical effects. Creativity and Innovation Management, 21, 247–262.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• George, J. M., & Zhou, J. (2001). When openness to experience and conscientiousness are related to creative behavior: An interactional approach. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 513–524.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Georgsdottir, A. S., & Getz, I. (2004). How flexibility facilitates innovation and ways to manage it in organizations. Creativity and Innovation Management, 13, 166–175.
   Google Scholar
• Gianiodis, P. T., Ellis, S. C., & Secchi, E. (2010). Advancing a typology of open innovation. International Journal of Innovation Management, 14, 1–42.
   Google Scholar
• Gioia, D. A., & Pitre, E. (1990). Multiparadigm perspectives on theory building. Academy of Management Review, 15, 584–602.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gittell, J. H., & Douglass, A. (2012). Relational bureaucracy: Structuring reciprocal relationships into roles. Academy of Management Review, 37, 709–733.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Granovetter, M. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78, 1360–1380.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grant, A. M. (2011). How customers can rally your troops. Harvard Business Review, 89, 96–103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gratton, L. (2011). Workplace 2025 – What will it look like? Organizational Dynamics, 40, 246–254.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graziano, W. G., & Eisenberg, N. (1997). Agreeableness: A dimension of personality. In R. Hogan, J. Johnson, & S. Briggs (Eds.), Handbook of personality psychology (pp. 795–824). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Graziano, W. G., Habashi, M. M., Sheese, B. E., & Tobin, R. M. (2007). Agreeableness, empathy, and helping: A person x situation perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 583–599.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greer, C. R., & Lei, D. (2012). Collaborative innovation with customers: A review of the literature and suggestions for future research. International Journal of Management Reviews, 14, 63–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffin, M. A., Neal, A., & Parker, S. K. (2007). A new model of work role performance: Positive behavior in uncertain and interdependent contexts. Academy of Management Journal, 50, 327–347.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagel, III, J., & Brown, J. S. (2005). Productive friction: How difficult business partnerships can accelerate innovation. Harvard Business Review, 83, 82–91.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hannah, D. R. (2005). Should I keep a secret? The effects of trade secret protection procedures on employees' obligations to protect trade secrets. Organization Science, 16, 71–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen, M. T. (1999). The search-transfer problem: The role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organization subunits. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 82–111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harryson, S. J. (2008). Entrepreneurship through relationships – Navigating from creativity to commercialisation. R&D Management, 38, 290–310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harryson, S. J., Dudkowski, R., & Stern, A. (2008). Transformation networks in innovation alliances – The development of the Volvo C70. Journal of Management Studies, 45, 745–773.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hislop, D. (2003). Linking human resource management and knowledge management via commitment. Employee Relations, 25, 182–202.
   Google Scholar
• Hoegl, M., & Gemuenden, H. G. (2001). Teamwork quality and the success of innovative projects: A theoretical concept and empirical evidence. Organization Science, 12, 435–449.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunter, S. T., Cushenberry, L., & Friedrich, T. (2012). Hiring an innovative workforce: A necessary yet uniquely challenging endeavor. Human Resource Management Review, 22, 303–322.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, S. E., Schuler, R. S., & Rivero, J. C. (1989). Organizational characteristics as predictors of personnel practices. Personnel Psychology, 42, 727–786.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang, J., Wang, S., & Zhao, S. (2012). Does HRM facilitate employee creativity and organizational innovation? A study of Chinese firms. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 23, 4025–4047.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jimenez-Jimenez, D., & Sanz-Valle, R. (2008). Could HRM support organizational innovation? International Journal of Human Resource Management, 19, 1208–1221.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jolink, M., & Dankbaar, B. (2010). Creating a climate for inter-organizational networking through people management. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 21, 1436–1453.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang, K. H., & Kang, J. (2009). How do firms source external knowledge for innovation? Analysing effects of different knowledge sourcing methods. International Journal of Innovation Management, 13, 1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Kang, S., Morris, S. S., & Snell, S. A. (2007). Relational archetypes, organizational learning, and value creation: Extending the human resource architecture. Academy of Management Review, 32, 236–256.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleinsmann, J., Deken, F., Dong, A., & Lauche, K. (2012). Development of design collaboration skills. Journal of Engineering Design, 23, 485–506.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koruna, S. (2004). Leveraging knowledge assets: Combinative capabilities – Theory and practice. R&D Management, 34, 505–516.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kristof, A. L. (1996). Person-organization fit: An integrative review of its conceptualizations, measurement, and implications. Personnel Psychology, 49, 1–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhn, Thomas S. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions (2nd ed.). Chicago. IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kwan, A., Schwartz, J., & Liakopoulos, A. (2012). Talent edge 2020: Redrafting strategies for the uneven recovery. Deloitte Consulting, LLP. Retrieved from http://d2mtr37y39tpbu.cloudfront.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/DUP98_TalentEdge2020_RedraftingTalent.pdf (accessed 9 January 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Laursen, K., & Foss, J. J. (2003). New human resource management practices, complementarities and the impact on innovation performance. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 27, 243–263.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawson, B., Petersen, K. J., Cousins, P. D., & Handfield, R. B. (2009). Knowledge sharing in interorganizational product development teams: The effect of formal and informal socialization mechanisms. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 26, 156–172.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, J. Y., Swink, M., & Pandejpong, T. (2011). The roles of worker expertise, information sharing quality, and psychological safety in manufacturing process innovation: An intellectual capital perspective. Production and Operations Management, 20, 556–570.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lepak, D. P., & Shaw, J. D. (2008). Strategic HRM in North America: Looking to the future. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 19, 1486–1499.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lepak, D. P., & Snell, S. A. (1999). The human resource architecture: Toward a theory of human capital allocation and development. Academy of Management Review, 24, 31–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LePine, J. A., Hollenbeck, J. R., Ilgen, D. R., & Hedlund, J. (1997). Effects of individual differences on the performance of hierarchical decision-making teams: Much more than g. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 803–811.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lettl, C., Herstatt, C., & Gemuenden, H. G. (2006). Users' contributions to radical innovation: Evidence from four cases in the field of medical equipment technology. R&D Management, 36, 251–272.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, H., Bingham, J. B., & Umphress, E. E. (2007). Fairness from the top: Perceived procedural justice and collaborative problem solving in new product development. Organization Science, 18, 200–216.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liang, H., & Hsu, C. (2010). Enhancing NPD performance through human resource management. Paper presented at the 2010 Academy of Management Annual Meeting, Montreal.
   Google Scholar
• Littler, D., Leverick, F., & Bruce, M. (1995). Factors affecting the process of collaborative product development: A Study of UK manufacturers of information and communications technology products. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 12, 16–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lunsford, J. L., & Michaels, D. (2005, June 10). New orders: After four years in the rear, Boeing is set to jet past Airbus. Wall Street Journal, A1.
   Google Scholar
• Mackenzie, K., Buckby, S., & Irvine, H. (2009). A framework for evaluating business lead users' virtual reality innovations in Second Life. Electronic Commerce Research, 9, 183–202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magnusson, P. R., Matthing, J., & Kristensson, P. (2010). Managing user involvement in service innovation: Experiments with innovating end users. Journal of Services Research, 6, 111–124.
   Google Scholar
• McCrae, R. R. (1987). Creativity, divergent thinking, and openness to experience. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 1258–1265.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCrae, R. R., & Costa, Jr., P. T. (1997). Conceptions and correlates of openness to experience. In R. Hogan, J. Johnson, & S. Briggs (Eds.), Handbook of Personality Psychology (pp. 825–847). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mehlman, S. K., Uribe-Saucedo, S., Taylor, R. P., Slowinski, G., Carreras, E., & Arena, C. (2010). Better practices for managing intellectual assets in collaborations. Research Technology Management, 53, 55–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meister, J. C., & Willyerd, K. (2010). The 2020 workplace: How innovative companies attract, develop, and keep tomorrow's employees today. New York, NY: Harper Collins.
   Google Scholar
• Morgeson, F. P., Reider, M. H., & Campion, M. A. (2005). Selecting individuals in team settings: The importance of social skills, personality characteristics, and teamwork knowledge. Personnel Psychology, 58, 583–611.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mumford, M. D. (2000). Managing creative people: Strategies and tactics for innovation. Human Resource Management Review, 10, 313–351.
   Google Scholar
• Nambisan, S. (2002). Designing virtual customer environments for new product development: Toward a theory. Academy of Management Review, 27, 392–413.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nambisan, S., & Baron, R. A. (2009). Virtual customer environments: Testing a model of voluntary participation in value co-creation activities. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 26, 388–406.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nambisan, S., & Baron, R. A. (2010). Different roles, different strokes: Organizing virtual customer environments to promote two types of customer contributions. Organization Science, 21, 554–572.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nonaka, I., & Konno, N. (1998). The concept of ‘ba’: Building a foundation for knowledge creation. California Management Review, 40, 40–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Novicevic, M. J., Duke, A. B., Holmes, E. R., Breland, J. W., Buckley, M. R., & Bing, M. N. (2011). Customers cocreating value with the firm: Implications for HRM. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 22, 746–761.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ojanen, V., & Hallikas, J. (2009). Inter-organisational routines and transformation of customer relationships in collaborative innovation. International Journal of Technology Management, 45, 306–322.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olander, H., & Hurmelinna-Laukkanen, P. (2010). The effects of HRM-related mechanisms on communication in R&D collaboration. International Journal of Innovation Management, 14, 415–433.
   Google Scholar
• Olson, E. L., & Bakke, G. (2001). Implementing the lead user method in a high technology firm: A longitudinal study of intentions versus actions. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 18, 388–395.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Onyemah, V., Rouzies, D., & Panagopoulos, N. G. (2010). How HRM control affects boundary-spanning employees' behavioural strategies and satisfaction: The moderating impact of cultural performance orientation. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 21, 1951–1975.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ordanini, A., & Parasuraman, A. (2011). Service innovation viewed through a service-dominant logic lens: A conceptual framework and empirical analysis. Journal of Service Research, 14, 3–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostergaard, C. R., Timmermans, B., & Kristinsson, K. (2011). Does a different view create something new? The effect of employee diversity on innovation. Research Policy, 40, 500–509.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pals, N., Steen, M. G. D., Langley, D. J., & Kort, J. (2008). Three approaches to take the user perspective into account during new product design. International Journal of Innovation Management, 12, 275–294.
   Google Scholar
• Prahalad, C. K., & Ramaswamy, V. (2000). Co-opting customer competence. Harvard Business Review, 78, 79–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Price Waterhouse Coopers. (2011). Demystifying innovation. Retrieved from http://www.pwc.com/gx/en/corporate-strategy-services/assets/ceosurvey-innovation.pdf (accessed 29 May 2012).
   Google Scholar
• Rasoal, C., Danielsson, H., & Jungert, T. (2012). Empathy among students in engineering programmes. European Journal of Engineering Education, 37, 427–435.
   Google Scholar
• Roberge, M. E., & van Dick, R. (2010). Recognizing the benefits of diversity: When and how does diversity increase group performance. Human Resource Management Review, 20, 295–308.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider, B., & Bowen, D. E. (1995). Winning the service game. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, B., Goldstein, H. W., & Smith, D. B. (1995). The ASA framework: An update. Personnel Psychology, 48, 747–773.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schoch, N., Oelschlaeger, P., Huskey, L., & McNamee, R. C. (2011). Collaboration continuum: Benchmarking knowledge sharing environments in organizations. Research Technology Management, 54, 54–56.
   Google Scholar
• Schultze, U., Prandelli, E., Salonen, P. I., & van Alstyne, M. (2007). Internet-enabled co-production: Partnering or competing with customers? Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 19, 294–324.
   Google Scholar
• Schwenker, B. (2006). Human resource management at Roland Berger Strategy Consultants. In M. E. Domsch & E. Hristozova (Eds.), Human resource management in consulting firms (pp. 107–124). Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Selden, L., & MacMillan, I. C. (2006). Manage customercentric innovation systematically. Harvard Business Review, 84, 108–116.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seybold, P. B. (2006). Outside innovation: How your customers will co-design your company's future. New York, NY: Harper Collins.
   Google Scholar
• Shipton, H., Budhwar, P., Sparrow, P., & Bimrose, J. (2014). Special issue: Call for papers – HRM and innovation: A multi-level perspective. Human Resource Management Journal. Retrieved from http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/store/10.1111/(ISSN)1748-8583/asset/homepages/CFP_27Tth_March_2014.pdf?v = 1&s = 1cf51d31cf7576bdf4a54c8ea0a4fca984e8c793 (accessed 1 September 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Shipton, H., Fay, D., West, M., Patterson, M., & Birdi, K. (2005). Managing people to promote innovation. Creativity and Innovation Management, 14, 118–128.
   Google Scholar
• Shipton, H., West, M. A., Dawson, J., Birdi, K., & Patterson, M. (2006). HRM as a predictor of innovation. Human Resource Management Journal, 16, 3–27.
   Google Scholar
• Simon, H. A. (1991). Bounded rationality and organizational learning. Organization Science, 2, 125–134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skjolsvik, T., Lowendahl, B. R., Kvalshaugen, R., & Fosstenlokken, S. M. (2007). Choosing to learn and learning to choose: Strategies for client co-production and knowledge development. California Management Review, 49, 110–128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snell, S. A. (1992). Control theory in strategic management: The mediating effect of administrative information. Academy of Management Journal, 35, 292–327.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snell, S. A., & Youndt, M. A. (1995). Human resource management and firm performance: Testing a contingency model of executive controls. Journal of Management, 21, 711–737.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spence, M. (1973). Job market signaling. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 87, 355–374.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevens, M. J., & Campion, M. A. (1999). Staffing work teams: Development and validation of a selection test for teamwork settings. Journal of Management, 25, 207–228.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suazo, M. M., Martinez, P. G., & Sandoval, R. (2009). Creating psychological and legal contracts through human resource practices: A signaling theory perspective. Human Resource Management Review, 19, 154–166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Subramaniam, M. M., & Youndt, A. (2005). The influences of intellectual capital on the types of innovative capabilities. Academy of Management Journal, 48, 450–463.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swink, M. (2006). Building collaborative innovation capacity. Research Technology Management, 49, 37–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trott, P., & Hartmann, D. (2009). Why ‘open innovation’ is old wine in new bottles. International Journal of Innovation Management, 13, 715–736.
   Google Scholar
• Vandermerwe, S. (2000). How increasing value to customers improves business results. Sloan Management Review, 42(1), 27–37.
   Google Scholar
• van der Meer, H. (2007). Open innovation – The Dutch treat: Challenges in thinking in business models. Creativity and Innovation Management, 16, 192–202.
   Google Scholar
• van der Molen, H. T., Schmidt, H. G., & Kruisman, G. (2007). Personality characteristics of engineers. European Journal of Engineering Education., 32, 495–501.
   Google Scholar
• van der Panne, G., van Beers, C., & Kleinknecht, A. (2003). Success and failure in innovation: A literature review. International Journal of Innovation Management, 7, 309–338.
   Google Scholar
• Verona, G., Prandelli, E., & Sawhney, M. (2006). Innovation and virtual environments: Towards virtual knowledge brokers. Organization Studies, 27, 765–788.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Hippel, E. (1978). Successful industrial products from customer ideas: Presentation of a new customer-active paradigm with evidence and implications. Journal of Marketing, 42, 39–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Hippel, E. (1986). Lead users: A source of novel product concepts. Management Science., 32, 791–805.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Hippel, E. (2005). Democratizing innovation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• von Hippel, E., Thomke, S., & Sonnack, M. (1999). Creating breakthroughs at 3M. Harvard Business Review, 77, 47–57.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wei, L., Liu, J., & Herndon, N. C. (2011). SHRM and product innovation: Testing the moderating effects of organizational culture and structure in Chinese firms. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 22, 19–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Werbel, J. D., & DeMarie, S. M. (2005). Aligning strategic human resource management and person-environment fit. Human Resource Management Review, 15, 247–262.
   Google Scholar
• Werbel, J. D., & Johnson, D. J. (2001). The use of person-group fit for employment selection: A missing link in person-environment fit. Human Resource Management, 40, 227–240.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, M. (2012). Perspective taking: Building positive interpersonal connections and trustworthiness one interaction at a time. In K. S. Cameron & G. M. Spreitzer (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of positive organizational scholarship (pp. 462–472). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, S. D. (2004). Personality, attitude, and leader influences on divergent thinking and creativity in organizations. European Journal of Innovation Management, 7, 187–204.
   Google Scholar
• Woodman, R. W., Sawyer, J. E., & Griffin, R. W. (1993). Toward a theory of organizational creativity. Academy of Management Review, 2, 293–321.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, Y., & Konrad, A. M. (2011). Diversity and organizational innovation: The role of employee involvement. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 32, 1062–1083.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu, B. T., & To, W. M. (2011). The importance of input control to work performance under the agency theory framework. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 22, 2874–2891.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, J., & Shalley, C. E. (2003). Research on employee creativity: A critical review and directions for future research. In J. J. Martocchio & G. R. Ferris (Eds.), Research in personnel and human resource management (Vol. 22, pp. 165–217). Oxford: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Zhou, J., & Shalley, C. E. (2011). Deepening our understanding of creativity in the workplace: A review of different approaches to creativity research. In S. Zedeck (Ed.), APA Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 275–302). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Zhou, Y., Hong, Y., & Liu, J. (2013). Internal commitment or external collaboration? The impact of human resource management systems on firm innovation and performance. Human Resource Management, 52, 263–288.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar