3,514
Views
96
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

A paradox view on green human resource management: insights from the Italian context

&

References

  • Albareda, L., Lozano, J. M., Tencati, A., Midttun, A., & Perrini, F. (2008). The changing role of governments in corporate social responsibility: Drivers and responses. Business Ethics: A European Review, 17, 347–363. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8608.2008.00539.x.
  • Anderson, L. M., & Bateman, T. S. (2000). Individual environmental initiative: Championing natural environmental issues in U.S. business organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 43, 548–570. doi:10.2307/1556355.
  • Andriopoulos, C., & Lewis, M. W. (2009). Exploitation–exploration tensions and organizational ambidexterity: Managing paradoxes of innovation. Organization Science, 20, 696–717. doi:10.1287/orsc.1080.0406.
  • Appelbaum, E., Bailey, T., Berg, P., & Kalleberg, A. (2000). Manufacturing advantage: Why high-performance work systems pay off. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
  • Bakker, S., van Lente, H., & Engels, R. (2012). Competition in a technological niche: The cars of the future. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 24, 421–434. doi:10.1080/09537325.2012.674666.
  • Bansal, P. (2003). From issues to actions: The importance of individual concerns and organizational values in responding to natural environmental issues. Organization Science, 14, 510–527. doi:10.1287/orsc.14.5.510.16765.
  • Barley, S. R., & Tolbert, P. S. (1997). Institutionalization and structuration: Studying the links between action and institution. Organization Studies, 18, 93–117. doi:10.1177/017084069701800106.
  • Beer, M., Spector, B., Lawrence, P., Mills, D. Q., & Walton, R. (1984). Human resource management: A general manager's perspective. New York, NY: Free Press.
  • Berrone, P., & Gomez-Mejia, L. R. (2009). Environmental performance and executive compensation: An integrated agency-institutional perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 52, 103–126. doi:10.5465/AMJ.2009.36461950.
  • Bloor, M., Frankland, G., Thomas, M., & Robson, K. (2001). Focus group in social research. London: Sage.
  • Blumer, H. (1954). What is wrong with social theory? American Sociological Review, 19, 3–10. doi:10.2307/2088165.
  • Boselie, P., Brewster, C., & Paauwe, J. (2009). In search of balance – Managing the dualities of HRM: An overview of the issues. Personnel Review, 38, 461–471. doi:10.1108/00483480910977992.
  • Cameron, K. S. (1986). Effectiveness as paradox: Consensus and conflict in conceptions of organizational effectiveness. Management Science, 32, 539–553. doi:10.1287/mnsc.32.5.539.
  • Cameron, K. S., & Quinn, R. E. (1988). Organizational paradox and transformation. In R. E. Quinn & K. S. Cameron (Eds.), Paradox and transformation: Toward a theory of change in organization and management (pp. 12–18). Cambrigde, MA: Ballinger.
  • Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development. (2012). Responsible and sustainable business: HR leading the way. Retrieved from www.cips.co.uk.
  • Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development. (2013). The role of HR in corporate responsibility. Retrieved from www.cips.co.uk.
  • Child, J., & McGrath, R. G. (2001). Organizations unfettered: Organizational form in an information-intensive economy. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 1135–1148. doi:10.2307/3069393.
  • Dameron, S., & Torset, C. (2014). The discursive construction of strategists' subjectivities: Towards a paradox lens on strategy. Journal of Management Studies, 51, 291–319. doi:10.1111/joms.12072.
  • Denison, D., Hooijberg, R., & Quinn, R. E. (1995). Paradox and performance: Toward a theory of behavioral complexity in managerial leadership. Organization Science, 6, 524–540. doi:10.1287/orsc.6.5.524.
  • Denzin, N. K. (1978). Sociological methods: A sourcebook. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
  • Dierdorff, E. C., & Morgeson, F. P. (2013). Getting what the occupation gives: Exploring multilevel links between work design and occupational values. Personnel Psychology, 66, 687–721. doi:10.1111/peps.12023.
  • Drever, E. (1997). Using semi-structured interviews in small-scale research: A teacher's guide. Edinburgh: The Scottish Council for Research in Education.
  • Ehnert, I. (2009). Sustainable human resource management: A conceptual and exploratory analysis from a paradox perspective. Heidelberg: Springer.
  • Ehnert, I. (2014). Paradox as a lens for theorizing sustainable HRM. In I. Ehnert, W. Harry, & K. J. Zink (Eds.), Sustainability and human resource management (pp. 247–271). Berlin: Springer.
  • Eisenhardt, K. M., & Westcott, B. J. (1988). Paradoxical demands and the creation of excellence: The case of just-in-time manufacturing. In R. E. Quinn & K. S. Cameron (Eds.), Paradox and transformation: Toward a theory of change in organization and management (pp. 169–194). Cambrigde, MA: Ballinger.
  • Evans, P. A. (1999). HRM on the edge: A duality perspective. Organization, 6, 325–338. doi:10.1177/135050849962010.
  • Fernández, E., Junquera, B., & Ordiz, M. (2003). Organizational culture and human resources in the environmental issue: A review of the literature. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 14, 634–656.
  • Figge, F. (2004). Bio-folio: Applying portfolio theory to biodiversity. Biodiversity and Conservation, 13, 827–849. doi:10.1023/B:BIOC.0000011729.93889.34.
  • Gao, J., & Bansal, P. (2013). Instrumental and integrative logics in business sustainability. Journal of Business Ethics, 112, 241–255. doi:10.1007/s10551-012-1245-2.
  • Guest, G., MacQueen, K. M., & Namey, E. E. (2012). Applied thematic analysis. Thousands Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Habisch, A., Patelli, L., Pedrini, M., & Schwartz, C. (2011). Different talks with different folks: A comparative survey of stakeholder dialog in Germany, Italy, and the U.S. Journal of Business Ethics, 100, 381–404. doi:10.1007/s10551-010-0686-8.
  • Hahn, T., Pinkse, J., Preuss, L., & Figge, F. (2014). Tensions in corporate sustainability: Towards an integrative framework. Journal of Business Ethics, 127, 297–316. doi:10.1007/s10551-014-2047-5.
  • Hahn, T., Preuss, L., Prinske, J., & Figge, F. (2014). Cognitive frames in corporate sustainability: Managerial sensemaking with paradoxical and business case frames. Academy of Management Review, 39, 463–487. doi:10.5465/amr.2012.0341.
  • Handy, C. B. (1994). The age of paradox. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
  • Harris, C., & Tregidga, H. (2012). HR managers and environmental sustainability: Strategic leaders or passive observers? The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 23, 236–254. doi:10.1080/09585192.2011.561221.
  • Harvey, G., Williams, K., & Probert, J. (2013). Greening the airline pilot: HRM and the green performance of airlines in the UK. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 24, 152–166. doi:10.1080/09585192.2012.669783.
  • Held, M. (2001). Sustainable development from a temporal perspective. Time & Society, 10, 351–366.
  • Jabbour, C. J. C. (2013). Environmental training and environmental management maturity of Brazilian companies with ISO14001: Empirical evidence. Journal of Cleaner Production, in press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.10.039.
  • Jabbour, C. J. C., Santos, F. C. A., & Nagano, M. S. (2008). Environmental management system and human resource practices: Is there a link between them in four Brazilian companies? Journal of Cleaner Production, 16, 1922–1925. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2008.02.004.
  • Jackson, S. E. (2012). Building empirical foundations to inform the future practice of environmental sustainability. In S. E. Jackson, D. S. Ones, & S. Dilchert (Eds.), Managing human resources for environmental sustainability (pp. 416–432). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Jackson, S. E., Ones, D. S., & Dilchert, S. (2012). Managing human resources for environmental sustainability. San Francisco, CA: Wiley.
  • Jansen, J. J., Simsek, Z., & Cao, Q. (2012). Ambidexterity and performance in multiunit contexts: Cross-level moderating effects of structural and resource attributes. Strategic Management Journal, 33, 1286–1303. doi:10.1002/smj.1977.
  • Jiang, K., Lepak, D. P., Han, K., Hong, Y., Kim, A., & Winkler, A. (2012). Clarifying the construct of human resource systems: Relating human resource management to employee performance. Human Resource Management Review, 22, 73–85. doi:10.1016/j.hrmr.2011.11.005.
  • Kleindorfer, P. R., Singhal, K., & Van Wasssenhove, L. N. (2005). Sustainable operations management. Production and Operations Management, 14, 482–492. doi:10.1111/j.1937-5956.2005.tb00235.x.
  • Kolk, A., & Perego, P. (2014). Sustainable bonuses: Sign of corporate responsibility or window dressing?. Journal of Business Ethics, 119(1), 1–15. doi:10.1007/s10551-012-1614-x.
  • Kozica, A. M. F., Gebhardt, C., Müller-Seitz, G., & Kaiser, S. (2015). Organizational identity and paradox: An analysis of the ‘stable state of instability’ of Wikipedia's identity. Journal of Management Inquiry, 24, 186–203. doi:10.1177/1056492614553275.
  • Kramar, R. (2013). Beyond strategic human resource management: Is sustainable human resource management the next approach? The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 25, 1069–1089.
  • Legge, K. (1978). Power, innovation, and problem-solving in personnel management. London: McGraw-Hill.
  • Leonard-Barton, D. (1992). Core capabilities and core rigidities: A paradox in managing new product development. Strategic Management Journal, 13, 111–125. doi:10.1002/smj.4250131009.
  • Lewis, M. W. (2000). Exploring paradox: Toward a more comprehensive guide. Academy of Management Review, 25, 760–776.
  • Margolis, J. D., Elfenbein, H. A., & Walsh, J. P. (2007). Does it pay to be good? A meta-analysis and redirection of research on the relationship between corporate social and financial performance. Boston, MA: Memeo Harvard Business School.
  • Markusson, N. (2010). The championing of environmental improvements in technology investment projects. Journal of Cleaner Production, 18, 777–783. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2010.01.011.
  • Matos, S., & Hall, J. (2007). Integrating sustainable development in the supply chain: The case of life cycle assessment in oil and gas and agricultural biotechnology. Journal of Operations Management, 25, 1083–1102. doi:10.1016/j.jom.2007.01.013.
  • Mayrhofer, W., Sparrow, P., & Brewster, C. (2012). European human resource management: A contextualized stakeholder approach. In C. Brewster & W. Mayrhofer (Eds.), Handbook on research on comparative human resource management (pp. 528–549). Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.
  • Michaud, V. (2014). Mediating the paradoxes of organizational governance through numbers. Organization Studies, 35, 75–101. doi:10.1177/0170840613495335.
  • Midttun, A. (2007). Corporate responsibility from a resource and knowledge perspective towards a dynamic reinterpretation of C(S)R: Are corporate responsibility and innovation compatible or contradictory? Corporate Governance, 4, 401–413.
  • Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Muthuri, J. N., Matten, D., & Moon, J. (2009). Employee volunteering and social capital: Contributions to corporate social responsibility. British Journal of Management, 20, 75–89. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8551.2007.00551.x.
  • Paauwe, J., Boon, C., Boselie, P., & Den Hartog, D. (2013). Reconceptualizing fit in strategic human resource management: Lost in translation? In D. E. Guest, J. Paauwe, & P. Wright (Eds.), HRM and performance: Achievements and challenges (pp. 61–78). Chichester: Wiley.
  • Paillé, P., & Boiral, O. (2013). Pro-environmental behavior at work: Construct validity and determinants. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 36, 118–128.
  • Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Pearce, J. A, I. I., & Doh, J (2005). The high impact of collaborative social initiatives. MIT Sloan Management Review, 46, 29–39.
  • Perrini, F., Russo, A., & Tencati, A. (2007). CSR strategies of SMEs and large firms. Evidence from Italy. Journal of Business Ethics, 74, 285–300. doi:10.1007/s10551-006-9235-x.
  • Poole, M. S., & Van de Ven, A. H. (1989). Using paradox to build management and organization theories. Academy of Management Review, 14, 562–578.
  • Probst, G., & Raisch, S. (2005). Organizational crisis: The logic of failure. The Academy of Management Executive, 19, 90–105.
  • Putnam, L., Myers, K. M., & Gailliard, B. M. (2014). Examining the tensions in workplace flexibility and exploring options for new directions. Human Relations, 67, 413–440. doi:10.1177/0018726713495704.
  • Quinn, R. E., Kahn, J. A., & Mandl, M. J. (1994). Perspective on organizational change: Exploring movement at the interface. In J. Greenberg (Ed.), Organizational behavior: The state of science (pp. 109–133). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Renwick, D. W., Redman, T., & Maguire, S. (2013). Green human resource management: A review and research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 15(1), 1–14. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2370.2011.00328.x.
  • Russo, A., & Tencati, A. (2009). Formal vs. informal CSR strategies: Evidence from Italian micro, small, medium-sized, and large firms. Journal of Business Ethics, 85, 339–353. doi:10.1007/s10551-008-9736-x.
  • Ryan, G. W., & Bernard, H. R. (2003). Techniques to identify themes. Field Methods, 15, 85–109. doi:10.1177/1525822X02239569.
  • Schutz, J. (1999). Organising diversity. In J. Kohn, J. M. Gowdy, F. Hinterberger, & J. van der Straaten (Eds.), Sustainability in question: The search for a conceptual framework (pp. 101–123). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
  • Schwandt, T. A. (1994). Constructivist, interpretivist approaches to human inquiry. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 118–137). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Sheehan, C., De Cieri, H., Greenwood, M., & Van Buren, H. J. (2013). HR professional role tensions: Perceptions and responses of the top management team. Human Resource Management, 53, 115–130. doi:10.1002/hrm.21574.
  • Slawinski, N., & Bansal, P. (2012). A matter of time: The temporal perspectives of organizational responses to climate change. Organization Studies, 33, 1537–1563. doi:10.1177/0170840612463319.
  • Smith, K., & Berg, D. (1987). Paradoxes of group life. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.
  • Smith, W. K., & Lewis, M. W. (2011). Toward a theory of paradox: A dynamic equilibrium model of organizing. Academy of Management Review, 36, 381–403. doi:10.5465/AMR.2011.59330958.
  • Society for Human Resource Management. (2011). Advancing sustainability: HR's role survey report. Retrieved from www.shrm.org.
  • Society for Human Resource Management. (2013). Sustainable workplace practices. Retrieved from www.shrm.org.
  • Spradley, J. P. (1979). The ethnographic interview. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
  • Suddaby, R. (2006). From the editors: What grounded theory is not. Academy of Management Journal, 49, 633–642. doi:10.5465/AMJ.2006.22083020.
  • Sundaramurthy, C., & Lewis, M. W. (2003). Control and collaboration: Paradoxes of governance. Academy of Management Review, 28, 397–415.
  • Vince, R., & Broussine, M. (1996). Paradox, defense and attachment: Accessing and working with emotions and relations underlying organizational change. Organization Studies, 17(1), 1–21. doi:10.1177/017084069601700101.
  • Warner, M. (2009). ‘Making sense’ of HRM in China: Setting the scene. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 20, 2169–2193. doi:10.1080/09585190903239559.
  • Westenholz, A. (1993). Paradoxical thinking and change in the frames of reference. Organization Studies, 14, 37–58. doi:10.1177/017084069301400104.
  • Whetten, D. A. (1989). What constitutes a theoretical contribution? Academy of Management Review, 14, 490–495. doi:10.5465/AMR.1989.4308371.
  • Wu, Z., & Pagell, M. (2011). Balancing priorities: Decision-making in sustainable supply chain management. Journal of Operations Management, 29, 577–590. doi:10.1016/j.jom.2010.10.001.
  • Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Yoon, S. J., & Chae, Y. J. (2012). Management of paradox: A comparative study of managerial practices in Korean and Japanese firms. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 23, 3501–3521. doi:10.1080/09585192.2011.560885.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.