17,360
Views
33
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Performance management practices within emerging market multinational enterprises: the case of Brazilian multinationals

, &

References

  • Almond, P. (2011). Re-visiting ‘Country of Origin’ effects on HRM in multinational corporations. Human Resource Management Journal, 21, 258–271. doi:10.1111/j.1748-8583.2010.00153.x.
  • Amado, G., & Brasil, H. V. (1991). Organizational behaviors and cultural context: The Brazilian Jeitinho. International Studies of Management and Organization, 21, 38–61.
  • Amba-Rao, S. C., Petrick, J. A., Gupta, J. N. D., Embse, T. J. V. D., & Amba-Rao, S. C. (2000). Comparative performance appraisal practices and management values among foreign and domestic firms in India. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 11, 60–89. doi:10.1080/095851900339990.
  • Aycan, Z. (2005). The interplay between cultural and institutional/structural contingencies in human resource management practices. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 16, 1083–1119. doi:10.1080/09585190500143956.
  • Bartlett, C., & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Managing across borders: The transnational solution. London: Random House.
  • Beekun, R. I., Stedham, Y., & Yamamura, J. H. (2003). Business ethics in Brazil and the U.S.: A comparative investigation. Journal of Business Ethics, 42, 267–279. doi:10.1023/A:1022200702149.
  • Biron, M., Farndale, E., & Paauwe, J. (2011). Performance management effectiveness: Lessons from world-leading firms. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 22, 1294–1311. doi:10.1080/09585192.2011.559100.
  • Borini, F. M., Fleury, M. T. L., Fleury, A. C. C., & Oliveira, Jr., M. M. (2009). The relevance of subsidiary initiatives for Brazilian multinationals. Revista de Administração de Empresas, 49, 253–265.
  • Brainard, L., & Martinez-Diaz, L. (2009). Brazil as an economic superpower? Understanding Brazil's changing role in the global economy. Washington, DC: Brookings.
  • Brandau, M., Endenich, C., Trapp, R., & Hoffjan, A. (2013). Institutional drivers of conformity – Evidence for management accounting from Brazil and Germany. International Business Review, 22, 466–479. doi:10.1016/j.ibusrev.2012.07.001.
  • Brewster, C., Wood, G., & Brookes, M. (2008). Similarity, isomorphism or duality? Recent survey evidence on the human resource management policies of multinational corporations. British Journal of Management, 19, 320–342. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8551.2007.00546.x.
  • Brock, D. M., Shenkar, O., Shoham, A., & Siscovick, I. C. (2008). National culture and expatriate deployment. Journal of International Business Studies, 39, 1293–1309. doi:10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400361.
  • Carvalho, F., Costa, I., & Duysters, G. (2010). Drivers of Brazilian foreign investments: Technology seeking and technology exploiting as determinants of emerging FDI (UNU-Merit Working Paper 16). Maastricht: Maastricht Economic and Social Research and Training Centre on Innovation and Technology, United Nations University (UNU).
  • Casanova, L. (2009). Global Latinas: Emerging multinationals from Latin America. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Cascio, W. F. (2006). Global performance management systems. In G. K. Stahl & I. Bjorkman (Eds.), Handbook of research in international human resource management (pp. 176–196). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
  • Chang, Y. Y., Mellahi, K., & Wilkinson, A. (2009). Control of subsidiaries of MNCs from emerging economies in developed countries: The case of Taiwanese MNCs in the UK. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 20, 75–95. doi:10.1080/09585190802528383.
  • Chung, C., Sparrow, P., & Bozkurt, Ö. (2014). South Korean MNEs' international HRM approach: Hybridization of global standards and local practices. Journal of World Business. doi:10.1016/j.jwb.2013.12.008.
  • Claus, L. (2008). Employee performance management in MNCs: Reconciling the need for global integration and local responsiveness. European Journal of Management, 2, 132–153.
  • Claus, L., & Hand, M. (2009). Customization decisions regarding performance management systems of multinational companies: An empirical view of Eastern European firms. International Journal of Cross Cultural Management, 9, 237–258. doi:10.1177/1470595809335726.
  • Coates, J., Davis, E., Emmanuel, C., Longden, S., & Stacey, R. (1992). Multinational companies performance measurement systems: International perspectives. Management Accounting Research, 3, 133–150. doi:10.1016/S1044-5005(92)70008-0.
  • Cogin, J. A., & Williamson, I. O. (2014). Standardize or customize: The interactive effects of HRM and environment uncertainty on MNC subsidiary performance. Human Resource Management. doi:10.1002/hrm.21602.
  • Colakoglu, S., & Caligiuri, P. M. (2008). Cultural distance, expatriate staffing and subsidiary performance: The case of us subsidiaries of multinational corporations. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 19, 223–239. doi:10.1080/09585190701799804.
  • Cooke, B., Macau, F., & Wood, Jr., T. (2013). Brazilian management gurus as reflexive soft-HRM practitioners: An empirical study. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 24, 110–129. doi:10.1080/09585192.2012.669779.
  • Cuervo-Cazurra, A. (2008). The multinationalization of developing country MNEs: The case of multilatinas. Journal of International Management, 14, 138–154. doi:10.1016/j.intman.2007.09.001.
  • Dant, R. P., Perrigot, R., & Cliquet, G. (2008). A cross-cultural comparison of the plural forms in franchise networks: United States, France, and Brazil. Journal of Small Business Management, 46, 286–311. doi:10.1111/j.1540-627X.2008.00244.x.
  • da Rocha, A., & da Silva, J. F. (2009). The internationalization of Brazilian firms: An introduction to the special issue. Latin American Business Review, 10, 61–71. doi:10.1080/10978520903288086.
  • da Silva, J. F., da Rocha, A., & Carneiro, J. (2009). The international expansion of firms from emerging markets: Toward a typology of Brazilian MNEs. Latin American Business Review, 10, 95–115. doi:10.1080/10978520903303638.
  • Decramer, A., Smolders, C., Vanderstraeten, A., & Christiaens, J. (2012). The impact of institutional pressures on employee performance management systems in higher education in the low countries. British Journal of Management, 23, S88–S103. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8551.2012.00820.x.
  • De Miranda Oliveira, M. M., & Mendes Borini, F. M. (2012). The role of subsidiaries from emerging economies-a survey involving the largest Brazilian multinationals. Thunderbird International Business Review, 54, 361–371. doi:10.1002/tie.21467.
  • DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48, 147–160. doi:10.2307/2095101.
  • Dossi, A., & Patelli, L. (2008). The decision-influencing use of performance measurement systems in relationships between headquarters and subsidiaries. Management Accounting Research, 19, 126–148. doi:10.1016/j.mar.2007.11.001.
  • Eden, L., & Miller, S. (2004). Distance matters: Liability of foreignness, institutional distance and ownership strategy. Advances in International Management, 16, 187–221.
  • Edwards, T. (1998). Multinationals, labour management and the process of reverse diffusion: A case study. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 9, 696–709. doi:10.1080/095851998340964.
  • Edwards, T., & Ferner, A. (2002). The renewed ‘American Challenge’: A review of employment practice in US multinationals. Industrial Relations Journal, 33, 94–111. doi:10.1111/1468-2338.00222.
  • Eisenhardt, K. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14, 532–550.
  • Evans, P., Pucik, V., & Barsoux, J. L. (2002). The global challenge: Frameworks for international human resource management. New York, NY: McGraw Hill/Irwin.
  • Farndale, E., Scullion, H., & Sparrow, P. (2010). The role of the corporate HR function in global talent management. Journal of World Business, 45, 161–168. doi:10.1016/j.jwb.2009.09.012.
  • Fee, A., McGrath-Champ, S., & Yang, X. (2011). Expatriate performance management and firm internationalization: Australian multinationals in China. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 49, 365–384. doi:10.1177/1038411111413529.
  • Festing, M., & Eidems, J. (2011). A process perspective on transnational HRM systems – A dynamic capability-based analysis. Human Resource Management Review, 21, 162–173. doi:10.1016/j.hrmr.2011.02.002.
  • Fletcher, C. (2001). Performance appraisal and management: The developing research agenda. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 74, 473–487. doi:10.1348/096317901167488.
  • Fletcher, C., & Perry, E. L. (2001). Performance appraisal and feedback: A consideration of national culture and a review of contemporary research and future trends. In N. Anderson, D. S. Ones, H. K. Sinangil, & C. Viswesvaran (Eds.), Handbook of industrial, work, and organizational psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 127–144). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Fletcher, C., & Williams, R. (1996). Performance management, job satisfaction and organizational commitment. British Journal of Management, 7, 169–179. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8551.1996.tb00112.x.
  • Fleury, A., & Fleury, M. T. L. (2009). Brazilian multinationals: Surfing the waves of internationalization. In R. Ramamurti & J. V. Singh (Eds.), Emerging multinationals in emerging markets  (pp. 200–243). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Fleury, A., & Fleury, M. T. L. (2011). Brazilian multinationals: Competences for internationalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Forstenlechner, I., & Mellahi, K. (2011). Gaining legitimacy through hiring local workforce at a premium: The case of MNEs in the United Arab Emirates. Journal of World Business, 46, 455–461. doi:10.1016/j.jwb.2010.10.006.
  • Geppert, M., Matten, D., & Williams, K. (2003). Change management in MNCs: How global convergence intertwines with national diversity. Human Relations, 56, 807–838.
  • Gooderham, P., Nordhaug, O., & Ringdal, K. (1998). When in Rome, do they do as the Romans? HRM practices of US subsidiaries in Europe. Management International Review, 38, 47–64.
  • Gooderham, P., Nordhaug, O., & Ringdal, K. (1999). Institutional and rational determinants of organisation practices: Human resource management in European firms. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 507–531.
  • Gunnigle, P., Murphy, K. M., Cleveland, J., Heraty, N., & Morley, M. (2002). Localisation in human resource management: Comparing American and European multinational corporations. Advances in International Management, 14, 259–284.
  • Hawksworth, J., & Cookson, G. (2008). The World in 2050: Beyond the BRIC's: A broader look at emerging market growth prospects. PricewaterhouseCoopers (http://www.pwc.com/en_LA/la/publications/assets/world_2050_brics.pdf).
  • Hickson, D. J., Hinings, C. R., McMillan, C., & Schwitter, I. P. (1974). The culture-tree context of organizational structure: A tri-national comparison. Sociology, 8, 59–80.
  • Hofstede, G. (1994). Management scientists are human. Management Science, 40, 4–13. doi:10.1287/mnsc.40.1.4.
  • Islam, G. (2012). Between unity and diversity: Historical and cultural foundations of Brazilian management. European Journal of International Management, 6, 265–282. doi:10.1504/EJIM.2012.047024.
  • Jensen, R., & Szulanski, G. (2004). Stickiness and the adaptation of organizational practices in cross-border knowledge transfers. Journal of International Business Studies, 35, 508–523. doi:10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400107.
  • Kerr, C., Dunlop, T., Harbison, H. H., & Myers, C. A. (1960). Industrialism and industrial man. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Khavul, S., Benson, G., & Datta, D. (2010). Is internationalization associated with investments in HRM? A study of entrepreneurial firms in emerging markets. Human Resource Management, 49, 693–713. doi:10.1002/hrm.20367.
  • Kostova, T. (1999). Transnational transfer of strategic organizational practices: A contextual perspective. Academy of Management Review, 24, 308–324.
  • Kostova, T., & Zaheer, S. (1999). Organizational legitimacy under conditions of complexity: The case of the multinational enterprise. Academy of Management Review, 24, 64–81.
  • Lenartowicz, T., & Roth, K. (2001). Does subculture within a country matter? A cross-cultural study of motivational domains and business performance in Brazil. Journal of International Business Studies, 32, 305–325. doi:10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490954.
  • Levy, D. L., & Kolk, A. (2002). Strategic responses to global climate change: Conflicting pressures on multinationals in the oil industry. Business and Politics, 4, 275–300. doi:10.2202/1469-3569.1042.
  • Lima, A. L. (2011). Brazilian MNEs positive in 2009 after the global crisis. In K. P. Sauvant, V. Govitrikar, & K. Davies (Eds.), MNEs from emerging markets: New players in the world FDI market (pp. 47–86). New York, NY: Vale Columbia Center on Sustainable Investment.
  • Lima, L. A., & de Barros, O. (2009). The growth of Brazil's outward investment and the challenges it faces  (Columbia FDI Perspectives. No. 13). New York, NY: Vale Columbia Center on Sustainable Investment.
  • Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
  • Lu, Y., & Bjorkman, I. (1997). HRM practices in China-Western joint ventures: MNC standardization versus localization. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 8, 614–628. doi:10.1080/095851997341414.
  • Luo, Y., & Tung, R. L. (2007). International expansion of emerging market enterprises: A springboard perspective. Journal of International Business Studies, 38, 481–498. doi:10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400275.
  • Mayrhofer, W., & Brewster, C. (1996). In praise of ethnocentricity: Expatriate policies in European multinationals. The International Executive, 38, 749–778. doi:10.1002/tie.5060380605.
  • Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83, 340–363. doi:10.1086/226550.
  • Morgan, G., & Kristensen, P. (2006). The contested space of multinationals: Varieties of institutionalism, varieties of capitalism. Human Relations, 59, 1467–1490. doi:10.1177/0018726706072866.
  • Muller, H.-E. (2001). Wie global player den Kampf un Talente Fuhren. Harvard Business Manager, 6, 16–25.
  • Muritiba, P. M., Muritiba, S. N., de Albuquerque, L. G., Bertoia, N., & French, J. L. (2010). International strategy, cultural distance and management policies in Brazilian multinational companies. Revista de Globalización, Competitividad y Gobernabilidad, 4, 24–37.
  • Muritiba, P. M., Muritiba, S. N., Galvao de Albuquerque, L. G., Fleury, M. T. L., & French, J. L. (2012). Challenges for Brazilian MNCs international human resources management. European Journal of International Management, 6, 248–264. doi:10.1504/EJIM.2012.047023.
  • Nicholls-Nixon, C. L., Davila Castilla, J. A. D., Sanchez Garcia, J. S., & Rivera Pesquera, M. R. (2011). Latin America management research: Review, synthesis, and extension. Journal of Management, 37, 1178–1227. doi:10.1177/0149206311403151.
  • North, D. C., & Thomas, P. R. (1973). The rise of the Western world: A new economic history. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Posthuma, R. A., Bisseling, D., & Sobral, F. (2011). A cross-cultural comparison of intragroup conflict in the Netherlands and Brazil. International Journal of Conflict Management, 22, 151–169. doi:10.1108/10444061111126684.
  • Prahalad, C. K., & Doz, Y. (1987). The multinational mission: Balancing local demands and global vision. New York, NY: The Free Press.
  • Pudelko, M., & Harzing, A. W. (2007). Country-of-origin, localization, or dominance effect? An empirical investigation of HRM practices in foreign subsidiaries. Human Resource Management, 46, 535–559. doi:10.1002/hrm.20181.
  • Ramamurti, R. (2012). What is really different about emerging market multinationals? Global Strategy Journal, 2, 41–47. doi:10.1002/gsj.1025.
  • Ramsey, J., Barakat, L. L., & Monteiro, R. R. P. (2013). Cultural distance and future entry mode choice of Brazilian MNEs. Latin American Business Review, 14, 55–78. doi:10.1080/10978526.2013.780514.
  • Ramsey, J., Resende, P., & Almeida, A. (2009). Transnationalization of Brazilian companies: Lessons from the top 20. Latin American Business Review, 10, 117–134. doi:10.1080/10978520903275653.
  • Rodrigues, L. L., & Craig, R. (2007). Assessing international accounting harmonization using Hegelian dialectic, isomorphism and Foucault. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 18, 739–757. doi:10.1016/j.cpa.2006.02.007.
  • Rodrigues, S. B., & Betania, B. (2002). Management in Brazil. In M. Warner (Ed.), International encyclopedia of business and management (pp. 528–540). London: Thompson Learning.
  • Rodrigues, S. B., Gonzalez Duarte, R., & de Padua Carrieri, A. (2012). Indigenous or imported knowledge in Brazilian management studies: A quest for legitimacy? Management and Organization Review, 8, 211–232. doi:10.1111/j.1740-8784.2011.00276.x.
  • Rosenzweig, P. M. (2006). The dual logics behind international human resource management: Pressures for global integration and local responsiveness. In G. K. Stahl & I. Bjorkman (Eds.), Handbook of research in international human resource management (pp. 36–48). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
  • Rosenzweig, P. M., & Nohria, N. (1994). Influences on human resource management practices in multinational corporations. Journal of International Business Studies, 25, 229–251. doi:10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490199.
  • Salomon, R. M., & Wu, Z. (2012). Institutional distance and local isomorphism strategy. Journal of International Business Studies, 43, 343–367. doi:10.1057/jibs.2012.3.
  • Schuler, R. S., Fulkerson, J. R., & Dowling, P. J. (1991). Strategic performance measurement and management in multinational corporations. Human Resource Management, 30, 365–392. doi:10.1002/hrm.3930300305.
  • Shen, J. (2004). International performance appraisals. International Journal of Manpower, 25, 547–563. doi:10.1108/01437720410560442.
  • Smale, A., Björkman, I., & Sumelius, J. (2013). Examining the differential use of global integration mechanisms across HRM practices: Evidence from China. Journal of World Business, 48, 232–240. doi:10.1016/j.jwb.2012.07.007.
  • Smith, C., & Meiksins, P. (1995). System, society and dominance effects in cross-national organisational analysis. Work, Employment and Society, 9, 241–267. doi:10.1177/0950017095009002003.
  • Srinivasa Rao, A. S. (2007). Effectiveness of performance management systems: An empirical study in Indian companies. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 18, 1812–1840. doi:10.1080/09585190701570973.
  • Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Journal, 20, 571–610.
  • Suddaby, R., & Greenwood, R. (2001). Colonizing knowledge: Commodification as a dynamic of jurisdictional expansion in professional service firms. Human Relations, 54, 933–953. doi:10.1177/0018726701547007.
  • Tanure, B. (2004). Gestão à Brasileira  (Brazilian Management) (3rd ed.). São Paulo: Atlas.
  • Taylor, S., Beechler, S., & Napier, N. (1996). Towards an integrative model of strategic international human resource management. Academy of Management Review, 21, 959–985.
  • Thite, M., Wilkinson, A., & Shah, D. (2012). Internationalization and HRM strategies across subsidiaries in multinational corporations from emerging economies – A conceptual framework. Journal of World Business, 47, 251–258. doi:10.1016/j.jwb.2011.04.012.
  • Tolbert, P., & Zucker, L. (1983). Institutional sources of change in the formal structure of organizations: The diffusion of civil service reform, 1880–1935. Administrative Science Quarterly, 28, 22–39. doi:10.2307/2392383.
  • Varma, A., Budhwar, P. S., & DeNisi, A. S. (2008). Performance management around the globe. In A. Varma, P. S. Budhwar, & A. S. DeNisi (Eds.), Performance management systems: A global perspective (pp. 3–14). London: Routledge.
  • Volkema, R. J. (1999). Ethicality in Negotiations. Journal of Business Research, 45, 59–67. doi:10.1016/S0148-2963(98)00056-3.
  • Wood, Jr., T., & Caldas, P. M. (2002). Adopting imported managerial expertise in developing countries: The Brazilian experience. Academy of Management Perspective, 16, 18–32.
  • Xu, D., & Shenkar, O. (2002). Institutional distance and the multinational enterprise. Academy of Management Review, 27, 608–618.
  • Zelli, F., & van Asselt, H. (2013). Introduction: The institutional fragmentation of global environmental governance: Causes, consequences, and responses. Global Environmental Politics, 13(3), 1–13. doi:10.1162/GLEP_a_00180.
  • Zhang, A. Y., Tsui, A. S., Song, L. J., Li, C., & Jia, L. (2008). How do I trust thee? The employee-organization relationship, supervisory support, and middle manager trust in the organization. Human Resource Management, 47, 111–132. doi:10.1002/hrm.20200.
  • Zhang, M., & Edwards, C. (2007). Diffusing ‘best practice’ in Chinese multinationals: The motivation, facilitation and limitations. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 18, 2147–2165. doi:10.1080/09585190701695291.