The role of knowledge management practices in supporting employee capacity for improvisation

References

• Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in context. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Amabile, T. M. (1998). How to kill creativity. Harvard Business Review, 76–87, September–October, 1998.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, N., & West, M. A. (1998). Measuring climate for work group innovation: Development and validation of the team climate inventory. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 19, 235–258.10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1379
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andreeva, T., & Kianto, A. (2011). Knowledge processes, knowledge-intensity and innovation: A moderated mediation analysis. Journal of Knowledge Management, 15, 1016–1034.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andreeva, T., & Kianto, A. (2012). Does knowledge management really matter? Linking knowledge management practices, competitiveness and economic performance. Journal of Knowledge Management, 16, 617–636.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Axtell, C., Holman, D., & Wall, T. (2006). Promoting innovation: A change study. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 79, 509–516.10.1348/096317905X68240
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker, T., Miner, A. S., & Eesley, D. T. (2003). Improvising firms: Bricolage, account giving and improvisational competencies in the founding process. Research Policy, 32, 255–276.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barclay, D. W., Higgins, C. A., & Thompson, R. (1995). The partial least squares approach to causal modeling: Personal computer adoption and use as illustration. Technology Studies, 2, 285–309.
   Google Scholar
• Basadur, M., & Gelade, G. A. (2006). The role of knowledge management in the innovation process. Creativity and Innovation Management, 15, 45–62.10.1111/caim.2006.15.issue-1
   Google Scholar
• Bastien, D. T., & Hostager, T. J. (1992). Cooperation as communicative accomplishment: A symbolic interaction analysis of an improvised Jazz concert. Communication Studies, 43, 92–104.10.1080/10510979209368363
   Google Scholar
• Bontis, N., Booker, L. D., & Serenko, A. (2007). The mediating effect of organizational reputation on customer loyalty and service recommendation in the banking industry. Management Decision, 45, 1426–1445.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bontis, N. & Serenko, A. (2007). The moderating role of human capital management practices on employee capabilities. Journal of Knowledge Management, 11, 31–51.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, J. S., & Duguid, P. (1991). Organizational learning and communities of practice: Towards a unified view of working, learning and innovation. Organization Science, 2, 47–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlie, P. R. (2004). The dynamics of firm knowledge and competitive advantage: A framework and case example. Organization Science, 15, 555–568.10.1287/orsc.1040.0094
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carmines, E. G., & Zeller, R. A. (1979). Reliability and validity assessment (Vol. 17). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, W., & Levinthal, D. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 128–152.10.2307/2393553
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connelly, C. E. & Kelloway, E. K. (2003). Predictors of employees' perceptions of knowledge sharing cultures. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 24, 294–301.
   Google Scholar
• Conway, J. M., & Lance, C. E. (2010). What reviewers should expect from authors regarding common method bias in organizational research. Journal of Business Psychology, 25, 325–334.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cunha, M. P., Cunha, J. V., & Kamoche, K. (1999). Organizational improvisation: What, when, how and why. International Journal of Management Reviews, 1, 299–341.10.1111/ijmr.1999.1.issue-3
   Google Scholar
• Damanpour, F. (1991). Organizational innovation: A meta-analysis of effects of determinants and moderators. Academy of Management Journal, 34, 555–590.10.2307/256406
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Jong, J. P., & Den Hartog, D. N. (2008). Innovative work behavior: Measurement and Validation. Zoetermeer: EIM Business and Policy Research.
   Google Scholar
• Demarest, M. (1997). Understanding knowledge management. Long Range Planning, 30, 374–384.10.1016/S0024-6301(97)90250-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duguid, P. (2008). Community of practice then and now. In A. Amin & J. Roberts. Community, economic creativity, and organization (pp. 1–10). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt, K. M., & Tabrizi, B. N. (1995). Accelerating adaptive processes: Product innovation in the global computer industry. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40, 84–110.10.2307/2393701
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher, C. M., & Amabile, T. (2009). Creativity, improvisation and organizations. In T. Richards, M. A. Runco, & S. Monger (Eds.), The Routledge companion to creativity. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 39–50.10.2307/3151312
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• George, J. M. (2007). Creativity in organizations. In J. P. Walsh & A. P. Brief (Eds.), Academy of management annals (Vol. 1, pp. 439–477). New York, NY: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Gold, A. H., Malhotra, A., & Segars, A. H. (2001). Knowledge management: An organizational capabilities perspective. Journal of Management Information Systems, 18, 185–214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grant, A. M., & Berry, J. W. (2011). The necessity of others is the mother of invention: Intrinsic and prosocial motivations, perspective taking, and creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 54, 73–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grant, R. (1996). Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17, 109–122, Special Issue: Knowledge and the Firm (Winter 1996).10.1002/smj.4250171110
   Google Scholar
• Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., & Sarsted, M. (2011). PLS-SEM: Indeed a silver bullet. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 19, 139–151.10.2753/MTP1069-6679190202
   Google Scholar
• Hair, J. F., Jr., Sarsted, M., Hopkins, L., & Kuppelwieser, V. G. (2014). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM): An emerging tool in business research. European Business Review, 26, 106–122.10.1108/EBR-10-2013-0128
   Google Scholar
• Hammond, M. M., Neff, N. L., Farr, J. L., Schwall, A. R., & Zhao, X. (2011). Predictors of individual-level innovation at work: A meta-analysis. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity and the Arts, 5, 90–115.10.1037/a0018556
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hmieleski, K. M., & Corbett, A. C. (2006). Proclivity for improvisation as a predictor of entrepreneurial intentions. Journal of Small Business Management, 44, 45–63.10.1111/jsbm.2006.44.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janssen, O. (2000). Job demands, perceptions of effort-reward fairness and innovative work behaviour. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 73, 287–302.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnstone, K. (1979). Impro: Improvisation and the theatre. New York, NY: Routledge/Theatre Arts Books.
   Google Scholar
• Jung, D., Wu, A., & Chow, C. W. (2008). Towards understanding the direct and indirect effects of CEO’s transformational leadership on firm innovation. The Leadership Quarterly, 19, 582–594.10.1016/j.leaqua.2008.07.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamoche, K., Cunha, M. P., & Cunha, J. V. (2003). Towards a theory of organizational improvisation: Looking beyond the Jazz metaphor. Journal of Management Studies, 40, 2023–2051.10.1046/j.1467-6486.2003.00410.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kianto, A. (2008). Development and validation of a survey instrument for measuring organizational renewal capability. International Journal of Technology Management, 42, 69–88.10.1504/IJTM.2008.018061
   Google Scholar
• Kianto, A. (2011). The influence of knowledge management on continuous innovation. International Journal of Technology Management, 55, 110–121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kianto, A., & Ritala, P. (2010). Knowledge-based perspective on dynamic capabilities: Strategic reconfigurations building dynamic capabilities in rapid innovation-based industries. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.10.4337/9781849805629
   Google Scholar
• Khilji, S. E., & Wang, X. (2006). ‘Intended’ and ‘implemented’ HRM: The missing linchpin in strategic human resource management research. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 17, 1171–1189.10.1080/09585190600756384
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koppett, K. (2002). Training using drama: Successful development techniques from theatre & improvisation. London: Kogan Page Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, H., & Choi, B. (2003). Knowledge management enablers, processes, and organizational performance: An integrative view and empirical examination. Journal of Management Information Systems, 20, 179–228.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lévi-Strauss, C. (1966). The savage mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Leybourne, S., & Sadler-Smith, E. (2006). The role of intuition and improvisation in project management. International Journal of Project Management, 24, 483–492.10.1016/j.ijproman.2006.03.007
   Google Scholar
• Lindkvist, L. (2005). Knowledge communities and knowledge collectives: A typology of knowledge work in groups. Journal of Management Studies, 4, 1189–1210.10.1111/joms.2005.42.issue-6
   Google Scholar
• Lorenz, E., & Lundvall, B.-Å. (2010). Measuring creative work: The European experience. The IUP Journal of Knowledge Management, VIII, 77–95.
   Google Scholar
• Magni, M., Proserpio, L., Hoegl, M., & Provera, B. (2009). The role of team behavioural integration and cohesion in shaping individual improvisation. Research Policy, 38, 1044–1053.10.1016/j.respol.2009.03.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magni, M., Provera, B., & Proserpio, L. (2010). Individual attitude toward improvisation in information systems development. Behaviour & Information Technology, 29, 245–255, May–June, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Mayerson, D., Weick, K. E., & Kramer, R. M. (1996). Swift trust and temporary groups. In R. M. Kramer & T. R. Tyler (Eds.), Trust in organizations: Frontiers of theory and research. (pp. 166–195). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Miner, A. J., Moorman, C., & Bassoff, C. (1996). Organizational improvisation in new product development, Unpublished manuscript. University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI.
   Google Scholar
• Montag, T., Maertz, C. P., & Baer, M. (2012). A critical analysis of the workplace creativity criterion space. Journal of Management, 38, 1362–1386.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montuori, A. (2003). The complexity of improvisation and the improvisation of complexity: Social science, art and creativity. Human Relations, 56, 237–255.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moorman, C., & Miner, A. S. (1998a). Organizational improvisation and organizational memory. Academy of Management Review, 23, 698–723.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moorman, C., & Miner, A. S. (1998b). The convergence of planning and execution: Improvisation in new product development. Journal of Marketing, 62, 1–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mumford, M. D., Scott, G. M., Gaddis, B., & Strange, J. M. (2002). Leading creative people: Orchestrating expertise and relationships. The Leadership Quarterly, 13, 705–730.10.1016/S1048-9843(02)00158-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge-creating company: How Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Orlikowski, W. (1996). Improvising organizational transformation over time: A situated change perspective. Information Systems Research, 7, 63–92.10.1287/isre.7.1.63
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orlikowski, W. J. (2002). Knowing in practice: Enacting a collective capability in distributed organizing. Organization science, 13, 249–273.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orr, J. E. (1996). Talking about machines: An ethnography of a modern job. Ithaca, NY: IRL Press an imprint of Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 879–903.10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pöyhönen, A. (2004). Organizational capability for renewal: Modeling and measuring organizational renewal capability. Acta Universitatis Lappeenrantaensis 200 (Dissertation) Lappeenranta University of Technology, Lappeenranta. ISBN 951-764-986-X, ISSN .
   Google Scholar
• Schermerhorn, J. R. (1977). Information sharing as an interorganizational activity. Academy of Management Journal, 20, 148–153.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shalley, G., Gilson, L., & Blum, T. (2009). Interactive effect of growth need strength, work context, and job complexity on self-reported creative performance. Academy of Management Journal, 52, 489–505.10.5465/AMJ.2009.41330806
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spender, J. (1996). Making knowledge the basis of a dynamic theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17, 45–62.10.1002/smj.4250171106
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stonehouse, G. H., & Pemberton, J. D. (1999). Learning and knowledge management in the intelligent organization. Participation and Empowerment: An International Journal, 7, 131–144.10.1108/14634449910287846
   Google Scholar
• Sutton, R. I., & Hargadon, A. (1997). Brainstorming groups in context: Effectiveness in a product design firm. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42, 685–718.
   Google Scholar
• Sung, S. Y., & Choi, J. N. (2012). Effects of team knowledge management on the creativity and financial performance of organizational teams. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes., 118, 4–13.10.1016/j.obhdp.2012.01.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taggar, S. (2000). Individual creativity and group ability to utilize individual creative resources: A multilevel model. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 315–330.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tierney, P., & Farmer, S. M. (2002). Creative self-efficacy: Its potential antecedents and relationship to creative performance. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 1137–1148.10.2307/3069429
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tierney, P., & Farmer, S. M. (2011). Creative self-efficacy development and creative performance over time. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96, 277.10.1037/a0020952
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vera, D., & Crossan, M. (2005). Improvisation and innovative performance in teams. Organization Science, 3, 203–224.10.1287/orsc.1050.0126
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vera, D., & Rodriguez-Lopez, A. (2007). Leading improvisation: Lessons from the American revolution. Organizational Dynamics, 36, 303–319.10.1016/j.orgdyn.2007.04.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Von Krogh, G. (1998). Care in knowledge creation. California Management Review, 40, 133–153.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weick, K. E. (1998). Improvisation as a mindset for organizational analysis. Organization Science, 9, 543–555.
   Google Scholar
• Weick, K. E., & Roberts, K. H. (1993). Collective mind in organizations: Heedful interrelating on flight decks. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38, 357–381.10.2307/2393372
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• West, M. A. (1990). The social psychology of innovation in groups. In M. A. West & J. L. Farr (Eds.), Innovation and creativity at work: Psychological and organizational strategies (pp. 309–333). Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, P. M., & Haggerty, J. J. (2005). Missing variables in theories of strategic human resource management: Time, cause, and individuals. Management Revue, 16, 164–173.
   Google Scholar
• Yuan, F., & Woodman, R. W. (2010). Innovative behaviour in the workplace: The role of performance and image outcome expectations. Academy of Management Journal, 53, 323–342.10.5465/AMJ.2010.49388995
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar