Trade unions as employment facilitators for disabled employees

References

• Arrowsmith, J. (2003). Post-privatisation industrial relations in the UK rail and electricity industries. Industrial Relations Journal, 34, 150–163.10.1111/irj.2003.34.issue-2
   Google Scholar
• Babin, B., Griffin, M., Zikmund, W., & Carr, J. (2012). Business research methods (9th ed.). Andover, MA: South-Western College Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Bacon, N., & Hoque, K. (2012). The role and impact of trade union equality representatives in Britain. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 50, 239–262.10.1111/bjir.2012.50.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bacon, N., & Hoque, K. (2015). The influence of trade union disability champions on employer disability policy and practice. Human Resource Management Journal, 25, 233–249.10.1111/1748-8583.12060
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker, D. (2011). The politics of neurodiversity: Why public policy matters. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, T. (2010). Exploring the potential of the union equality representative. Employee Relations, 32, 509–525.10.1108/01425451011061667
   Google Scholar
• Berta, W., Teare, G., Gilbart, E., Ginsburg, L., Lemieux-Charles, L., Davis, D., & Rappolt, S. (2010). Spanning the know-do gap: Understanding knowledge application and capacity in long-term care homes. Social Science & Medicine, 70, 1326–1334.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butterworth, B., & Kovas, Y. (2013). Understanding neurocognitive developmental disorders can improve education for all. Science, 340, 300–305.10.1126/science.1231022
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cassell, C., & Lee, B. (2007). Re-vitalising learning and development? Exploring the role of the trade union learning representative. Personnel Review, 36, 781–799.10.1108/00483480710774043
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cassell, C., & Lee, B. (2009). Trade unions learning representatives: Progressing partnership? Work, Employment & Society, 23, 213–230.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Certification Officer. (2013). Transport salaried staffs’ association. Retrieved October 20, 2015, from http://www.certoffice.org/CertificationOfficer/media/DocumentLibrary/PDF/376T_2012.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Coole, C., Radford, K., Grant, M., & Terry, J. (2012, December). Returning to work after stroke: Perspectives of employer stakeholders, a qualitative study. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 23, 406–418.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies, P. (2006). Exploratory research. In V. Jupp (Ed.), The Sage dictionary of social research methods (pp. 110–111). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Department for Business Innovation & Skills. (2014). Trade union membership 2013. London: BIS.
   Google Scholar
• DTI. (2004). Union modernisation fund: Consultation on the draft rules and procedures. London: DTI.
   Google Scholar
• Ewing, K. (2005). The function of trade unions. Industrial Law Journal, 34(1), 1–22.10.1093/ilj/34.1.1
   Google Scholar
• Fevre, R., Robinson, A., Lewis, D., & Jones, R. (2013). The ill-treatment of employees with disabilities in British workplaces. Work, Employment & Society, 27, 288–307.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fielding, N., & Thomas, H. (2008). Qualitative interviewing. In N. Gilbert (Ed.), Researching social life (3rd ed., pp. 245–265). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Forrester, K. (2004). ‘The quiet revolution’? Trade union learning and renewal strategies. Work, Employment & Society, 18, 413–420.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forrester, K., & Payne, J. (2000). Trade union modernisation and lifelong learning. Research in Post-Compulsory Education, 5, 153–171.10.1080/13596740000200072
   Google Scholar
• Foster, D. (2007). Legal obligation or personal lottery? Employee experiences of disability and the negotiation of adjustments in the public sector workplace. Work, Employment & Society, 21, 67–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foster, D., & Fosh, P. (2010). Negotiating ‘difference’: Representing disabled employees in the British workplace. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 48, 560–582.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilbert, N. (2008). Research, theory and method. In N. Gilbert (Ed.), Researching social life (3rd ed., pp. 21–40). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Greenbaum, T. (2000). Moderating focus groups: A practical guide for group facilitation. London: Sage.10.4135/9781483328522
   Google Scholar
• Gyi, D., Sang, K., & Haslam, C. (2013). Participatory ergonomics: Co-developing interventions to reduce the risk of musculoskeletal symptoms in business drivers. Ergonomics, 56, 45–58.10.1080/00140139.2012.737028
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haafkens, J., Kopnina, H., Meerman, M., & van Dijk, F. (2011). Facilitating job retention for chronically ill employees: Perspectives of line managers and human resource managers. BMC Health Services Research, 11, 104.10.1186/1472-6963-11-104
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heery, E., Williams, S., & Abbott, B. (2012). Civil society organizations and trade unions: Cooperation, conflict, indifference. Work, Employment & Society, 26, 146–160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hendrickx, S. (2010). The adolescent and adult neuro-diversity handbook: Asperger syndrome, ADHD, dyslexia and dyspraxia and related conditions. Gateshead: JKP.
   Google Scholar
• Herrera, C. (2013). What’s the difference? In C. Herrera & A. Perry (Eds.), Ethics and neurodiversity (pp. 1–17). Newcastle-upon-Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.
   Google Scholar
• Heyes, J., & Rainbird, H. (2011). Mobilising resources for union learning: A strategy for revitalisation? Industrial Relations Journal, 42, 565–579.10.1111/irj.2011.42.issue-6
   Google Scholar
• Hoque, K., & Bacon, N. (2008). Trade unions, union learning representatives and employer-provided training in Britain. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 46, 702–731.10.1111/bjir.2008.46.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoque, K., & Noon, M. (2004). Equal opportunities policy and practice in Britain: Evaluating the ‘empty shell’ hypothesis. Work, Employment & Society, 18, 481–506.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Humber, L. (2014). Social inclusion through employment: The marketisation of employment support for people with learning disabilities in the United Kingdom. Disability & Society, 29, 275–289.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, M. (2013). Disability and perceptions of work and management. British Journal of Industrial Relations. Online Early.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, M., & Wass, V. (2013). Understanding changing disability-related employment gaps in Britain 1998–2011. Work, Employment & Society, 27, 982–1003.
   Google Scholar
• King, N. (2004). Using templates in thematic analysis of text. In C. Cassell & G. Symon (Eds.), Essential guide to qualitative methods in organizational research (pp. 256–270). London: Sage.10.4135/9781446280119
   Google Scholar
• Krcek, T. (2013). Deconstructing disability and neurodiversity: Controversial Issues for autism and implications for social work. Journal of Progressive Human Services, 24, 4–22.10.1080/10428232.2013.740406
   Google Scholar
• McIlroy, J. (2008). Ten years of new labour: Workplace learning, social partnership and union revitalization in Britain. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 46, 283–313.10.1111/j.1467-8543.2008.00678.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McIlroy, J., & Croucher, R. (2013). British trade unions and the academics: The case of Unionlearn. Capital & Class, 37, 263–284.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, R. (2001). Asperger syndrome employment workbook: An employment workbook for adults with asperger syndrome. London: JKP.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, S., & Wright, T. (2012). Shifting models of equality? Union equality reps in the public services. Industrial Relations Journal, 43, 433–447.10.1111/irj.2012.43.issue-5
   Google Scholar
• Moore, S., Wright, T., & Conley, H. (2012). Addressing discrimination in the workplace on multiple grounds – the experience of trade union equality reps. London: ACAS.
   Google Scholar
• Morris, J., & Farrell, C. (2007). The ‘post-bureaucratic’ public sector organization. New organizational forms and HRM in ten UK public sector organizations. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 18, 1575–1588.10.1080/09585190701570544
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mustchin, S. (2014). Union modernisation, coalitions and vulnerable work in the construction sector in Britain. Industrial Relations Journal, 45, 121–136.10.1111/irj.2014.45.issue-2
   Google Scholar
• Nesbitt, S. (2000). Why and why not? Factors influencing employment for individuals with asperger syndrome. Autism, 4, 357–369.10.1177/1362361300004004002
   Google Scholar
• Özbilgin, M., & Tatli, A. (2011). Mapping out the field of equality and diversity: Rise of individualism and voluntarism. Human Relations, 64, 1229–1253.10.1177/0018726711413620
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paletta, D. (2013). Equality, capability and neurodiversity. In C. Herrera & A. Perry (Eds.), Ethics and neurodiversity (pp. 39–51). Newcastle-upon-Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.
   Google Scholar
• Schur, L. (2003). Employment and the creation of an active citizenry. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 41, 751–771.10.1046/j.1467-8543.2003.00297.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stake, R. (1995). The art of the case study. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Stuart, M., & Martínez Lucio, M. (2014). Union modernisation fund: Round three evaluation – broadening the role of unions for an increasingly vulnerable workforce. London: BIS.
   Google Scholar
• Stuart, M., Martínez Lucio, M., & Charlwood, A. (2009). The union modernisation fund – round one: Final evaluation report. London: BIS.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, C. (2004). Developing the social relational in the social model of disability: A theoretical agenda. In C. Barnes & G. Mercer (Eds.), Implementing the social model of disability: Theory and research (pp. 32–47). Leeds: The Disability Press.
   Google Scholar
• TSSA. (2013). Rule book. Retrieved October 20, 2015, from http://www.tssa.org.uk/en/Your-union/TSSA-democracy/tssa-rulebook/
   Google Scholar
• TSSA. (n.d.). Find your company. Retrieved October 20, 2015, from http://www.tssa.org.uk/en/Your-union/Your-company/company-pages/
   Google Scholar
• TUC. (2010). Equality reps make a real difference to UK workplaces. Retrieved October 20, 2015, from https://www.tuc.org.uk/sites/default/files/extras/equalityrepssurvey.pdf
   Google Scholar
• TUC. (2014). Autism in the workplace. Retrieved October 20, 2015, from http://www.tuc.org.uk/sites/default/files/Autism.pdf
   Google Scholar
• UK Government. (2015). 2010–2015 government policy: Equality. Retrieved October 20, 2015, from https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/2010-to-2015-government-policy-equality/2010-to-2015-government-policy-equality
   Google Scholar
• UnionLearn. (n.d.). Our history. Retrieved October 20, 2015, from https://www.unionlearn.org.uk/our-history
   Google Scholar
• Unison. (n.d.). Dyslexia awareness. Retrieved October 20, 2015, from http://www.unison.org.uk/for-activists/training/utrain/union-learning-representatives-courses/dyslexia-awareness
   Google Scholar
• Wallis, E., Stuart, M., & Greenwood, I. (2005). ‘Learners of the workplace unite!’ an empirical examination of the UK trade union learning representative initiative. Work Employment & Society, 19, 283–304.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar