Conformist innovation: an institutional logics perspective on how HR executives construct business school reputations

References

• Albert, S., & Whetten, D. A. (1985). Organizational identity. Research in Organizational Behaviour, 7, 263–295.
   Google Scholar
• Almandoz, J. (2014). Founding teams as carriers of competing logics: When institutional forces predict banks’ risk exposure. Administrative Science Quarterly, 59, 442–473.10.1177/0001839214537810
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Battilana, J., & D’Aunno, T. (2009). Institutional work and the paradox of embedded agency. In T. B. Lawrence, R. Suddaby, & B. Leca (Eds.), Institutional work: Actors and agency in institutional studies of organization (pp. 31–58). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511596605
   Google Scholar
• Bednar, M. K., Geofffrey Love, E., & Kraatz, M. (2015). Paying the price? The impact of controversial governance practices on managerial reputation. Academy of Management Journal, 58, 1740–1760.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergh, D. D., Ketchen Jr., D. J., Boyd, B. K., & Bergh, J. (2010). New frontiers of the reputation–performance relationship: Insights from multiple theories. Journal of Management, 36, 620–632.10.1177/0149206309355320
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bevort, F., & Poufelt, F. (2015). Human resource management in professional service firms: Too good to be true? Transcending conflicting institutional logics. German Journal of Human Resource Management, 29, 102–130.
   Google Scholar
• Besharov, M., & Smith, W. K. (2014). Multiple logics in organizations: A theoretical integration. Academy of Management Review, 39, 364–381.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blomgren, M., & Waks, C. (2015). Coping with contradictions: Hybrid professionals managing institutional complexity. Journal of Professions and Organization, 2015, 78–102.10.1093/jpo/jou010
   Google Scholar
• Boyd, B. K., Bergh, D. D., & Ketchen Jr., D. J. (2010). Reconsidering the reputation–performance relationship: A resource-based view. Journal of Management, 36, 588–609.10.1177/0149206308328507
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cresswell, J. C., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2010). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Deephouse, D. L., & Suchman, M. (2008). Legitimacy in organizational institutionalism. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, R. Suddaby, & K. Sahlin-Andersson (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism (pp. 49–77). London: Sage.10.4135/9781849200387
   Google Scholar
• Devilla, T., & Epstein, M. (2014). The innovation paradox: Why good businesses kill breakthroughs and how they can change. New York, NY: Berrett- Koehler.
   Google Scholar
• DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48, 147–160.10.2307/2095101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dugard, P., Todman, J., Staines, H. J. (2010). Approaching multivariate analysis: A practical introduction (2nd ed.). Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Enders, J. (2014). The academic arms race. In A. M. Pettigrew, E. Cornuel, & U. Hommel (Eds.), The institutional development of business schools (pp. 89–104). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fligstein, N., & McAdam, D. (2012). A theory of fields. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199859948.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Fotaki, M., & Prasad, A. (2015). Questioning neo-liberal capitalism and economic inequality in business schools. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 14, 556–575.10.5465/amle.2014.0182
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedland, R., & Alford, R. R. (1991). Bringing society back in symbols, practice and institutional contradictions. In W. W. Powell & P. J. Di Maggio (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis (pp. 232–263). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Godard, J. (2014). The psychologisation of employment relations? Human Resource Management Journal, 24, 1–18.10.1111/hrmj.2014.24.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guest, D., & King, Z. (2004). Power, innovation and problem-solving: The personnel managers’ three steps to heaven? Journal of Management Studies, 41, 401–423.10.1111/joms.2004.41.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Juusola, K., Kettunen, K., & Alajoutsijarvi, K. (2015). Accelerating the Americanization of management education: Five responses from business schools. Journal of Management Inquiry, 24, 347–369.10.1177/1056492615569352
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hattke, F., Blaschke, S., & Frost, J. (2014). Governance logics in universities: Organisational change as oscillating conversations. In A. Pettigrew, E. Cornuel, & U. Hommel (Eds.), The institutional development of business schools (pp. 69–94). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kendall, L. (2015, August, 10). Business school reputation rankings: An employer’s perspective. Showcase symposium on Business School rankings, Academy of Management Annual Conference, Vancouver.
   Google Scholar
• Kvale, S. (1996). Interviews: An introduction to qualitative research interviewing. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Lawrence, T. B., Leca, B., & Zilber, T. B. (2013). Institutional work: Current research, new directions and overlooked issues. Organization Studies, 34, 1023–1033.10.1177/0170840613495305
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawrence, T. B., Suddaby, R. W., & Leca, B. (2009). Institutional work: actors and agency in institutional studies of organizations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Legge, K. (1978). Power, innovation and problem-solving in personnel management. London: McGraw Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Lejeune, C., & Vas, A. (2014). Institutional pressure as a trigger for organizational identity change: The case of accreditation failure within seven European business schools. In A. M. Pettigrew, E. Cornuel, & U. Hommel (Eds.), The institutional development of business schools (pp. 95–125). Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198713364.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Mabey, C., Egri, C. P., & Parry, K. (2015). Questions business schools don’t ask. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 14, 535–538.10.5465/amle.2015.0302
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• March, J., & Simon, H. A. (1993). Organizations (2nd ed.). Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Marchington, M. (2015). Human resource management (HRM): Too busy looking up to see where it is going longer term?. Human Resource Management Review, 25, 176–187.10.1016/j.hrmr.2015.01.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, G., Farndale, E., Paauwe, J., & Stiles, P. G. (2016). Corporate governance and strategic human resource management: Four archetypes and proposals for a new approach to corporate sustainability. European Management Journal, 34, 22–35.10.1016/j.emj.2016.01.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morse, J. M., & Niehaus, L. (2009). Mixed methods design: Principles and procedures. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.
   Google Scholar
• Naidoo, R., & Pringle, J. (2014). Branding business schools. In A. M. Pettigrew, E. Cornuel, & U. Hommel (Eds.), The institutional development of business schools (pp. 176–194). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Operti, E., & Carnabuci, G. (2014). Public knowledge, private gain: The effect of spillover networks on firms’ innovative performance. Journal of Management., 40, 1042–1074.10.1177/0149206311422448
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paradeise, C., Thoenig, J. C., Mignot-Gerard, S., Delemarie, A., Biland, E., & Goastellec, G. (2014). Relevance and excellence in higher education vocational schools: The case of business schools. In A. M. Pettigrew, E. Cornuel, & U. Hommel (Eds.), The institutional development of business schools (pp. 126–154). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pettigrew, A. M., Cornuel, E., & Hommel, U. (Eds.). (2014). The institutional development of business schools. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pfeffer, J. (2015, August 10). Business school reputation rankings: Where to begin? Showcase symposium on Business School rankings, Academy of Management Annual Conference, Vancouver.
   Google Scholar
• Rasche, A., Hommel, U., & Cornuel, E. (2014). Discipline as instiutional maintenance: The case of business school rankings. In A. M. Pettigrew, E. Cornuel, & U. Hommel (Eds.), The institutional development of business schools (pp. 196–220). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rindova, V. P., Williamson, I. O., & Petkova, A. P. (2010). Reputation as an intangible asset: Reflections on theory and methods in two empirical studies of business school reputations. Journal of Management, 36, 610–619.10.1177/0149206309343208
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seo, M., & Creed, D. W. E. (2002). Institutional contradictions, praxis and institutional change: A dialectical perspective. Academy of Management Review, 27, 222–247.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slaughter, S., & Rhoades, G. (2009). Academic capitalism and the new economy: Markets, state, and higher education. Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Spector, B. (2003). HRM at Enron - the unindicted co-conspiritor. Organizational Dynamics, 32, 207–220.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suchman, M. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20, 571–610.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Subramony, M. (2006). Why organizations adopt human resource management practices and reject others: An exploration of HR rationales. Human Resource Management, 45, 195–210.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thornton, P. H., & Ocasio, W. (2008). Institutional logics. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, K. Sahlin-Andersson, & R. Suddaby (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism (pp. 99–128). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.10.4135/9781849200387
   Google Scholar
• Thornton, P. H., Ocasio, W., & Lounsbury, M. (2012). The institutional logics perspective: A new approach to culture, structure and process. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199601936.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Trank, C., & Washington, M. (2009). Maintaining and institution in a contested organizational field: The work of the AACSB and its constituents. In T. B. Lawrence & R. W. Suddaby (Eds.), Institutional work: actors and agency in institutional studies of organizations (pp. 236–261). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wedlin, L. (2006). Ranking business schools: Forming fields, identities and boundaries in international management education. Chichester: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• ‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬Wedlin, L. (2007). The role of rankings in codifying a business school template: Classifications, diffusion and mediated isomorphism in organizational fields. European Management Review, 4, 24–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wedlin, L. (2011). Going global: Rankings as rhetorical devices to construct an international field of management education. Management Learning, 42, 199–218.10.1177/1350507610389683
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, D., & McKiernan, P. (2011). Global mimicry: Putting strategic choice back on the business school agenda. British Journal of Management, 22, 457–469.10.1111/bjom.2011.22.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar