The effects of employee engagement and self-efficacy on job performance: a longitudinal field study

References

• Albrecht, S. L., Bakker, A. B., Gruman, J. A., Macey, W. H., & Saks, A. M. (2015). Employee engagement, human resource management practices and competitive advantage: An integrated approach. Journal of Organizational Effectiveness: People and Performance, 2, 7–35.
   Google Scholar
• Bailey, C., Madden, A., Alfes, K., & Fletcher, L. (2015). The meaning, antecedents and outcomes of employee engagement: A narrative synthesis. International Journal of Management Reviews, 1–23. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12077
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. New York NY: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY: W.H. Freeman.
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (2006). Toward a psychology of human agency. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1, 164–180.10.1111/ppsc.2006.1.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartunek, J. M., & Rynes, S. L. (2014). Academics and practitioners are alike and unlike the paradoxes of academic-practitioner relationships. Journal of Management, 40, 1181–1201.10.1177/0149206314529160
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breevaart, K., Bakker, A. B., Demerouti, E., & Hetland, J. (2012). The measurement of state work engagement. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 28, 305–312.10.1027/1015-5759/a000111
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, G., Gully, S. M., & Eden, D. (2001). Validation of a new general self-efficacy scale. Organizational Research Methods, 4, 62–83.10.1177/109442810141004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christian, M. S., Garza, A. S., & Slaughter, J. E. (2011). Work engagement: A quantitative review and test of its relations with task and contextual performance. Personnel Psychology, 64, 89–136.10.1111/peps.2011.64.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frayne, C. A., & Geringer, J. (2000). Self-management training for improving job performance: A field experiment involving salespeople. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 361–372.10.1037/0021-9010.85.3.361
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardner, W., Mulvey, E. P., & Shaw, E. C. (1995). Regression analyses of counts and rates: Poisson, overdispersed poisson, and negative binomial models. Psychological Bulletin, 118, 392–404.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson, C. B. (2001). Me and us: Differential relationships among goal-setting training, efficacy and effectiveness at the individual and team level. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22, 789–808.10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1379
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gist, M. E. (1989). The influence of training method on self-efficacy and idea generation among managers. Personnel Psychology, 42, 787–805.10.1111/peps.1989.42.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gist, M. E., Schwoerer, C., & Rosen, B. (1989). Effects of alternative training methods on self-efficacy and performance in computer software training. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 884–891.10.1037/0021-9010.74.6.884
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2011). PLS-SEM: Indeed a silver bullet. The Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 19, 139–152.10.2753/MTP1069-6679190202
   Google Scholar
• Halbesleben, J. R. B. (2010). A meta-analysis of work engagement: Relationships with burnout, demands, resources and consequences. In A. B. Bakker & M. P. Leiter (Eds.), Work engagement : A handbook of essential theory and research (pp. 102–117). Hove: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harter, J. K., Schmidt, F. L., Killham, E. A., & Asplund, J. W. (2006). Q12® meta-analysis. Washington DC: Gallup.
   Google Scholar
• Hochschild, A. R. (2003). The managed heart : Commercialization of human feeling. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hogg, M. A., Abrams, D., & Martin, G. N. (2010). Social cognition and attitudes. In G. N. Martin, N. R. Carlson, & W. Buskist (Eds.), Psychology (6th ed., pp. 646–677). Harlow: Pearson Education Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Inceoglu, I., & Fleck, S. (2010). Engagment as a motivational construct. In S. L. Albrecht (Ed.), Handbook of employee engagement : Perspectives, issues, research and practice (pp. 74–86). Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Judd, C. M., Kenny, D. A., & McClelland, G. H. (2011). Estimating and testing mediation and moderation in within-subject designs. Psychological Methods, 6, 115–134.
   Google Scholar
• Judge, T. A., Jackson, C. L., Shaw, J. C., Scott, B. A., & Rich, B. L. (2007). Self-efficacy and work-related performance: The integral role of individual differences. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 107–127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahn, W. A. (1990). Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work. Academy of Management Journal, 33, 692–724.10.2307/256287
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kluger, A. N., & DeNisi, A. (1996). The effects of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 254–284.10.1037/0033-2909.119.2.254
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landy, F. J. (1989). Psychology of work behavior. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, C., & Bobko, P. (1994). Self-efficacy beliefs: Comparison of five measures. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 364–369.10.1037/0021-9010.79.3.364
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macey, W. H., & Schneider, B. (2008). The meaning of employee engagement. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 1, 3–30.10.1111/iops.2008.1.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macey, W. H., Schneider, B., Barbera, K. M., & Young, S. A. (2009). Employee engagement: Tools for analysis, practice, and competitive advantage. Malden, MA: Wiley.10.1002/9781444306538
   Google Scholar
• Manz, C. C. (1986). Self-leadership: Toward an expanded theory of self-influence processes in organizations. The Academy of Management Review, 11, 585–600.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maslach, C., & Jackson, S. E. (1981). The measurement of experienced burnout. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 2, 99–113.10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1379
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maslach, C., Schaufeli, W., & Leiter, M. (2001). Job burnout. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 397–422.10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.397
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mauno, S., Kinnunen, U., Mäkilkangas, A., & Feldt, T. (2010). Job demands and resources as antecedents of work engagement: A qualitative review and directions for future research. In S. L. Albrecht (Ed.), Handbook of employee engagement : Perspectives, issues, research and practice (pp. 3–19). Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Maurer, T. J., & Pierce, H. R. (1998). A comparison of Likert scale and traditional measures of self-efficacy. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 324–329.10.1037/0021-9010.83.2.324
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morin, L., & Latham, G. P. (2000). The effect of mental practice and goal setting as a transfer of training intervention on supervisors' self-efficacy and communication skills: An exploratory study. Applied Psychology, 49, 566–578.10.1111/apps.2000.49.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pajares, F. (1997). Current directions in self-efficacy research. In M. L. Maehr & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Advances in motivation and achievement (pp. 1–49). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pajares, F., & Urdan, T. C. (2006). Self-efficacy beliefs of adolescents. Greenwich, CT: IAP – Information Age.
   Google Scholar
• Parker, S. K., Williams, H. M., & Turner, N. (2006). Modeling the antecedents of proactive behavior at work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 636–652.10.1037/0021-9010.91.3.636
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peterson, S. J., & Byron, K. (2008). Exploring the role of hope in job performance: Results from four studies. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 29, 785–803.10.1002/job.v29:6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rank, J., Carsten, J. M., Unger, J. M., & Spector, P. E. (2007). Proactive customer service performance: Relationships with individual, task, and leadership variables. Human Performance, 20, 363–390.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rich, B. L., Lepine, J. A., & Crawford, E. R. (2010). Job engagement: Antecedents and effects on job performance. Academy of Management Journal, 53, 617–635.10.5465/AMJ.2010.51468988
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saks, A. M. (2006). Antecedents and consequences of employee engagement. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 21, 600–619.10.1108/02683940610690169
   Google Scholar
• Salanova, M., Peiró, J. M., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2002). Self-efficacy specificity and burnout among information technology workers: An extension of the job demand-control model. European Journal of Work & Organizational Psychology, 11, 1–25.10.1080/13594320143000735
   Google Scholar
• Schaufeli, W. B., & Salanova, M. (2007). Work engagement: An emerging psychological concept and its implications for organizations. In S. Gilliland, D. Steiner, & D. Skarlicki (Eds.), Managing social and ethical issues in organizations (pp. 135–177). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
   Google Scholar
• Schaufeli, W. B., & Salanova, M. (2010). How to improve work engagement. In S. L. Albrecht (Ed.), Handbook of employee engagement : Perspectives, issues, research and practice (pp. 399–415). Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Schaufeli, W. B., Salanova, M., González-romá, V., & Bakker, A. B. (2002). The measurement of engagement and burnout: A two sample confirmatory factor analytic approach. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3, 71–92.10.1023/A:1015630930326
   Google Scholar
• Schaufeli, W. B., Bakker, A. B., & Salanova, M. (2006). The measurement of work engagement with a short questionnaire: A cross-national study. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66, 701–716.10.1177/0013164405282471
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sonnentag, S., Dormann, C., & Demerouti, E. (2010). Not all days are created equal: The concept of state work engagement. Work engagement: A handbook of essential theory and research, 25–38.
   Google Scholar
• Stajkovic, A. D., & Luthans, F. (1997). A meta-analysis of the effects of organizational behavior modification on task performance, 1975–95. Academy of Management Journal, 40, 1122–1149.10.2307/256929
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stajkovic, A. D., & Luthans, F. (1998). Self-efficacy and work-related performance: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 240–261.10.1037/0033-2909.124.2.240
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tonidandel, S., Williams, E. B., & LeBreton, J. M. (2015). Size matters … just not in the way that you think. In C. E. Lance & R. J. Vanderberg (Eds.), More statistical and methodological myths and urban legends (pp. 162–183). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Xanthopoulou, D., Bakker, A. B., Demerouti, E., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2009). Work engagement and financial returns: A diary study on the role of job and personal resources. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 82, 183–200.10.1348/096317908X285633
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar