Who does what in enabling ambidexterity? Individual Actions and HRM practices

References

• Ahammad, M. F., Lee, S. M., Malul, M., & Shoham, A. (2015). Behavioural ambidexterity: The impact of incentive schemes on productivity, motivation, and performance of employees in commercial banks. Human Resource Management, 54(Suppl. 1), S45–S62.10.1002/hrm.2015.54.issue-S1
   Google Scholar
• Andriopoulos, C., & Lewis, M. (2009). Exploitation-exploration tensions and organizational ambidexterity: Managing paradoxes of innovation. Organization Science, 20, 696–717.10.1287/orsc.1080.0406
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birkinshaw, J., & Gupta, K. (2013). Clarifying the distinctive contribution of ambidexterity to the field of organization studies. Academy of Management Perspectives, 27, 287–298.10.5465/amp.2012.0167
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burgess, N., Strauss, K., Currie, G., & Wood, G. (2015). Organizational ambidexterity and the hybrid middle manager: The case of patient safety in UK hospitals. Human Resource Management, 54(S1), S87–S109.10.1002/hrm.2015.54.issue-S1
   Google Scholar
• Caniels, M. C. J., & Veld, M. (2016). Employee ambidexterity, high performance work systems and innovative work behaviour: How much balance do we need? The International Journal of Human Resource Management. doi:10.1080/09585192.2016.1216881
   Google Scholar
• Cegarra-Navarro, J. G., & Dewhurst, F. (2007). Linking organizational learning and customer capital through an ambidexterity context: An empirical investigation in SMEs. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 18, 1720–1735.10.1080/09585190701570882
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, Y.-Y. (2015). A multilevel examination of high-performance work systems and unit-level organizational ambidexterity. Human Resource Management Journal, 25, 79–101.10.1111/hrmj.2015.25.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Clercq, D., Thongpapanl, N., & Dimov, D. (2013). Shedding new light on the relationship between contextual ambidexterity and firm performance: An investigation of internal contingencies. Technovation, 33, 119–132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Clercq, D., Thongpapanl, N., & Dimov, D. (2014). Contextual ambidexterity in SMEs: The roles of internal and external rivalry. Small Business Economics, 42, 191–205.10.1007/s11187-013-9471-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dixon, S. E. A., Meyer, K. E., & Day, M. (2007). Exploitation and exploration learning and the development of organizational capabilities: A cross-case analysis of the Russian oil industry. Human Relations, 60, 1493–1523.10.1177/0018726707083475
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dover, P. A., & Dierk, U. (2010). The ambidextrous organization: Integrating managers, entrepreneurs and leaders. Journal of Business Strategy, 31, 49–58.10.1108/02756661011076318
   Google Scholar
• Garaus, C., Güttel, W., Konlechner, S., Koprax, I., Lackner, H., Link, K., & Müller, B. (2016). Bridging knowledge in ambidextrous HRM systems: Empirical evidence from hidden champions. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 27, 355–381.10.1080/09585192.2015.1045007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson, C. B., & Birkinshaw, J. (2004). The antecedents, consequences, and mediating role of organizational ambidexterity. Academy of Management Journal, 47, 209–226.10.2307/20159573
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Güttel, W. H., & Konlechner, S. W. (2009). Continuously hanging by a thread: Managing contextually ambidextrous organizations. Schmalenbach Business Review, 61, 150–172.
   Google Scholar
• Havermans, L. A., Den Hartog, D. N., Keegan, A., & Uhl-Bien, M. (2015). Exploring the role of leadership in enabling contextual ambidexterity. Human Resource Management, 54, S179–P200.10.1002/hrm.2015.54.issue-S1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heavey, C., Simsek, Z., & Fox, B. C. (2015). Managerial social networks and ambidexterity of SMEs: The moderating role of a proactive commitment to innovation. Human Resource Management, 54, S201–S221.10.1002/hrm.2015.54.issue-S1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, J., & Kim, H. J. (2013). Conceptualizing structural ambidexterity into the innovation of human resource management architecture: The case of LG Electronics. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 24, 922–943.10.1080/09585192.2012.743471
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janssen, O., van de Vliert, E., & West, M. (2004). The bright and dark sides of individual and group innovation: a Special Issue introduction. [Editorial Material]. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25, 129–145.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Junni, P., Sarala, R. M., Tarba, S. Y., Liu, Y., & Cooper, C. L. (2015). Guest editors’ introduction: The role of human resources and organizational factors in ambidexterity. Human Resource Management, 54, S1–S28.10.1002/hrm.2015.54.issue-S1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Junni, P., Sarala, R. M., Taras, V., & Tarba, S. Y. (2013). Organizational ambidexterity and performance: A meta-analysis. Academy of Management Perspectives, 27, 299–312.10.5465/amp.2012.0015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang, S.-C., Morris, S. S., & Snell, S. A. (2007). Relational archetypes, organizational learning and value creation: Extending the human resource architecture. Academy of Management Review, 32, 236–256.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang, S.-C., & Snell, S. A. (2009). Intellectual capital architectures and ambidextrous learning: A framework for human resource management. Journal of Management Studies, 46, 65–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang, S., Swart, J., & Snell, S. (2012). Options-based HRM, intellectual capital and exploratory and exploitive learning in Law Firm’s Practice groups. Human Resource Management, 51, 461–485.10.1002/hrm.v51.4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ketkar, S., & Sett, P. K. (2009). HR flexibility and firm performance: Analysis of a multi-level causal model. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 20, 1009–1038.10.1080/09585190902850240
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kline, T. J. B., Sulsky, L. M., & Rever-Moriyama, S. D. (2000). Common method variance and specification errors: A practical approach to detection. Journal of Psychology, 134, 401–421.10.1080/00223980009598225
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kostopoulos, K. C., Bozionelos, N., & Syrigos, E. (2015). Ambidexterity and unit performance: Intellectual capital antecedents and cross-level moderating effects of human resource practices. Human Resource Management, 54, S111–S132.10.1002/hrm.2015.54.issue-S1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lepak, D., & Snell, S. A. (1999). The strategic management of human capital’: Determinants and implications of different relationships. Academy of Management Review, 24(1), 1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Levinthal, D. A., & March, J. G. (1993). The myopia of learning. Strategic Management Journal, 14, 95–112.10.1002/(ISSN)1097-0266
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, M. W. (2000). Exploring paradox: Toward a more comprehensive guide. Academy of Management Review, 25, 760–776.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, Q., Maggitti, P., Smith, K., Tesluk, P., & Katila, R. (2013). Top management attention to innovation: The role of search selection and intensity in new product introductions. Academy of Management Journal, 56, 893–916.10.5465/amj.2010.0844
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lubatkin, M. H., Simsek, Z., Ling, Y., & Veiga, J. F. (2006). Ambidexterity and performance in small- to medium-sized firms: The pivotal role of top management team behavioral integration. Journal of Management, 32, 646–672.10.1177/0149206306290712
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• March, J. G. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2, 71–87.10.1287/orsc.2.1.71
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mom, T. J. M., Van den Bosch, F., & Volberda, H. W. (2007). Investigating managers’ exploration and exploitation activities: The influence of top-down, bottom-up, and horizontal knowledge inflows. Journal of Management Studies, 44, 910–931.10.1111/joms.2007.44.issue-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mom, T. J. M., Van den Bosch, F., & Volberda, H. W. (2009). Understanding variation in managers’ ambidexterity: Investigating direct and interaction effects of formal structural and personal coordination mechanisms. Organization Science, 20, 812–828.10.1287/orsc.1090.0427
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nemanich, L. A., & Vera, D. (2009). Transformational leadership and ambidexterity in the context of an acquisition. Leadership Quarterly, 20, 19–33.10.1016/j.leaqua.2008.11.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge-creating company. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• O’Reilly, C. A., & Tushman, M. L. (2004). The ambidextrous organization. Harvard Business Review, 82, 74–81.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Reilly, C. A., & Tushman, M. L. (2011). Organizational ambidexterity in action: How managers explore and exploit. California Management Review, 53, 5–22.10.1525/cmr.2011.53.4.5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Reilly, C. A., & Tushman, M. L. (2013). Organizational ambidexterity: Past, present, and future. Academy of Management Perspectives, 27, 324–338.10.5465/amp.2013.0025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patel, P. C., Messersmith, J. G., & Lepak, D. P. (2013). Walking the tight-rope: An assessment of the relationship between high performance work systems and organizational ambidexterity. Academy of Management Journal, 56, 1420–1442.10.5465/amj.2011.0255
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 879.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2012). Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it. Annual Review of Psychology, 63, 539–569.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Podsakoff, P. M. & Organ, D. W. (1986). Self-reports in organizational research: Problems and prospects. Journal of Management, 12, 531–544.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prieto, I. M., Pilar Pérez Santana, M. (2012). Building ambidexterity: The role of human resource practices in the performance of firms from Spain. Human Resource Management, 51, 189–211.10.1002/hrm.v51.2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prieto-Pastor, I., & Martin-Perez, V. (2015). Does HRM generate ambidextrous employees for ambidextrous learning? The moderating role of management support. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 26, 589–615.10.1080/09585192.2014.938682
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raisch, S., & Birkinshaw, J. (2008). Organizational ambidexterity: Antecedents, outcomes, and moderators. Journal of Management, 34, 375–409.10.1177/0149206308316058
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renzl, B., Rost, M., & Kaschube, J. (2013). Facilitating ambidexterity with HR practices – A case study of an automotive supplier. International Journal of Automotive Technology & Management, 13, 257–272.10.1504/IJATM.2013.054920
   Google Scholar
• Scott, R. K. (1995). Creative employees: A challenge to managers. Journal of Creative Behavior, 29, 64–71.10.1002/jocb.1995.29.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seshadri, B. S., Piderit, S. K., & Giridharadas, R. (2010). How many minds does a team have? Contextual ambidexterity and goal harmony in healthcare. Academy of Management Annual Meeting Proceedings, Montréal (pp. 1–6).10.5465/AMBPP.2010.54493682
   Google Scholar
• Swart, J. (2007). HRM and knowledge workers in the oxford handbook of human resource management. In P. Boxall, J. Purcell, & P. Wright (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Human Resource Management (pp. 450–468). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Swart, J., & Kinnie, N. (2014). Re-considering boundaries: Human resource management in a networked world. Human Resource Management, 53, 291–310.10.1002/hrm.21551
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tiwana, A. (2008). Do bridging ties complement strong ties? An empirical examination of alliance ambidexterity. Strategic Management Journal, 29, 251–272.10.1002/(ISSN)1097-0266
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner, N., & Lee-Kelley, L. (2013). Unpacking the theory on ambidexterity: An illustrative case on the managerial architectures, mechanisms and dynamics. Management Learning, 44, 179–196.10.1177/1350507612444074
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner, N., Swart, J., & Maylor, H. (2013). Mechanisms for managing ambidexterity: A review and research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 15, 317–332.10.1111/ijmr.2013.15.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner, N., Swart, J., Maylor, H., & Antonacopoulou, E. (2016). Making it happen: How managerial actions enable project-based ambidex. Management Learning, 47, 199–222.10.1177/1350507615610028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tushman, M. L., & O’Reilly, C. A. (1996). Ambidextrous organizations: Managing evolutionary and revolutionary change. California Management Review, 38, 8–30.10.2307/41165852
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, C., & Rafiq, M. (2014). Ambidextrous organizational culture, contextual ambidexterity and new product innovation: A comparative study of UK and Chinese high-tech firms. British Journal of Management, 25, 58–76.10.1111/j.1467-8551.2012.00832.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xing, Y., Liu, Y., Tarba, S. Y., & Wood, G. (2015). A cultural inquiry into ambidexterity in supervisor-subordinate relationship. The International Journal of Human Resource Management. doi:10.1080/09585192.2015.1137619
   Google Scholar
• Yoon, S. J., & Chae, Y. J. (2012). Management of paradox: A comparative study of managerial practices in Korean and Japanese firms. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 23, 3501–3501.10.1080/09585192.2011.560885
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar