The performance of performance appraisal systems: understanding the linkage between appraisal structure and appraisal discrimination complaints

References

• Arvey, R. D. , & Murphy, K. R. (1998). Performance evaluation in work settings. Annual Review of Psychology , 49 (1), 141–168.10.1146/annurev.psych.49.1.141
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ayers, R. S. (2013). Building goal alignment in federal agencies’ performance appraisal programs. Public Personnel Management , 42 (4), 495–520.10.1177/0091026013496077
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Battaglio, R. P. , & Condrey, S. E. (2009). Reforming public management: Analyzing the impact of public service reform on organizational and managerial trust. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory , 19 (4), 689–707.10.1093/jopart/mun030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blume, B. D. , Baldwin, T. T. , & Rubin, R. S. (2009). Reactions to different types of forced distribution performance evaluation systems. Journal of Business and Psychology , 24 (1), 77–91.10.1007/s10869-009-9093-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cawley, B. D. , Keeping, L. M. , & Levy, P. E. (1998). Participation in the performance appraisal process and employee reactions: A meta-analytic review of field investigations. Journal of Applied Psychology , 83 (4), 615–633.10.1037/0021-9010.83.4.615
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chun, Y. , & Rainey, H. (2005). Goal ambiguity and organizational performance in U.S. federal agencies. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory , 15 (4), 529–557.10.1093/jopart/mui030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox, T. , & Nkomo, S. (1986). Differential performance appraisal criteria: A field study of black and white managers. Group & Organization Management , 11 (1–2), 101–119.
   Google Scholar
• Daley, R. (2004). Designing effective performance appraisal systems. In S. Condrey (Ed.), Handbook of human resource management in government (2nd ed., pp. 499–527). San Fancisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Decramer, A. , Smolders, C. , & van der Straeten, A. (2013). Employee performance management culture and system features in higher education: Relationship with employee performance management satisfaction. The International Journal of Human Resource Management , 24 (2), 352–371.10.1080/09585192.2012.680602
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dickinson, T. L. (1993). Attitudes about performance appraisal. In S. Schuler , J. Farr , & M. Smith (Eds.), Personnel selection and assessment: Individual and organizational perspectives (pp. 141–161). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Dipboye, R. (1985). Some neglected variables in research on discrimination in appraisals. Academy of Management Review , 10 (1), 116–127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dobbins, G. H. , Cardy, R. L. , & Truxillo, D. M. (1988). The effects of purpose of appraisal and individual differences in stereotypes of women on sex differences in performance ratings: A laboratory and field study. Journal of Applied Psychology , 73 (3), 551.10.1037/0021-9010.73.3.551
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dominick, P. G. (2009). Forced rankings: Pros, cons, and practices. In J. Smither & M. London (Eds.), Performance management: Putting research into action (pp. 411–443). San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Erdogan, B. , Kraimer, M. L. , & Liden, R. C. (2001). Procedural justice as a two-dimensional construct an examination in the performance appraisal context. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science , 37 (2), 205–222.10.1177/0021886301372004
   Google Scholar
• Feldman, Jack M. (1981). Beyond attribution theory: Cognitive processes in performance appraisal. Journal of Applied Psychology , 66 (2), 127–148.10.1037/0021-9010.66.2.127
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Folger, R. , Konovsky, M. A. , & Cropanzano, R. (1992). A due process metaphor for performance appraisal. Research in Organizational Behavior , 14 , 129–129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenberg, J. (1986). Determinants of perceived fairness of performance evaluations. Journal of Applied Psychology , 71 , 340–342.10.1037/0021-9010.71.2.340
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heilman, M. E. , & Eagly, A. H. (2008). Gender stereotypes are alive, well, and busy producing workplace discrimination. Industrial and Organizational Psychology , 1 , 393–398.10.1111/j.1754-9434.2008.00072.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hitt, M. , Bierman, L. , Shimizu, K. , & Kochhar, R. (2001). Direct and moderating effects of human capital on strategy and performance in professional service firms: a resource-based perspective. Academy of Management Journal , 44 (1), 13–28.10.2307/3069334
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jawahar, I. M. , & Williams, C. R. (1997). Where all the children are above average: The performance appraisal purpose effect. Personnel Psychology , 50 (4), 905–925.10.1111/peps.1997.50.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kellough, J. E. , & Nigro, L. G. (2002). Pay for performance in Georgia state government employee perspectives on GeorgiaGain after 5 years. Review of Public Personnel Administration , 22 (2), 146–166.10.1177/0734371X0202200206
   Google Scholar
• Kellough, J. E. , & Selden, S. (2003). The reinvention of public personnel administration: An analysis of the diffusion of personnel management reforms in the states. Public Administration Review , 63 (2), 165–176.10.1111/puar.2003.63.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landy, F. J. (2008). Stereotypes, bias, and personnel decisions: Strange and stranger. Industrial and Organizational Psychology , 1 (4), 379–392.10.1111/j.1754-9434.2008.00071.x
   Google Scholar
• Landy, F. J. , Barnes, J. L. , & Murphy, K. R. (1978). Correlates of perceived fairness and accuracy of performance evaluation. Journal of Applied Psychology , 65 , 751–754.10.1037/0021-9010.63.6.751
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landy, Frank J. , Barnes-Farrell, J.L. , & Cleveland, J.N. (1980). Perceived fairness and accuracy of performance evaluation: A follow-up. Journal of Applied Psychology , 65 (3), 355–356.10.1037/0021-9010.65.3.355
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latham, G. (2012). Work motivation: History, theory, research, and practice (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.10.4135/9781506335520
   Google Scholar
• Leslie, L. M. , King, E. B. , Bradley, J. C. , & Hebl, M. R. (2008). Triangulation across methodologies: All signs point to persistent stereotyping and discrimination in organizations. Industrial and Organizational Psychology , 1 , 399–404.10.1111/j.1754-9434.2008.00073.x
   Google Scholar
• Levy, P. E. , & Williams, J. R. (2004). The social context of performance appraisal: A review and framework for the future. Journal of Management , 30 (6), 881–905.10.1016/j.jm.2004.06.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Locke, E. A. , & Latham, G. P. (2002). Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation: A 35-year odyssey. American Psychologist , 57 (9), 705.10.1037/0003-066X.57.9.705
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moon, S. H. , Scullen, S. E. , & Latham, G. P. (2016). Precarious curve ahead: The effects of forced distribution rating systems on job performance. Human Resource Management Review , 26 (2), 166.10.1016/j.hrmr.2015.12.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy, K. , & Cleveland, J. (1995). Understanding performance appraisal: Social organizational, and goal-based perspectives . Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Pandy, S. , & Wright, B. (2006). Connecting the dots in public management: Political environment, organizational goal ambiguity, and the public manager's role ambiguity. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory , 16 (4), 511–532.10.1093/jopart/muj006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, S. (2014). Motivation of public managers as raters in performance appraisal developing a model of rater motivation. Public Personnel Management , 43 (4), 387–414.10.1177/0091026014530675
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perry, J. L. , Engbers, T. A. , & Jun, S. Y. (2009). Back to the future? Performance-related pay, empirical research, and the perils of persistence. Public Administration Review , 69 (1), 39–51.10.1111/puar.2009.69.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts, G. E. (2003). Employee performance appraisal system participation: A technique that works. Public Personnel Management , 32 (1), 89–98.10.1177/009102600303200105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts, G. E. , & Reed, T. (1996). Performance appraisal participation, goal setting and feedback the influence of supervisory style. Review of Public Personnel Administration , 16 (4), 29–60.10.1177/0734371X9601600404
   Google Scholar
• Roch, S. G. , Sternburgh, A. , & Caputo, P. (2007). Absolute versus relative performance rating formats: Implications for fairness and organizational justice. International Journal of Selection and Assessment , 15 , 302–316.10.1111/ijsa.2007.15.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roch, S. G. , Woehr, D. J. , Mishra, V. , & Kieszczynska, U. (2012). Rater training revisited: An updated meta-analytic review of frame-of-reference training. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology , 85 (2), 370–395.10.1111/joop.2012.85.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubin, E. (2015). Holding employees accountable for the accomplishment of organizational goals in the U.S. federal government. International Journal of Organization Theory and Behavior , 18 (1), 76–105.
   Google Scholar
• Rubin, E. , & Kellough, J. (2012). Does civil service reform affect behavior? Linking complaints, alternative personnel systems, and procedural justice perceptions. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory , 22 (1), 121–141.10.1093/jopart/mur008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schleicher, D. J. , Bull, R. A. , & Green, S. G. (2008). Rater reactions to forced distribution rating systems. Journal of Management , 35 (4), 899–927.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silverman, S. B. , & Wexley, K. N. (1984). Reaction of employees to performance appraisal interviews as a function of their participation in rating scale development. Personnel Psychology , 37 (4), 703–710.10.1111/peps.1984.37.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, M. S. , Tracy, K. B. , Renard, M. K. , Harrison, J. K. , & Carroll, S. J. (1995). Due process in performance appraisal: A quasi-experiment in procedural justice. Administrative Science Quarterly , 40 (3), 495–523.10.2307/2393795
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tubre, T. , & Collins, J. (2000). Jackson and Schuler (1985) revisited: A meta-analysis of the relationships between role ambiguity, role conflict, and job performance. Journal of Management , 26 (1), 155–169.10.1177/014920630002600104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• U.S. Office of Personnel Management . (2006). System Audit tool: Performance appraisal assessment tool . Washington, DC Retrieved April 2010 from http://www.opm.gov/perform/PAAT/GS-PAAT-Instructions.pdf
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Office of Personnel Management . (2016). Performance management guidance for end-of-fiscal-year 2015 and beginning-of-fiscal year 2016 activities . Washington, DC Retrieved February 2016 from https://www.chcoc.gov/content/performance-management-guidance-end-fiscal-year-2015-and-beginning-fiscal-year-2016
   Google Scholar
• Wang, X. M. , Wong, K. E. , & Kwong, J. Y. (2010). The roles of rater goals and ratee performance levels in the distortion of performance ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology , 95 (3), 546–561.10.1037/a0018866
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar