The dynamic nature of HRM implementation: a structuration perspective

References

• Barley, S. R. (1986). Technology as an occasion for structuring: Evidence from observations of CT scanners and the social order of radiology departments. Administrative Science Quarterly, 31(1), 78–108.10.2307/2392767
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Battilana, J., Leca, B., & Boxenbaum, E. (2009). 2 How actors change institutions: Towards a theory of institutional entrepreneurship. The Academy of Management Annals, 3(1), 65–107.10.1080/19416520903053598
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bednall, T. C., Sanders, K., & Runhaar, P. (2014). Stimulating informal learning activities through perceptions of performance appraisal quality and human resource management system strength: A two-wave study. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 13(1), 45–61.10.5465/amle.2012.0162
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beer, M. (1997). The transformation of the human resource function: Resolving the tension between a traditional administrative and a new strategic role. Human Resource Management (1986–1998), 36(1), 49.10.1002/(ISSN)1099-050X
   Google Scholar
• Björkman, I., Ehrnrooth, M., Mäkelä, K., Smale, A., & Sumelius, J. (2014). From HRM practices to the practice of HRM: Setting a research agenda. Journal of Organizational Effectiveness: People and Performance, 1(2), 122–140.10.1108/JOEPP-02-2014-0008
   Google Scholar
• Bondarouk, T., & Ruël, H. J. M. (2009). Structuring the IT-enabled transformation of HR: An HRM frames analysis in an international company. In P. Sparrow (Ed.), Handbook of international human resource management: Integrating people, process, and context (pp. 271–292). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Bondarouk, T., Kees Looise, J., & Lempsink, B. (2009). Framing the implementation of HRM innovation: HR professionals vs line managers in a construction company. Personnel Review, 38(5), 472–491.10.1108/00483480910978009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bondarouk, T., Bos-Nehles, A. C., & Hesselink, X. (2016). Understanding the congruence of HRM frames in a healthcare organization. Baltic Journal of Management, 11(1), 2–20.10.1108/BJM-02-2015-0035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boselie, P., Dietz, G., & Boon, C. (2005). Commonalities and contradictions in HRM and performance research. Human Resource Management Journal, 15(3), 67–94.10.1111/hrmj.2005.15.issue-3
   Google Scholar
• Bos-Nehles, A. C., Van Riemsdijk, M. J., & Looise, J. K. (2013). Employee perceptions of line management performance: Applying the AMO theory to explain the effectiveness of line managers’ HRM implementation. Human Resource Management, 52(6), 861–877.10.1002/hrm.v52.6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bos-Nehles, A. C., Bondarouk, T., & Labrenz, S. (2017). HRM implementation in multinational companies: The dynamics of multifaceted scenarios. European Journal of International Management, 11(5), 515–536.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bos-Nehles, A. C., Bondarouk, T., & Nijenhuis, K. (2017). Innovative work behaviour in knowledge-intensive public sector organizations: The case of supervisors in the Netherlands fire services. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 28(2), 379–398.10.1080/09585192.2016.1244894
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowen, D. E., & Ostroff, C. (2004). Understanding HRM–firm performance linkages: The role of the “strength” of the HRM system. Academy of Management Review, 29(2), 203–221.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brewster, C., Gollan, P. J., & Wright, P. M. (2013). Guest editors’ note: Human resource management and the line. Human Resource Management, 52(6), 829–838.10.1002/hrm.v52.6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cetina, K. K., Schatzki, T. R., & Von Savigny, E. (2005). The practice turn in contemporary theory. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Delery, J. E., & Doty, D. H. (1996). Modes of theorizing in strategic human resource management: Tests of universalistic, contingency, and configurational performance predictions. Academy of Management Journal, 39(4), 802–835.10.2307/256713
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delmotte, J., De Winne, S., & Sels, L. (2012). Toward an assessment of perceived HRM system strength: Scale development and validation. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 23(7), 1481–1506.10.1080/09585192.2011.579921
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Den Hartog, D. N., Boon, C., Verburg, R. M., & Croon, M. A. (2013). HRM, communication, satisfaction, and perceived performance: A cross-level test. Journal of Management, 39(6), 1637–1665.10.1177/0149206312440118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeSanctis, G., & Poole, M. S. (1994). Capturing the complexity in advanced technology use: Adaptive structuration theory. Organization Science, 5(2), 121–147.10.1287/orsc.5.2.121
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farndale, E., & Kelliher, C. (2013). Implementing performance appraisal: Exploring the employee experience. Human Resource Management, 52(6), 879–897.10.1002/hrm.v52.6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feldman, M. S. (2015). Theory of routine dynamics and connections to strategy as practice. In D. Golsorkhi, L. Rouleau, D. Seidl, & E. Vaara (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of strategy as practice (pp. 317–330). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139681032
   Google Scholar
• Feldman, M. S., & Orlikowski, W. J. (2011). Theorizing practice and practicing theory. Organization Science, 22(5), 1240–1253.10.1287/orsc.1100.0612
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Festing, M., & Maletzky, M. (2011). Cross-cultural leadership adjustment – A multilevel framework based on the theory of structuration. Human Resource Management Review, 21(3), 186–200.10.1016/j.hrmr.2011.02.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geare, A., Edgar, F., & Deng, M. (2006). Implementation and consumption of HRM: Stakeholder differences. Research and Practice in Human Resource Management, 14(2), 34–48.
   Google Scholar
• Giddens, A. (1979). Central problems in social theory: Action, structure, and contradiction in social analysis. Berkeley: University of California Press.10.1007/978-1-349-16161-4
   Google Scholar
• Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Giddens, A. (1991). Modernity and self-identity: Self and society in the late modern age. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gilbert, C., De Winne, S., & Sels, L. (2011). The influence of line managers and HR department on employees’ affective commitment. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 22(8), 1618–1637.10.1080/09585192.2011.565646
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gratton, L., & Truss, C. (2003). The three-dimensional people strategy: Putting human resources policies into action. The Academy of Management Executive, 17(3), 74–86.10.5465/AME.2003.10954760
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guest, D. (1987). Human resource management and industrial relations. Journal of Management Studies, 24(5), 503–521.10.1111/joms.1987.24.issue-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guest, D., & Bos-Nehles, A. C. (2013). Human resource management and performance: The role of effective implementation. In J. Paauwe & P. Wright (Eds.), HRM and performance: Achievements and challenges (pp. 79–96). Chichester, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Huselid, M. A. (1995). The impact of human resource management practices on turnover, productivity, and corporate financial performance. Academy of Management Journal, 38(3), 635–672.10.2307/256741
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jarzabkowski, P. (2008). Shaping strategy as a structuration process. Academy of Management Journal, 51(4), 621–650.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang, K., Lepak, D. P., Hu, J., & Baer, J. C. (2012). How does human resource management influence organizational outcomes? A meta-analytic investigation of mediating mechanisms. Academy of Management Journal, 55(6), 1264–1294.10.5465/amj.2011.0088
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, M. R., & Karsten, H. (2008). Giddens’s structuration theory and information systems research. MIS Quarterly, 32(1), 127–157.10.2307/25148831
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khilji, S. E., & Wang, X. (2006). ‘Intended’ and ‘implemented’ HRM: The missing linchpin in strategic human resource management research. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 17(7), 1171–1189.10.1080/09585190600756384
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein, K. J., & Sorra, J. S. (1996). The challenge of innovation implementation. Academy of Management Review, 21(4), 1055–1080.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kroon, B., & Paauwe, J. (2014). Structuration of precarious employment in economically constrained firms: The case of Dutch agriculture: Structuration of precarious employment. Human Resource Management Journal, 24(1), 19–37.10.1111/hrmj.2014.24.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lammers, J. C., & Barbour, J. B. (2006). An Institutional Theory of Organizational Communication. Communication Theory, 16(3), 356–377.10.1111/comt.2006.16.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lepak, D. P., & Snell, S. A. (2002). Examining the human resource architecture: The relationships among human capital, employment, and human resource configurations. Journal of Management, 28(4), 517–543.10.1177/014920630202800403
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, X., Frenkel, S. J., & Sanders, K. (2011). Strategic HRM as process: How HR system and organizational climate strength influence Chinese employee attitudes. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 22(9), 1825–1842.10.1080/09585192.2011.573965
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Makhecha, U. P., Srinivasan, V., Prabhu, G. N., & Mukherji, S. (2016). Multi-level gaps: A study of intended, actual and experienced human resource practices in a hypermarket chain in India. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 1–39.10.1080/09585192.2015.1126336
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meijerink, J. (2014). Practicing social Innovation: Enactment of the employee-organization relationship by employees. In T. Bondarouk & M. R. Olivas-Luján (Eds.), Human resource management social innovation and technology (pp. 135–153). Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing.10.1108/asm
   Google Scholar
• Meijerink, J., Bondarouk, T., & Lepak, D. P. (2016). Employees as active consumers of HRM: Linking employees’ HRM competences with their perceptions of HRM service value. Human Resource Management, 55(2), 219–240.10.1002/hrm.2016.55.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Mierlo, J., & Bondarouk, T. (2017). The struggle towards maturity: The evolution of HRM practices in the Dutch federal government. Presented at the 10th Biennial International Conference of the Dutch HRM Network, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Nehles, A. C., Van Riemsdijk, M., Kok, I., & Looise, J. K. (2006). Implementing human resource management successfully: A first-line management challenge. Management Revue, 17(3), 256–273.
   Google Scholar
• Nishii, L. H., Lepak, D. P., & Schneider, B. (2008). Employee attributions of the “why” of HR practices: Their effects on employee attitudes and behaviors, and customer satisfaction. Personnel Psychology, 61(3), 503–545.10.1111/peps.2008.61.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Op de Beeck, S., Wynen, J., & Hondeghem, A. (2016). HRM implementation by line managers: Explaining the discrepancy in HR-line perceptions of HR devolution. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 27(17), 1901–1919.10.1080/09585192.2015.1088562
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orlikowski, W. J. (1992). The duality of technology: Rethinking the concept of technology in organizations. Organization Science, 3(3), 398–427.10.1287/orsc.3.3.398
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orlikowski, W. J. (2000). Using technology and constituting structures: A practice lens for studying technology in organizations. Organization Science, 11(4), 404–428.10.1287/orsc.11.4.404.14600
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostroff, C., & Bowen, D. E. (2016). Reflections on the 2014 decade award: Is there strength in the construct of HR system strength? Academy of Management Review, 41(2), 196–214.10.5465/amr.2015.0323
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piening, E. P., Baluch, A. M., & Ridder, H.-G. (2014). Mind the intended-implemented gap: Understanding employees’ perceptions of HRM. Human Resource Management, 53(4), 545–567.10.1002/hrm.2014.53.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Purcell, J., & Hutchinson, S. (2007). Front-line managers as agents in the HRM-performance causal chain: Theory, analysis and evidence. Human Resource Management Journal, 17(1), 3–20.10.1111/hrmj.2007.17.issue-1
   Google Scholar
• Rousseau, D. M. (2005). I-deals, idiosyncratic deals employees bargain for themselves. Armonk, NY: ME Sharpe.
   Google Scholar
• Runhaar, P., & Sanders, K. (2013). Implementing Human Resources Management (HRM) within Dutch VET institutions: Examining the fostering and hindering factors. Journal of Vocational Education & Training, 65(2), 236–255.10.1080/13636820.2013.783612
   Google Scholar
• Rynes, S. L., Colbert, A. E., & Brown, K. G. (2002). HR professionals’ beliefs about effective human resource practices: Correspondence between research and practice. Human Resource Management, 41(2), 149–174.10.1002/(ISSN)1099-050X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanders, K., & Yang, H. (2016). The HRM process approach: The influence of employees’ attribution to explain the HRM-performance relationship. Human Resource Management, 55(2), 201–217.10.1002/hrm.2016.55.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanders, K., Dorenbosch, L., & de Reuver, R. (2008). The impact of individual and shared employee perceptions of HRM on affective commitment: Considering climate strength. Personnel Review, 37(4), 412–425.10.1108/00483480810877589
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanders, K., Shipton, H., & Gomes, J. F. (2014). Guest editors’ introduction: Is the HRM process important? Past, current, and future challenges. Human Resource Management, 53(4), 489–503.10.1002/hrm.2014.53.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, W. R. (2005). Institutional theory: Contributing to a theoretical research program. Great Minds in Management: The Process of Theory Development, 37, 460–484.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, J. R., Groleau, C., Heaton, L., & Van Every, E. J. (2001). The computerization of work: A communication perspective. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Trullen, J., Stirpe, L., Bonache, J., & Valverde, M. (2016). The HR department’s contribution to line managers’ effective implementation of HR practices. Human Resource Management Journal, 26(4), 449–470.10.1111/hrmj.v26.4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner, J. H. (1986). The theory of structuration. American Journal of Sociology, 91(4), 969–977.10.1086/228358
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valverde, M., Ryan, G., & Soler, C. (2006). Distributing HRM responsibilities: A classification of organisations. Personnel Review, 35(6), 618–636.10.1108/00483480610702692
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vermeeren, B. (2014). Variability in HRM implementation among line managers and its effect on performance: A 2-1-2 mediational multilevel approach. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 25(22), 3039–3059.10.1080/09585192.2014.934891
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walsham, G., & Han, C. K. (1990). Structuration theory and information systems research. Presented at the ICIS 1990 Proceedings.
   Google Scholar
• Woodrow, C., & Guest, D. (2014). When good HR gets bad results: Exploring the challenge of HR implementation in the case of workplace bullying. Human Resource Management Journal, 24(1), 38–56.10.1111/hrmj.2014.24.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, P. M., & Nishii, L. H. (2013). Strategic HRM and organizational behavior: Integrating multiple levels of analysis. In D. Guest & J. Paauwe (Eds.), HRM and performance: Achievements and challenges (pp. 97–110). Chichester, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Wrzesniewski, A., & Dutton, J. E. (2001). Crafting a job: Revisioning employees as active crafters of their work. Academy of Management Review, 26(2), 179–201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar