Technology and the hybrid workplace: the affective living of IT-enabled space

References

• Albu, O. B., & Etter, M. (2016). Hypertextuality and social media: A study of the constitutive and paradoxical implications of organizational Twitter use. Management Communication Quarterly, 30(1), 5–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318915601161
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bain, P., & Taylor, P. (2000). Entrapped by the ‘electronic panopticon’? Worker resistance in the call centre. New Technology, Work and Employment, 15(1), 2–18. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-005X.00061
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baldry, C. (1999). Space – The final frontier. Sociology, 33(3), 535–553.
   Google Scholar
• Banbury, S., & Berry, D. (2005). Office noise and employee concentration: Identifying causes of disruption and potential improvements. Ergonomics, 48(1), 25–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140130412331311390
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernstein, E. S. (2017). Making transparency transparent: The evolution of observation in management theory. Academy of Management Annals, 11(1), 217–266. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2014.0076
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berti, M., Simpson, A. V., & Clegg, S. R. (2018). Making a place out of space: The social imaginaries and realities of a business school as a designed space. Management Learning, 49(2), 168–186.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Beyes, T., & Holt, R. (2020). The topographical imagination: Space and organization theory. Organization Theory, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/2631787720913880
   Google Scholar
• Beyes, T., & Steyaert, C. (2012). Spacing organization: Non-representational theory and performing organizational space. Organization, 19(1), 45–61. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508411401946
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bloomfield, B. P., Latham, Y., & Vurdubakis, T. (2010). Bodies, technologies and action possibilities: When is an affordance? Sociology, 44(3), 415–433. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038510362469
   Google Scholar
• Bondarouk, T., Harms, R., & Lepak, D. (2017a). Does e-HRM lead to better HRM service? The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 28(9), 1332–1362. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2015.1118139
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bondarouk, T., Parry, E., & Furtmueller, E. (2017b). Electronic HRM: Four decades of research on adoption and consequences. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 28(1), 98–131. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2016.1245672
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bondarouk, T. V., & Ruël, H. J. M. (2009). Electronic human resource management: Challenges in the digital era. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 20(3), 505–514. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585190802707235
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bos-Nehles, A., Bondarouk, T., & Smit-Methorst, H. (2019). A Sociomateriality perspective of sustainable e-HRM implementation. Studi Organizzativi, 2, 29–54.
   Google Scholar
• Callahan, J. L. (2013). Space, the final frontier’? Social movements as organizing spaces for applying HRD. Human Resource Development International, 16(3), 298–312. https://doi.org/10.1080/13678868.2013.782945
   Google Scholar
• Carlile, P. R., Nicolini, D., Langley, A. & Tsoukas, H. (Eds.) (2013). How matter matters: Objects, artifacts, and materiality in organization studies (Vol. 3). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Choudhury, P. (2020). Our work-from-anywhere future. Harvard Business Review, 98(6), 58–67.
   Google Scholar
• Ciborra, C., & Willcocks, L. (2006). The mind or the heart? It depends on the (definition of) situation. Journal of Information Technology, 21(3), 129–139. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jit.2000062
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Courpasson, D., Dany, F., & Delbridge, R. (2017). Politics of place: The meaningfulness of resisting places. Human Relations, 70(2), 237–259. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726716641748
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dale, K. (2005). Building a social materiality: Spatial and embodied politics in organizational control. Organization, 12(5), 649–678. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508405055940
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dale, K., & Burrell, G. (2008). The spaces of organization & the organization of space: Power, identity and materiality at work. Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• De Molli, F., Mengis, J., & van Marrewijk, A. (2020). The aestheticization of hybrid space: The atmosphere of the Locarno Film Festival. Organization Studies, 41(11), 1491–1512. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840619867348
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Vaujany, F. X., & Mitev, N. (2013). (Eds.), Materiality and space: Organizations, artefacts and practices. Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Donnelly, R., & Johns, J. (2021). Recontextualising remote working and its HRM in the digital economy: An integrated framework for theory and practice. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 32(1), 84–105.
   Google Scholar
• Ellmer, M., & Reichel, A. (2018). Unpacking the “e” of e-HRM. A review and reflection about assumptions about technology in HRM research. In J. H. Dulebohn & D. L. Stone (Eds.), The brave new world of e-HRM 2.0. (Chapter 7, pp. 247–278). Information Age Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Endrissat, N., & Leclercq-Vandelannoitte, A. (2021). From sites to vibes: Technology and the spatial production of coworking spaces. Information and Organization, 100353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoandorg.2021.100353
   Google Scholar
• Elsbach, K. D., & Pratt, M. G. (2007). 4 the physical environment in organizations. Academy of Management Annals, 1(1), 181–224. https://doi.org/10.5465/078559809
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faraj, S., & Azad, B. (2012). The materiality of technology: An affordance perspective. In P. M. Leonardi, B. A. Nardi, & J. Kallinikos (Eds.), Materiality and organizing: Social interaction in a technological world (pp. 237–258). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fayard, A. L. (2012). Space matters, but how? In P. M. Leonardi, B. A. Nardi, & J. Kallinikos (Eds.), Materiality and organizing: Social interaction in a technological world (pp. 177–195). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fayard, A. L., & Weeks, J. (2007). Photocopiers and water-coolers: The affordances of informal interaction. Organization Studies, 28(5), 605–634. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840606068310
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fayard, A. L., & Weeks, J. (2014). Affordances for practice. Information and Organization, 24(4), 236–249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoandorg.2014.10.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fleming, P., & Spicer, A. (2004). ‘You can checkout anytime, but you can never leave’: Spatial boundaries in a high commitment organization. Human Relations, 57(1), 75–94. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726704042715
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furnari, S. (2014). Interstitial spaces: Microinteraction settings and the genesis of new practices between institutional fields. Academy of Management Review, 39(4), 439–462. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2012.0045
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gratton, L. (2021). Four principles to ensure hybrid work is productive work. MIT Sloan Management Review, 62(2), 11A–16A.
   Google Scholar
• Gruber, M., de Leon, N., George, G., & Thompson, P. (2015). Managing by design. Academy of Management Journal, 58(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2015.4001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halford, S. (2005). Hybrid workspace: Re‐spatialisations of work, organisation and management. New Technology, Work and Employment, 20(1), 19–33. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-005X.2005.00141.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halford, S., & Leonard, P. (2006). Place, space and time: Contextualizing workplace subjectivities. Organization Studies, 27(5), 657–676. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840605059453
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison, S., & Dourish, P. (1996). Re-place-ing space: The roles of place and space in collaborative systems. In M. S. Ackerman (Ed.), Proceedings of the 1996 ACM conference on computer supported cooperative work (pp. 67–76). ACM Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hauptmann, S., & Steger, T. (2013). “A brave new (digital) world”? Effects of in-house social media on HRM. German Journal of Human Resource Management: Zeitschrift für Personalforschung, 27(1), 26–46. https://doi.org/10.1177/239700221302700104
   Google Scholar
• Henfridsson, O., & Lindgren, R. (2005). Multi-contextuality in ubiquitous computing: Investigating the car case through action research. Information and Organization, 15(2), 95–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoandorg.2005.02.009
   Google Scholar
• Husted, E., & Plesner, U. (2017). Spaces of open-source politics: Physical and digital conditions for political organization. Organization, 24(5), 648–670. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508417713215
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iedema, R., Long, D., & Carroll, K. (2010). Corridor communication, spatial design and patient safety: Enacting and managing complexities. In A. Van Marrewijk & D. Yanow (Eds.), Organizational spaces. Rematerializing the workaday world (pp. 41–57). Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Irving, G. L., Ayoko, O. B., & Ashkanasy, N. M. (2020). Collaboration, physical proximity and serendipitous encounters: Avoiding collaboration in a collaborative building. Organization Studies, 41(8), 1123–1146. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840619856913
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jarzabkowski, P., & Pinch, T. (2013). Sociomateriality is ‘the New Black’: Accomplishing repurposing, reinscripting and repairing in context. M@n@gement, 16(5), 579–592. https://doi.org/10.3917/mana.165.0579
   Google Scholar
• Jeske, D., & Shultz, K. S. (2016). Using social media content for screening in recruitment and selection: Pros and cons. Work, Employment and Society, 30(3), 535–546. https://doi.org/10.1177/0950017015613746
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kane, G. C., Nanda, R., Phillips, A., & Copulsky, J. (2021). Redesigning the post-pandemic workplace. MIT Sloan Management Review, 62(3), 12–14.
   Google Scholar
• Khazanchi, S., Sprinkle, T. A., Masterson, S. S., & Tong, N. (2018). A spatial model of work relationships: The relationship-building and relationship-straining effects of workspace design. Academy of Management Review, 43(4), 590–609. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2016.0240
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kingma, S. F., Dale, K, & Wasserman, V. (2018). (Eds.), Organisational space and beyond: The significance of Henri Lefebvre for organisation studies. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Köchling, A., & Wehner, M. C. (2020). Discriminated by an algorithm: A systematic review of discrimination and fairness by algorithmic decision-making in the context of HR recruitment and HR development. Business Research, 13(3), 795–848. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40685-020-00134-w
   Google Scholar
• Lamprou, E. (2017). Spatiality as Care: A Heideggerian perspective on sociomaterial practices. Organization Studies, 38(12), 1733–1752. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840617693267
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leclercq-Vandelannoitte, A. (2013). Beyond panoptic enclosures? On the spatiotemporal dimension of organizational control as induced by mobile information systems. In F. X. De Vaujany & N. Mitev (Eds.), Materiality and space: Organizations, artefacts and practices (pp. 197–215). Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Leclercq-Vandelannoitte, A. (2021). The new paternalism? The workplace as a place to work—and to live. Organization, 135050842110153. https://doi.org/10.1177/13505084211015374
   Google Scholar
• Lefebvre, H. (1991). The production of space. Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Lefebvre, H. (2004). Rhythmanalysis. Space, time and everyday life. Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Lefebvre, H. (2014). The critique of everyday life. Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Leonardi, P. M. (2010). Digital materiality? How artifacts without matter, matter. First Monday, 15(6). http://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/3036/2567 https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v15i6.3036
   Google Scholar
• Leonardi, P. M. (2013). Theoretical foundations for the study of sociomateriality. Information and Organization, 23(2), 59–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoandorg.2013.02.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leonardi, P. M., & Barley, S. R. (2010). What’s under construction here? Social action, materiality, and power in constructivist studies of technology and organizing. Academy of Management Annals, 4(1), 1–51. https://doi.org/10.5465/19416521003654160
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lepak, D. P., & Snell, S. A. (1998). Virtual HR: Strategic human resource management in the 21st century. Human Resource Management Review, 8(3), 215–234. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1053-4822(98)90003-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindberg, A., & Lyytinen, K. (2013). Towards a theory of affordance ecologies. In F. X. De Vaujany & N. Mitev (Eds.), Materiality and space: Organizations, artefacts and practices (pp. 44–61). Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Majchrzak, A., Faraj, S., Kane, G. C., & Azad, B. (2013). The contradictory influence of social media affordances on online communal knowledge sharing. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 19(1), 38–55. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marler, J. H., & Parry, E. (2016). Human resource management, strategic involvement and e-HRM technology. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 27(19), 2233–2253. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2015.1091980
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mukherjee, A. (2021). Technology and the simultaneous collapsing and expanding of organizational space: A COVID-19 experience. In N. Mitev, J. Aroles, K., Stephenson, & J. Malaurent (Eds.), New ways of working: Organizations and organizing in the digital age (pp. 343–364). Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Newlands, G. (2021). Algorithmic surveillance in the gig economy: The organisation of work through Lefebvrian conceived space. Organization Studies, 42(5), 719–737.
   Google Scholar
• O’Leary, M. B., Wilson, J. M., & Metiu, A. (2014). Beyond being there. The symbolic role of communication and identification in perceptions of proximity to geographically disperse colleagues. MIS Quarterly, 38(4), 1219–1244. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2014/38.4.13
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orlikowski, W. J. (2007). Sociomaterial practices: Exploring technology at work. Organization Studies, 28(9), 1435–1448. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840607081138
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orlikowski, W. J., & Scott, S. V. (2008). Sociomateriality: Challenging the separation of technology, work and organization. Academy of Management Annals, 2(1), 433–474. https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520802211644
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orlikowski, W. J., & Scott, S. V. (2015). The algorithm and the crowd: Considering the materiality of service innovation. MIS Quarterly, 39(1), 201–216. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2015/39.1.09
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orlikowski, W. J., & Scott, S. V. (2021). Liminal innovation in practice: Understanding the reconfiguration of digital work in crisis. Information and Organization, 31(1), 100336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoandorg.2021.100336
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palumbo, R. (2021). Does digitizing involve desensitizing? Strategic insights into the side effects of workplace digitization. Public Management Review, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2021.1877796
   Google Scholar
• Rogiers, P., De Stobbeleir, K., & Viaene, S. (2021). Stretch yourself: Benefits and burdens of job crafting that goes beyond the job. Academy of Management Discoveries, 7(3), 367–380. https://doi.org/10.5465/amd.2019.0093
   Google Scholar
• Roth, W. M., & Jornet, A. (2018). From object-oriented to fluid ontology: A case study of the materiality of design work in agile software development. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), 27(1), 37–75. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10606-017-9297-6
   Google Scholar
• Rowe, A. (2015). Exploring a spatial–temporal understanding of organizational learning. Management Learning, 46(1), 105–124. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350507613490264
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruël, H. J. M., Bondarouk, T., & Looise, J. C. (2004). E-HRM: Innovation or irritation. An explorative empirical study in five large companies on web-based HRM. Management Revu, 15(3), 364–380. https://doi.org/10.5771/0935-9915-2004-3-364
   Google Scholar
• Ruël, H. J. M., Bondarouk, T., & Van der Velde, M. (2007). The contribution of e-HRM to HRM effectiveness. Employee Relations, 29(3), 280–291. https://doi.org/10.1108/01425450710741757
   Google Scholar
• Saunders, C., Rutkowski, A. F., Genuchten van, M., Vogel, D., & Orrego, J. M. (2011). Virtual space and place: Theory and test. MIS Quarterly, 35(4), 1079–1098.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schatzki, T. (2016). Practice theory as flat ontology. In Spaargaren, G., Weenink, D., & Lamers, M. (Eds.) Practice theory and research: Exploring the dynamics of social life (pp. 28–42). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sewell, G., & Taskin, L. (2015). Out of sight, out of mind in a new world of work? Autonomy, control, and spatiotemporal scaling in telework. Organization Studies, 36(11), 1507–1529. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840615593587
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shortt, H. (2015). Liminality, space and the importance of ‘transitory dwelling places’ at work. Human Relations, 68(4), 633–658. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726714536938
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shortt, H., Betts, J., & Warren, S. (2014). Visual workplace identities: Objects, emotion and resistance. In E. Bell, S. Warren, & J. E. Schroeder (Eds.) The Routledge companion to visual organization (pp. 309–325). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Stein, M. K., Newell, S., Wagner, E. L., & Galliers, R. D. (2014). Felt quality of sociomaterial relations: Introducing emotions to sociomaterial theorizing. Information and Organization, 24(3), 156–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoandorg.2014.05.003
   Google Scholar
• Stephenson, K. A., Kuismin, A., Putnam, L. L., & Sivunen, A. (2020). Process studies of organizational space. Academy of Management Annals, 14(2), 797–827. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2018.0146
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stone, D. L., Deadrick, D. L., Lukaszewski, K. M., & Johnson, R. (2015). The influence of technology on the future of human resource management. Human Resource Management Review, 25(2), 216–231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2015.01.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stone, D. L., & Dulebohn, J. H. (2013). Emerging issues in theory and research on electronic human resource management (e-HRM). Human Resource Management Review, 23(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2012.06.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stone, C. B., Neely, A. R., & Lengnick-Hall, M. L. (2018). Human resource management in the digital age: Big data, HR analytics and artificial intelligence. In P. N. Melo & C. Machado (Eds.), Management and technological challenges in the digital age (pp. 13–42). CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Strohmeier, S. (2009). Concepts of e-HRM consequences: A categorisation, review and suggestion. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 20(3), 528–543. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585190802707292
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Symon, G., & Pritchard, K. (2015). Performing the responsive and committed employee through the sociomaterial mangle of connection. Organization Studies, 36(2), 241–263. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840614556914
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Townley, B. (1993). Foucault, power/knowledge, and its relevance for human resource management. The Academy of Management Review, 18(3), 518–545. https://doi.org/10.2307/258907
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Våland, M. S., & Georg, S. (2018). Spacing identity: Unfolding social and spatial-material entanglements of identity performance. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 34(2), 193–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scaman.2018.04.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Volkoff, O., & Strong, D. M. (2013). Critical realism and affordances: Theorizing IT-associated organizational change processes. MIS Quarterly, 37(3), 819–834. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2013/37.3.07
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waizenegger, L., McKenna, B., Cai, W., & Bendz, T. (2020). An affordance perspective of team collaboration and enforced working from home during COVID-19. European Journal of Information Systems, 29(4), 429–442. https://doi.org/10.1080/0960085X.2020.1800417
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, B., Liu, Y., & Parker, S. K. (2020). How does the use of information communication technology affect individuals? A work design perspective. Academy of Management Annals, 14(2), 695–725. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2018.0127
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wasserman, V., & Frenkel, M. (2011). Organizational aesthetics: Caught between identity regulation and culture jamming. Organization Science, 22(2), 503–521. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1100.0583
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weinfurtner, T., & Seidl, D. (2019). Towards a spatial perspective: An integrative review of research on organisational space. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 35(2), 101009. https://doi.org/10.1177/2631787720913880
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, J. M., Boyer O’Leary, M., Metiu, A., & Jett, Q. R. (2008). Perceived proximity in virtual work: Explaining the paradox of far-but-close. Organization Studies, 29(7), 979–1002. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840607083105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, K. S., & Case, C. J. (2004). Internet abuse in the workplace: New trends in risk management. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 7(1), 105–111. https://doi.org/10.1089/109493104322820174
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zhang, Z. (2006). What is lived space. Ephemera, 6(2), 219–223.
   Google Scholar