Contested fields of equality, diversity and inclusion at work: an institutional work lens on power relations and actors’ strategies in Germany and Turkey

References

• Acar Erdur, D. (2022). Diversity and equality in Turkey: An institutional perspective. In Klarsfeld A., Knappert L, Kornau A, Ng E and Ngunjiri F (Eds.), Research handbook on new frontiers of equality and diversity at work. International perspectives (pp. 235–254). Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Acker, J. (2006). Inequality regimes: Gender, class and race in organizations. Gender & Society, 20(4), 441–464. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243206289499
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahonen, P., Tienari, J., Meriläinen, S., & Pullen, A. (2014). Hidden contexts and invisible power relations: A Foucauldian reading of diversity research. Human Relations, 67(3), 263–286. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726713491772
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al Ariss, A., Vassilopoulou, J., Özbilgin, M. F., & Game, A. (2013). Understanding career experiences of skilled minority ethnic workers in France and Germany. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 24(6), 1236–1256. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2012.709190
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bansal, P. T., & Corley, K. (2011). The coming of age for qualitative research: Embracing the diversity of qualitative methods. Academy of Management Journal, 54(2), 233–237. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2011.60262792
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Battilana, J., & D’Aunno, T. (2009). Institutional work and the paradox of embedded agency. In Lawrence T B, Suddaby R and Leca B (Eds.), Institutional work. Actors and agency in institutional studies of organizations (pp. 31–58). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Battilana, J., Leca, B., & Boxenbaum, E. (2009). How actors change institutions: Towards a theory of institutional entrepreneurship. Academy of Management Annals, 3(1), 65–107. https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520903053598
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beer, M., Spector, B., Lawrence, P. R., Quinn, M., & Walton, R. E. (1984). Management human assets. The groundbreaking Harvard business school program. The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Björkman, I., Smale, A., Sumelius, J., Suutari, V., & Lu, Y. (2008). Changes in institutional context and MNC operations in China: Subsidiary HRM practices in 1996 versus 2006. International Business Review, 17(2), 146–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2008.02.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blommaert, L., & van den Brink, M. (2020). Gender equality in appointments of board members: The role of multiple actors and their dynamics. European Management Review, 17(3), 633–647. https://doi.org/10.1111/emre.12381
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonache, J., & Festing, M. (2020). Research paradigms in international human resource management: An epistemological systematisation of the field. German Journal of Human Resource Management: Zeitschrift Für Personalforschung, 34(2), 99–123. https://doi.org/10.1177/2397002220909780
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bruchhagen, V., Grieger, J., Koall, I., Meuser, M., Ortlieb, R., & Sieben, B. (2010). Social inequality, diversity, and equal treatment at work: The German case. In Klarsfeld A (Eds.), International handbook on diversity management at work (pp. 109–138). Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Busenitz, L. W., Gomez, C., & Spencer, J. W. (2000). Country institutional profiles: Unlocking entrepreneurial phenomena. Academy of Management Journal, 43(5), 994–1003. https://doi.org/10.2307/1556423
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calás, M. B., Holgersson, C., & Smircich, L. (2009). ‘Diversity Management’? Translation? Travel? Scandinavian Journal of Management, 25(4), 349–351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scaman.2009.09.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collien, I., Sieben, B., & Müller-Camen, M. (2016). Age work in organizations: Maintaining and disrupting institutionalized understandings of higher age. British Journal of Management, 27(4), 778–795. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.12198
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Destatis. (2018). State & society – Migration & integration. https://www.destatis.de/EN/FactsFigures/SocietyState/Population/MigrationIntegration/MigrationIntegration.html
   Google Scholar
• Doldor, E., Sealy, R., & Vinnicombe, S. (2016). Accidental activists: Headhunters as marginal diversity actors in institutional change towards more women on boards. Human Resource Management Journal, 26(3), 285–303. https://doi.org/10.1111/1748-8583.12107
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Easterby-Smith, M., & Malina, D. (1999). Cross-cultural collaborative research: Toward reflexivity. Academy of Management Journal, 42(1), 76–86. https://doi.org/10.5465/256875
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elomäki, A., & Kantola, J. (2020). European social partners as gender quality actors in EU. Social and economic governance. Journal of Common Market Studies, 58(4), 999–1015. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.13018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engel, S. M. (2001). The unfinished revolution: Social movement theory and the gay and lesbian movement. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2018). Turkey 2018 report. Strasbourg: European Commission. https://ec.europa.eu/neighbourhood-enlargement/sites/near/files/20180417-turkey-report.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Farndale, E., Biron, M., Briscoe, D., & Raghuram, S. (2015). A global perspective on diversity and inclusion in work organisations. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 26(6), 677–687. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2014.991511
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furnari, S. (2018). When does an issue trigger change in a field? A comparative approach to issue frames, field structures and types of field change. Human Relations, 71(3), 321–348. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726717726861
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society: Outline of a theory of structuration. Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gidley, D., & Palmer, M. (2021). Institutional work: A review and framework based on semantic and thematic analysis. M@n@gement, 24(4), 49–63. https://doi.org/10.37725/mgmt.v24.4579
   Google Scholar
• Gioia, D. A., Corley, K. G., & Hamilton, A. L. (2013). Seeking qualitative rigor in inductive research: Notes on the Gioia methodology. Organizational Research Methods, 16(1), 15–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428112452151
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gooderham, P. N., Mayrhofer, W., & Brewster, C. (2019). A framework for comparative institutional research on HRM. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 30(1), 5–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2018.1521462
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenwood, R., & Suddaby, R. (2006). Institutional entrepreneurship in mature fields: The big five accounting firms. Academy of Management Journal, 49(1), 27–48. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2006.20785498
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Healy, G., & Oikelome, F. (2007). Equality and diversity actors: A challenge to traditional industrial relations? Equal Opportunities International, 26(1), 44–65. https://doi.org/10.1108/02610150710726525
   Google Scholar
• Hofstede Insights. (2022). Country comparison Germany and Turkey. https://www.hofstede-insights.com/country-comparison/germany,turkey/
   Google Scholar
• House, R. J., Hanges, P. J., Javidan, M., Dorfman, P. W., & Gupta, V. (2004). Culture, readership and organizations: The GLOBE study of 62 societies. SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Hunter, S., & Swan, E. (2007). Oscillating politics and shifting agencies: Equalities and diversity work and actor network theory. Equal Opportunities International, 26(5), 402–419. https://doi.org/10.1108/02610150710756621
   Google Scholar
• Hyman, R., Klarsfeld, A., Ng, E., & Haq, R. (2012). Introduction: Social regulation of diversity and equality. European Journal of Industrial Relations, 18(4), 279–292. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959680112461575
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jonsen, K., Tatli, A., Özbilgin, M. F., & Bell, M. P. (2013). The tragedy of the uncommons: Reframing workforce diversity. Human Relations, 66(2), 271–294. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726712466575
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kemper, L. E., Bader, A. K., & Froese, F. J. (2016). Diversity management in ageing societies: A comparative study of Germany and Japan. Management Revu, 27(1–2), 29–49. https://doi.org/10.5771/0935-9915-2016-1-2-29
   Google Scholar
• Kirton, G., & Greene, A. M. (2010). What does diversity management mean for the gender equality project in the United Kingdom? Views and experiences of organizational actors. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences / Revue Canadienne Des Sciences de L’Administration, 27(3), 249–262. https://doi.org/10.1002/cjas.168
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klarsfeld, A., Ng, E., & Tatli, A. (2012). Social regulation and diversity management: A comparative study of France, Canada and the UK. European Journal of Industrial Relations, 18(4), 309–327. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959680112461091
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klarsfeld A. (Eds.). (2016). Research handbook of international and comparative perspectives on diversity management. Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Klarsfeld, A., Knappert, L., Kornau, A., Ngunji, F., & Sieben, B. (2019). Diversity in under-researched countries: New empirical fields challenging old theories? Equality, Diversity and Inclusion. Equality, Diversity and Inclusion: An International Journal, 38(7), 694–704. https://doi.org/10.1108/EDI-03-2019-0110
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klarsfeld A., Knappert L., Kornau A., Ng E. and Ngunjiri F. (Eds.). (2022). Research handbook on new frontiers of equality and diversity at work. International perspectives. Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Knappert, L., Peretz, H., Aycan, Z., & Budhwar, P. (2021). Staffing effectiveness across countries: An institutional perspective. Human Resource Management Journal, 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1111/1748-8583.12411
   Google Scholar
• Kornau, A., Frerichs, I. M., & Sieben, B. (2020). An empirical analysis of research paradigms within international human resource management: The need for more diversity. German Journal of Human Resource Management: Zeitschrift Für Personalforschung, 34(2), 148–177. https://doi.org/10.1177/2397002220908035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kostova, T. (1999). Transnational transfer of strategic organizational practices: A contextual perspective. Academy of Management Review, 24(2), 308–324. https://doi.org/10.2307/259084
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Küskü, F., Aracı, Ö., & Özbilgin, M. F. (2021). What happens to diversity at work in the context of a toxic triangle? Accounting for the gap between discourses and practices of diversity management. Human Resource Management Journal, 31(2), 553–574. https://doi.org/10.1111/1748-8583.12324
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lauring, J. (2013). International diversity management: Global ideals and local responses. British Journal of Management, 24(2), 211–224. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2011.00798.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawrence, T. B., & Suddaby, R. (2006). Institutions and institutional work. In Clegg SR, Hardy C, Lawrence TB and Nord WR (Eds.), Handbook of organization studies (2nd ed, pp. 215–254). SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Lawrence, T. B. (2008). Power, institutions, and organizations. In Greenwood R, Oliver C, Sahlin K and Suddaby R (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of organizational institutionalism (pp. 170–197). SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Lawrence, T. B., Suddaby, R., & Leca, B. (2009). Introduction: Theorizing and studying institutional work. In Lawrence TB, Suddaby R and Leca B (Eds.), Institutional work. Actors and agency in institutional studies of organizations (pp. 1–27). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lawrence, T. B., Suddaby, R., & Leca, B. (2011). Institutional work: Refocusing institutional studies of organization. Journal of Management Inquiry, 20(1), 52–58. https://doi.org/10.1177/1056492610387222
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, A. C., Huang, L. S. R., & Cardy, R. L. (2019). Institutional theory and HRM: A new look. Human Resource Management Review, 29(3), 316–335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2018.07.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lok, J. (2019). Why (and how) institutional theory can be critical: Addressing the challenge to institutional theory’s critical turn. Journal of Management Inquiry, 28(3), 335–349. https://doi.org/10.1177/1056492617732832
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maguire, S., Hardy, C., & Lawrence, T. B. (2004). Institutional entrepreneurship in emerging fields: HIV/AIDS treatment advocacy in Canada. Academy of Management Journal, 47(5), 657–697. https://doi.org/10.5465/20159610
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahadevan, J., & Kilian-Yasin, K. (2017). Dominant discourse, orientalism and the need for reflexive HRM: Skilled Muslim migrants in the German context. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 28(8), 1140–1162. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2016.1166786
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McAdam, D., McCarthy, J. D., & Zald, M. N. (1996). Comparative perspectives on social movements: Political opportunities, mobilizing structures, and cultural framings. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McAdam, D., & Scott, W. R. (2005). Organizations and movements. In Davis GF, McAdam D, Scott WR and Zald MW (Eds.), Social movements and organization theory (pp. 4–40). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Meyerson, D., & Tompkins, M. (2007). Tempered radicals as institutional change agents: The case of advancing gender equity at the university of Michigan. Harvard Journal of Law & Gender, 30, 303–322.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, K., McDonald, P., & Bartlett, J. (2017). The social legitimacy of disability inclusive human resource practices: The case of a large retail organisation. Human Resource Management Journal, 27(4), 514–529. https://doi.org/10.1111/1748-8583.12129
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Müller-Jentsch, W. (2004). Theoretical approaches to industrial relations. In Kaufman BE (Ed.), Theoretical perspectives on work and the employment relationship (pp. 1–40). Industrial Relations Research Association.
   Google Scholar
• Munir, K. A. (2015). A loss of power in institutional theory. Journal of Management Inquiry, 24(1), 90–92. https://doi.org/10.1177/1056492614545302
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, D. M., Brooks, S. L., Sahaym, A., & Cullen, J. B. (2017). Family-friendly work perceptions: A cross country analysis. Gender in Management: An International Journal, 32(4), 300–316. https://doi.org/10.1108/GM-03-2016-0066
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nishii, L. H. (2013). The benefits of climate for inclusion for gender-diverse groups. Academy of Management Journal, 56(6), 1754–1774. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2009.0823
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliver, C. (1991). Strategic responses to institutional processes. Academy of Management Review, 16(1), 145–179. https://doi.org/10.2307/258610
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Özbilgin, M., Syed, J., & Dereli, B. (2010). Managing gender diversity in Pakistan and Turkey: A historical review. In Klarsfeld A (Ed.), International handbook on diversity management at work (pp. 11–26). Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Özbilgin, M., & Tatli, A. (2011). Mapping out the field of equality and diversity: Rise of individualism and voluntarism. Human Relations, 64(9), 1229–1253. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726711413620
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozgener, S. (2008). Diversity management and demographic differences-based discrimination: The case of Turkish manufacturing industry. Journal of Business Ethics, 82(3), 621–631. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-007-9581-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Öztürk, M. B., & Özbilgin, M. (2014). From cradle to grave: The lifecycle of compulsory heterosexuality in Turkey. In Colgan F, Rumens N (Eds.), Sexual orientation at work contemporary issues and perspectives (pp. 166–179). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Pancevski, B. (2018). Turkish president Erdogan’s visit to Germany proves tricky for Merkel. Wall Street Journal. https://www.wsj.com/articles/turkish-president-erdogans-visit-to-germany-proves-tricky-for-merkel-1538150321.
   Google Scholar
• Peretz, H., Levi, A., & Fried, Y. (2015). Organizational diversity programs across cultures: Effects on absenteeism, turnover, performance and innovation. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 26(6), 875–903. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2014.991344
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pesch, R., & Ipek, E. (2017). Refugees’ stress coping and social support: A qualitative study of employed refugees in Germany. Academy of Management Proceedings, 2017(1), 15884. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMBPP.2017.15884abstract
   Google Scholar
• Pudelko, M., Reiche, B. S., & Carr, C. (2015). Recent developments and emerging challenges in international human resource management. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 26(2), 127–135. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2015.964928
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rao, H., Morrill, C., & Zald, M. N. (2000). Power plays: How social movements and collective action create new organizational forms. Research in Organizational Behavior, 22, 237–281. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-3085(00)22007-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberson, Q. M. (2006). Disentangling the meanings of diversity and inclusion in organizations. Group & Organization Management, 31(2), 212–236. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601104273064
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romani, L., Boussebaa, M., & Jackson, T. (2020). Critical perspectives on cross-cultural management. In Szkudlarek B, Romani L, Caprar DV and Osland JS (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of contemporary cross-cultural management (pp. 51–65). SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Roos, H., Mampaey, J., Huisman, J., & Luyckx, J. (2020). The failure of gender equality in academia exploring defensive institutional work in Flemish universities. Gender & Society, 34(3), 467–495. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243220914521
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, W., & Müller, A. (2013). Social integration and workplace industrial relations: Migrant and native employees in German industry. Relations Industrielles, 68(3), 361–386. https://doi.org/10.7202/1018432ar
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schreiblmayr, I., & Reichel, A. (2022). At the European intersection: the Austrian way to equality, diversity and inclusion. In Klarsfeld A., Knappert L., Kornau A., Ng E. and Ngunjiri F. (Eds), Research handbook on new frontiers of equality and diversity at work. International perspectives (pp. 16–35). Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, W. R. (1995). Institutions and organizations. Foundations for organizational science. SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Seierstad, C., Warner-Søderholm, G., Torchia, M., & Huse, M. (2017). Increasing the number of women on boards: The role of actors and processes. Journal of Business Ethics, 141(2), 289–315. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2715-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd ed). SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Stringfellow, E. (2012). Trade unions and discourses of diversity management: A comparison of Sweden and Germany. European Journal of Industrial Relations, 18(4), 329–345. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959680112461094
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stringfellow, E. (2020). Ideas at work: A discursive institutionalist analysis of diversity management and social dialogue in France, Germany and Sweden. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 31(19), 2521–2519. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2018.1454489
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Styhre, A. (2014). Gender equality as institutional work: The case of the Church of Sweden. Gender, Work & Organization, 21(2), 105–120. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Süddeutsche Zeitung (2021). Das gehetzte Parlament. https://projekte.sueddeutsche.de/artikel/politik/bundestag-das-gehetzte-parlament-e953507/
   Google Scholar
• Sürgevil, O. (2010). Is diversity management relevant for Turkey? Evaluation of some factors leading to diversity management in the context of Turkey. In Syed J, Özbilgin M (Eds.), Managing cultural diversity in Asia (pp. 373–392). Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Süß, S., & Kleiner, M. (2007). Diversity management in Germany: Dissemination and design of the concept. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 18(11), 1934–1953.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Syed, J., & Özbilgin, M. (2009). A relational framework for international transfer of diversity management practices. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 20(12), 2435–2453. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585190903363755
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tatli, A. (2011). A multi-layered exploration of the diversity management field: Diversity discourses, practices and practitioners in the UK. British Journal of Management, 22(2), 238–253. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2010.00730.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tatli, A., Vassilopoulou, J., Al Ariss, A., & Özbilgin, M. (2012). The role of regulatory and temporal context in the construction of diversity discourses: The case of the UK, France and Germany. European Journal of Industrial Relations, 18(4), 293–308. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959680112461092
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tatli, A., Nicolopoulou, K., Özbilgin, M., Karatas-Ozkan, M., & Öztürk, M. B. (2015). Questioning impact: Interconnection between extra-organizational resources and agency of equality and diversity officers. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 26(9), 1243–1258. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2014.934893
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tatli, A., Ozturk, M. B., & Wo, H. S. (2017). Individualization and marketization of responsibility for gender equality: The case of female managers in China. Human Resource Management, 56(3), 407–430. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.21776
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, V. (1989). Social movement continuity: The women’s movement in abeyance. American Sociological Review, 54(5), 761. https://doi.org/10.2307/2117752
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Guardian. (2014). Recep Tayyip Erdoğan: ‘Women Not Equal to Men’. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/nov/24/turkeys-president-recep-tayyip-erdogan-women-not-equal-men.
   Google Scholar
• Welch, C., & Piekkari, R. (2014). Handbook of qualitative research methods for international business. Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Welch, C., & Piekkari, R. (2017). How should we (not) judge the ‘quality’ of qualitative research? A re-assessment of current evaluative criteria in International Business. Journal of World Business, 52(5), 714–725. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2017.05.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamak, S., Ergur, A., Ünsal, A., Uygur, S., & Özbilgin, M. (2015). Between a rock and a hard place: Corporate elites in the context of religion and secularism in Turkey. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 26(11), 1474–1497. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2014.938678
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yılmaz, V., & Göçmen, İ. (2016). Denied citizens of Turkey: Experiences of discrimination among LGBT individuals in employment, housing and health care. Gender, Work & Organization, 23(5), 470–488. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12122
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zanakis, S. H., Newburry, W., & Taras, V. (2016). Global social tolerance index and multi-method country rankings sensitivity. Journal of International Business Studies, 47(4), 480–497. https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2016.5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zanoni, P., Janssens, M., Benschop, Y., & Nkomo, S. (2010). Guest editorial: Unpacking diversity, grasping inequality: Rethinking difference through critical perspectives. Organization, 17(1), 9–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508409350344
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zanoni, P., & Janssens, M. (2021). Making diversity research matter for social change: New conversations beyond the firm. Organization Theory, 2(2), 263178772110046–263178772110021. https://doi.org/10.1177/26317877211004603
   Google Scholar