The effects of group set-up on participation and learning in discussion forums

References

• Ahern, T. C. (2008). CMC for language acquisition. In F. Zhang. & B. Barber (Eds.), Handbook of research on computer-enhanced language acquisition and learning (pp. 295–307). Hershey: Information Science Reference .
   Google Scholar
• Alderson, J. C. (2005). Diagnosing foreign language proficiency: The interface between learning and assessment. London/New York: Bloomsbury Publishing PLC.
   Google Scholar
• Arnold, N., & Ducate, L. (2006). Future foreign language teachers' social and cognitive collaboration in an online environment. Language Learning & Technology, 10(1), 42–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belz, J. A. (2007). The role of computer mediation in the instruction and development of L2 pragmatic competence. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 27, 45–75. doi: 10.1017/S0267190508070037
   Google Scholar
• Blake, R., & Zyzik, E. (2003). Who's helping whom? Learner/heritage‐speakers' networked discussions in Spanish. Applied Linguistics, 24(4), 519–544. doi: 10.1093/applin/24.4.519
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bower, J., & Kawaguchi, S. (2011). Negotiation of meaning and corrective feedback in Japanese/English eTandem. Language Learning & Technology, 5(1), 41–71.
   Google Scholar
• Bueno-Alastuey, M. C. (2013). Interactional feedback in synchronous voice-based computer mediated communication: Effect of dyad. System, 41(3), 543–559. doi: 10.1016/j.system.2013.05.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, J. J., & Yang, S. C. (2014). Fostering foreign language learning through technology-enhanced intercultural projects. Language Learning & Technology, 18(1), 57–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coffin, C., & Donohue, J. (2014). “I feel very new to it and very inexperienced”: Semantic orientation, semiotic mediation, and the genres and registers of online discussion forums. Language Learning, 64(Suppl 1), 205–254. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12042
   Google Scholar
• Delahunty, J. (2018). Connecting to learn, learning to connect: Thinking together in asynchronous forum discussion. Linguistics and Education, 46, 12–22. doi: 10.1016/j.linged.2018.05.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deris, F., Koon, R., & Salam, A. (2015). Virtual communities in an online English language learning forum. International Education Studies, 8(13), 79–87. doi: 10.5539/ies.v8n13p79
   Google Scholar
• Du, J., Durrington, V. A., & Mathews, J. G. (2007). Online collaborative discussion: Myth or valuable learning tool. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 3(2), 94–104.
   Google Scholar
• Fernández-García, M., & Martínez-Arbelaiz, A., (2002). Negotiation of meaning in nonnative speaker-nonnative speaker synchronous discussions. CALICO, 19(2), 279–294.
   Google Scholar
• Fernández-García, M., & Martínez-Arbelaiz, A. (2003). Learners’ interactions: A comparison of oral and computer-assisted written conversations. ReCALL, 15(1), 113–136. doi: 10.1017/S0958344003000910
   Google Scholar
• Fredriksson, C. (2015). The influence of group formation on learner participation, language complexity, and corrective behaviour in synchronous written chat as part of academic German studies. ReCALL, 27(2), 217–238. doi: 10.1017/S0958344014000238
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gass, S., & Mackey, A. (2007). Input, interaction, and output in second language acquisition. In B. VanPatten & J. Williams (Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition (pp. 180–206). London: LEA.
   Google Scholar
• Gilbert, P. K., & Dabbagh, N. (2005). How to structure online discussions for meaningful discourse: A case study. British Journal of Educational Technology, 36(1), 5–18. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2005.00434.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goertler, S., Kraemer, A., & Schenker, T. (2016). Setting evidence-based language goals. Foreign Language Annals, 49(3), 434–454. doi: 10.1111/flan.12214
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gurzynski-Weiss, L., & Baralt, M. (2014). Exploring learner perception and use of task-based interactional feedback in FTF and CMC modes. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 36(1), 1–37. doi: 10.1017/S0272263113000363
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guth, S., & Helm, F. (2012). Developing multiliteracies in ELT through telecollaboration. ELT Journal, 66(1), 42–51. doi: 10.1093/elt/ccr027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammond, M. (2000). Communication within on-line forums: The opportunities, the constraints and the value of a communicative approach. Computers & Education, 35(4), 251–262. doi: 10.1016/S0360-1315(00)00037-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanna, B. E., & De Nooy, J. (2003). A funny thing happened on the way to the forum: Electronic discussion and foreign language learning. Language Learning & Technology, 7(1), 71–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jauregi, K., Graaf, R. D., Bergh, H. V D., & Kriz, M. (2012). Native/non-native speaker interactions through video-web communication: A clue for enhancing motivation? Computer Assisted Language Learning, 25(1), 1–19. doi: 10.1080/09588221.2011.582587
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kabata, K., & Edasawa, Y. (2011). Tandem language learning through a cross-cultural keypal project. Language Learning & Technology, 15(1), 104–121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kawaguchi, S., & Ma, Y. (2012). Corrective feedback, negotiation of meaning and grammar development: Learner-learner and learner-native speaker interaction in ESL. Open Journal of Modern Linguistics, 02(02), 57–70. doi: 10.4236/ojml.2012.22008
   Google Scholar
• Khine, M. S., Yeap, L. L., & Lok, A. T. C. (2003). The quality of messages ideas, thinking and interaction in an asynchronous CMC environment. Education Media International, 40(1–2), 115–126. doi: 10.1080/0952398032000092161
   Google Scholar
• Kitade, K. (2006). The negotiation model in asynchronous computer-mediated communication (CMC): Negotiation in task-based email exchanges. CALICO Journal, 23(2), 319–348. doi: 10.1558/cj.v23i2.319-348
   Google Scholar
• Kitajima, R. (2013). Interactional features of repair negotiation in NS–NNS interaction on two task types: Information gap and personal information exchange. Linguistics and Education, 24(2), 165–178. doi: 10.1016/j.linged.2013.01.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knight, P. (2005). Learner interaction using email: The effects of task modification. ReCALL, 17(1), 101–121. doi: 10.1017/S0958344005000819
   Google Scholar
• Kötter, M. (2003). Negotiation of meaning and codeswitching in online tandems. Language Learning & Technology, 7(2), 145–172.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lancaster University. (2017). Information about DIALANG (previously at www.dialang.org). Retrieved from https://www.lancaster.ac.uk/researchenterprise/dialang/about
   Google Scholar
• Lee, L. (2002). Synchronous online exchanges: A study of modification devices on non-native discourse. System, 30(3), 275–288. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0346-251X(02)00015-5 doi: 10.1016/S0346-251X(02)00015-5
   Google Scholar
• Lee, L., & Markey, A. (2014). A study of learners’ perceptions of online intercultural exchange through Web 2.0 technologies. ReCALL, 26(3), 281–297. doi: 10.1017/S0958344014000111
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, S. H. -J. (2017). Text-based negotiated interaction of NNS–NNS and NNS–NS dyads on Facebook. ReCALL, 29(3), 294–312. doi: 10.1017/S0958344017000143
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Llopis-García, R. (2012). Email tandem exchanges as a tool for authentic cultural learning. International Journal of Virtual and Personal Learning Environments, 3(3), 43–59. doi: 10.4018/jvple.2012070103
   Google Scholar
• Long, M. H. (1983). Linguistic and conversational adjustments to non-native speakers. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 5(2), 177–193. doi: 10.1017/S0272263100004848
   Google Scholar
• Long, M. H. (1996). The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In W. C. Ritchie & T. K. Bahtia (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 413–468). New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lyster, R., & Ranta, L. (1997). Corrective feedback and learner uptake: Negotiation of form. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19(1), 37–66. doi: 10.1017/S0272263197001034
   Google Scholar
• Mackey, A. (2006). Feedback, noticing and instructed second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 27(3), 405–430. doi: 10.1093/applin/ami051
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mackey, A., Oliver, R., & Leeman, J. (2003). Interactional input and the incorporation of feedback: An exploration of NS–NNS and NNS–NNS adult and child dyads. Language Learning, 53(1), 35–66. doi: 10.1111/1467-9922.00210
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meredith, R. A. (1990). The oral proficiency interview in real life: Sharpening the scale. The Modern Language Journal, 74(3), 288–296. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-4781.1990.tb01065.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meskill, C., & Anthony, N. (2010). Teaching languages online. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Nami, F., & Marandi, S. (2014). Wikis as discussion forums: Exploring students’ contribution and their attention to form. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 27(6), 483–508. doi: 10.1080/09588221.2013.770036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nandi, D., Hamilton, M., Chang, S., & Balbo, S. (2012). Evaluating quality in online asynchronous interactions between students and discussion facilitators. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 28(4), 684–702. doi: 10.14742/ajet.835
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nor, N. F. M., Hamat, A., & Embi, M. A. (2012). Patterns of discourse in online interaction: Seeking evidence of the collaborative learning process. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 25(3), 237–256. doi: 10.1080/09588221.2012.655748
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Dowd, R. (2006). The use of videoconferencing and e-mail as mediators of intercultural student ethnography. In J. A. Belz & S. L. Thorne (Eds.), Internet-mediated intercultural foreign language education (pp. 86–121). Boston: Thomson Heinle.
   Google Scholar
• Oliver, R. (2002). The patterns of negotiation for meaning in child interactions. The Modern Language Journal, 86(1), 97–111. doi: 10.1111/1540-4781.00138
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oskoz, A. (2009). Using online forums to integrate the standards into the foreign language curriculum. In V. Scott (Ed.), Principles and practices of the standards in college foreign language education (pp. 106–125). Boston: Heinle & Heinle.
   Google Scholar
• Peterson, M. (2008). Non-native speaker interaction management strategies in a network-based virtual environment. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 19(1), 91–117.
   Google Scholar
• Qian, K., & McCormick, R. (2014). Building course cohesion: The use of online forums in distance Chinese language learning. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 27(1), 44–69. doi: 10.1080/09588221.2012.695739
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rifkin, B. (2005). A ceiling effect in traditional classroom foreign language instruction: Data from Russian. The Modern Language Journal, 89(1), 3–18. doi: 10.1111/j.0026-7902.2005.00262.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Satar, H. M., & Özdener, N. (2008). The effects of synchronous CMC on speaking proficiency and anxiety: Text versus voice chat. The Modern Language Journal, 92(4), 595–613. doi: 10.2307/25173104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schenker, T. (2013). The effects of a virtual exchange on students' interest in learning about culture. Foreign Language Annals, 46(3), 491–507. doi: 10.1111/flan.12041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schenker, T. (2015). Telecollaboration for novice language learners – Negotiation of meaning in text chats between nonnative and native speakers. In E. Dixon & M. Thomas (Eds.), Researching language learner interactions online: From social media to MOOCs (Vol. 13, pp. 237–259). San Marcos: CALICO
   Google Scholar
• Schenker, T. (2016). Syntactic complexity in a cross-cultural E-mail exchange. System, 63, 40–50. doi: 10.1016/j.system.2016.08.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schenker, T. (2017). Synchronous telecollaboration for novice language learners – Effects on speaking skills and language learning interests. ALSIC, 20, 1–18. doi: 10.4000/alsic.3068
   Google Scholar
• Schenker, T., & Poorman, F. (2017). Students’ perceptions of telecollaborative communication tools. In C. Ludwig & K. V. d. P oel (Eds.), Collaborative Language Learning and New Media: New Insights into an Evolving Field (pp. 55–71). Frankfurt am Main. Peter Lang..
   Google Scholar
• Schmitt, E. (2014). Seat time versus proficiency: Assessment of language development in undergraduate students. In J. Norris & N. Mills (Eds.), Innovation and Accountability in Language Program Evaluation (pp. 110–130). Boston: Cengage.
   Google Scholar
• Shim, Y. -S. (2003). The use of asynchronous CMC in a beginning Korean class. The Korean Language in America, 8, 199–220.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, B. (2003). Computer-mediated negotiated interaction: An expanded model. The Modern Language Journal, 87(1), 38–57. doi: 10.1111/1540-4781.00177
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sotillo, S. M. (2005). Corrective feedback via instant messenger learning activities in NS-NNS and NNS–NNS dyads. CALICO Journal, 22(3), 467–496. doi: 10.1558/cj.v22i3.467-496
   Google Scholar
• Sotillo, S. M. (2009). Learner noticing, negative feedback, and uptake in synchronous computer-mediated environments. In L. B. Abraham & L. Williams (Eds.), Electronic discourse in language learning and language teaching (pp. 87–110). Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Swain, M. (1993). The output hypothesis: Just speaking and writing aren't enough. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 50(1), 158–164. doi: 10.3138/cmlr.50.1.158
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swain, M. (2005). The output hypothesis: Theory and research. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (Vol. 1, pp. 471–483). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Swain, M., & Lapkin, S. (1995). Problems in output and the cognitive processes they generate: A step towards second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 16(3), 371–391. doi: 10.1093/applin/16.3.371
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takahama, J., & Pasfield-Neofitou, S. (2013). Learners’ email with native speakers beyond the class: A follow-up to a classroom email project. ReCALL, 25(3), 373–391. doi: 10.1017/S095834401300013X
   Google Scholar
• Taki, S., & Ramazani, Z. (2011). Improving reading skills through e-mail: The case of Iranian EFL students. International Journal of Instructional Technology & Distance Learning, 8(4), 15–25.
   Google Scholar
• Tan, K. -E. (2017). Using online discussion forums to support learning of paraphrasing. British Journal of Educational Technology, 48(6), 1239–1249. doi: 10.1111/bjet.12491
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, M. J. W. (2002). Learning within incoherent structures: The space of online discussion forums. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 18(3), 351–366. doi: 10.1046/j.0266-4909.2002.03800.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomé-Williams, A. C. (2016). Developing intercultural communicative competence in Portuguese through Skype and Facebook. Intercultural Communication Studies, 15(1), 213–233.
   Google Scholar
• Tschirner, E., Bärenfänger, O., & Wanner, I. (2012). Assessing evidence of validity of assigning CEFR ratings to the ACTFL oral proficiency interview (OPI) and the oral proficiency interview by computer (OPIc).Leipzig: Universität Leipzig.
   Google Scholar
• Ushioda, E. (2000). Tandem language learning via e-mail: From motivation to autonomy. ReCALL, 12(2), 121–128. doi: 10.1017/S0958344000000124
   Google Scholar
• Van der Zwaard, R., & Bannink, A. (2014). Video call or chat? Negotiation of meaning and issues of face in telecollaboration. System, 44(0), 137–148. doi: 10.1016/j.system.2014.03.007
   Google Scholar
• Van der Zwaard, R., & Bannink, A. (2016). Nonoccurrence of negotiation of meaning in task‐based synchronous computer‐mediated communication. The Modern Language Journal, 100(3), 625–640. doi:doi: 10.1111/modl.12341
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varonis, E. M., & Gass, S. (1985). Non-native/non-native conversations: A model for negotiation of meaning. Applied Linguistics, 6(1), 71–90. doi: 10.1093/applin/6.1.71
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, S. J. (2018). Language learners’ perceptions of having two interactional contexts in eTandem. Language Learning & Technology, 22(1), 42–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, Y., &Lin, N. C. (2010). Internet perceptions, online participation and language learning in Moodle forums: A case study on nursing students in Taiwan. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 2647–2651. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.388
   Google Scholar
• Yanguas, I. (2012). Task-based oral computer-mediated communication and L2 vocabulary acquisition. CALICO, 29(3), 507–531. doi: 10.11139/cj.29.3.507-531
   Google Scholar